But the cross-sharing of participations in shares between Renault and Mercedes vetoed it, among other things... Mercedes reveals terms of possible Red Bull F1 engine supply deal - F1 news - AUTOSPORT.com Rgds
One or two discussions Do not equate to a contract signed in ink So they cancelled a solid contract without having a replacement in place ? These RB people look more and more amateurish as time goes by
Your kidding right ? You think multi Billion dollar organisations make agreements on conversation alone ?
I very clearly remember Mercedes PUBLICLY stating (multiple times) that they could and would not enter into any negotiations while there was a contract between RBR and Renault Racing... If RBR thought that was implied consent, they are extremely naive.
"Could" not??? So, your existing engine deal precludes you from even beginning negotiations on a subsequent deal until the end of your contract? Contractual discontinuity? Seems odd to me.
Whatever was "decided" in that meeting, nothing came of it, so it wasn't an agreement. Mercedes wanted RBR to obtain formal approval from Renault; that didn't happen. I think it was just a delaying tactic. Arrivabene offered last year Ferrari engines in jest. That was taken seriously. RBR "pissed off" Renault even more, couldn't come to term from Mercedes and got a final refusal from Ferrari. So, the decision-making at Red Bull is based on hopes, suppositions, expectations but not much management skills, it seems.
That's a pretty solid assessment of the situation with the information we have available. All the best, Andrew.
Remember, Mercedes and Renault own a small stake in each other...Mercedes did not want to step on those toes. So, the "could" not was from a business stand-point. IOW, they were not legally prevented from negotiating with Red Bull...they just felt it was the right thing to do considering their relationship with Renault. In the end, RBR will probably go slinking back to Renault. The question I have is: was the old contract nullified by RBR and Renault by mutual agreement? ...or are the terms still legally binding? If nullified, RBR just lost 'preferred team' status with Renault...which will matter if Renault does buy Lotus. RBR is smelling really bad and Renault a bit like roses these days...I'd say that by doing nothing, Mercedes was a very fine corporate partner.
Lauda is now saying that Marko is regretting having been so outspoken about Renault, and fueling the divorce. Well, Red Bull should have know that "a bird in the hand is better than two in the bush". They had an engine, but they pursued silly dreams on impulse and now they are facing a technical disaster.
I am still surprised that the one running a multi billion dollar company (RB) could be that naive...I can not belive that Mateschitz left all the decisions to others without having a word in that! The only explanation might be that both RB and RBR never had a time when thing went backwards so they might not be really trained in crisis management but still they should handle this a little bit more clever. I understand that neither Mercedes nore Ferrari wants them to have the newest engine, one just saw in Austin that they still have a good chassis and they might kick the works teams in their butt with their own engine. Both Mercedes and Ferrari built an engine on big expenses to promote their own cars and not to be shown up by RBR. For sure they will say that they do not fear the competition but they are not just race teams but also big companies and the team leaders have to justify in front of higher instances who might care less about sportmenship than success and sales. Mateschitz should have known that before allowing his team to mess up with Renault...
What they really need to do is poach some engine engineers and build their own. All the best, Andrew.
c'mon ferrari give them 2016-spec engines and let the drivers prove their worth. ric+kvyat will definitely make seb+kimi work for their paycheck. My money would be on ric if that happened!!!
Indeed, Helmut Marko really shot himself in the foot big time. Rumor from France is still the same: Cyril Abitebol, the boss of Renault-sport, the subsidiary that build the engines, would accept a deal to provide RB with engines, but from the corporate side, the board of the "Renault" company still says "RBR? considering the disregard they had this summer for the Renault image? no way". Rgds
According to a quick search in the french news, Renault could perhaps consider providing Red Bull Racing with its engines next year, but is adamant on: "public excuses by RBR and engagement that badmouthing the Renault company will never happen again". Formule 1, Renault pourrait fournir Red Bull si... - Le Mag Sport Auto How you call that in English? eating crow? eating humble pie? Rgds
Even with 2015 spec engines I think RBR will fight Ferrari tooth and nail for every position...if not beat them! Their chassis is fantastic, as is their aero work. No doubt Ferrari's next car will be an improvement on this seasons', but I wonder if they can catch RBR in that area!
Dietrich Mateschitz: "I had decided upon an absolute dead-line for solving our engine situation on October 31st... ...but considering the situation, I extend that deadline up to Abu Dhabi..." Rgds Red Bull sets new deadline to secure 2016 Formula 1 engine deal - F1 news - AUTOSPORT.com
I think it also means that if Red Bull Racing do get Renault engines next year, then Renault basically has the company's boot at Red Bull Racing's throat. If they bad-mouth the engine again, I wonder if Renault could simply refuse any replacement engines or further engine support for the rest of 2016. By that time, the car would be designed for the Renault engine and other options (if there are any) might not fit in the package without seriously compromising the car's aerodynamics. All the best, Andrew.
From the Renault's perspective, the situation is still the same: -the engine-making subsidiary, Renault-Sport, is ready and willing to accept a deal for 2016, as suggested by Cyril Abitebol. - But the corporate entity, "Renault" (the whole group of the car maker) is still not ready to agree. Rumor has it that Carlos Ghosn is adamant on public apolgies ("excuses publiques") and what-have-you, and that he wants a firm contractual obligation for RB not to say anything bad about Renault engines again. And some say that among the board of directors, some cleary state that Red Bull will never, ever, get an engine badged "Renault" again. Rgds (P.S: The rumor also has it that the Lotus situation regarding the debt is finally solved: the $30 millions debt coming from the loan by the Snoras bank when the former Renault team became Lotus will be taken by Proton, the parent company of Lotus at the time; it should clear the Lotus-Renault deal) Rgds
Perhaps a solution would be that Red Bull takes over/funds the Renault engine making facility, brand it as a RBR engine, and everything is their own fault from now on. ??