R.I.P. F-14 Tomcat | FerrariChat

R.I.P. F-14 Tomcat

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by dmaxx3500, Apr 25, 2010.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. dmaxx3500

    dmaxx3500 Formula 3

    Jul 19, 2008
    1,027
    over on the F-14 forum , there are pics of the last 10 tomcats getting ready to be cut-up,,the best dam navy fighter




    R.I.P. Tomcats Forever
     
  2. LightGuy

    LightGuy Three Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Oct 4, 2004
    39,594
    Texas
    Full Name:
    David
    #2 LightGuy, Apr 25, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2010
    Absolutely moronic to end these aircraft.
    Meaning F-14, F- 15 and soon to be F-16 to pursue the F-35 et all money pit to fight a foe which no longer exists.
    The B-52 still flies to cover the same mission it was designed all these years later.
    Once terrorists exceed Mach one with stealth we need to upgrade. Know your enemy.
    All else is EGO and pocket lining.
     
  3. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    37,985
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    #3 tazandjan, Apr 25, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2010
    David- That is not why we replace aircraft. The F-14 was a third generation fighter, like the F-111s I flew, and its basic systems were becoming almost impossible to service at a reasonable cost. The aircraft had been shifted from a long-range interceptor to a PGM interdictor role as time went on. Now the aircraft is unsupportable affordably and the F/A-18E/F is assuming both its roles. We have learned a lot about aerodynamics since the day of the swing-wing F-111/Mig-23/27/Su-20/22/24/Tornado/F-14 and no longer need to sweep wings for aerodynamic efficiency at low and supersonic speeds.

    Ego and pocket lining are easy to say by someone who has never gone into combat against technically superior aircraft, as we have done in the past. We want an unfair advantage in any air combat scenario. Hopefully we can keep one in the future, despite the best efforts of Gates, Congress, and other short sighted groups and individuals.

    Incidentally, the B-52 does not still perform the same mission for which it was designed. It is now only survivable in a stand-off role against any adversary who has any surface to air capability.

    Taz
    Terry Phillips
     
  4. alexD

    alexD F1 Rookie

    Oct 1, 2006
    4,670
    sunnyvale
    Full Name:
    alex d
    The B-52 is a bomb truck that can only launch standoff weapons or fly into wide open airspace. Stealth planes are the ones that make it possible for flying trucks like the B-52 to do their job. The F-117 flew into the most heavily defended air space in the world in the opening night of the first gulf war without getting a single scratch, helping to make it possible for our F-18s et al to go in and do their work with as little risk as possible.

    Of course, the F-35 is still a disaster.
     
  5. Michiel

    Michiel Formula 3

    Apr 15, 2008
    1,968
    Amsterdam, NL
    Full Name:
    Michiel
  6. 2NA

    2NA F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner Professional Ferrari Technician

    Dec 29, 2006
    18,214
    Twin Cities
    Full Name:
    Tim Keseluk
    I recall reading that a reason the F-14 was taken out of service was to eliminate the possibility of Iran obtaining important spare parts for all the Tomcats we sold them decades ago.
     
  7. Blue@Heart

    Blue@Heart F1 Rookie

    Jun 20, 2006
    3,889
    Yellowknife, NWT
    Full Name:
    David
    Link please?
     
  8. darth550

    darth550 Six Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Jul 14, 2003
    60,788
    In front of you
    Full Name:
    BCHC
    F-14's are cool but the F-16 will always be the sexiest fighter to me.....
     
  9. Billy10mm

    Billy10mm Formula Junior

    Nov 11, 2003
    664
    Westchester
    Full Name:
    Billy Ng
  10. SilverF20C

    SilverF20C Formula 3

    Jun 22, 2004
    1,126
    Correct - only a handful I believe are being used for museum display but a good portion of those being cut up are out in AZ. One of the planes was out for display for a recent airshow and I think it'll be kept but the rest were going to the cutters. :/
     
  11. Bryanp

    Bryanp F1 Rookie

    Aug 13, 2002
    3,799
    Santa Fe, NM
    My father retired from the Navy in 1988; his last command was CO of the Ships Parts Control Center in Mechanicsburg, PA. Although the main purpose of SPCC was/is the primary computer inventory control point for every nut and bolt in the USN, the base still had thousands of acres of warehouse capability. One warehouse still had the F-14 parts paid for by the Shah and held there since '79. Don't know if they're still there or not. . . . .
     
  12. Michiel

    Michiel Formula 3

    Apr 15, 2008
    1,968
    Amsterdam, NL
    Full Name:
    Michiel
    #12 Michiel, Apr 27, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  13. HobbsTC

    HobbsTC Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 14, 2004
    1,469
    Lakeland, FL
    Full Name:
    Thomas
    I was at Davis-Monthan in Tucson last month and I saw them being cut up. Such a shame, however we also destroyed P-51s and F4Us in the past so its just the circle of life.
     
  14. ralfabco

    ralfabco Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Mar 1, 2002
    28,029
    Dixie
    Full Name:
    Itamar Ben-Gvir
    The F-14D is still a viable multi-role fighter. It is cost prohibitive, to maintain a small force, of a few F-14D squadrons. It has already been mentioned, that it is an expensive aircraft to maintain. In addition with any Navy combat aircraft, you have issues such as corrosion and fatigue from operating off, of the boat.
     
  15. LightGuy

    LightGuy Three Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Oct 4, 2004
    39,594
    Texas
    Full Name:
    David
    IMO Its a matter of priorities.
    In a perfect world yes we would have aircraft and systems that kick everyones but. And we do.
    The Defense budget is however limited so we have to look at where the real threats are.
    What gives us the biggest bang for the buck in present and realistically foreseeable foes.
    Who are our enemies ?
    Spend the money to defeat THEM not for replacing proven aircraft for some theoretical future situation.
     
  16. rydermike

    rydermike Formula Junior

    Mar 27, 2010
    416
    Spring Hill,FL
    Full Name:
    Mike Donohue
    While I wish they would at least keep them in places fr the public to see them , operationally it's real easy to see the cost savings. A Tomcat was taking about 60 hours maint , per 1 hour of flight compared with 18 on a F/A 18.
    I think they are the coolest , with the Phantom a close second.
     
  17. Whisky

    Whisky Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 27, 2006
    25,287
    Upper Great Plains
    Full Name:
    The original Fernando
    In my dreams, in my world I would have kept the B-58, but it was dropped QUICK when it simply was going to cost far too much to maintain.

    And anyone that had followed me here knows I have always had a love affair with the 'century series' fighters, along with a few others like the B-57, T-33, A-4, F-8U, and so on. I loved all those planes, luckily I got to see all of them fly, at least once or twice, at air shows in the late-60's and 70's.

    F-14?

    Hell, the F-4 was pretty damned good also, don't forget about that one!
     
  18. NORTY

    NORTY Formula Junior

    Aug 15, 2008
    502
    CARLSBAD, CA, USA,
    Full Name:
    NORTY
    Speaking of razorblades, what's the status of the SR-71 fleet? They still in Lancaster?
     
  19. dmaxx3500

    dmaxx3500 Formula 3

    Jul 19, 2008
    1,027
    go to F-14 tomcat association,great guys,iran still flys their F-14's
     
  20. jimangle

    jimangle F1 Rookie

    Nov 5, 2003
    2,501
    Haverford
    Full Name:
    James
    The F-4 had a glide ratio of a rock, and the fuel system simliar to a toilet reservior, limiting inverted flight, vertical climbs.

    The F-16 is built like a disposable aircraft. Really well engineered, minimalistic for airframe design, can take a lot of G's, but if it get'*****, it's done. Single engine isn't desirable for combat operations.

    The coolest fighter I have seen was the almost black looking Navy Blue XF-14 at Luke AFB. It made all the F-15's and 16's we had look like toys.

    Jim
     
  21. nathandarby67

    nathandarby67 F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Feb 1, 2005
    8,349
    Mississippi
    Full Name:
    Nathan
    #21 nathandarby67, Jun 17, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  22. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    37,985
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    David- You miss the big picture on aircraft buys. What continues to happen is we spend all the upfront money to develop a capability and then Congressional liberals and the administrations pick at and reduce the numbers of aircraft just as we are beginning to see the benefits of a production program. 132 B-2s becomes 22, 759 F-22s become less than 200, etc. So all the big RDT&E funds are spent and divided by a much smaller number of aircraft. The manufacturer has to charge more per aircraft because they and their suppliers never get to an efficient production rate. Those aircraft also become more expensive to operate because we are unable to take advantage of economies of scale on engines, spare parts, etc. It literally becomes almost a waste of money if the production run is hugely curtailed, as it has been for nearly all our late model combat aircraft. If we knew what was going to happen with the F-22, we would have probably been better off with another 600 F-15Es and 1000 F-16C/Ds, all of which could have been paid for with the money spent on the F-22.

    Your comments on prioity and current enemies parrots those of Gates, who I believe is shortsighted. The defense budget is the highest it has been since Viet-Nam in the late 60s and early 70s.


    Taz
    Terry phillips
     
  23. ralfabco

    ralfabco Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Mar 1, 2002
    28,029
    Dixie
    Full Name:
    Itamar Ben-Gvir
    Terry,

    Good point.

    Now the aircraft are falling apart, with no end in sight. The cost for mechanically upkeep, has gone up, as the aircraft become older. The procurement holiday from the Clinton years, is going to cost the USAF.

    The F-35 ? It will be delayed a few years, before IOC. It probably would have been better to buy the F-15SE, with add on stealth features, AESA radar, and zero hours on the airframe. At least open a bridge, until the F-35 appears in large numbers.
     
  24. Brian Elliston

    Brian Elliston F1 Rookie

    Oct 9, 2009
    2,770
    Clermont, FL
    Full Name:
    Brian Elliston
    RIP F-14

    I was lucky enough to teach an F-14 pilot to hang-glide. We became friends and he took me to the real simulator in Virginia Beach. I got an hour in the simulator. I landed it on my first try. :)
     
  25. ralfabco

    ralfabco Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Mar 1, 2002
    28,029
    Dixie
    Full Name:
    Itamar Ben-Gvir
    #25 ralfabco, Jul 5, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    The website that hosted the attached pic, claimed this is the end of the line. A pic of the last F-14D operational sortie, just before it shut down it's engines at NAS Pensacola. VF-213 Black Lions.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     

Share This Page