THE F70 (LaFerrari) Thread

[4re4ever]

little big and brighter than my preivous

[IntelligentOperator]

Originally Posted by 4re4ever

little big and brighter than my preivous

The front wants to fight you in your mirrors,

The back makes you a grimace going past.

[Cozmic_Kid]

Originally Posted by 4re4ever

I have played with the lighting and changed the hue (thats why its green) seems to show alot more now

It just show what we already see, in green.

[scirocco]

In an old interview Amedeo felisa told that the f70 will be 3 seconds faster than Enzo in 0-200.
2 sec it's probably whitout kers.
PS.sorry for english error

[maximilien]

wide vision.....

[arhimede]

Now i realize that the 288gto looks like a P4/5....the wheel arches, the side scoops....

[maximilien]

wide vision...

[ingegnere]

Originally Posted by Milanno

Most of discussion is related to F150 rear part, so I took some research on F150 Carbon Monocoque presentation from Ferrari and based on my observations I`ve made some adjustments. I discovered amazing curves under blurry shadows.

Photo in higher resolution: http://i46.tinypic.com/2cz1unc.jpg

Did you add the join line along the roof pillar and the sort of bevelled edge along the rear window?

[arhimede]

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/4479/enzo2movie.png

[ingegnere]

Originally Posted by Drive550PFB

To me, the rear shot -- which is very cool -- looks like it takes in the best elements of the Pagani and Napolis' car. I am surprised that Ferrari couldn't (or wouldn't) steer the car away from either of these designs. In their press release it will be very interesting to see their public comments. A proper respect for the designs that formed the groundwork for this car is in order and it does not diminish Ferrari's abilities one iota.

I bet they will pay respect to their founder, their racing heritage and their engineering more than they will acknowledge any designer's work.

And, in my opinion, that is sad. It is petty.

You've not seen the car, there's been no press release and you're calling Ferrari sad and petty? Am i missing something?

[amenasce]

Is there what seems to be a little wing at the back?

[Milanno]

Originally Posted by ingegnere

Did you add the join line along the roof pillar and the sort of bevelled edge along the rear window?

If I understood your question right, on that position was tiny line when I brightened original photo to max. Later, when I saw F150 monocoque I realized there is separation line that I hardly saw on original photo. So i pointed that part much more clearly on my photo with adjustments.

[Rezzell]

Originally Posted by Milanno

If I understood your question right, on that position was tiny line when I brightened original photo to max. Later, when I saw F150 monocoque I realized there is separation line that I hardly saw on original photo. So i pointed that part much more clearly on my photo with adjustments.

I might be wrong. But after I brighten it up, I think that part could be a wing or some kind of active aero.

[Traveller]

Originally Posted by Rezzell

I might be wrong. But after I brighten it up, I think that part could be a wing or some kind of active aero.

I think you may be right. Let's face, it to begin to get close to the P1 in downforce terms there are going to have to be some fancy active aero devices of some sort at the rear.

[Milanno]

Originally Posted by Rezzell

I might be wrong. But after I brighten it up, I think that part could be a wing or some kind of active aero.

I had thoughts about active aero thing/wing, but after reading latest issue of Ferrari Magazine and interview with Flavio Manzoni about F150, I realized that Ferrari have no plans to put any type of wing on their street legal cars. However, they are fine with wings in F1, which I completely understand from engineering point of view.

Take a look:

[Traveller]

Originally Posted by Milanno

I had thoughts about active aero thing/wing, but after reading latest issue of Ferrari Magazine and interview with Flavio Manzoni about F150, I realized that Ferrari have no plans to put any type of wing on their street legal cars. However, they are fine with wings in F1, which I completely understand from engineering point of view.

Take a look:

I don't expect a wing as such like the P1, but there may be some form of moveable lip to form part of an active aero package.

[Milanno]

Originally Posted by Traveller

I don't expect a wing as such like the P1, but there may be some form of moveable lip to form part of an active aero package.

I would say no for that too. Read article again

[IntelligentOperator]

Originally Posted by Traveller

I think you may be right. Let's face, it to begin to get close to the P1 in downforce terms there are going to have to be some fancy active aero devices of some sort at the rear.

599xx ears? I doubt it. Plus there should have been some hints on the mule's chassis where, although there is a protuberance on the right, it seemed more some kind of electronic analysis device.

[Traveller]

In which case just how are they going to develop the downforce without some major technological leap? Hopefully soon we will know the answer.

[IntelligentOperator]

Originally Posted by Traveller

In which case just how are they going to develop the downforce without some major technological leap? Hopefully soon we will know the answer.

Underbody fans as in 599xx. Downforce with no drag, wings or stupid drs. Hopefully...