Double Bubble D8? | FerrariChat

Double Bubble D8?

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by Juan-Manuel Fantango, Sep 15, 2016.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Juan-Manuel Fantango

    Juan-Manuel Fantango F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 18, 2004
    12,470
    Full Name:
    Juan
    #1 Juan-Manuel Fantango, Sep 15, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Faster than the speed of SOUND: Nasa?s radical future plan for planes | Travel News | Travel | Daily Express

    This from the article

    The Virginia-based developers are confident the radical new design will be a fully fledged flight service by 2027.

    Fuel efficiency will be increased more than 50 per cent on the new planes compared to the best-in-class aircraft currently available.

    To put that in perspective, the D8 would use 2,095 gallons of fuel less than the most efficient planes in the air at the moment, on a flight from LA to New York (2,475 miles).

    The model was inspired by the Boeing 707 from 1958, which opened the door to world travel in the space of a day.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  2. Bisonte

    Bisonte F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Mar 27, 2007
    7,996
    Northern Virginia
    Full Name:
    Greg
    Hmmmm.

    Also, while the efficiency targets sound great, I'm not crazy about the idea of having both engines side-by-side, buried in the middle of the empannage.
     
  3. 360HB

    360HB Formula Junior
    Owner

    Sep 10, 2016
    345
    VMC would be managable though lol
     
  4. Bisonte

    Bisonte F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed

    Mar 27, 2007
    7,996
    Northern Virginia
    Full Name:
    Greg
    True that, as long as the failure wasn't catastrophic!
     
  5. solofast

    solofast Formula 3

    Oct 8, 2007
    1,773
    Indianapolis
    This isn't going supersonic at 528 mph....

    NASA is really good a throwing out "goals" and "concepts" and when you look closely at the assumptions they have often added things like "unobtainum" into the engines to get higher temperatures than are realistic, or are making the structure out of something that isn't real yet...

    I rather doubt that the capability to reduce fuel consumption by 50%, compared to what is flying today (787) is anywhere near achievable without injections of technology that would, if applied to current aircraft, bring big improvements to them too. Or they'll do other things like fly a lot higher (easy gains), but not realistic from a safety standpoint if you lost cabin pressure..

    The design and development of aircraft is a very competitive business. If it was that easy to get a 50% improvement in fuel efficiency AB or Boeing would have done it a long time ago.
     

Share This Page