Why would anyone want a 360? Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

FerrariChat.com » General Ferrari Discussion Archives » Archive through August 09, 2003 » Why would anyone want a 360? « Previous Next »

Author Message
Steven J. Solomon (Solly)
Member
Username: Solly

Post Number: 547
Registered: 6-2001
Posted on Saturday, August 09, 2003 - 12:07 am:   

Last weekend at Lime rock it rained the first day, and all cars with slicks could not go out. so my 360 CH sat under the tent, but I was antsy, so I grabbed some stick on race numbers from bob and took the 360 spider out on the track in the rain. I have gotten some good lessons from Matt Karson on throttle steering, but unless you are Matt Karson it really doesn't come into play much on dry surfaces with street tires. HOWEVER, since i pretty much had the track to myself i experimented in the wet with throttle steering the 360 around Big Bend to turn 2 (an abnormal turn where you can't track out of turn 1, but must stay on the left). I must tell you that the 360 shined in the wet, and I probably had more fun chucking it around the empty wet course than I did driving the 360CH the next day. The 360 is amazingly well balanced, and just a nudge or slight lift on the accelerator in a turn turns the nose in or out with uncanny precision. I was amazed at how well it handled, having never been able to go to the limit on the street. It seems that every time i take a 360 out i discover a little more capability than I thought it had. I have never driven a 550 on a track, so I can't compare it, but the 360 is fantastically nimble and very predictable near the limit. I had a blast, but as was mentioned above, this car does need to be driven near red line to extract the most out of the motor.
I also think the 360 looks very cool, although the 550/575 has a certain elegance about it (Like an an Aston). One suggests Speed Racer and the other suggests a more understated big brother.
Jaime T. Ferraris are sex on wheels (Chevarri)
Junior Member
Username: Chevarri

Post Number: 133
Registered: 1-2003
Posted on Friday, August 08, 2003 - 3:43 pm:   

Hey, Ben hes obssesed with Classic Ferraris,the Dino and 250GTO.
Yes he does have issues, hes very complex and defensive when it comes classic Ferrari and Porsche, he also doesnt acknowledge new Ferraris as being true/real Ferraris. He went off the wall when I said the Porsche Cayenne was just a money making ploy! I told him, "heck if they(Porsche) made a SUV, then they could even make a luxo truck, trucks are gaining in popularity. They made the Cayanne to make money, then hey some one might get the idea of using a truck for the same purpose". He went completely irate! He said, "listen(insert four letter words here)the only reason they made the Cayenne is to make money so they could continue to be independent. They arent selling Cayennes to make money, they would never ever make a truck(more four letter words)!!!" I told him, "10 years ago do you think they would have ever made an SUV?" He gives me that look like, "Im going to rip off your head and S down your neck!"

Ben Cannon (Artherd)
Member
Username: Artherd

Post Number: 692
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Friday, August 08, 2003 - 12:59 pm:   

LWR- Basically because it goes from 4grand all the way to 8500rpm :-)

They are two very different cars, and to each their own. Personally, I want both. Actually, I want a 512M REAL BAD!

Michael- very true about the E34 M5s, what a motor above 4grand!


JamesT- Your friend's got issues. Dino, Ferrari. Ferrari, Dino, whatever. It's a great car, and certinly sharing a lot in spirit with the 246GT is NOT a bad thing! You'd have to do way worse (ie, do something actually bad) to get tossed out of my house :P)

Best!
Ben.
John Kemmerly (Gman)
New member
Username: Gman

Post Number: 15
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Friday, August 08, 2003 - 12:20 pm:   

Glen C Winters - You have a PM!

Thanks
John
Kevin Butler (Challenge)
Junior Member
Username: Challenge

Post Number: 194
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Friday, August 08, 2003 - 10:55 am:   

Glen,
Were you in Mechanicsburg on Carlisle Pike a couple of Sundays ago?
Hubert Otlik (Hugh)
Intermediate Member
Username: Hugh

Post Number: 1213
Registered: 1-2002
Posted on Friday, August 08, 2003 - 10:32 am:   

Jaime T. Ferraris are sex on wheels (Chevarri):
Maybe your friends Rx of valium had just run out?
David J. Smith (Darkhorse512)
Junior Member
Username: Darkhorse512

Post Number: 229
Registered: 10-2002
Posted on Friday, August 08, 2003 - 5:40 am:   

I'd take a 360 because I'm a fan of all things quick, where a 550 is for fans of all things fast...

...and the shape of a 360 is arguably a little more "Ferrari" than the 550.
Vincent (Vincent348)
Member
Username: Vincent348

Post Number: 948
Registered: 4-2003
Posted on Friday, August 08, 2003 - 12:12 am:   

I'm with Dr. Shelbee on this one!

Each has its own merits.

Vincent.
Dr. Shelbee (Shelbee)
Member
Username: Shelbee

Post Number: 452
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Friday, August 08, 2003 - 12:08 am:   

LWR,

Don't complaint, each car has its own characteristics.

Therefore Ferrari made V12 and V8.

If you don't like 360, just don't get it then.

So simple. I love mine both.
Jaime T. Ferraris are sex on wheels (Chevarri)
Junior Member
Username: Chevarri

Post Number: 131
Registered: 1-2003
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 7:01 pm:   

Speaking of 360s, I told a buddy of mine that, "I THINK the 360 kind of has some styling cues from the Dino, almost what a Dino MIGHT look like today". I then said, "look the Dino and 360 both have front fender flares that are raised above the hood line,the hoods even share the same shape, the hoods also share the same design where the front end slopes down, they both have similar in design rear intake scoops, they are both MR, and they have relatively small motors(no 12s). Maybe Pininfarina took some styling cues from the Dino?" After that he went ballistic! "He said shut your mouth, the 360 doesn't even deserve to be in the same sentence as the Dino!! The Dino is in a level all its own, and the 360 is ugly and sounds terriable!! You dont deserve, and have no right to say that the 360 remotely looks like a Dino, get out of my Damn house now!" I told him to calm down, and that it was just an observation. He shook his head and told me to leave.

What do you guys think about my observation, and what he and I said?
Vince (Manatee)
Member
Username: Manatee

Post Number: 294
Registered: 6-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 6:34 pm:   

The 575 fits more of my style of driving pleasure than a 360 does. If the 575 wasn't available, I'd have a 360.
Ron (Easy_rider)
Member
Username: Easy_rider

Post Number: 647
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 6:10 pm:   

Bruce, me too. In fact I may be getting one within the next week or so. It is going in for PPI tomorrow.

Ron
Jack (Gilles27)
Intermediate Member
Username: Gilles27

Post Number: 1269
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 3:39 pm:   

Isn't this all kind of like "Why would you sleep with Liz Hurley when Pamela Anderson is available?"

Oooh, bad example. She's got hepatitis.
KCCK (Kenneth)
Member
Username: Kenneth

Post Number: 535
Registered: 10-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 2:45 pm:   

360 FOR IMPECCABLE BALANCE BETWEEN HUMANITY AND INSANITY :-)
Glen C Winters (Wildwarrior)
New member
Username: Wildwarrior

Post Number: 27
Registered: 3-2003
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 2:36 pm:   

It is like comparing my new M5 with my brothers M3 BMW.I love the 360 but own a 512 TR, my next F car will be a 6speed 360 spider to add to my toy collection,the 360 is as different from my 512 as the M5 is to the M3.The 360 is a blast to drive and has great lines.If I want pure speed and insane power I drive my 2oo MPH + race car on the track.Unless you have a death wish, at least where I live in PA I can occasionaly whined through 4th gear at 7100rpms at 140mph for a few seconds on the interstate before I need to slow for traffic, I have only been in 5th a few times.We all have our thing! Glen
Bruce Wellington (Bws88tr)
Advanced Member
Username: Bws88tr

Post Number: 2590
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 2:31 pm:   

BEAUTIFUL CAR....BUT MY 1ST CHOICE WOULD BE A 512TR..............DONT LIKE THE F1
Dr. Ken Lee (Kenster888)
Junior Member
Username: Kenster888

Post Number: 217
Registered: 4-2003
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 2:30 pm:   

Thanks ELI for the info. I'm not looking for one right now. I imagine early next year.
Matt (Matt_lamotte)
Member
Username: Matt_lamotte

Post Number: 504
Registered: 10-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 2:04 pm:   

I would like a 360 because.......

ITS A FREAKING FERRARI 360 MODENA!!!!!!!
neal (95spiderneal)
Junior Member
Username: 95spiderneal

Post Number: 220
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 1:58 pm:   

i think gallardo makes this question of 550 v 360 moot as it has hp, torque to compare with 550 and style to compare to 360 all with awd traction.

exotics should look the part with a mid engine dictated short front, long back. the front engine 550 with long hood short rear deck is just too conventional profile. vette, viper, 350z, mitsu, supra, etal all have this look. 360, gallardo, muci only ones to have the unique look need in this segment
Hubert Otlik (Hugh)
Intermediate Member
Username: Hugh

Post Number: 1208
Registered: 1-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 12:34 pm:   

Did you drive it w/ ASR on/off? Also, most mid-engined cars will tend to understeer at turn in, and show signs of mild on throttle oversteer on exit; it's a matter of where the weight is, and how it moves around under dynamic change in direction. Just think about where the mass is suspended in a 360? And, think about how that weight will shift... the front wheels will get light, by nature. BTW, where'd you drive this car? I'd say for a fair comparison, it'd have to be on a track... nowhere else could you really formualte a definite opinion on either car, overall. The street is far too limiting, and slow.
Also, you've got a torque montster driving style; i.e., down low grunt in any gear, by my guess you weren't driving the 360 correctly (it's got 6 gears for a reason), and while you do have to keep the revs up v. a 550, I think after a couple hours of rowing through the gears you'd adjust.
Honestly, there's really no point to comparing the cars head on, if only the object in doing so is to point out how different and incompatable they are for comparison.
Styling is a subjective thing; you like blondes, I like brunettes, etc.

ELI (Titanium360)
Member
Username: Titanium360

Post Number: 559
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 12:12 pm:   

Dr. Ken, there is red 512M for sale at the Ferrari of Long Island last time i was there.
Kendall Kim (Kenny)
Member
Username: Kenny

Post Number: 441
Registered: 9-2001
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 12:10 pm:   

I think LWR is spreading viscious Propaganda, so the inherent value of 360's will plummet in the near future, thus enabling him to afford one at a more reasonable cost.. -)
RICK ROMERO (Tr90)
Junior Member
Username: Tr90

Post Number: 224
Registered: 4-2001
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 12:07 pm:   

Dave, no hard feelings.
Ron Thomas (Ronsupercar)
Member
Username: Ronsupercar

Post Number: 982
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 11:48 am:   

If the 550 is ugly, then give me an ugly car..

RICK ROMERO (Tr90)
Junior Member
Username: Tr90

Post Number: 223
Registered: 4-2001
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 11:47 am:   

Doc i apparently beat you to it!
Dave (Maranelloman)
Intermediate Member
Username: Maranelloman

Post Number: 2472
Registered: 1-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 11:47 am:   

Rick, those are my attempt to inject a little levity into what is nearly a religious war. That is why I added the :-) to my post. Sorry if you missed that clue. Plus, I have a 550, and do not like what I think are its beautiful good looks demeaned!!

Lighten up, man, please. Message boards are supposed to be fun.
Dr. Ken Lee (Kenster888)
Junior Member
Username: Kenster888

Post Number: 214
Registered: 4-2003
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 11:44 am:   

Dave, I save you some trouble and gave myself one of these :-)
Upload

Rick, Dave's just messing around :-) It's all cool.
RICK ROMERO (Tr90)
Junior Member
Username: Tr90

Post Number: 222
Registered: 4-2001
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 11:41 am:   

Dave, you sure can state your opinion but with a little class and not calling people ASSCLOWNS or profanity.
RICK ROMERO (Tr90)
Junior Member
Username: Tr90

Post Number: 221
Registered: 4-2001
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 11:38 am:   

Dr. ken, watch out here comes the ASSCLOWN comments!
Dave (Maranelloman)
Intermediate Member
Username: Maranelloman

Post Number: 2470
Registered: 1-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 11:38 am:   

Rick, what is your problem? i can't state my opinion? class act rick!
Dr. Ken Lee (Kenster888)
Junior Member
Username: Kenster888

Post Number: 213
Registered: 4-2003
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 11:35 am:   

The next Fcar on my list is a 512tr or 512M. I disagree that the 550 looks like a Toyota, it looks more like a MitsuBUSHI 3000GT (or whatever Dodge calls it)....Not that there is anything wrong with that. A 360 spider....now that's style! Just my opinion.
RICK ROMERO (Tr90)
Junior Member
Username: Tr90

Post Number: 220
Registered: 4-2001
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 11:34 am:   

Dave, what is your problem? i can't state my opinion? class act dave!

Mitch, if you think that 360 is ugly compared to 355 then that's fine. it is all personal taste.
JRV (Jrvall)
Intermediate Member
Username: Jrvall

Post Number: 2150
Registered: 11-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 11:28 am:   

>>Why buy a 360 when you can get a 550 or a F512M that is faster? (ask Mark Moon, he has both) Why buy either when you can get a Porsche turbo or lambo or even an F40? <<

Yea I know, I just don't get it either. But as long as a 360 is under warranty and can be flipped for the next new one under warranty leaving Ferrari to hold the repair bag it's just a matter of taste.

But once the electronics start breaking down, (which on Ferraris is only a matter of time {:-)}), the repair problems will start to dull the shine of Bling Bling.
Dave (Maranelloman)
Intermediate Member
Username: Maranelloman

Post Number: 2467
Registered: 1-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 11:22 am:   

For Rick Romero: :-)

Upload

Upload

Upload

Upload
arthur chambers (Art355)
Intermediate Member
Username: Art355

Post Number: 2308
Registered: 6-2001
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 11:17 am:   

LWR:

The difference in lap times at Thunderhill between the 550 and the 360 was about 10 seconds, with the 360 with the advantage. The 360 is indeed faster over the road, but you have to work it, to get the extra power. My Audi works better than a 360 for driving on the freeway, but the mission is different.

Your driving habits are probably different than someone who would want a 360, that's why some of us would want a 360 over a 550.

Art
Mitch Alsup (Mitch_alsup)
Member
Username: Mitch_alsup

Post Number: 938
Registered: 4-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 11:08 am:   

"simple, because 550 is ugly compared to a 360!"

And so is the 360 compared to the F355!
Fred (I Luv 4REs) (Iluv4res)
Member
Username: Iluv4res

Post Number: 458
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 10:31 am:   

I want a 360!!! Just because!!!!
RICK ROMERO (Tr90)
Junior Member
Username: Tr90

Post Number: 219
Registered: 4-2001
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 8:34 am:   

simple, because 550 is ugly compared to a 360!
will h (Willh)
Junior Member
Username: Willh

Post Number: 162
Registered: 3-2003
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 6:32 am:   

As others have said, the 360 offers a relatively nimble, darty. lighter weight feel that I prefer. I love the 550/575, but would own one for a different experience than I would own the 360. What I really want, I think, is a 512BBi, seems like it affords the sort of "visceral" experience I love.
Michael W. (Whimike)
New member
Username: Whimike

Post Number: 9
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 3:14 am:   

LWR:

Because your driving style is based on the 550, which has a 12-cylinder torque monster engine, you get much of your power at the low revs and you learn to drive it that way. with the 360 engine you learn all of the power is above 4500 RPM and if you want to be fast you always keep it up there. If you are at 3000 rpm in both cars and floor it, the 550 would eat the 360. However, keep the engines at 5000 rpm and floor it and see which comes out ahead. They both have a completely different driving style.

As far as handling, I can't imagine the 550 is anywhere close to the 360. The 360 has less weight on its side and also the inherently better design of a mid-engine layout.

It all comes down to personal preference. I had a '91 BMW M5 and this was the inline-6 BWM racing-derived engine. If somebody drove the car that didn't know what they were doing it was very slow, but if you knew to keep the RPM's above 5000 RPM it was very very fast.

-- Michael
MarkPDX (Markpdx)
Junior Member
Username: Markpdx

Post Number: 191
Registered: 4-2003
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 2:33 am:   

There are a number of cars that are faster and have better handling but, in my opinion, the 360 is the best looking car on the market today. The 550 Barchetta looks good but otherwise the Maranello holds no particular appeal to me. The Modena is definitely the car to go Boulevard pimpin in.
Norman (Storminnormin)
Junior Member
Username: Storminnormin

Post Number: 211
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 2:22 am:   

Different strokes for different folks, LWR. I owned a 550 for one year, and although the power was eyeball suckingly incredible, I did not find it very exciting to drive. I found it to be a superb, comfortable, powerful Grand Touring car, but it wasn't very exciting. My favourite Ferrari liason person let me drive a 360 about 3 months ago. I drove it several times before deciding to trade. Coming out of a 550 and jumping into a 360, my immediate initial impression was that the relatively poor low end power of the 360 (compared to the 550) made it feel kind of anemic. Then I learned how to drive the 360 properly, and OH MY GOD THAT THING IS SO MUCH FUN TO DRIVE!!! The 360 is lighter, more nimble, better balanced. I used to think what you thought: Why would anyone buy a 360 when you can get a newer 550 with much more power for the same or less money? Now I know. I think if you spent a bit more time in the 360 you would come to appreciate its attributes.
Jordan Witherspoon (Jordan747_400)
Intermediate Member
Username: Jordan747_400

Post Number: 1662
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 2:14 am:   

Omar said it best, its just taste. I like both equally.
Paul Loussia (Bumboola)
Junior Member
Username: Bumboola

Post Number: 144
Registered: 3-2003
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 2:06 am:   

Hmm, maybe this is why:


Upload


No offence meant to 550/575 owners, I love big Toyotas!
Omar (Auraraptor)
Member
Username: Auraraptor

Post Number: 848
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 1:52 am:   

Why buy a 550 when you can get a F512M that is faster? (ask Mark Moon, he has both) Why buy either when you can get a Porsche turbo or lambo?

Because of tastes. Some like the darty feel of the 360...some the brutal (but oh so amazing) ride of the F512M....some the feel of the 550..its taste!

Personally, in a heart beat I would take a F512M over either the 550/75 or 360!

Why do you want a power steering? A big roomy cabin? Who cares! I like 'living with it' as for me its part of the charm. WHen I want a relaxing ride, I'll take a Bimmer...when I want an experiance..i'll take a Ferrari.
LWR (Lwr)
New member
Username: Lwr

Post Number: 33
Registered: 12-2001
Posted on Thursday, August 07, 2003 - 1:43 am:   

OK... so I put in a deliberately contraversial subject line...

I had the opportunity to drive a 360 a few days ago... as a 550 owner, I was disappointed.

Much less power and low/mid range grunt than a 550. In the 360, had to keep the revs over 4000 to keep it on power.

Handling was not as neutral as the 550... I found it understeered, and had none of the 550's characteristic slight oversteer followed by a squatting of the rear end and abundance of rear end grip.

I also thought the cabin in the 550 was much nicer.

Not that the 360 was bad, just that I thought the 550 was much better.

So... why would most people prefer a 360 to a 550 and why can I buy a much newer 550 for equivilent 360 money?

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration