FerrariChat.com needs your help for a... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

FerrariChat.com » General Ferrari Discussion Archives » Archive through December 25, 2002 » FerrariChat.com needs your help for a minute... « Previous Next »

Author Message
Bart Boonacker (Sharky666)
Junior Member
Username: Sharky666

Post Number: 115
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Monday, December 23, 2002 - 9:30 am:   

Can't make the ping, I'm connecting trough a proxy with an included firewall.

But everything is working fine over here.
Vince (Manatee)
Junior Member
Username: Manatee

Post Number: 90
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Monday, December 23, 2002 - 8:30 am:   

209.115.108.75
average 568ms
Steve Hanis (Steve_hanis)
New member
Username: Steve_hanis

Post Number: 34
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Sunday, December 22, 2002 - 9:15 pm:   

209.115.108.75 from kc.rr.com
Tino (Bboxer)
Junior Member
Username: Bboxer

Post Number: 197
Registered: 8-2001
Posted on Sunday, December 22, 2002 - 9:13 pm:   

209.115.108.75
billy bob (Fatbillybob)
Junior Member
Username: Fatbillybob

Post Number: 105
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Sunday, December 22, 2002 - 9:03 pm:   

209.115.108.75
David S (Djs308)
New member
Username: Djs308

Post Number: 16
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Sunday, December 22, 2002 - 8:44 pm:   

This is what I got (using Optimum Online in NY):

Microsoft(R) Windows DOS
(C)Copyright Microsoft Corp 1990-2001.

C:\DOCUME~1\OWNER>ping ferrarichat.com

Pinging ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=103ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=240

Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 101ms, Maximum = 104ms, Average = 103ms

C:\DOCUME~1\OWNER>
Jim E (Jimpo1)
Intermediate Member
Username: Jimpo1

Post Number: 1073
Registered: 7-2001
Posted on Sunday, December 22, 2002 - 4:02 pm:   

209 115 108 75

We must all be bored as hell.
Stanley DiGuiseppi (Standig)
Junior Member
Username: Standig

Post Number: 86
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 7:28 pm:   

209 115 08 75
4 times no problem
Mike Charness (Mcharness)
Junior Member
Username: Mcharness

Post Number: 125
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 4:49 pm:   

Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=244
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=244
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member
Username: Rob328gts

Post Number: 3030
Registered: 12-2000
Posted on Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 11:10 am:   

Frankie, thanks for the FYI, Off Topics had a bug, it's fixed now, let me know if any other topics have problems. Thanks.
Francisco J. Quinones (Frankie)
Junior Member
Username: Frankie

Post Number: 124
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 8:27 am:   

mmm...i couldn't post in off-topic,said "permission denied"
what happened?
Francisco J. Quinones (Frankie)
Junior Member
Username: Frankie

Post Number: 117
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 7:24 am:   

209.115.108.75
min=192ms
max=206ms
av=195ms
posted at7:22cst
Frankie
Mr. Doody (Doody)
Member
Username: Doody

Post Number: 639
Registered: 11-2001
Posted on Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 5:38 am:   

rob - it's almost certainly not netsol and verisign's fault. there are hundreds of thousands of DNS servers out there - they all have to get the update, and some of them are just configured wrong. there's nothing you can do about it except wait a month.

doody
Andr� Ferreira da Costa (Oporto328)
New member
Username: Oporto328

Post Number: 18
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 10:17 pm:   

209.115.108.75
time average 1847ms
Barney Guzzo (Trinacria)
New member
Username: Trinacria

Post Number: 44
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 10:02 pm:   

Ben, I made the mistake of pinging the (old) network address instead of Ferrarichat.com. Here are the real results. Sorry.

Ping has started ...

PING ferrarichat.com (209.115.108.75): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=159.874 ms
64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=160.991 ms
64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=158.706 ms
64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=159.311 ms
64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=157.826 ms
64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=5 ttl=244 time=158.554 ms
64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=6 ttl=244 time=159.315 ms
64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=7 ttl=244 time=158.193 ms
64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=8 ttl=244 time=158.086 ms
64 bytes from 209.115.108.75: icmp_seq=9 ttl=244 time=158.001 ms

--- ferrarichat.com ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 157.826/158.885/160.991 ms


Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member
Username: Rob328gts

Post Number: 3024
Registered: 12-2000
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 9:34 pm:   

Network Solutions and Verisign can suck my quad exhaust. My home pc was resolving to the old server all week. I call them up this morning and tell them something is wrong, they say nothing is wrong, I tell them that myself and others around the world aren't all resolving the new server 4 days later, they say nothing is wrong, I tell them I moved 9 domains to this server and the other 8 are with lowcostdomains.com and all of those weren't having problems, they still said nothing was wrong. Well, they did something because tonight is the first time my home PC is hitting the new server. Those wankers!
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member
Username: Rob328gts

Post Number: 3021
Registered: 12-2000
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 9:09 pm:   

It appears that 95% is about where it is. Looks like many from the west coast that haven't picked the new one up and having the slowest times. Would just the people getting the 216.* IP try again and post every day or two. Hopefully we'll see those switching over to the 209.* too. Thanks everyone! You've helped a bunch.
Mr. Doody (Doody)
Member
Username: Doody

Post Number: 638
Registered: 11-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 8:45 pm:   

do keep in mind that dns propagation is not an exact science. just 'cuz you set your ttl to 60 seconds doesn't mean that every dns server is paying proper attention. if 95% of the folks are seeing the right thing then you're all set and the other 5% have dung-for-brains ISPs or sysads. pull the plug. you undoubtedly have other work to do!

doody.
Jeffrey Ballmer (Jballmer)
New member
Username: Jballmer

Post Number: 6
Registered: 2-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 8:40 pm:   

216.122.248.245
Peter (Bubba)
Junior Member
Username: Bubba

Post Number: 213
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 8:38 pm:   

Rob,

From Hong Kong

209.115.108.75
0% packet loss
min=309ms max=311ms avg=310ms
magoo (Magoo)
Advanced Member
Username: Magoo

Post Number: 3818
Registered: 2-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 8:38 pm:   

Rob, tried it twice and all that comes up is a black screen with script "microsoft windows 98" c:windows\Desk Top>
Coop (360)
New member
Username: 360

Post Number: 49
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 8:27 pm:   

Ben,
VERIZON DSL
I just tried it again and now it's pointing to the new server...


C:\>ping www.ferrarichat.com

Pinging ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=541ms TTL=238
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=238
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=661ms TTL=238
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=772ms TTL=238

Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 260ms, Maximum = 772ms, Average = 558ms
Mr. Doody (Doody)
Member
Username: Doody

Post Number: 637
Registered: 11-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 8:09 pm:   

Tracing route to ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

4 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms gbr1-p70.cb1ma.ip.att.net [12.123.40.98]
5 5 ms 6 ms 5 ms tbr2-p013501.cb1ma.ip.att.net [12.122.11.201]
6 27 ms 28 ms 28 ms tbr2-p012401.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.10.34]
7 27 ms 27 ms 26 ms gbr2-p40.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.11.54]
8 27 ms 27 ms 27 ms gr1-p3110.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.5.5]
9 37 ms 37 ms 36 ms aads.fnsi.net [206.220.243.64]
10 38 ms 38 ms 38 ms core2-atm4-0-0-1.Columbus.fnsi.net [216.29.101.2
5]
11 38 ms 37 ms 37 ms edge2.core.jtlnet.com [209.115.127.6]
12 37 ms 36 ms 38 ms 209.115.108.75

Trace complete.

doody.
Ben Lobenstein 90 TR (Benjet)
Member
Username: Benjet

Post Number: 942
Registered: 1-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 5:52 pm:   

Houston we have a problem!

COOP, BARNEY and DES, if I may ask what ISP's are you on, AOL or MSN perhaps?

Pinging www.ferrarichat.com should bring up 209.115.108.75, the other 216.xxx.xxx.xxx number is the old server and that means it's not resolving the name properly.
Bruno (Originalsinner)
Member
Username: Originalsinner

Post Number: 808
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 5:47 pm:   

philly,pa 6:45 est.
Bruno (Originalsinner)
Member
Username: Originalsinner

Post Number: 807
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 5:46 pm:   

C:\>"ping ferrarichat.com"

Pinging ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=180ms TTL=241
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=241
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=241
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=241

Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 170ms, Maximum = 180ms, Average = 172ms
Coop (360)
New member
Username: 360

Post Number: 48
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:48 pm:   

From West Los Angeles at 3pm pst


Microsoft(R) Windows DOS
(C)Copyright Microsoft Corp 1990-1999.

C:\>ping 209.115.108.75

Pinging 209.115.108.75 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=111ms TTL=238
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=238
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=238
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=238

Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 110ms, Maximum = 111ms, Average = 110ms


OLD SERVER

C:\>ping ferrarichat.com

Pinging ferrarichat.com [216.122.248.245] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.122.248.245: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=53
Reply from 216.122.248.245: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=53
Reply from 216.122.248.245: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=53
Reply from 216.122.248.245: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=53

Ping statistics for 216.122.248.245:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 80ms, Maximum = 80ms, Average = 80ms
Patrick (Patrickr)
Junior Member
Username: Patrickr

Post Number: 78
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:48 pm:   

209.115.108.75
wm hart (Whart)
Member
Username: Whart

Post Number: 648
Registered: 12-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:45 pm:   

ditto
Bart Bosmans (Bel)
New member
Username: Bel

Post Number: 7
Registered: 11-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:33 pm:   

Pinging ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] with 32 bytes

Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=230ms TTL=242

Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss)
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 230ms, Maximum = 230ms, Average = 230ms

Bart
Rehan (F3606m)
Junior Member
Username: F3606m

Post Number: 56
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:27 pm:   

209.115.108.75

Average 268ms

Noelrp (Noelrp)
Junior Member
Username: Noelrp

Post Number: 135
Registered: 8-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:19 pm:   

Pinging ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=242

Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 72ms, Maximum = 77ms, Average = 74ms
DES (Sickspeed)
Member
Username: Sickspeed

Post Number: 343
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:15 pm:   

209.115.108.75

Minimum 110Ms
Maximum 151Ms
Average 130Ms
arthur chambers (Art355)
Member
Username: Art355

Post Number: 840
Registered: 6-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 4:02 pm:   

Rob:

If you look at the times, you can see who has DSL, T lines, or dial up.

Art
Robert Rothschild (Rothschild)
New member
Username: Rothschild

Post Number: 24
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 3:21 pm:   

Here you go rob. 65ms from the bay area


Pinging ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=240
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=240

Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 70ms, Average = 65ms
Jonathan Peck (Jonathanp)
New member
Username: Jonathanp

Post Number: 27
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 3:20 pm:   

209.115.108.75 @ 78ms

Jeremy Lawrence (F512m)
Junior Member
Username: F512m

Post Number: 84
Registered: 1-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 3:20 pm:   

Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=242

Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 50ms, Maximum = 70ms, Average = 57ms
Ton Visser (Lion315)
New member
Username: Lion315

Post Number: 45
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 3:19 pm:   

209.115.108.75
Tim N (Timn88)
Intermediate Member
Username: Timn88

Post Number: 1750
Registered: 6-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 3:15 pm:   

55ms average. FAST!
Michael N. (Man90tr)
Member
Username: Man90tr

Post Number: 742
Registered: 4-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 3:10 pm:   

209.115.108.75
Barney Guzzo (Trinacria)
New member
Username: Trinacria

Post Number: 43
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 3:08 pm:   

PING 216.122.248.245 (216.122.248.245): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=39.344 ms
64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=37.472 ms
64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=38.374 ms
64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=38.798 ms
64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=37.76 ms
64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=36.896 ms
64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=49.552 ms
64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=37.753 ms
64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=48.592 ms
64 bytes from 216.122.248.245: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=38.519 ms

--- 216.122.248.245 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 36.896/40.306/49.552 ms
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member
Username: Rob328gts

Post Number: 3018
Registered: 12-2000
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:51 pm:   

That would be great, I need users to tell me the best ways to reach the international Ferrari crowd. Please send me the contact information and I'll place ads in those. Thanks, rob.
Douglas A Hunt (Boxercrazy)
New member
Username: Boxercrazy

Post Number: 21
Registered: 11-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:51 pm:   

209.115.108.75

douglas hunt
Mark Collins (Markcollins)
Junior Member
Username: Markcollins

Post Number: 63
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:48 pm:   

Rob

Bit of a Thread Hijack!

On another thread you were looking for ways to increase the exposure of the Board, have you considered putting ads in the various Countries Owners Club Mags or on their sites, Membership in the UK is around 2,500 and I think there's abut 10 of us get on here,


drop me a mail if you want contact details for UK Owners club
Mark Collins (Markcollins)
Junior Member
Username: Markcollins

Post Number: 62
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:36 pm:   

209.115.108.75

It's made it's way to the UK!
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member
Username: Rob328gts

Post Number: 3012
Registered: 12-2000
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:18 pm:   

Ben, hmm, I didn't even know that, I guess our new server is in Ohio. Say hi if anyone is in the area.
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member
Username: Rob328gts

Post Number: 3011
Registered: 12-2000
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:17 pm:   

Dave Wapinski, are you refering to the Old Texas SRX7 site, not the old FerrariChat.com site?

If you enter just the IP then it will forward you to the old server and the Texas SRX7 site will appear. That's OK, I think. ;)
Mark (Markg)
Member
Username: Markg

Post Number: 339
Registered: 2-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:15 pm:   

209.115.108.75 sent=4 received=0 failures=4 (100%loss)
Ben Lobenstein 90 TR (Benjet)
Member
Username: Benjet

Post Number: 941
Registered: 1-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:12 pm:   

209.115.108.75 which is located in Reynoldsburg, Ohio, United States.

Also did a DNS propigation check, result is to the new servers (209.115.108.80 and 209.115.108.81), I think that's correct ;)

I'd advise to deactivate the board on the old server (should really have been done when you made the move) and put up a single refer page, altho when I type the 216.122.248.245 into my browser I get bounced to http://server.ferrarichat.com/~ferrari/ferrarichat.com/cgi-bin/discus/discus.cgi

something tells me that is causing part of the conufsion, well maybe.

When I type the 209.115.108.75 into my browser I get bounced to
http://www.spec7.org/cgi-bin/discus/discus.cgi

Go figure.

HTH

-Ben
Charles Byrd (Vogel)
Junior Member
Username: Vogel

Post Number: 59
Registered: 6-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:12 pm:   

Pinging 209.115.108.75 from here in GA.
Dave (Maranelloman)
Member
Username: Maranelloman

Post Number: 622
Registered: 1-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 2:02 pm:   

209-115-108-75
Dave Wapinski (Davewapinski)
Member
Username: Davewapinski

Post Number: 435
Registered: 8-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:58 pm:   

It appears that your IP addresses are reversed.

When I go to http://209.115... I get the old server.

When I go to http://216.122... I get the new server

Dave
JRV (Jrvall)
Member
Username: Jrvall

Post Number: 403
Registered: 11-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:54 pm:   

209.115.108.75
Eric Hawley (Eric)
New member
Username: Eric

Post Number: 34
Registered: 8-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:53 pm:   

Pinging ferrarichat.com [209.115.108.75] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=242
Reply from 209.115.108.75: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=242

Ping statistics for 209.115.108.75:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 110ms, Maximum = 116ms, Average =
William Huber (Solipsist)
Member
Username: Solipsist

Post Number: 536
Registered: 9-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:42 pm:   

209.115.108.75 bytes=32 time=72ms ttl=244
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member
Username: Rob328gts

Post Number: 3010
Registered: 12-2000
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:33 pm:   

cool, thanks everyone, keep them coming if you haven't done it yet. The new server is 209.115.108.75, which is good if that's what you're pinging. 216.122.248.245 is the old server which is bad and means the domain DNS settings had problems when propogating around the world. I'm trying to get that problem worked out because I want to turn the old server off this weekend so I don't have to pay anymore. If you get an error, that just means you're behind a firewall like me, I can't do it right now either.
Pat Pasqualini (Enzo)
Junior Member
Username: Enzo

Post Number: 107
Registered: 2-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:22 pm:   

DNS address=209.115.108.75
J.D. Smythe (Jeff)
Junior Member
Username: Jeff

Post Number: 84
Registered: 2-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:22 pm:   

456 ms average
Wade R Nunez (308nut)
Junior Member
Username: 308nut

Post Number: 55
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:21 pm:   

208.115.108.75 bytes=32 time=126 ttl=242

Packets sent-4 received-4 lost-0 (0%lost)

round trip times in milliseconds
min=126ms max=133ms avg=122ms


Wade
www.fortunemotors.com
Howie/ExoticAutoBrokers.com (Brokerofexotics)
Member
Username: Brokerofexotics

Post Number: 315
Registered: 11-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:19 pm:   

209.115.108.75
Tillman Strahan (Tillman)
Junior Member
Username: Tillman

Post Number: 239
Registered: 11-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:13 pm:   

209.115.108.75
D B (Threesixty)
Junior Member
Username: Threesixty

Post Number: 105
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:12 pm:   

avg 86ms
209.115.108.75
Eric Eiland (Eric308gtsiqv)
Member
Username: Eric308gtsiqv

Post Number: 513
Registered: 11-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:10 pm:   

Reply = 209.115.108.75
Joseph Caretti (Pino)
Junior Member
Username: Pino

Post Number: 120
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:10 pm:   

209.115.108.75
bruce wellington (Bws88tr)
Intermediate Member
Username: Bws88tr

Post Number: 1304
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:10 pm:   

no working here rob
arthur chambers (Art355)
Member
Username: Art355

Post Number: 839
Registered: 6-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:10 pm:   

79 NS FOR AVERAGE REPLY
TomD (Tifosi)
Intermediate Member
Username: Tifosi

Post Number: 2049
Registered: 9-2001
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:07 pm:   

sorry tried and can't do it. IS this like pinging in submarine talk :-)
DES (Sickspeed)
Member
Username: Sickspeed

Post Number: 336
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:07 pm:   

216.122.248.245

didn't think about it, before, but if you need it, my average minutes is like, 36, i think it said...
Jim Schad (Jim_schad)
Member
Username: Jim_schad

Post Number: 598
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:06 pm:   

209.115.108.75
Rob Lay (Rob328gts)
Advanced Member
Username: Rob328gts

Post Number: 3008
Registered: 12-2000
Posted on Friday, December 20, 2002 - 1:03 pm:   

Before I shut the old server off I want to make sure everything is ok. Can a few people...

1) Go to Start - Run
2) Type "command" and then hit OK
3) Type "ping ferrarichat.com" at the prompt.
4) Post in this thread the number that comes back.

This may not work if you're at work behind a firewall.

Thanks,
rob

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration