I hit the pistons! ^$#** Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

FerrariChat.com » Technical Q&A Archives » Archive through August 05, 2003 » I hit the pistons! ^$#** « Previous Next »

Author Message
myles kleinfelter (Gonzo350)
Junior Member
Username: Gonzo350

Post Number: 54
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Saturday, August 09, 2003 - 2:13 pm:   

OK....just got my gasket kit for Superperformance (great service!) does anyone know if the valves seals in that kit are good and worth using...or should I go with the 85 BMW M5 seals?
Jack Habits (Ferraristuff)
Member
Username: Ferraristuff

Post Number: 904
Registered: 4-2003
Posted on Monday, August 04, 2003 - 2:56 am:   

Judging by the condition of the piston in your picture, it looks like there is already deposit on the damaged areas which woul dindicate an older dame. It doesn't look like a piston that was "freshly hit".

Jack
myles kleinfelter (Gonzo350)
Junior Member
Username: Gonzo350

Post Number: 53
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Monday, August 04, 2003 - 1:54 am:   

I guess I should clarify that.....I did not completely loose oil pressure. I had lower than normal readings. As to how low....my memory has faded...this is over two years ago. But i do recall it scared me into shutting the motor down.
Joe Craven (Rscapri2600)
New member
Username: Rscapri2600

Post Number: 21
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Monday, August 04, 2003 - 12:36 am:   

OK, perhaps the knocking noise you heard was the one bent intake valve. How did it get bent?

What worries me more is that you reported that your motor lost oil pressure. Something caused it - I wonder what? Could it be coincidence that your pressure sender failed at this exact moment.

85 Mondial QV
myles kleinfelter (Gonzo350)
Junior Member
Username: Gonzo350

Post Number: 52
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Sunday, August 03, 2003 - 10:11 pm:   

Pulled the pistons out this evening and I'm very happy to report all on the bottom end looks fine. There is no vissible wear on the cylinder walls and all bearings look normal for having 81K on them. Is there anything I should be aware of before taking the block to the machine shop to be cleaned? Thanks everyone for all the help through this project!
rob guess (Beast)
Junior Member
Username: Beast

Post Number: 135
Registered: 5-2003
Posted on Sunday, August 03, 2003 - 9:45 am:   

Myles;

I know what you are feeling. At the age of 26 i was rebuilding the engine in my former bosses 308QV

Have you found anything in the bottom end yet???

Rob
rob guess (Beast)
Junior Member
Username: Beast

Post Number: 134
Registered: 5-2003
Posted on Sunday, August 03, 2003 - 9:43 am:   

Mitchell;

There is the potential for a couple of problems with the method that you stated.

1. If the spring is starting to lose its tension it will continue to get weaker durring opreation.

2. If the spring is shimmed to much it can coil bind durring operation, fracturing the spring and allowing the valve to drop into the motor.

The shimming process i am talking about is the shim used to adjust the valve clearance to allow for thermal expansion durring operation. the shims are avaliable in a certain size range as the seats wear , stems streach, and valve faces wear the clearances get tighter. durring the seat cutting process material is removed from the seat to clean up the surface. If to much metal is removed then you can no longer get the proper valve clearance because there is not a thin enough shim avaliable. At this point the seats have to be replaced.

This very point i stress to my students.

1. Measure everything twice before it is sent to the machine shop.

2. Measure everything again twice once it comes back from the Machine shop.

3. if anything is wrong send it back now. If you put the part into service and it fails due to incorrect work at the Machine shop, It is your fault not the machine shops since you are also the quality control inspector for the rebuild.

Rob


myles kleinfelter (Gonzo350)
Junior Member
Username: Gonzo350

Post Number: 51
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Sunday, August 03, 2003 - 12:54 am:   

I cant believe at the age of 30 I'm rebuilding a Ferrari motor!Upload
Mitchell Le (Yelcab1)
Member
Username: Yelcab1

Post Number: 616
Registered: 11-2001
Posted on Sunday, August 03, 2003 - 12:51 am:   

Rob

The machine shop I used had this spring force measuring gauge. It tells how much force was used to compress the spring to a certain range. The force / spring lengths specs are in the book. If the spring is "weak," they use one of the shims at the bottom of the spring to bring it back within range. That would take 10 minutes to check all the spings.

Isn't that ... good enough? I suppose an absolute complete job would replace all the springs with new ones, but that would be an overkill.
Phil Hughes (Ferrarifixer)
New member
Username: Ferrarifixer

Post Number: 29
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Sunday, August 03, 2003 - 12:01 am:   

If you made your own tool for removing the nuts, be very careful when you refit the heads. it's very easy to get innacurate torque of the nuts as the tool can touch the head and feel tight before it really is, or a compound angle difference will amplify or reduce your true torque achievements from what you set the gauge to.

I'd practise and test several times on a dummy stud/nut arrangement where you can compare torques achieved from direct access with a socket to your access using your tool.

Very common to find under tightened QV/TR heads. Will damage if you overtighten them too....

When done properly, they don't need re-tightening. If you suspect the heads have already been removed once before, replace all the studs too. I reckon it's OK to re-use them once if you can be sure. If in doubt, change them.
Phil Hughes (Ferrarifixer)
New member
Username: Ferrarifixer

Post Number: 28
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Saturday, August 02, 2003 - 11:58 pm:   

If you made your own tool for removing the nuts, be very careful when you refit the heads. it's very easy to get innacurate torque of the nuts as the tool can touch the head and feel tight before it really is, or a compound angle difference will amplify or reduce your true torque achievements from what you set the gauge to.

I'd practise and test several times on a dummy stud/nut arrangement where you can compare torques achieved from direct access with a socket to your access using your tool.

Very common to find under tightened QV/TR heads. Will damage if you overtighten them too....

When done properly, they don't need re-tightening. If you suspect the heads have already been removed once before, replace all the studs too. I reckon it's OK to re-use them once if you can be sure. If in doubt, change them.
rob guess (Beast)
Junior Member
Username: Beast

Post Number: 133
Registered: 5-2003
Posted on Saturday, August 02, 2003 - 9:05 pm:   

Mitchell;

I would not count on it. For the shop to properly be able to do it they would need the head with the cams, shims, buckets Etc.

Rob
Mitchell Le (Yelcab1)
Member
Username: Yelcab1

Post Number: 615
Registered: 11-2001
Posted on Saturday, August 02, 2003 - 9:01 am:   

Hell

For a $500 valve job, I would expect the machine shop to measure the spring force and shim up everyone that is weak. This is standard practice, isn't it?
rob guess (Beast)
Junior Member
Username: Beast

Post Number: 131
Registered: 5-2003
Posted on Saturday, August 02, 2003 - 8:47 am:   

Myles;

Being that you only have one bent valve and you stated that all the pistons had impact marks on them i would be inclined to say that the marks are from a previous failure, not the one that you just had.

Did the Machine shop check the shim thickness and the free length and spring rate for the valve springs???? if your shim thickness is on the low side of there size range you may not be able to set the correct valve lash clearance upon reassembly. I would go and have all of these items checked before having any of the valve seats cut.

Rob
Mike Florio (Mike_in_nevada)
New member
Username: Mike_in_nevada

Post Number: 21
Registered: 6-2003
Posted on Friday, August 01, 2003 - 11:01 pm:   

Have you determined exactly what caused the valve/piston collison? I think I would be reticient to reinstall the heads until I knew the bottom end was OK too.
myles kleinfelter (Gonzo350)
New member
Username: Gonzo350

Post Number: 49
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Friday, August 01, 2003 - 10:39 pm:   

Well thats good to know...thanks for the tip on the QV head...haven't seen that before. Had to make my own wrench just like everyone else to get teh acorn nuts off....after that...heads came right off....no trouble what so ever.
Timothy Fulmer (Tf308)
New member
Username: Tf308

Post Number: 42
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Friday, August 01, 2003 - 10:13 pm:   

PS...How difficult was it to get your heads off?
Timothy Fulmer (Tf308)
New member
Username: Tf308

Post Number: 41
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Friday, August 01, 2003 - 10:12 pm:   

The QV heads never had sodium filled valves! It was only the two valve car...How long did you stress over this?
JohnR. (Rivee)
Member
Username: Rivee

Post Number: 252
Registered: 1-2002
Posted on Friday, August 01, 2003 - 8:33 pm:   

This is the Fcar page. http://www.sivalves.com/ocforeign_valvessp_fer.html
Paul Hill (348paul)
Member
Username: 348paul

Post Number: 350
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Friday, August 01, 2003 - 11:42 am:   

Simon,

http://www.sivalves.com/contactus.html

(Great day at Brands Hatch yesterday!)

Paul
Simon Campbell (Simonc)
Junior Member
Username: Simonc

Post Number: 123
Registered: 2-2002
Posted on Friday, August 01, 2003 - 11:33 am:   

Anyone have an email address for SI Valves or a phone number please
myles kleinfelter (Gonzo350)
New member
Username: Gonzo350

Post Number: 48
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Friday, August 01, 2003 - 7:19 am:   

Good news Good news! The machine shop called and said only had ONE bent intake valve and it was only barely bent! Seats were still in good condition and the guides looked great! Also another bonus....sombody has already replaced the sodium filled valves with SS ones. Both heads will be complete with 3 angle valve job for $500! Whew!
Keith Mahan (Gyrokeith)
New member
Username: Gyrokeith

Post Number: 32
Registered: 4-2003
Posted on Thursday, July 31, 2003 - 5:02 pm:   

I've had some experience with stainless steel valves and regular steel valves in "identical" vw engines. I found that the ss valves were made thinner and flowed better, great for hp. They only tended to hold seal about half as long as the regular type. Their sealing surface receded more/faster and they eroded more quickly.

Regular steel valves seem to be good for 150k plus miles in most engines. If you were only putting a on few thousand miles a year then ss is fine. I've just found then not to be reliable for high milage type engines.

I'm not a metalurgist so I don't realy know why this happens.. one would assume they harden the ss valves, too...

When I machine ss it seems to be more maleable but ss valves must be ground, indicating a hardening process..
JohnR. (Rivee)
Member
Username: Rivee

Post Number: 251
Registered: 1-2002
Posted on Wednesday, July 30, 2003 - 7:24 pm:   

Call SI valves. Their valves are Stainless Steel and are around $20-25/valve. Guides=$7.00
William Henderson (Billh)
Junior Member
Username: Billh

Post Number: 73
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Tuesday, July 29, 2003 - 9:12 am:   

just for sh*ts and giggles,

how much for TR valves and guides?
Jeff Howe (Ferrari_uk)
Member
Username: Ferrari_uk

Post Number: 452
Registered: 12-2002
Posted on Tuesday, July 29, 2003 - 5:35 am:   

I said they weren't cheap!
William Henderson (Billh)
Junior Member
Username: Billh

Post Number: 71
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Monday, July 28, 2003 - 2:02 pm:   

you could probably get custom valves made for less than that....

sheesh.
Mitchell Le (Yelcab1)
Member
Username: Yelcab1

Post Number: 607
Registered: 11-2001
Posted on Monday, July 28, 2003 - 1:26 pm:   

Quote:

Inlet #131198 $47.84
Exhaust #131199 $103.20

End of quote.

If the prices above are the same for QV, then that is $2416.64 for valves, 10% inport duty fees, and shipping, will get you to $2700 just for valves. Plus $320 for valve guides (32 at $10 each), that will be $3000.

My calculator works with a little fudging.
Tom Bakowsky (Tbakowsky)
Member
Username: Tbakowsky

Post Number: 491
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Monday, July 28, 2003 - 12:48 pm:   

I would check that piston with the damage very carefully. The ringland could be crushed. I would replace that piston and check all the rest. If all the rest are fine then clean them up and reuse them. You don't need to replace all the pistons. Yes replace the sodium filled exhaust valves with new valves form SIvalves. Might aswell slam new guides and seals in there as well. Inspect everything very carefully. If nesassary send the whole bunch out and have it inspected by a good machine shop. They will have more experiance finding the problem, as they deal with this type of thing everyday.
William Henderson (Billh)
Junior Member
Username: Billh

Post Number: 70
Registered: 5-2002
Posted on Monday, July 28, 2003 - 12:23 pm:   

Ok, try this one on for size:

are the valves actually bent? I haven't read anything stating such. Is it a prior owners "valve to piston" encounter?

could your symptoms be related to something else?
Ken (Allyn)
Intermediate Member
Username: Allyn

Post Number: 1094
Registered: 10-2001
Posted on Monday, July 28, 2003 - 11:45 am:   

$3000 for valves (if true), plus labor, pistons, and everything else...hmmm if you do your own work it may make sense but if it goes to a shop you really just have a parts car.
Malcolm West (Ferrari_uk_tech)
New member
Username: Ferrari_uk_tech

Post Number: 2
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Monday, July 28, 2003 - 11:35 am:   

Myles - At 81,000 miles I would replace all the valves and pistons, check the valve guides as well, I would expect you to find excessive wear there. The camshaft must have locked in order to have caused the damage as shown in your pictures, check the journals carefully. Also as the valves have hit the pistons with some force I would recommend that you check the four con-rods just in case they are bent.
Good Luck
John Millard (Jmillard308)
New member
Username: Jmillard308

Post Number: 43
Registered: 5-2003
Posted on Monday, July 28, 2003 - 11:22 am:   

Mitchell - we obviously have different calculators:-)
Mitchell Le (Yelcab1)
Member
Username: Yelcab1

Post Number: 606
Registered: 11-2001
Posted on Monday, July 28, 2003 - 11:04 am:   

Jeff at Ferr UK just responded to the 328 valves... over $40 intake, over $100 exhaust. At those prices, $3000 for 32 valves, I would make sure the valves are toast before replacing them.
John Millard (Jmillard308)
New member
Username: Jmillard308

Post Number: 42
Registered: 5-2003
Posted on Monday, July 28, 2003 - 10:23 am:   

My opinion - replace all valves - particularly if exhaust valves are still OE sodium. At 80K I'd do pistons too - and whatever else was needed (or looking a bit suss) while the engine is in bits
JohnR. (Rivee)
Junior Member
Username: Rivee

Post Number: 250
Registered: 1-2002
Posted on Monday, July 28, 2003 - 10:13 am:   

Miles, check with T Rutlands for a rebuilt short block. I bought one for $4,700.00 (short block only) with exchange for your block. Also SI Industries for valves.
JohnR. (Rivee)
Junior Member
Username: Rivee

Post Number: 249
Registered: 1-2002
Posted on Monday, July 28, 2003 - 10:10 am:   

wITH THE LOSS OF OIL PRESSURE IT SOUNDS TO ME LIKE YOU SPUN A ROD BEARING
Mitchell Le (Yelcab1)
Member
Username: Yelcab1

Post Number: 603
Registered: 11-2001
Posted on Monday, July 28, 2003 - 9:58 am:   

No need to replace all 32 valves, but you will need the machine shop (who does your valve job) to check the valves for you. They will check to see if the valves have excessive run-out, have enough material for a grinding, and if not, they will tell you to get replacement for that valve. So, you just do not know how many to buy until they inspect them all. Ferrari valves are not cheap so I would not just go out and drop $1000 for all 32 valves unless there is a good reason to.

I would not know about the pistons, but my guess is it can be repaired. Although, at 80,000 miles and 20 years old, you could conceivably change them without feeling too guilty. They are expensive though, aren't they.

Maybe someone at Ferrari UK will take pity on you and offer you a big discount with the stock they have. Jeff?
myles kleinfelter (Gonzo350)
New member
Username: Gonzo350

Post Number: 47
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Monday, July 28, 2003 - 7:09 am:   

All four cams rotate freely and nothing has been sheared. Thank god the motor was shut down right away. Heads are off, however I dont have the cams out yet so I can not state what the journal surfaces look like. The motor will be torn down to the bare block and completely rebuilt. So what I am asking is....can the pistons be reused if they are filed and repaired, and do I need to replace all 32 valves or can I replace just the bent intake valves? Heads are going to the machine shop this week so I will keep everyone updated as to what I find there. Thanks for all the input!
Joe Craven (Rscapri2600)
New member
Username: Rscapri2600

Post Number: 13
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 10:55 pm:   

I think Verell's guess may have started the damage. It could have been a loose rod cap or perhaps just a rod bearing getting pounded out. the piston was allowed to move further up the bore, striking 2 valves which caused the cam locating mechanism to fail.

The valves that touched the pistons are bent and will need to be replaced.
The pistons might be salvageable if the damage isn't too bad. One can polish the piston to remove the sharp edges. However, I suspect that this motor suffered significant damage and the cost of new pistons will be relatively small part of the total rebuild cost.

85 Mondial QV
Henryk (Henryk)
Member
Username: Henryk

Post Number: 989
Registered: 8-2001
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 10:50 pm:   

Rob: It seems we both agree that the problem was with the cam rotating at a different speed then the cam gear. However, he did state no oil pressure accured first....this could have helped to freeze the cam.......then the key let go......then the problem. Hence it would appear that there may be a problem with the oil pump, as the initial cause. The reason I asked where the oil sending unit was, because......if it is in the involved head, then the problem could be the cam going first, for whatever reason, and causing a no oil pressure reading. If the sending unit is elsewhere, then the problem was primarily a loss of oil pressure that caused the cam to start seizing...thus, a bad oil pump.
rob guess (Beast)
Junior Member
Username: Beast

Post Number: 122
Registered: 5-2003
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 10:22 pm:   

Henry;

I would be more inclined to think that the key that keeps the cam in alingment with the pulley had either sheared or got hammered by a loose pulley bolt than the cam siezing up.

Myles;

More pictures please as you get deeper into the engine.

Rob
Henryk (Henryk)
Member
Username: Henryk

Post Number: 986
Registered: 8-2001
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 10:08 pm:   

The cam actually had to be "partially" frozen, since all 4 pistons where involved.

Since it happened at idle, and the engine was shut down, would explain why no further damage was done, such as the exhaust valves hitting, or the other side going.

Is the oil pressure sender by the affected side of the engine?

I love a Ferrari mystery!!!!!!1
rob guess (Beast)
Junior Member
Username: Beast

Post Number: 121
Registered: 5-2003
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 10:02 pm:   

Myles;

Definatly go through the entire motor leaving no stone unturned. The worse thing you can do at this point is start replacing parts without finding the true cause of the failure, doing so will just result another failure. I would go through the entire motor and measure everything.

I would have to agree with HenryK that the most probable cause would be something to do with the intake cam on the failed bank. But again do not stop searching once you found what may have been the smoking gun, The true cause may be another component that failed causing the damage to the other part.

Rob
Henryk (Henryk)
Member
Username: Henryk

Post Number: 985
Registered: 8-2001
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 9:09 pm:   

Loss of oil pressure could have "frozen" the cam in place, while the cam gear continued to turn.

Again, just a shot in the dark.
Henryk (Henryk)
Member
Username: Henryk

Post Number: 984
Registered: 8-2001
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 9:07 pm:   

Before you decide how to rebuild the motor, I would think it imperative to find the reason behind the disaster first!!!!!!!!

Let's see: All 4 intake valves hit the pistons, only on one side; timing marks are dead on; knocking sound before disaster.......it appears to me that the knocking sound was that of the pistons hitting the valves, as they bent. With the timing dead on, then the cam must have broken loose off the cam gear. The cam had to be in a position to let the valves hit the pistons, therefore, with timing on, the cam had to be in a differennt position than the cam gear. The reason the exhaust valves weren't hitting the pistons, is that maybe there is a larger relief in the pistons for them. What do you think?

Just my 2 cents worth!!!!!!!!
Jeremy Lawrence (F512m)
Junior Member
Username: F512m

Post Number: 160
Registered: 1-2002
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 8:51 pm:   

At 81K miles I would do both sides while you have the engine out. Yes it will be more expensive, but, you will probably have another 80k miles, or more, before you will have to do that kind of work again.
Verell Boaen (Verell)
Intermediate Member
Username: Verell

Post Number: 1005
Registered: 5-2001
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 8:44 pm:   

Since this is a street car, I'm not so sure the pistons have to be replaced. The pistons will certainly need some repair. I suspect that the valve dings could be welded up & then the piston re-faced for significantly less than new pistons.
I'd certainly discuss it with experts tho.

This is speculation as I haven't had to deal with this class of problem before(knock on wood). However, I've heard of it being done on motorcycles & 'pistons is pistons'.

The real question is how did your valves come to ding the piston(s?) (If more than 1 piston, how many tapped valves? & which pistons were they? )

It takes being off more than 1 tooth to get piston-valve interference. I believe it takes being off at least 3 teeth, but haven't used the cam profile to work out the numbers.

I suspect a clue to the answer lies in the loss of oil pressure. A piston tapping a valve will not affect oil pressure. My bet is on a con rod cap coming off or a con rod breaking along a bearing surface & letting the oil bleed out.
myles kleinfelter (Gonzo350)
New member
Username: Gonzo350

Post Number: 46
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 8:03 pm:   

Not much to tell....car was fine one day....knocking the next morning with a loss of oil pressure and here we are all of this happened at idle. Got the 2nd head off and there is no apparent damage...so only one side hit...and it was only the intake valves on that side. So....is it possible to get away with just replacing 4 pistons and 8 intake valves? What do you guys think? 81,000 miles.
Henryk (Henryk)
Member
Username: Henryk

Post Number: 983
Registered: 8-2001
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 5:39 pm:   

Myles: Where you just driving along and then.....BANG? Did you run the revs up; engine cold; etc.? Could you shed some more light on what you where doing when this happened.......and what you heard, felt, at the time?

This would be of interest to all.
myles kleinfelter (Gonzo350)
New member
Username: Gonzo350

Post Number: 45
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 4:57 pm:   

haven't gotten to the bottom end yet....just now getting the heads off.
Mark Collins (Markcollins)
Member
Username: Markcollins

Post Number: 303
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 4:42 pm:   

Myles

Has the conrod let go or the conrod bolts stretched? it's got to be that or a timing problem, maybe the belt has jumped and managed to finf it's way back into the right place, either way you need to check the bottom end.

With the likely rebuild costs have you considered looking for a used replacement
Philip Airey (Pma1010)
Member
Username: Pma1010

Post Number: 324
Registered: 7-2002
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 4:07 pm:   

Myles
Others are more qualified than me to answer this, but from what I know I think the answer to replacing pistons is "yes". As I understand it, any nick or scratch is going to the locus for any detonation effects (potentially leading to a hole in the piston).

I expect there are specifications on the values, the amount they are out of round, seat conditions etc that can guide you on replacement. Given that it is an expensive job to pull it all apart, and you'll be investing in some expensive hardware already (pistons), it would seem prudent to go the extra mile and do the valves.

Good luck
myles kleinfelter (Gonzo350)
New member
Username: Gonzo350

Post Number: 44
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 3:52 pm:   

well thats a bit of a curious question...obviously you'd think the timing belt jumped a tooth.....and it did have 20,000 miles on it. However all the timing marks were dead on. Your guess is as good as mine. 1984 308 qv...81,000 miles
Mr. Doody (Doody)
Intermediate Member
Username: Doody

Post Number: 1479
Registered: 11-2001
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 3:48 pm:   

no help from me, unfortunately. but i am curious - how did this happen?

doody.
myles kleinfelter (Gonzo350)
New member
Username: Gonzo350

Post Number: 43
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 3:36 pm:   

Upload
myles kleinfelter (Gonzo350)
New member
Username: Gonzo350

Post Number: 42
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 3:35 pm:   

try this again!
myles kleinfelter (Gonzo350)
New member
Username: Gonzo350

Post Number: 41
Registered: 8-2002
Posted on Sunday, July 27, 2003 - 3:32 pm:   

popjpeg{289042,Upload}
Well its official...the valves hit the pistons. Looking for opinions here....should I replace the pistons or are they ok with their newly found valve reliefs? If I replace them...who has had good luck with aftermarket manufacturers? What are costs....comp ratio's etc. This is a street driven car so I would want to keep comp ratios under 10.5. Should I replace the exhaust valves while I'm at it...they appear to be untouched? Just looking for thoughts here...thanks all!

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration