NADA says countach worth Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

FerrariChat.com » Other Italian » NADA says countach worth « Previous Next »

Author Message
Dan Gordon (Ferruccio)
Junior Member
Username: Ferruccio

Post Number: 82
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Sunday, August 17, 2003 - 12:17 am:   

Thanks Ralph!!!!!!!!!
Ralph Koslin (Ralfabco)
Member
Username: Ralfabco

Post Number: 668
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Saturday, August 16, 2003 - 11:40 pm:   

DAN:

I Forgot your last question:

Yes the alternator burned out.

NOTE: I am NOT speaking for JRV.

JRV explained to me that an alternator
has to constantly bust its ass to try
and recharge the battery when you have
a garage queen that is not driven regularly.

There are alternative methods available to
keep the battery happy when you are not
going to drive the car every day. You can
install a device to keep the battery well
charged. This will prevent the ALT from
working very hard all the time.

Also I had to have the AC serviced. The
original owner who I purchased the car from
lived in The Bay Area. I looked at the car
around midnite in March. I froze while I
was in his garage. Needless to say I forgot
to check the AC. It was blowing strong when
I got the car home. It was not cold. It had
alot of residue in some of the fittings from
lack of use. The car was recommended to
me from the Sales Mgr at Al Burtoni.

I have heard that they are reliable cars.
I have also heard that some people have had
problems with the cars. Every car is different. It is a hand made auto.

NOTE: I "assume" that Lamborghini from time
to time changed different suppliers for parts
on the car. This perhaps brought about a
different story for different cars ?? I am
not positive on this. I do know that if you
line up ten of the same models of Lamborghini's
you will find each car has some significant differences after you have taken them apart.

ie.... One car might have ATE brakes, and
the earlier car may have Girling. All of
this may help explain "perhaps" why some have
had better luck than others ????? It is
not like GM where you have 30,000 cars that
are basically the same from the beginning to
the end. Each car will almost be different
in some way or another. For sure when it
comes from year to year.

I just found out that the inside of the dash
on the 88 is different from the 89. Interesting
how they would change the inside of the dash
while they knew that the C/T line was going to
close very soon. The outside of the dash is
similar from 88 to 89. I hope that I am not boring you all. Thanks Omar.
Omar (Auraraptor)
Member
Username: Auraraptor

Post Number: 880
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Saturday, August 16, 2003 - 9:53 pm:   

Ralph. thanks for the input, your reflections and experiances are invaluable.
Ralph Koslin (Ralfabco)
Member
Username: Ralfabco

Post Number: 666
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Saturday, August 16, 2003 - 7:14 pm:   

I cannot compare the car to a Ferrari.
The main competitor of the C/T QV was
obviously the TR. Realize that they
made alot of TR's. Each car has some
inherent issues. Do your research
here. Alot has to do with personal
preference.

The TR has belts and the C/T has the
clutch. These are the main normal
maintainance issues with the car.

I will not complain about anyones ride.
I like TR's also. Lots of torque and
power. I have only been in a TR and
512 TR one time. I do not have significant
time in each car. 512TR should be compared
to the Diabolo. Do not purchase the first
car you run into. Spend alot of time with
research and study the market.
Ralph Koslin (Ralfabco)
Member
Username: Ralfabco

Post Number: 665
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Saturday, August 16, 2003 - 7:08 pm:   

Dan:

The car's main problem is the clutch. Allan
has had good luck with his clutch when he had
the car. Do not do stupid burn-outs and your
clutch will last. The car will rock after you
start rolling. All Italian cars are not drag
racers.

My car has 9,600 kilometers with the original
clutch. The clutch really grabs and feels
like it has plenty of life. Purchase a motorcycle for the burning acceleration.

Look for books, tools, service records ( NO GAPS ), low # of owners, was the owner a car enthusiast ?, originality, compression test,
PPI ~ from someone who knows the cars, etc...

The good thing is that the car has probably
been sorted out by now; if it has been kept
for quite awhile. They offer alot of
performance for the money.

Good Luck.
Dan Gordon (Ferruccio)
Junior Member
Username: Ferruccio

Post Number: 80
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Saturday, August 16, 2003 - 1:36 am:   

Ralph,
I know you just bought your countach. But has anything gone wrong with it yet?

Do you have any advice in buying the car(what to look out for Clutch, etc.)?

Can you compare the car to any other exotics like some Ferraris?

Thanks
Ralph Koslin (Ralfabco)
Member
Username: Ralfabco

Post Number: 659
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 14, 2003 - 8:33 am:   

OMAR:

I have never been in any Lotus.
I heard they handle very good.
Omar (Auraraptor)
Member
Username: Auraraptor

Post Number: 873
Registered: 9-2002
Posted on Thursday, August 14, 2003 - 1:47 am:   

Ralph, is front visibility worse than a 87+ Esprit?
adrian low (Audionut)
Member
Username: Audionut

Post Number: 339
Registered: 4-2003
Posted on Wednesday, August 13, 2003 - 8:44 pm:   

Well put Ralph. Your last line sums it up perfectly. Wish I had one.
Dan Gordon (Ferruccio)
Junior Member
Username: Ferruccio

Post Number: 76
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Tuesday, August 12, 2003 - 11:58 pm:   

Ralph,
Thanks for the Info!!
Ralph Koslin (Ralfabco)
Member
Username: Ralfabco

Post Number: 655
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Tuesday, August 12, 2003 - 5:38 pm:   

Dan:

Greetings. Like everyone else, most people are
happy with what they have. I am happy with the
C/T. Most people claim that the 4 valve car is
the one with "far" more performance. An owner of
a two valve car claimed that his was like a row boat compared to a 4 valve. I have never driven
a two valve car. I have no way of evaluating the
two. Most people recommend finding a 4 valve car.
Parts are harder to find on the earlier cars.

I do not have enough time with the car to tell you about reliability. Everyone has different
stories. I have heard both good and bad stories.
This is not limited to just the C/T.

Visibility is poor. There is a bad blind spot.
That is just one thing you will have to live with.
Frontal vision is fine. There is a dash glare
on occasions. You will learn to get used to the
"blind spot." Simply just pass up a car and
turn into the lane when you see the front end
in the rear view mirror. You could also install
a small camera if that helps you. You can
also use it to spy on your maid when you are not driving. This way you can be confident that your maid is not stealing your wives lingerie.

The car has an abundance of luxury on the inside. There is leather everywhere you look. Everything is hand stitched. They do not make cars like this anymore. Who needs a luxury car when they used to make cars like this ? The paint is decent. A modern entry level Lexus will have higher quality paint. Most Italian
cars are like this. They repainted some F 40's after they were delivered to the USA.

Unfortunately I feel you cannot leave a car like
this anywhere. It will only be a matter of time
before vandalism will occur. I feel that I will
need a car sitter; if I ever decide to park and
leave the car (especially at night). I know its
crazy but what are you going to do ? How long
until someone keys it ? 15K to paint the car !
A car sitter is cheaper. I am not into taking
the car and parking it on a Sat Night. A car sitter is the way to go. I was looking for a Sunday AM driver when I purchased it.

The car is not very difficult to shift. It
requires effort. It is not a workout in the
gym. The clutch is stiff. Again it is not the
end of the world. If you cannot make sacrifices
to some degree, look into a new Corvette. That
car is loaded with refinement. The clutch and
break petals are close together. You really need small shoes here. The C/T was designed in the very early 1970's !!!!!!! Ergonomics, driver comfort, and refinement were really not factored into design at the time. It DOES NOT have the refinement of new modern cars.

The tires on the car are terrific. It easily
comes out on top with all the other cars of the
era in this department. The car is like a go
cart in the turns. I suppose the brakes are
typical of the period. Fair-by todays standard,
with no place on the track.

Ingress and egress is difficult. It is a pleasure to go in and out though. It is not your daily driver correct ? The doors are enjoyable. Years ahead on styling and function. The car is a thrill to drive and own. It is not a practicle car you can use very
often. It is a joy to own as a third car. They will never make a car like this again.


Kenny Herman (Kennyh)
Intermediate Member
Username: Kennyh

Post Number: 1151
Registered: 8-2001
Posted on Monday, August 11, 2003 - 10:33 pm:   

Taek-Ho, CountachXX (Will)'s 512tr has more then 40k miles on it (I believe) and I know that if his Lambo could stay out of the shop, it would have just as many. It's one badass car, there is no denying it. I just have never seen one that didn't have some kind of issues. Chances are you know much more then me, but having experience at various track events in the NE, everyone seems to have some kind of problem.

With that being said, I'd still love to own one in the not so distant future; I believe this car is the "ultimate" exotic car.
Taek-Ho Kwon (Stickanddice)
Intermediate Member
Username: Stickanddice

Post Number: 1944
Registered: 11-2002
Posted on Monday, August 11, 2003 - 10:24 pm:   

Kenny,

Having known some Countach owners I would have to say that is definitely not the norm. Also keep in mind having a good mechanic who can sort the problems well is crucial with any exotic.

Stay away from any 20 year old car that has 10k miles only too. That pretty much translates into a light restoration. All sorts of crap is going to have to be replaced. These cars are meant to be driven and when they're not, like any machine...they fall apart.

Cheers
Kenny Herman (Kennyh)
Intermediate Member
Username: Kennyh

Post Number: 1149
Registered: 8-2001
Posted on Monday, August 11, 2003 - 10:14 pm:   

Dan, one of the forum members who I spent most of last summer with had the worst trouble with his Countach, he said he invested over double the value of the car to get it running, yet it never has been 100%. On the way to the Poconos concourse last year the battery kept going. Imagine seeing a 512tr Ferrari jump a Countach on the side of the road! :-)
Dan Gordon (Ferruccio)
Junior Member
Username: Ferruccio

Post Number: 72
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Monday, August 11, 2003 - 8:37 pm:   

Ralph,
I can't help but notice that you have a Countach.
How do you like it?
How bad are the manintance costs?
Are the erogonomics as bad as the magazines say?
How reliable has it been?
Any other info would be helpfull
Ralph Koslin (Ralfabco)
Member
Username: Ralfabco

Post Number: 651
Registered: 3-2002
Posted on Monday, August 11, 2003 - 6:17 pm:   

Like "ANY" of these cars purchase the very best
one you can find. A bargain will hit you between the eyes a month or so down the road.

Sure there can be good buys out there. It does
happen some times. I originally started looking
for a bargain. I realized real soon that it
would probably take forever to find one.

Typical situation:

Pay 10K more at the top of the market prices
for a low mile car with documented services
and few owners.

~or~

Save the 10K or around that amount, and purchase a car with many owners and no documentation of any services. The owner will probably not know
what if anything was done to the car.

Choose where you want to be.

Countach 4 Valve cars: Anywhere from 55K to as
hi as 90K asking price.

Two valve cars: I presume are a little lower.
Scott Levinsohn (Rennen)
New member
Username: Rennen

Post Number: 8
Registered: 7-2003
Posted on Monday, August 11, 2003 - 5:46 pm:   

I always found those guides to be a little lower than market value, at least asking prices.
Dan Gordon (Ferruccio)
Junior Member
Username: Ferruccio

Post Number: 71
Registered: 2-2003
Posted on Monday, August 11, 2003 - 4:28 pm:   

Nada says an 1987 Lamborghini countach is worth 55,000 does that sound right? I thought you could pic up a decent one for 65,000 but 55,000 seems low.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration