New Engine/Gearbox Numbers Reassignment | FerrariChat

New Engine/Gearbox Numbers Reassignment

Discussion in 'Boxers/TR/M' started by 134282, Jan 4, 2015.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. 134282

    134282 Four Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Aug 3, 2002
    40,647
    California
    Full Name:
    Carbon McCoy
    #1 134282, Jan 4, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    It's my understanding that, after Ferrari stopped doing "matching numbers" that corresponded with serial numbers, engine numbers and assembly numbers and body numbers and gearbox numbers started over again each year ...for several years. In some cases, a separate set of engine/assembly/body/gearbox numbers were assigned to cars that were sent to different countries.

    Does anyone know when this numbering system stopped? This car was built in August, 1988, but both the engine and gearbox numbers are relatively high. I understand Ferrari made a lot of Testarossas, but still...
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  2. Steve Magnusson

    Steve Magnusson Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Jan 11, 2001
    25,135
    30°30'40" N 97°35'41" W (Texas)
    Full Name:
    Steve Magnusson
    No, after the numbers matching era, the engine SNs started over when a new engine family was introduced (not by year -- but maybe on the newer models they do that - I've no information). Also, I don't think that you can say more than a higher engine serial number in the sequence is made after a lower serial number in time -- i.e., it didn't just go 1, 2, 3... perfectly within in each engine family. My F113A040 engine (US model year 1991) has serial number 25188 so that 1988 F113A040 serial number looks reasonable IMO.
     
  3. 134282

    134282 Four Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Aug 3, 2002
    40,647
    California
    Full Name:
    Carbon McCoy
    Steve, just a few serial numbers after the car I posted, s/n 78444 (an F40) has engine number 12687. Also 78548, a 328 GTS, has engine number 14228, and 78549, a Testarossa, has engine number 14445. If the numbers weren't started over each year, what type of system were they using for engine numbers, assembly numbers, body numbers, and gearbox numbers?
     
  4. Steve Magnusson

    Steve Magnusson Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Jan 11, 2001
    25,135
    30°30'40" N 97°35'41" W (Texas)
    Full Name:
    Steve Magnusson
    Random? ;)

    There could even be other conventions that were in the food chain at other times - e.g., across some models, sequential for all model production from a single foundry, etc.. Without knowing the exact "rules" in place at any time (and the exceptions that they made), I'd still say the order of the SNs within any engine family should increase with time/year, but that's about it. You'll have to add another column to your excel file ;)
     
  5. 134282

    134282 Four Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Aug 3, 2002
    40,647
    California
    Full Name:
    Carbon McCoy
    I recently added another field when I learned about an internal factory engine quality assurance code - but I don't see any reasons to add any additional fields for the older cars; I already have a field for the engine types and numbers.

    I can see how Ferrari would do random stampings - but I don't believe that their numbering system was random at that time, and it's certainly not random now. Perhaps their order then wasn't the same as it is now, but I believe there was some order; it is that order I'm vying to discern.
     
  6. turbo-joe

    turbo-joe F1 Veteran

    Apr 6, 2008
    8,929
    southwest germany and thailand
    Full Name:
    romano schwabel
    could it be that the engine numbers continuous are raising for all engines, so it does not matter if a 12 cylinder or 8 cylinder engine is produced? every engine gets the own number so no number ( serial ) could be twice then?
    Only idea from me
     
  7. 134282

    134282 Four Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Aug 3, 2002
    40,647
    California
    Full Name:
    Carbon McCoy
    Romano, that's how it's done now with the engine and assembly numbers - although body numbers are still assigned by country (but body numbers are not visible anywhere on the current models). It was back then, when this car and others like it were built, that Ferrari had a different numbering system, and my goal is to discern the system used back then, because it wasn't sequential like it is now.
     
