If I buy, which one is best for me? Help!

2000 miles per year : shockingly excessive ! Also means less likely to have been clocked

 

You are absolutely right that the 3.2 is much easier for belt service. I'd say the 3.2 is easier than the T to work on for maintenance and repair in general. One difference to be aware of is that the T has power steering, the 3.2 does not. This matters to some people, but not at all to others.

 

Take a real good look at the Scaledetails, blue 3.2 Cab, located in the FerrariAds section.

Cheers, Hank

 

I think the 88 3.2 with ABS is best you can get for the do it yourselfers. I have gotten use to the no power steering, and with the bigger wooden steering wheel upgrade I did, it handles much nicer! I don't think you can go wrong, just be prepared to work on the rear windows when the motors finally give up if they haven't yet!
Cheers!

 

Stephane (Scaledetails) takes care of biz. His Mondi didn't get that mileage by sitting in a garage while everything in it, dried up. I love the term, "well sorted" -------- and I believe it would apply in this case. It saves money in the long run.

Best of luck in the hunt. Do the research - ask the questions, any questions. Enjoy the process

Cheers, Hank

 

My Dec 87 3.2 (with ABS) has 100k miles now without serious problems. The motor is still running very strong. The 3.2 is very reliable is my impression.

 

Awesome Jeka ! How about the chap that has, if my memory isn't all kaput, close to or over, 90k on his Enzo (from new). He obviously wants to drive it - not sell it

Cheers, Hank

 

Hi Jeka, just wondering but do you do your own major service (especially Cambelts) ?
That's the only thing I don't want to screw up and have bent valves, the rest of the major is not a big deal.

 

Miles really aren't an issue. I purchased mine at 48K miles and put 18K more on it in 2.5 years.

From my experience and if you want to use it for the summer, find one that has had regular miles put on it over the last few years and has had a belt service in the last couple years. You should have something you can drive for a couple years with no issues.

They really are great cars. It's only a lightly modernized version of what you have.

 

I was thinking the same looks like a decent deal also check out www.forzamotorsports.com he has a few in stock.

 

Yes, a roll of the dice on cambelts. Also I presume you don't want to enter summer with two Ferraris in the shop. On QV/3.2 VS t I'd say if you have the service done and aren't too worried about the additional cost the t may have some benefit. I've heard but haven't confirmed the seats are a bit more comfortable and of course the power steering. I do all my own service so the t was not an option for me at this point in my life. The t has the 348 engine so you may want to jump down to that section and see about any problems people are having with them. My neighbor has a 348 and it has been dead reliable in the few years he has had it. It can sit for months and he just turns the key and goes.

 

The best Ferrari, assuming equal condition, is the latest one you can afford. The Mondial T is a better car than the 3.2, because they fixed some of the problems. More expensive to service, probably, but a lot of the issues with the 3.2 were fixed with the T, and it has quite a bit more power, even if the numbers don't reflect that, it's a much quicker car.

They all leak. Haven't driven a drop top Ferrari that didn't leak like s sieve, but most don't drive them in the rain anyway.

Either one is a great car, but if you can, get a T, it is better.

Art

 

Wow, 90k with an Enzo! At least he had lots of fun. Perhaps the costs per mile is even less than an low mileage car. I think driving as much as possible is better than waiting in the garage.

 

I didn't do my own major service, yet. Smaller repairs are no problem. Last year my belts were replaced, now i have to wait for 2 years to try it myself. With the Birdman description it doesn't look too complicated to try.

 

I replaced the top seal at the leading edge at top of windshield. No leakage at all under any circumstance. Driving through rain, snow, sat out all night in the rain, etc.

 

Agree that the t has better all around performance, but not so about the durability being better in the t, relative to the 3.2.

Also, my top doesn't leak either, but it clearly hasn't been exposed to the elements like PV Dirk's has.

 

Hello,

Have my heart set on a 3.2 Mondial Coupe. Besides the usual electrical issues, what problems were fixed on the Mondial t?

Thank you.


Joe

 

The T didn't fix anything in the 3.2, if anything they introduced new systems that had their own complexities from motorized seatbelts to adjustable shocks.

The 3.2 and T are dramatically different cars that do not have much in common.

The Mondial T has more in common mechanically with the 348 than the Mondial 3.2.

Both are fantastic cars, but the T is not more reliable than the 3.2.

If you want the best performance in a Mondial, you get the T.

If you like the old school feel of the Ferrari 328, but want a larger more practical package with lower maintenance costs, you get the Mondial 3.2.

Personally, the 3.2 is my Mondial of choice. It is much cheaper to maintain than the T and comes without power steering, which I prefer.

 

the t has a lower CG. It rolls less in the turns...I'm not saying it pulls more lateral Gs, just that there is less body roll. They accomplished this by adding a dry sump oil system and by moving the engine ahead of the tranny instead of on top of it. The t has the same wonderful rack+pinion steering with the addition of Power steering which R&T admitted was an improvement (granted, not for everyone). The t makes more power with less fuel burn thanks to the Bosch Motronic electronic fuel injection/ vs the electro-mechanical system in the 3.2 (no more frequency valve). If ain't got carbs, why not have the most efficient EFI? The t also got rid of the fender flares by widening the body panels, not sure if that's an improvement. What they messed up was putting on a Cadillac type exhaust....purrs like a kitten at idle and allows stress-free conversation at 70mph+, but who wants that??? The seats have more lateral support but also require a narrow posterior. IDK, matter of taste I guess.

Dave

 

The Mondial t is a great car! I have an 89 t and the 89 model doesn't have the seat belts crossing all over the place, like the 1990 and later Mondial t's. Good luck.

 

If you are unsure, I would drive both. For me, the 3.2 was the way to go over the t, and it had nothing to do with price.

Either way, both are amazing cars.

Erik