"Formula 1 needs equalisation moves says Red Bull's Christian Horner" | FerrariChat

"Formula 1 needs equalisation moves says Red Bull's Christian Horner"

Discussion in 'F1' started by Serie1926, Mar 15, 2015.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. greyboxer

    greyboxer F1 World Champ

    Dec 8, 2004
    12,313
    South East
    Full Name:
    Jimmie
    I think Wolff's response was correct

    "If you come into Formula One, try to beat each other and perform at the highest level and then you need equalisation after the first race - you cry out after the first race - that's not how we've done things in the past," he said. "I think just get your f***ing head down, work hard and try to sort it out. I didn't mean the F-word in relation to him [Horner]," he clarified.
     
  2. ARTNNYC

    ARTNNYC F1 Rookie
    Owner

    Jul 8, 2005
    3,767
    NYC, FL
    Full Name:
    Jerome
    Horner is a cry baby. What about Red Bulls multiple year domination?
     
  3. NJB13

    NJB13 Formula 3

    Jan 5, 2013
    1,317
    Pampanga,Philippines
    Full Name:
    Norm
    It was somewhat different. There wasn't legislation preventing the other teams from catching up to Red Bull during their years of dominance, likewise for Ferrari.
     
  4. subirg

    subirg F1 Rookie

    Dec 19, 2003
    4,198
    Cheshire
    Equalisation has no place in F1. Never has, never will. Sour grapes from Horner, as usual.
     
  5. F2003-GA

    F2003-GA F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Nov 2, 2003
    13,090
    Sunbelt
    Full Name:
    Bro
    This Horner guy is major A*s Clown - They win Four years in a row and now he's Bit**ing
    Probably cuz he doesn't see themselves winning again for a long time especially since the real
    talent Newey is stepping back and Little baby Horner can't handle the heat in the kitchen
     
  6. Neonzapper

    Neonzapper F1 Rookie

    Oct 19, 2008
    2,580
    MD/FL/Philippines
    Full Name:
    Mykol
    When Red Bull wins, it is a "Red Bull" win - thanks to the genius of Newey and Horner. Anything other than a win is the Renault engine failing.
     
  7. Senna1994

    Senna1994 F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Nov 11, 2003
    13,163
    Orange County
    Full Name:
    Anthony T
    Couldn't agree more with all you guys, at least with MBZ the drivers are allowed to race one another. Horner should go pound sand, and if RB is not happy don't let the door hit you on the way out Soda Manufacturer.
     
  8. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 3, 2006
    25,594


    This from a team that won 8 championship in 4 years!!

    Looks like Mr Horner likes to win only and nothing else.

    Is that hinting that Red Bull will leave F1 before long if it cannot taste the podium anymore?
     
  9. Jack-the-lad

    Jack-the-lad Six Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 22, 2004
    69,430
    Moot Pointe
    Sure, Chrissie....F1 needs to be more regulated and MORE of a spec series, right?
     
  10. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    41,426
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    I understand where he's coming from.

    The regs changed too much suddenly and modifications to trial and error parts that are highly essential for performance is to restrictive. Last year with the engines not allowed modifications after February and now with the whole token idea...I don't think it works.

    IMO they should be allowed continous modifications to the entire drive train whilst they're simply not allowed to go over the standard dimensions and fuel flow limit. It would allow teams to actually have somewhat equal power instead of there being one highly succesful engine and the rest aren't allowed to catch up.

    F1 is suffering intensely now because of this...I think this year we will see another significant drop in F1 viewers. IMO by Spain if certain aspects haven't been adjusted and more viewers drop, Bernie should take critical measures to literally save the sport. Mercedes can ***** and moan about leaving, but soon they will not have a sport to voluntarily leave anymore because it won't exist.
     
  11. Simon^2

    Simon^2 F1 World Champ

    Oct 17, 2005
    12,313
    At Sea Level
    The flaw in Wolff's position is the regulations on testing prevent any team catching up. As far as the WCC,... It's already over. And the WDC is down to 2.
     
  12. subirg

    subirg F1 Rookie

    Dec 19, 2003
    4,198
    Cheshire
    Has everyone forgotten who developed and voted in the current regs? The teams themselves. They can change the regs for future years if they want to - unanimously.
     
  13. F2003-GA

    F2003-GA F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Nov 2, 2003
    13,090
    Sunbelt
    Full Name:
    Bro
    It's not Merc's fault it's the FIA's fault for allowing such an expensive engine formula
    and no way to balance things out.They should have kept the design scope of the engine
    very tight in which no one would have walked away with a superior engine - IMO

    Now that 100's of millions are already spent any changes in regs will bust budgets even more
     
  14. subirg

    subirg F1 Rookie

    Dec 19, 2003
    4,198
    Cheshire
    True. The only low cost way out is to go back to a previous formula. That won't happen because the embarrassment factor would be too damaging for the leaders of the sport. So... There is no cheap or quick way out of this. The fairest thing to do would be open the flood gates for unlimited development and testing. Still expensive, but the only way to make progress immediately.
     
  15. Igor Ound

    Igor Ound F1 Veteran

    Sep 30, 2012
    8,102
    The Horn
    Full Name:
    Igor Ound
    True and Red Bull were constantly getting stuff banned to get the gap closed. Also aero is very much in your face while engines and mappings are hard to replicate. IMO the FIA should at least release engines' specs and construction details to make it easier for others to catch up.
     
  16. Axecent

    Axecent Formula 3

    Oct 15, 2008
    1,112
    Central Texas
    Full Name:
    John
    F1 is taking the lead in technology that will halt global warming!

    (hits off crack pipe)
     
  17. moretti

    moretti Five Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 1, 2003
    58,441
    Australia
    Full Name:
    John
    Mercedes and Ferrari were the cause by using exotic materials in their engines that made them hugely expensive ...... I had no issue with this, if you want to compete at the highest level then use engines from the highest plane.

    But it WAS and IS Mercs fault, along with Ferrari, all that happened was that Mrec got the engine right and Ferrari didn't AND then weren't allowed to play catch up, THAT was BS
     
  18. Jack-the-lad

    Jack-the-lad Six Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 22, 2004
    69,430
    Moot Pointe
    Yep, they are sacrificing the sport at the altar of "relevance." They might as well just default to Formula E or whatever it's called, as the premier form of auto racing.
     
  19. subirg

    subirg F1 Rookie

    Dec 19, 2003
    4,198
    Cheshire
    Agreed. The ban on development is what's causing the problem. Unleash the engineers!
     
  20. ginge82

    ginge82 Formula 3

    Jul 23, 2012
    1,361
    Europe
    Full Name:
    Art Corvelay
    They should simply agree a multi year fixed price for engines to teams and then allow engine manufacturers to develop all year to any degree and cost that they feel suitable.

    Seems stupid that teams can constantly update their cars and yet the engine development is drip fed. If these engines are really road relevant the boards can justify the further research/development.

    I doubt Ferrari, Renault and Honda are enjoying being held back as their technology looks so poor and limited compared to Mercedes. If they are prepared to spend to catch up and repair their reputations, let them.
     
  21. Ney

    Ney F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 20, 2004
    6,664
    Correct, but with one change. In order to get your head down and sort it out, you need to be able to test. Development must be allowed.

    IMO, for every 10 points that you are behind the constructors championship leader, your team earns a test day. You can test, or if you are tail end charlie, you can sell the test to a team that can afford it. If you purchase a test day it is only good until the next race, so you can't accrue them. No testing in August. This allows teams that need to improve to test and allows teams that will accrue the most test days to test or trade them for capital which they need.
     
  22. toil

    toil F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    Apr 23, 2014
    3,534
    This is the problem

    How CVC Has Made $8.2 Billion From Formula One Auto Racing - Forbes

    A return of 753% for ️️cvc over 8 years. If they stopped treating f1 like a cash cow and increased the proportion given to teams (particularly lower tier teams) they could have unlimited testing again and solve a lot of the current inequalities over development. But of course that won't happen. They just wanna suck the sport dry. 10 percent return a year is good. 753% over 8 years is just bloody Redixulous and greedy. When teams start dying they should cut their profits rather than letting the sport die and taking it down with tbeir greed
     
  23. toil

    toil F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    Apr 23, 2014
    3,534
    That would provide teams with the tactical incentive to sometimes fake bad performance to allow for development. At least I can envisage it happening in some circumstances whereby they think the benefit of development would outweigh the points lost in a particular circumstance. But definitely could work if well regulated
     
  24. ginge82

    ginge82 Formula 3

    Jul 23, 2012
    1,361
    Europe
    Full Name:
    Art Corvelay
    They give the teams a billion a season.

    Its how it divvied up that's the problem not the amount but CVC and Bernie are already locked into a contract that favours the teams that promised to give the sport the stability it lacked when they acquired the rights.

    All teams had the chance to sign up until 2020. Those that did have been rewarded more. In retrospect it was a terrible agreement but at the time it probably made a great deal of sense.
     

Share This Page