  8. evandaalen

    evandaalen Formula 3
    Consultant

    Feb 7, 2004
    2,394
    Deventer, NL
    Full Name:
    Edvar van Daalen
    Not sure if it helps Carbon, but this is what I posted on my TR website:

    "All Testarossa engines have a 5-digit engine number. Each engine type has its own numbering, always starting from the beginning (00001). All Testarossas with a serialnumber lower than s/n 75xxx, will have an enginenumber starting with "00" (so: 00xxx). Near s/n 75700, there is a ‘jump’ in the numbers and from that moment, all engine numbers will be like ‘1xxxx’ or even '2xxxx'. "
     
  9. Llenroc

    Llenroc F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Jun 9, 2004
    4,807
    Colorado
    Full Name:
    Vern
    #9 Llenroc, Jan 6, 2015
    Last edited: Jan 6, 2015
    Hey Carbon, I have some information that may help or make things worse based on my ability to organize what I have so bare with me this may get lengthy:).
    I will start with info I have on a few 512TRs;
    #91549, eng. no. ? , assm. no. 8511
    #91661, eng. no. 29093, assm. no. ?
    #91741, eng. no. 29173, assm. no. 8827
    The difference between the 2nd and 3rd serial nos. is 80 units also the same difference between the engine nos. = 80 units. Which would lead you to believe that all 512TRs would have "sequential" mating of Serial no. with engine no. So the engine no. for 91549 would be 28981?
    The opposite part of that theory is the assembly no. difference, between 8511 and 8827=316 this doesn't make sense the difference 91549 and 91741 is 192.
    Another problem with the assembly no. that I have found, the parts book on the 512 shows that the "testarossa" script is not on the engine cover after assembly no. 11516. This script is only on 1992 cars from what I can find in pictures of cars for sale, the last '92 serial no. I found was #93418 it has "testarossa" on the cover. The first '93 serial no. I have is #94073 it did not have the script on the engine cover. The problem being, difference between 8827 and 11516 is 2689, they only built 2261 512TRs from '91-'94.
    As was stated above the engine no. seems to change with the series of engines. I think this could be applied to the gear box also. My gearbox no. is 93, my car is an early 512TR(91741 above) I have verified copies of about 140 1992 512 serial nos. the earliest being #89738 relating my car to that number I could put my car around the 93rd built. If that were correct the gear box number could tell a person what car number they owned, i.e.; 1 thru 2261 who ever has no. 2261 on their gearbox has the last 512TR built?(might have to take in consideration the 512Ms since they are a similar unit). The parts book gives some clues on this, it uses gear box numbers to denote changes on later cars, i.e.; no. 1749 is mentioned for a change that occurred as are nos. 1102, 1135, 1512. Ferrari parts books are full of running change info using engine nos. and assembly nos. as reference points. This could a lot of help deciphering reasoning and use of numbers.
    An additional note as added information; I owned a 348SS, serial no. 94269, assm. no. 18405, engine no. 32135 this car was built in June of 1992. The engine no. is around the numbers used for the 512TRs built using the serial numbers in the 94… range.
    Sorry for the long post, I will stop here for now and read thru this to see if need to edit it. I have other info and thoughts but I'm tired of typing :D
     
  10. 134282

    134282 Four Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Aug 3, 2002
    40,647
    California
    Full Name:
    Carbon McCoy
    Edvar, yes, that actually does help to somewhat clarify the issue. Thank you!

    Hey, the assembly number and engine number on those first two cars were new to me - thank you! I already have the engine and assembly numbers on 91741 - but that's because you already sent it to me. :)

    I think the difference of 80 engine numbers (29093-29173) between 80 512 TRs (91661-91741) is, in this case, a stroke of luck. For example, 96180 and 96400 are both US-spec 512 TRs, and they're 220 numbers apart; they have engine numbers 33402 and 33619 respectively, and the engine numbers are 217 numbers apart (granted 96180 is a '92 and 96400 is a '93, but they were both built in '92). Okay, so not such a big difference. But 90910 and 90927 are both '92 US-spec 512 TRs that are 17 numbers apart; they have 28503 and 28576 respectively, and those engines are 73 numbers apart.

    Ferrari's numbering systems aren't even remotely as precise as other manufacturers' numbering systems, so it's too risky to simply guess that 91549 has engine number 28981; 91606 and 91661 (both '92 US cars) are 55 numbers apart, but their engine numbers (28914 and 29093 respectively) are 179 numbers apart.

    Now this is more like it - I'm much more accustomed to mismatched differences between groups of assembly numbers and groups of serial numbers.

    Like you mentioned with the gearboxes, this could due to the fact that some 512 TR parts were similar (or exactly the same) as what was used on F512 Ms. But, at the very least, it's another example of Ferrari inconsistency.

    As for the Testarossa badge being replaced by the 512 TR badge mid-512 production, it's a bit tough to discern now (as opposed to when the cars were new), because it's next to impossible to tell which cars left the factory with which badges, and which cars' badges were replaced or updated by the owners. For example, 91949 is a '92 512 that was built in late '91 - but there's no Testarossa badge on the rear deck lid. Now is this because 91949 might be a Canadian-spec car and not US-spec? I don't know; I don't even know, with certainty, if it was sold new as a CDN car (all North American-spec Ferraris have A VINs, so there's no part of the VIN itself that will reveal whether the car was built for the states or the cold white north above us). But then, moving right along, 92051, a '92 USA model also built in late '91, still has the Testarossa badge on the rear deck lid.

    You mean N 93, right? There should be an N that precedes the number. I don't know what the N represents, but I've never seen a 512 TR gearbox number that didn't begin with an N.

    Unfortunately, the idea of gearbox numbers being sequential is just as unreliable as sequential engine numbers. N 40 and N 49 go with 90871 and 90927 respectively; the boxes are only nine apart, while the cars themselves are 56 apart. Further muddying just the gearbox numbers, as well as gearbox numbers compared with serial numbers, are examples like this one: 92619 is an early '92 US 512 built in late '91 ...with gearbox N 5572. However, this might be because that particular gearbox is gearbox type F110 AB (the same gearbox type used on Testarossas), whereas the gearbox type on 512 TRs is 124859. Can a Testarossa gearbox be mated to a 512 TR? Maybe that's what happened with 92619. Unfortunately, I don't know.

    It's possible that, by that point, Ferrari changed over to an engine numbering system that was globally sequential. The assembly numbering system was already on the single globally sequential system by that point. SS 33/100 (94370) has engine number 31652; yours was 31/100 - a lower serial number (94269) with a higher engine number (32135). And 94397, a '92 RHD 512 TR has engine number 31646; 94470, a '92 RHD 348 ts, has engine 30992; 94482, a '92 RHD 512 TR, has engine 31948; and 94502, a '93 US-spec 348 SS (37/100) built in May, 1992, has engine 31812 (I could go on and on). I'm fairly certain that by this point, Ferrari was using a unified engine numbering system where every engine, irrespective of the model or the country to which the car was being delivered new, was sequentially stamped.

    Sorry for the late reply; please feel free to continue adding information. :)
     
  11. Newman

    Newman F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner Professional Ferrari Technician

    Dec 26, 2001
    14,155
    Canada
    Full Name:
    Newman
    Yes it can, Ive put an 88 and a 90 gearbox on a 512M engine, TR is the same of course.
     
  12. dgt

    dgt Formula 3
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Jan 14, 2011
    1,283
    Northeast, USA & Oz
    Full Name:
    Andrew
    Hi,
    I have some input on this...

    I don't think it's luck, the differences in engine number/VIN are relatable for the most part but I wouldn't expect it to be perfect as there 4-5 vehicle models and engine types being manufactured at the same time. There will always be issues where engines fail or they may have pulled a bunch of engines for warranty work etc.
    I look at Urbans' Ferrari S/N manual for info. The serial number is global across all models of Ferrari, holes in the sequence are either unallocated or unrecorded cars I guess.
    You referred to 80 512TRs but there are only around 14 512TR+TR in the S/N range 91661-91741 so I think you mean't 80 Ferraris.

    I own 91949, the badge on the engine lid was removed early in the life of the car along with some other minor changes for europe. It is a USA spec car that was originally delivered to Italy (a very early 512TR), then Switzerland, then exported to Canada 10 years ago and now in the USA (it took 22 years but it eventually made it!). I've researched the history with some kind help from Marcel.

    There are five 512TR plus five TR recorded between S/N 90871 to 90927 (see p415-416), so 10 cars difference and a difference of 9 in the gearbox sequence is pretty good. I think you now have your answer regarding the use of gearbox type in the early 512TR....
    There are also some unrecorded S/N in the book so there could be more 512TR or TR in this range (but probably unlikely).

    Agree.... and with respect to early 512TR I believe that;
    1. S/N and assembly numbers are global.
    2. Gearbox numbers are more or less sequential with TR+512TR production until the new gearbox arrived on the 512TR.
    3. Engine numbers are global except some very early 512TR which started with a very low number.
    4. Chassis numbers, which I don't see discussed are easy to find stamped on the chassis rail directly below the assembly number plate and are sequential I believe. These are more useful than the VIN IMHO.

    To verify a car, I think you can relate the S/N to the engine and assembly number sequence then look at the difference in the number of 512TR+TR in the S/N manual to get the chassis and gearbox number difference and extrapolate. At least this is what I've been doing and seems to work for the most part.
    In reality I looked at relatively few cars plus info I found here on fchat along with photos from cars for sale so could be wrong.
    Andrew
     
  13. dgt

    dgt Formula 3
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Jan 14, 2011
    1,283
    Northeast, USA & Oz
    Full Name:
    Andrew
    The chassis number I'm referring to here might be better called a frame number, there is also probably a different body number which might be found inside the door panels, for example.
    I'm not sure if these are supposed to be the same? (Carbon referred to a body number earlier)
     
  14. chabch

    chabch Formula 3

    Aug 15, 2010
    1,075
    France
    Full Name:
    Christophe
    Could there be gaps in the sequence for prototyping, crash tests, various country administrative validation, etc? Just a thought.

    One thing I know for sure Dir having experienced it when I moved to Europe and Ferrari inspected the car before giving me the paperwork for registration, the have kept track of all gearbox/chassis/etc. serial numbers, and the KNOW what chassis got what gearbox, etc. They verified my numbers and told me they ask matched the factory records. The technician even told be that they have "secret" numbers hidden here and there, very hard to reach, that allows them to make sure none of the main numbers were intentionally (fraud) modified.
     
  15. Newman

    Newman F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner Professional Ferrari Technician

    Dec 26, 2001
    14,155
    Canada
    Full Name:
    Newman
    The hidden numbers they may be referring to could be the matching numbers they stamp on the heads and valve covers because the covers are machined on the heads for the end seals. Also the block halves have sequence numbers that match the timing case number. None of the numbers correlate with the engine serial number but if all these numbers were recorded by ferrari (sounds like they are) then it would be next to impossible to duplicate.
     
  16. chabch

    chabch Formula 3

    Aug 15, 2010
    1,075
    France
    Full Name:
    Christophe
    Apologies for all the typos, I wrote this on my phone real quick. (corrected version in the quote above)
     
  17. evandaalen

    evandaalen Formula 3
    Consultant

    Feb 7, 2004
    2,394
    Deventer, NL
    Full Name:
    Edvar van Daalen
    Regarding the "testarossa" badge on top of the engine lid of the 512 TR: It was not replaced by a different badge, but it was simply removed. This change is documented in official publications and happened at assembly number 11516. So, it should be quite clear which cars originally had it or not.

    Regarding the last part about Canadian cars: in some cases, it CAN be seen by looking at the VIN.
    512 TR: ZFFLG40A for USA versions and ZFFLM40A for Canadian versions.
    Testarossa: ZFFSG17A for USA versions and ZFFSM17A for Canadian versions.

    (Early Testarossas made for the North American market had ZFFSA17A, so at that time probably no difference between USA and Canada regarding the VIN).
     

Share This Page