PHOTO COP (Ticket in the Mail) Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

FerrariChat.com » General Ferrari Discussion Archives » Archive through November 18, 2002 » PHOTO COP (Ticket in the Mail) « Previous Next »

Author Message
TomD (Tifosi)
Intermediate Member
Username: Tifosi

Post Number: 1744
Registered: 9-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 12:19 pm:   

we discussed those in another thread - some places they are illegal if you get caught
Matt Lemus (Mlemus)
Member
Username: Mlemus

Post Number: 489
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 12:19 pm:   

Hans,

Check in road and track or car and driver in the ads section in the back.

M
TomD (Tifosi)
Intermediate Member
Username: Tifosi

Post Number: 1743
Registered: 9-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 12:17 pm:   

hans, maybe you provided a defense here. After all commission of a crime in avoidance of a worse crime is defensible. Did you guys see the guy who got off for DWI because he said some guys tried to jump him in a bar and the only way to get away was for him to jump in his car - they never found the guys trying to jump him but he got off
Hans E. Hansen (4re_gt4)
Member
Username: 4re_gt4

Post Number: 470
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 12:17 pm:   

BTW, I heard that somewhere you can get a prism-like license cover. Visible from front, but from an upward angle not visible.

Anybody know? I'd like to get one.

Or perhaps they could then simply read my s/n off of the steering column. <jk>
Matt Lemus (Mlemus)
Member
Username: Mlemus

Post Number: 487
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 12:12 pm:   

Hans

Bum's don't make big dents. If you clip them fast enough they fly right over the roof.

Remember sunday at McDonalds?

He cleared my roof by at least 4 feet.

M

TomD (Tifosi)
Intermediate Member
Username: Tifosi

Post Number: 1741
Registered: 9-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 12:11 pm:   

I hear ya - just stating the legal facts which stink
Hans E. Hansen (4re_gt4)
Member
Username: 4re_gt4

Post Number: 469
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 12:10 pm:   

Tom: Recently had a bum step off the curb while I was going thru the intersection. I stopped - mostly to prevent dent in car. Light changed before I could resume.
TomD (Tifosi)
Intermediate Member
Username: Tifosi

Post Number: 1740
Registered: 9-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 12:07 pm:   

hans

that is also illegal (blocking the box) - if you can't go through an intersection completely don't enter it :-(
Hans E. Hansen (4re_gt4)
Member
Username: 4re_gt4

Post Number: 468
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 12:06 pm:   

Err, Ralph, isn't that called a credit/debit card?
Hans E. Hansen (4re_gt4)
Member
Username: 4re_gt4

Post Number: 467
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 12:05 pm:   

What bothers me is that sometimes you can get stuck in the intersection - especially in urban areas. Presto! Ticket.
Ralph Koslin (Ralfabco)
Junior Member
Username: Ralfabco

Post Number: 77
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 12:02 pm:   

Whats next? computer chips to pay for a loaf of
bread when they confiscate all cash money worldwide to help "track" organized crime and terrorism?

That is not the real reason. We all know why.

They want to know everything about you. This includes the size of your wifes / girlfriends
;( if you are single ) bra size.


Ralph
Kevin Marcus (Rumordude)
Junior Member
Username: Rumordude

Post Number: 100
Registered: 9-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 11:56 am:   

some time ago there was an article talking about these in car-and-driver. It sugested that they also *reduce* the "yellow light" time in order to try and catch more people - down to like 3 seconds from 4 (or 4 seconds from 5). they are totally bogus.
TomD (Tifosi)
Intermediate Member
Username: Tifosi

Post Number: 1737
Registered: 9-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 11:52 am:   

hans , more or less from what I remember
Hans E. Hansen (4re_gt4)
Member
Username: 4re_gt4

Post Number: 466
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 11:51 am:   

Tom: Are you trying to say that the camera got the back of her head?
BobD (Bobd)
Member
Username: Bobd

Post Number: 738
Registered: 3-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 11:51 am:   

Just tell them somebody stole your car... and later that day you caught up to him in your wife's Yugo, pulled him over and kicked the $&%# out of him... then took your car back. Tell them the guy ran off before you could get his name.

I think this will work.
TomD (Tifosi)
Intermediate Member
Username: Tifosi

Post Number: 1735
Registered: 9-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 11:49 am:   

well I think she was almost in his lap if you know what I mean :-)
Karsten Jensen (Karsten335)
New member
Username: Karsten335

Post Number: 2
Registered: 11-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 11:48 am:   

That you can't do here. The passenger is ALWAYS blurred, whether there are one, or not.

But, ouch!
TomD (Tifosi)
Intermediate Member
Username: Tifosi

Post Number: 1732
Registered: 9-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 11:44 am:   

when I was in the UK, I remember a guy getting his pic taken by a speed camera, problem was he was with his girlfriend and his wife opened the mail - ouch
Dan B. (Dan_the_man)
Junior Member
Username: Dan_the_man

Post Number: 61
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 11:40 am:   

Go to court and fight it. It is the responsibilty of the DA to prove the charges that are against you. You do not have to prove to them who is driving. They have to prove it is you.

Jonas Petersen (Jones27)
New member
Username: Jones27

Post Number: 46
Registered: 11-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 11:09 am:   

Hmm here in DK we have something called,
"Gennemsigtigt papir"
"Transparent paper"

If you put it on the plates of the car, it can't be photographed, very neet trick.
Scott A. B. Collins (Scott)
Junior Member
Username: Scott

Post Number: 84
Registered: 6-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 11:06 am:   

Some legal types need to get fired up about this and at least work on defeating the "rat out" clause. According to Car & Driver, some municipalities just require proof (a picture, or an appearance in person) that it isn't you in the pictures. Others make you ID the person driving, which to me is insane. The next step would be to fight these damn things all together.
Tim N (Timn88)
Intermediate Member
Username: Timn88

Post Number: 1593
Registered: 6-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 10:39 am:   

These are illegal in alot of states.
Just send a picture of money to the police dept.
Schumi (Schumi)
Junior Member
Username: Schumi

Post Number: 75
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 9:53 am:   

I wonder what happened to the notion of innocent until proven guilty and you have the right to remain silent and require strict proof beyond a reasonable doubt to be proven by the Prosecuting Attorney? While I do not like the photo thing, I am more troubled by the administrative procedure that requires YOU to tell them anything to avoid criminal penalties. Unless we the people are informed about who we elect to represent US, this kind of thing - as well as the all new anti-terrorism bills - will get much worse. I will now step down from the soapbox. Thank you.
Terry Springer (Tspringer)
Member
Username: Tspringer

Post Number: 311
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 8:55 am:   

I would like to see a huge campaign by citizens to destroy these cameras. Pick hammer to the lens should do it. Middle of the night raids. Lets all get out there and exercise our right to a little revolution and take out this big brother crap!

BTW they dont have any of these here in GA :-)

Lawrence Coppari (Lawrence)
Member
Username: Lawrence

Post Number: 385
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 7:34 am:   

Could there be some sort of perjury charge if you got caught not telling the truth? I don't know about your situation, but my wife does not look like me.
Dr Tommy Cosgrove (Vwalfa4re)
Member
Username: Vwalfa4re

Post Number: 425
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 7:14 am:   

Put one of those reflector things on your tag that keeps someone from reading it unless they are straight behind you.
Mike Fisher (Mikef)
Junior Member
Username: Mikef

Post Number: 131
Registered: 11-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 5:28 am:   

Companies that install and maintain these cameras split the fines collected with the municipality. It's just a revenue generator.
Around here, you could never make a left turn if you didn't do it on the yellow-red.
BretM (Bretm)
Advanced Member
Username: Bretm

Post Number: 2915
Registered: 2-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 2:24 am:   

From what I understand about the system (I've done a little research b/c this big brother bullsh_t drives me insane) they send the ticket to the driver of the car. If the driver of the car says they weren't driving it then they have to name who was or the ticket sticks to them. In other words you would have to rat out whoever was driving the car or they just give the ticket to you. So theoretically if you wanted them to give the ticket to your wife you could do that, but you can't just say I wasn't driving so I don't deserve a ticket.

This whole thing is a load of sh_t. A government fundraiser at its best. They have pretty good editorials in Car and Driver about it every once in awhile, I think there was just one recently actually. Basically lengthening the time of the yellow light drastically reduces car accidents whereas the cameras seem to keep the accident rate the same or increase it. So, there is simply no reason to keep the cameras other than fundraising. They were actually talking of trying to make it fully automated, ie no one even reviews the photo offenses, they would be sent out all through a computer system. Another point, the cameras are incorrect something like 45% of the time and numerous cases have occured where someone received two tickets for running two red lights in different areas at the same time. It's all b.s.
Jason Godsil (Godsil)
Junior Member
Username: Godsil

Post Number: 183
Registered: 9-2001
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 1:51 am:   

I know here in Washington that if you get one you have to tell them it wasn't you and send them a copy of your driver's license to prove it wasn't and then they drop it. However I have seen one of those tickets and they take some pretty good pictures. As I have heard before, just send them a photo of the amount on the ticket!
Henry D. Chin (Hanknum)
New member
Username: Hanknum

Post Number: 38
Registered: 2-2002
Posted on Thursday, November 14, 2002 - 1:37 am:   

I just received a ticket in the mail for running a red light (it just changed from yellow, honest). The pictures that they sent me has a picture (quality is pretty good) of someone who looks just like me running a left turn red. The paper work they sent me says if it wasn't me driving, that I could identify who was driving. This leads me to my question:

If I were to claim it was my wife or someone else driving would/could they investigate to see if that was actually true?

Anyone have any experience in this?

These are all hypothetical situations of course.

Henry

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration