| Author |
Message |
Jason (Jason77)
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 28, 2001 - 1:09 pm: | |
Your right the body does need to be redesigned, but I still cannot fathom how a car that costs that much can loose that much value compared to an 88 ferrari and 88 lotus is only 20 grand cheaper.Both new cost about the same. |
William Hubbell (Countachxx)
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 28, 2001 - 12:55 pm: | |
I think the lotus twin turbo V8 came out around 96, nice car. Could use a redesign of the body soon though |
David Albright (Dalbright)
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 28, 2001 - 10:14 am: | |
Didn't Lotus start producing a V8 after those years? That may be a reason for the price difference. |
William Hubbell (Countachxx)
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 28, 2001 - 9:50 am: | |
Ferrari & Porsche r THE names in the european sportscar biz. Everybody else is an also ran.
Lotus is plagued by a long history of unreliable cheaply built cars, even though today's Lotus may be more reliable & not deserving of this |
Jason (Jason77)
| | Posted on Wednesday, February 28, 2001 - 7:37 am: | |
I am very curious to know why the prices of Lotus s4 years 94 and 95 are about the same price as a late 80's ferrari 328/mondial.The two cars are about the same in price, but the lotus seems to loose loose 45,000 of its value in 6 years.Is this a comparison of how much better one of those two ferraris are. |