Author |
Message |
Bart Boonacker (Sharky666)
Junior Member Username: Sharky666
Post Number: 115 Registered: 9-2002
| Posted on Monday, December 23, 2002 - 9:30 am: | |
Can't make the ping, I'm connecting trough a proxy with an included firewall. But everything is working fine over here.
|
Vince (Manatee)
Junior Member Username: Manatee
Post Number: 90 Registered: 6-2002
| Posted on Monday, December 23, 2002 - 8:30 am: | |
209.115.108.75 average 568ms |
Steve Hanis (Steve_hanis)
New member Username: Steve_hanis
Post Number: 34 Registered: 5-2002
| Posted on Sunday, December 22, 2002 - 9:15 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 from kc.rr.com
|
Tino (Bboxer)
Junior Member Username: Bboxer
Post Number: 197 Registered: 8-2001
| Posted on Sunday, December 22, 2002 - 9:13 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 |
billy bob (Fatbillybob)
Junior Member Username: Fatbillybob
Post Number: 105 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Sunday, December 22, 2002 - 9:03 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 |
David S (Djs308)
New member Username: Djs308
Post Number: 16 Registered: 9-2002
| Posted on Sunday, December 22, 2002 - 8:44 pm: | |
This is what I got (using Optimum Online in NY): Microsoft(R) Windows DOS (C)Copyright Microsoft Corp 1990-2001. C:\DOCUME~1\OWNER>ping ferrarichat.com Pinging ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=103ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=240 Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 101ms, Maximum = 104ms, Average = 103ms C:\DOCUME~1\OWNER> |
Jim E (Jimpo1)
Intermediate Member Username: Jimpo1
Post Number: 1073 Registered: 7-2001
| Posted on Sunday, December 22, 2002 - 4:02 pm: | |
209 115 108 75 We must all be bored as hell. |
Stanley DiGuiseppi (Standig)
Junior Member Username: Standig
Post Number: 86 Registered: 5-2002
| Posted on Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 7:28 pm: | |
209 115 08 75 4 times no problem |
Mike Charness (Mcharness)
Junior Member Username: Mcharness
Post Number: 125 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 4:49 pm: | |
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=244 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=244 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=244 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=244 |
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member Username: Rob328gts
Post Number: 3030 Registered: 12-2000
| Posted on Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 11:10 am: | |
Frankie, thanks for the FYI, Off Topics had a bug, it's fixed now, let me know if any other topics have problems. Thanks. |
Francisco J. Quinones (Frankie)
Junior Member Username: Frankie
Post Number: 124 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 8:27 am: | |
mmm...i couldn't post in off-topic,said "permission denied" what happened? |
Francisco J. Quinones (Frankie)
Junior Member Username: Frankie
Post Number: 117 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 7:24 am: | |
209.115.108.75 min=192ms max=206ms av=195ms posted at7:22cst Frankie |
Mr. Doody (Doody)
Member Username: Doody
Post Number: 639 Registered: 11-2001
| Posted on Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 5:38 am: | |
rob - it's almost certainly not netsol and verisign's fault. there are hundreds of thousands of DNS servers out there - they all have to get the update, and some of them are just configured wrong. there's nothing you can do about it except wait a month. doody |
Andr� Ferreira da Costa (Oporto328)
New member Username: Oporto328
Post Number: 18 Registered: 9-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 10:17 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 time average 1847ms |
Barney Guzzo (Trinacria)
New member Username: Trinacria
Post Number: 44 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 10:02 pm: | |
Ben, I made the mistake of pinging the (old) network address instead of Ferrarichat.com. Here are the real results. Sorry. Ping has started ... PING ferrarichat.com (209.115.108.75): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=159.874 ms 64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=160.991 ms 64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=158.706 ms 64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=159.311 ms 64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=157.826 ms 64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=5 ttl=244 time=158.554 ms 64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=6 ttl=244 time=159.315 ms 64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=7 ttl=244 time=158.193 ms 64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=8 ttl=244 time=158.086 ms 64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=9 ttl=244 time=158.001 ms --- ferrarichat.com ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 157.826/158.885/160.991 ms
|
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member Username: Rob328gts
Post Number: 3024 Registered: 12-2000
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 9:34 pm: | |
Network Solutions and Verisign can suck my quad exhaust. My home pc was resolving to the old server all week. I call them up this morning and tell them something is wrong, they say nothing is wrong, I tell them that myself and others around the world aren't all resolving the new server 4 days later, they say nothing is wrong, I tell them I moved 9 domains to this server and the other 8 are with lowcostdomains.com and all of those weren't having problems, they still said nothing was wrong. Well, they did something because tonight is the first time my home PC is hitting the new server. Those wankers! |
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member Username: Rob328gts
Post Number: 3021 Registered: 12-2000
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 9:09 pm: | |
It appears that 95% is about where it is. Looks like many from the west coast that haven't picked the new one up and having the slowest times. Would just the people getting the 216.* IP try again and post every day or two. Hopefully we'll see those switching over to the 209.* too. Thanks everyone! You've helped a bunch. |
Mr. Doody (Doody)
Member Username: Doody
Post Number: 638 Registered: 11-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 8:45 pm: | |
do keep in mind that dns propagation is not an exact science. just 'cuz you set your ttl to 60 seconds doesn't mean that every dns server is paying proper attention. if 95% of the folks are seeing the right thing then you're all set and the other 5% have dung-for-brains ISPs or sysads. pull the plug. you undoubtedly have other work to do! doody. |
Jeffrey Ballmer (Jballmer)
New member Username: Jballmer
Post Number: 6 Registered: 2-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 8:40 pm: | |
216.122.248.245 |
Peter (Bubba)
Junior Member Username: Bubba
Post Number: 213 Registered: 5-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 8:38 pm: | |
Rob, From Hong Kong 209.115.108.75 0% packet loss min=309ms max=311ms avg=310ms |
magoo (Magoo)
Advanced Member Username: Magoo
Post Number: 3818 Registered: 2-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 8:38 pm: | |
Rob, tried it twice and all that comes up is a black screen with script "microsoft windows 98" c:windows\Desk Top> |
Coop (360)
New member Username: 360
Post Number: 49 Registered: 4-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 8:27 pm: | |
Ben, VERIZON DSL I just tried it again and now it's pointing to the new server... C:\>ping www.ferrarichat.com Pinging ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=541ms TTL=238 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=238 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=661ms TTL=238 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=772ms TTL=238 Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 260ms, Maximum = 772ms, Average = 558ms |
Mr. Doody (Doody)
Member Username: Doody
Post Number: 637 Registered: 11-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 8:09 pm: | |
Tracing route to ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] over a maximum of 30 hops: 4 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms gbr1-p70.cb1ma.ip.att.net [12.123.40.98] 5 5 ms 6 ms 5 ms tbr2-p013501.cb1ma.ip.att.net [12.122.11.201] 6 27 ms 28 ms 28 ms tbr2-p012401.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.10.34] 7 27 ms 27 ms 26 ms gbr2-p40.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.54] 8 27 ms 27 ms 27 ms gr1-p3110.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.5.5] 9 37 ms 37 ms 36 ms aads.fnsi.net [206.220.243.64] 10 38 ms 38 ms 38 ms core2-atm4-0-0-1.Columbus.fnsi.net [216.29.101.2 5] 11 38 ms 37 ms 37 ms edge2.core.jtlnet.com [209.115.127.6] 12 37 ms 36 ms 38 ms 209.115.108.75 Trace complete. doody. |
Ben Lobenstein 90 TR (Benjet)
Member Username: Benjet
Post Number: 942 Registered: 1-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 5:52 pm: | |
Houston we have a problem! COOP, BARNEY and DES, if I may ask what ISP's are you on, AOL or MSN perhaps? Pinging www.ferrarichat.com should bring up 209.115.108.75, the other 216.xxx.xxx.xxx number is the old server and that means it's not resolving the name properly. |
Bruno (Originalsinner)
Member Username: Originalsinner
Post Number: 808 Registered: 5-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 5:47 pm: | |
philly,pa 6:45 est. |
Bruno (Originalsinner)
Member Username: Originalsinner
Post Number: 807 Registered: 5-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 5:46 pm: | |
C:\>"ping ferrarichat.com" Pinging ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=241 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=241 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=241 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=241 Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 170ms, Maximum = 180ms, Average = 172ms
|
Coop (360)
New member Username: 360
Post Number: 48 Registered: 4-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:48 pm: | |
From West Los Angeles at 3pm pst Microsoft(R) Windows DOS (C)Copyright Microsoft Corp 1990-1999. C:\>ping 209.115.108.75 Pinging 209.115.108.75 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=238 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=238 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=238 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=238 Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 110ms, Maximum = 111ms, Average = 110ms OLD SERVER C:\>ping ferrarichat.com Pinging ferrarichat.com [216.122.248.245] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 216.122.248.245: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=53 Reply from 216.122.248.245: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=53 Reply from 216.122.248.245: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=53 Reply from 216.122.248.245: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=53 Ping statistics for 216.122.248.245: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 80ms, Maximum = 80ms, Average = 80ms |
Patrick (Patrickr)
Junior Member Username: Patrickr
Post Number: 78 Registered: 4-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:48 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 |
wm hart (Whart)
Member Username: Whart
Post Number: 648 Registered: 12-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:45 pm: | |
ditto |
Bart Bosmans (Bel)
New member Username: Bel
Post Number: 7 Registered: 11-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:33 pm: | |
Pinging ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] with 32 bytes Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=242 Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss) Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 230ms, Maximum = 230ms, Average = 230ms Bart |
Rehan (F3606m)
Junior Member Username: F3606m
Post Number: 56 Registered: 4-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:27 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 Average 268ms
|
Noelrp (Noelrp)
Junior Member Username: Noelrp
Post Number: 135 Registered: 8-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:19 pm: | |
Pinging ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=242 Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 72ms, Maximum = 77ms, Average = 74ms
|
DES (Sickspeed)
Member Username: Sickspeed
Post Number: 343 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:15 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 Minimum 110Ms Maximum 151Ms Average 130Ms |
arthur chambers (Art355)
Member Username: Art355
Post Number: 840 Registered: 6-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:02 pm: | |
Rob: If you look at the times, you can see who has DSL, T lines, or dial up. Art |
Robert Rothschild (Rothschild)
New member Username: Rothschild
Post Number: 24 Registered: 6-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 3:21 pm: | |
Here you go rob. 65ms from the bay area Pinging ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=240 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=240 Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 70ms, Average = 65ms |
Jonathan Peck (Jonathanp)
New member Username: Jonathanp
Post Number: 27 Registered: 7-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 3:20 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 @ 78ms
|
Jeremy Lawrence (F512m)
Junior Member Username: F512m
Post Number: 84 Registered: 1-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 3:20 pm: | |
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=242 Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 50ms, Maximum = 70ms, Average = 57ms |
Ton Visser (Lion315)
New member Username: Lion315
Post Number: 45 Registered: 12-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 3:19 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 |
Tim N (Timn88)
Intermediate Member Username: Timn88
Post Number: 1750 Registered: 6-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 3:15 pm: | |
55ms average. FAST! |
Michael N. (Man90tr)
Member Username: Man90tr
Post Number: 742 Registered: 4-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 3:10 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 |
Barney Guzzo (Trinacria)
New member Username: Trinacria
Post Number: 43 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 3:08 pm: | |
PING 216.122.248.245 (216.122.248.245): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=39.344 ms 64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=37.472 ms 64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=38.374 ms 64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=38.798 ms 64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=37.76 ms 64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=36.896 ms 64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=49.552 ms 64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=37.753 ms 64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=48.592 ms 64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=38.519 ms --- 216.122.248.245 ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 36.896/40.306/49.552 ms
|
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member Username: Rob328gts
Post Number: 3018 Registered: 12-2000
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:51 pm: | |
That would be great, I need users to tell me the best ways to reach the international Ferrari crowd. Please send me the contact information and I'll place ads in those. Thanks, rob. |
Douglas A Hunt (Boxercrazy)
New member Username: Boxercrazy
Post Number: 21 Registered: 11-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:51 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 douglas hunt |
Mark Collins (Markcollins)
Junior Member Username: Markcollins
Post Number: 63 Registered: 7-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:48 pm: | |
Rob Bit of a Thread Hijack! On another thread you were looking for ways to increase the exposure of the Board, have you considered putting ads in the various Countries Owners Club Mags or on their sites, Membership in the UK is around 2,500 and I think there's abut 10 of us get on here, drop me a mail if you want contact details for UK Owners club |
Mark Collins (Markcollins)
Junior Member Username: Markcollins
Post Number: 62 Registered: 7-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:36 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 It's made it's way to the UK! |
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member Username: Rob328gts
Post Number: 3012 Registered: 12-2000
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:18 pm: | |
Ben, hmm, I didn't even know that, I guess our new server is in Ohio. Say hi if anyone is in the area. |
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member Username: Rob328gts
Post Number: 3011 Registered: 12-2000
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:17 pm: | |
Dave Wapinski, are you refering to the Old Texas SRX7 site, not the old FerrariChat.com site? If you enter just the IP then it will forward you to the old server and the Texas SRX7 site will appear. That's OK, I think. ;) |
Mark (Markg)
Member Username: Markg
Post Number: 339 Registered: 2-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:15 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 sent=4 received=0 failures=4 (100%loss) |
Ben Lobenstein 90 TR (Benjet)
Member Username: Benjet
Post Number: 941 Registered: 1-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:12 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 which is located in Reynoldsburg, Ohio, United States. Also did a DNS propigation check, result is to the new servers (209.115.108.80 and 209.115.108.81), I think that's correct ;) I'd advise to deactivate the board on the old server (should really have been done when you made the move) and put up a single refer page, altho when I type the 216.122.248.245 into my browser I get bounced to http://server.ferrarichat.com/~ferrari/ferrarichat.com/cgi-bin/discus/discus.cgi something tells me that is causing part of the conufsion, well maybe. When I type the 209.115.108.75 into my browser I get bounced to http://www.spec7.org/cgi-bin/discus/discus.cgi Go figure. HTH -Ben |
Charles Byrd (Vogel)
Junior Member Username: Vogel
Post Number: 59 Registered: 6-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:12 pm: | |
Pinging 209.115.108.75 from here in GA. |
Dave (Maranelloman)
Member Username: Maranelloman
Post Number: 622 Registered: 1-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:02 pm: | |
209-115-108-75 |
Dave Wapinski (Davewapinski)
Member Username: Davewapinski
Post Number: 435 Registered: 8-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:58 pm: | |
It appears that your IP addresses are reversed. When I go to http://209.115... I get the old server. When I go to http://216.122... I get the new server Dave |
JRV (Jrvall)
Member Username: Jrvall
Post Number: 403 Registered: 11-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:54 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 |
Eric Hawley (Eric)
New member Username: Eric
Post Number: 34 Registered: 8-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:53 pm: | |
Pinging ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=242 Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=242 Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 110ms, Maximum = 116ms, Average = |
William Huber (Solipsist)
Member Username: Solipsist
Post Number: 536 Registered: 9-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:42 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 bytes=32 time=72ms ttl=244 |
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member Username: Rob328gts
Post Number: 3010 Registered: 12-2000
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:33 pm: | |
cool, thanks everyone, keep them coming if you haven't done it yet. The new server is 209.115.108.75, which is good if that's what you're pinging. 216.122.248.245 is the old server which is bad and means the domain DNS settings had problems when propogating around the world. I'm trying to get that problem worked out because I want to turn the old server off this weekend so I don't have to pay anymore. If you get an error, that just means you're behind a firewall like me, I can't do it right now either. |
Pat Pasqualini (Enzo)
Junior Member Username: Enzo
Post Number: 107 Registered: 2-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:22 pm: | |
DNS address=209.115.108.75 |
J.D. Smythe (Jeff)
Junior Member Username: Jeff
Post Number: 84 Registered: 2-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:22 pm: | |
456 ms average |
Wade R Nunez (308nut)
Junior Member Username: 308nut
Post Number: 55 Registered: 7-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:21 pm: | |
208.115.108.75 bytes=32 time=126 ttl=242 Packets sent-4 received-4 lost-0 (0%lost) round trip times in milliseconds min=126ms max=133ms avg=122ms Wade www.fortunemotors.com |
Howie/ExoticAutoBrokers.com (Brokerofexotics)
Member Username: Brokerofexotics
Post Number: 315 Registered: 11-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:19 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 |
Tillman Strahan (Tillman)
Junior Member Username: Tillman
Post Number: 239 Registered: 11-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:13 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 |
D B (Threesixty)
Junior Member Username: Threesixty
Post Number: 105 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:12 pm: | |
avg 86ms 209.115.108.75 |
Eric Eiland (Eric308gtsiqv)
Member Username: Eric308gtsiqv
Post Number: 513 Registered: 11-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:10 pm: | |
Reply = 209.115.108.75 |
Joseph Caretti (Pino)
Junior Member Username: Pino
Post Number: 120 Registered: 4-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:10 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 |
bruce wellington (Bws88tr)
Intermediate Member Username: Bws88tr
Post Number: 1304 Registered: 4-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:10 pm: | |
no working here rob |
arthur chambers (Art355)
Member Username: Art355
Post Number: 839 Registered: 6-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:10 pm: | |
79 NS FOR AVERAGE REPLY |
TomD (Tifosi)
Intermediate Member Username: Tifosi
Post Number: 2049 Registered: 9-2001
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:07 pm: | |
sorry tried and can't do it. IS this like pinging in submarine talk  |
DES (Sickspeed)
Member Username: Sickspeed
Post Number: 336 Registered: 8-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:07 pm: | |
216.122.248.245 didn't think about it, before, but if you need it, my average minutes is like, 36, i think it said... |
Jim Schad (Jim_schad)
Member Username: Jim_schad
Post Number: 598 Registered: 7-2002
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:06 pm: | |
209.115.108.75 |
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member Username: Rob328gts
Post Number: 3008 Registered: 12-2000
| Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:03 pm: | |
Before I shut the old server off I want to make sure everything is ok. Can a few people... 1) Go to Start - Run 2) Type "command" and then hit OK 3) Type "ping ferrarichat.com" at the prompt. 4) Post in this thread the number that comes back. This may not work if you're at work behind a firewall. Thanks, rob |