The Future of Bizjet Interiors? | FerrariChat

The Future of Bizjet Interiors?

Discussion in 'Creative Arts' started by tritone, May 26, 2014.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. tritone

    tritone F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 8, 2003
    6,883
    On the Rock
    Full Name:
    James
    #1 tritone, May 26, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Airbus ACJ319 Modular Interior - Business Insider

    Take that Jeff Kennedy!!! :)





    $7MM difference between fully custom interior and a 'factory custom interior', on an $80MM airplane….big deal! But at least you can be 'different' while still being just the same! Much safer that way….. Reminds me of when the client can't make the choice, so asks his secretary "which one do you think is best?"
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  2. lcworld

    lcworld Formula Junior

    Dec 25, 2013
    377
    Where r the seatbelts?
     
  3. CarbBoxer

    CarbBoxer Formula Junior

    Oct 7, 2008
    841
    Houston
    Full Name:
    PW
    the table has a Rubik's cube even i could solve.
     
  4. lcworld

    lcworld Formula Junior

    Dec 25, 2013
    377
    Perhaps... it's already solved.
     
  5. Jeff Kennedy

    Jeff Kennedy F1 Veteran
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Oct 16, 2007
    6,582
    Edwardsville, IL
    Full Name:
    Jeff Kennedy
    Modular = standardized. This is a long running argument within the VIP outfitting industry. Some of the discussion comes with a lot of marketing hype talking about what is already reality behind the scenes and other portions are trying to tell clients that they still get everything they want when they really won't.

    The real way to save money and time is to manufacture duplicate package simultaneously. Engineering and certification will go from 20%+ of an outfitting bill down to $150,000 for aircraft #2 if not changes. Fabricate a second or 3rd shipset of cabinetry while making #1 with change of wood veneer selection only then expect 15% savings. There will be incremental savings for the bought components. This is real savings but who, other than the NetJets type fractionals, is going to buy multiple identical aircraft?

    Modular deals like this one touted for the ACJ is mostly a PR stunt. It is cheap to have a designer sit in their area and do space planning floorplans and elevations. Want to get real then do all the detail engineering for each module an then each possible combination of modules. Tell the senior management of the outfitting facility that most of their engineering group (mechanical, systems, electrical and certification) will be working a fictional project for the next year. Going through this process also means locking in vendor component selections while the market will be evolving. Done correctly this will also entail working certification issues for both EASA and FAA variations.

    More than anything else this tactic is about getting a prospective client to give the facility an audience. By the time the meeting is over the project will not be within the standardization program beyond a couple of elements are "normal" to any outfitting by anyone.

    The motivation for this class of aircraft is to be able to tailor the space to one's own desires. The amount of space also allows for far more aesthetic treatment selections which in turn means a lot more variations of detail engineering resolutions.
     

Share This Page