Insurance for 360/430, including out of state LLC ownership for tax purposes | FerrariChat

Insurance for 360/430, including out of state LLC ownership for tax purposes

Discussion in '360/430' started by MikeR397, Oct 20, 2011.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. MikeR397

    MikeR397 Formula 3

    May 9, 2010
    1,469
    SE Michigan
    #1 MikeR397, Oct 20, 2011
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2011
    There are a couple ways to legally avoid sales tax (and annual registration fees if your state has those) on car purchases. Keep in mind, I'm not giving legal advice here or advocating anything. I would just like to ask some questions and discuss what legal options we have to avoid or minimize sales tax, which, IMO, is a similar right to legally minimizing and avoiding as much income tax as possible. I'm posting in the 360/430 section b/c I have specific data points for these cars...

    One way to avoid sales tax is to become a dealer, but that is difficult due to physical site loctions and actual inspections. I'm not sure how easy it is to get a dirt lot with a $500 beater for sale with a sign on a woodshack "Bob's used cars" and then have a Ferrari in dealership inventory that is parked in the dealer's home garage. Maybe it is that easy? Afterall, many states force you to become a car dealer if you are selling 5 or more cars per year, which many exotic flippers do, but I still think you need the physical location requirement to get a dealer license or they somehow prevent you from selling that sixth car, or they fee you?

    The other option is to form an LLC in a state that does not tax car sales, or does so cheaply. Montana and Alaska are some options. Many people do this with not just exotics, but expensive RV's as well. A couple links: http://www.49dollarmontanaregisteredagent.com/montana-vehicle-registration.html and http://www.49dollarmontanaregisteredagent.com/montana-commercial-insurance.html

    With respect to insurance, there are two options as the car will be bought and owned by the LLC: (1) carry commercial vechicle insurance on the car for LLC/car coverage and your own insurance policy (otherwise covering your regular DD) will protect you personally. (2) insure the car owned by the LLC on your personal insurance policy and name the LLC as a "named insured" on your policy. Option 2 is cheaper, and is pretty common practice and should be ok so long as you make clear the LLC's sole asset and purpose is ownership of the car. In that case, the car and you are on your personal policy and the LLC is protected by being a named insured so there is no open LLC liablity either. Without naming the LLC on your personal policy, in the event of an accident, while you are covered from a personal law suit, someone could sue the LLC directly and there would be no insurance coverage for the LLC itself, which ultimately would equite to personal exposure as you own 100% of the single member LLC and piercing the corporate veil in this situation should not be too difficult. Fortunately, it seems easy enough to simply name the LLC as an additional insured at no extra cost in this situaiton. As always, it makes sense to look into umbrella coverage as needed.

    I've seen a lot of mixed reports on these tactics. Some people call it fraud, some say its perfectly legal, but for sure many people do it and save tens of thousands on sales tax. I have a law degree, and from what I have read, it appears to be legal if you are open about what you are doing. As you will be required to have the out of state license places (which another benefit of this is not having to mount the front plate or put it in the window when parked on public streets if your home state otherwise requires this), I am not sure what level of problems you may have with local police if you routeinly park your car on public streets. I would assume most do not do this with thier exotics, and the only time it would come up would be on speeding tickets or accidents. I'm not sure what the police could do in this situation if you are upfront about how the LLC you own, owns the exotic, which you primarily drive in your home state and is insured on your personal auto policy with the LLC as a named insured. The cops head would start spinning a bit. Feedback here is welcomed.

    Please discuss all relevant details you are aware of, and I'd love some anecdotal reports from those who successfully employ such tactics. Again, I'm not suggesting anyone do this, just looking to learn more about it.
     
  2. MikeR397

    MikeR397 Formula 3

    May 9, 2010
    1,469
    SE Michigan
    #2 MikeR397, Oct 20, 2011
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2011
    A related comment I wanted to make is that I attempted to do option (2) above with Geico. Supposedly they have no problem adding the LLC as a named insured to my policy, just like I had them do when I did a cashout-refi to arbitrage a 2.9% 5 year rate PenFed offered me after I bought my 996tt with cash. I got the cash at 2.9% to invest, Penfed got my title, and Geico added PenFed as a named insured on the Porsche.

    Unfortunately, Geico is skittish at best about insuring a Ferrari. I called in January asking about F430 coverage and was initially given a (very favorable) quote based on $130k estimated purchase price, then told they could not underwrite it due to it being an exotic despite in thier system and not explicitly excluded, then when I threatened them about removing all my cars and insurance policies from them to another company if they did not, they came back and said they would underwrite the F430 afterall. This was all documented on my account in January. Currently, I'm actually leaning toward buying a nicely optioned 360 instead of the F430, and called Geico to get a potential quote and see about the LLC angle. I pay $808 ANNUALLY to insure an 04 G35 coupe and 02 Porsche 996tt, and to add the 360 they quoted me $1,130 annually (which is fantastic; $1k deductibles on all cars, clean record, max liability coverage, 3 vehicles and work at home so no work commute so all pleasure commuting at 4k,4k, 3k miles estimated per car). Unfortunately, the rep came back from underwriting saying they could generally name an LLC on the policy if it's only puropse was ownership of a car, but unfortuantely they could not insure the 360 b/c it's an exotic (after it came up in their system and I got this quote). So I made the same threat as last time with the F430, got a supervisor who seemed like she wanted to help and spoke to two other underwriters and an underwriting supervisor, and all said no, they could not underwrite a Ferrari 360 with an estimate purchase price of ~$70k.

    Geico is pulling some crap, which I'm putting up with becuase of thier low pricing. I asked why it came up in thier system and I got a quote only to be told later they can't do it, why the same thing happened with an F430 quote in Jan worth nearly 2x as much, yet they eventually said they could underwrite the F430, but now cannot underwrite a 360 coupe? She said they really don't insure cars worth more than $60k, which I replied that know two people with a $100k Merc and a $95k 2012 GTR who both have Geico insurance, so how is it they can't cover a $70k 360 coupe? I eventually gave up, and will have to try again later and hope there isn't a note on my acount that says no 360 coverage now since I'm sure this is fungible.

    I called Hagarty today for a quote for the 360 with 2k miles expected to be driven (more likely 3k-4k), and they said $2,160 for JUST the 360. I told them what Geico quoted me and they said thier quote was so high b/c I am 26 and to check back when I'm older. I informed them that I was also 26 on my Geico policy, so why are they 500% more expensive. Lovely.

    So now I not only have to figure out the sales tax purpose in the first post, but also where to get reasonably priced coverage if I can't get Geico to play ball. Sales tax is not a major issue for the 360, but I hate to flush $5k+ if I don't need to, and I really want to be able to buy/flip future cars more often without having to plan to keep them so long to average out the sales tax hit.
     
  3. m.roberts

    m.roberts Formula Junior

    Nov 2, 2009
    907
    USA
    Doesn't totally address your issues.. but I am 30 and had my first F car, a 430, at 26 years old.

    I have had State Farm as my carrier. They cover all of my possessions... boats, cars, houses, etc...

    The 430 is set as a secondary vehicle, less that 7500 miles per year, 500 deduct, and then I have multiple discounts due to all my items isured with them... but the 430 works out to like $110.00 per month for full coverage.

    Seems pretty reasonable to me. The real truth comes out when/if a claim will ever be filed though. THAT is when you decide if the carrier and policy was good/worth it.

    -Matt
     
  4. gilly6993

    gilly6993 F1 Rookie

    Aug 20, 2009
    2,550
    Longmeadow, MA
    Full Name:
    Eric
    All I know in MA this whole thing out of state plates and insurance would never fly.....very tightly regulated all the way around....

    OH may be different though....hell, you can own a zoo in your backyard if you wanted to....
     
  5. er72

    er72 Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    Aug 16, 2008
    322
    Roslyn Harbor, NY
    Full Name:
    Eugene
    I have 2001 360 insured by Geico in Nassau county, NY for $983/6 mos. If it helps you at all, PM me and I'll send you a copy of my insurance coverage papers that will show Geico that they do in fact insure F360's :)

    Eugene
     
  6. arizonaitalian

    arizonaitalian Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Oct 29, 2010
    20,475
    Wyoming
    To me the issues isn't "can I register my car in Montana in a LLC".

    Its what are XYZ state's laws with regard to living in their state and having your car registered somewhere else?

    I'm pretty sure I read the AZ and CA rules to say that they require you to register your car in their state if you are there for X days.

    I ask because, i'm pretty sure the local cops will pull you over more often for chit chat or whatever if you have out of state plates (I am certain of this in CA and guessing in AZ).

    Anyone know how this works?

    [my neighbor has an RV registered in Montana, but he's gone for the winter now and I can't ask him what the deal is - he happens to have homes in the same two states as me...]
     
  7. chris360hawks

    chris360hawks Formula Junior

    May 29, 2007
    477
    San Antonio, Texas
    Full Name:
    Chris Hard
    I am interested in this as well. Doesn't seem too difficult in setting up a LLC and registering the car in Montana. The question just comes if cops in your state will have a issue with it. Could you just tell the police if you get pulled over that your company is based out of Montana and you brought the car down for part of the year or something along those lines?
     
  8. MikeR397

    MikeR397 Formula 3

    May 9, 2010
    1,469
    SE Michigan
    #8 MikeR397, Oct 20, 2011
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2011
    I really don't know where to figure this info out. Like I said, it's not like these cars will be parked out on the street in the same spot every day where the meter cops will see the out of state license plate daily and start getting suspicious. On the other hand, in places like Ohio, any Ferrari stands out and the same cop may remember seeing it and bring up the license plate issue just to be an ass, or perhaps incidentally to getting a speeding ticket. I really don't know what or how they would go about enforcing dissatisfaction with this, and I've been digging with the Ohio DMV rules online and cannot find any language addressing the issue for when cars used within the state must be registered/titled in Ohio. I'm almost tempted to try calling the DMV and asking, but that would just be crazy.
     
  9. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    105,219
    Vegas baby
    If you can afford an F car, you should be able to afford paying the taxes in the state you reside.

    If you can't, don't buy it.
     
  10. arizonaitalian

    arizonaitalian Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Oct 29, 2010
    20,475
    Wyoming
    The cops are aware of this ploy (at least in some parts of CA) and they do find a reason to pull over out of state exotics...

    I'd be amazed if OH doesn't have the language/rule re "when to register your car in OH".

    For CA and AZ it comes up easily and quickly in the FAQ on the DMV websites...its practically the first thing I saw when looking. A few minutes more searching turned up the kicker for CA...if you bring your own car into CA they will make you not only register it and pay license fees, BUT ALSO WILL CHARGE YOU CA SALES TAX (less a credit for what you paid in your state) if you have owned the car for less than one year. What cr%&!

    I paid no sales tax on my CS because AZ doesn't charge sales tax on private party transactions (i.e. if you don't buy from a dealer). If I move the car to CA within the first year I will be charged ~9% sales tax by CA! Obviously I won't be doing that (moving the car to CA that is).

    This might explain why they are on the lookout for this stuff in CA. Its all about the $$$!
     
  11. biophase

    biophase Karting

    Apr 17, 2008
    70
    Geico wouldn't insure my 360 either. I ended up with Amica Insurance, $1100 a year.
     
  12. crcs

    crcs Formula 3
    BANNED

    Apr 18, 2009
    1,306
    Burlington Ontario
    #12 crcs, Oct 21, 2011
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2011
    This topic comes up almost every week. The biggest problem you are going to face when plating in Montana and driving in your home state is your fellow resident. Today most people feel being an informant ie a rat is a noble and honorable thing to be doing. The Montana plate coupled with the Ferrari will make you a huge target for snitch neighbors. Not to mention more then likely your state government is also bankrupt, so they will be much more willing to fine you or punish you for supposed tax evasion. You can also expect to be vilified when your local newspaper publishes the exploits. In the end with state sales taxes in the US already being low(relative to other regions) + the low price of Ferrari's in general it probably isn't worth the headache of the Montana plate.
     
  13. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    105,219
    Vegas baby
    #13 TheMayor, Oct 21, 2011
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2011

    That's because it IS the noble and honorable thing to do.

    If registering your vehicle out of state where honorable, then they wouldn't be "rats", would they?

    If there was nothing wrong with it, then why fear "the rat"?
     
  14. MikeR397

    MikeR397 Formula 3

    May 9, 2010
    1,469
    SE Michigan
    #14 MikeR397, Oct 21, 2011
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2011
    With all due respect, I disagree with your point. I can "afford" to rent a villa for $20k a week when I vacation in CA next month, but that doesn't mean I'm not using Priceline's name your own price with cashback opportunities b/c I don't wish to be wasteful and pay for things I don't need or want to. I can afford whatever Ferrari I want, but that doesn't mean I want to chase the latest model with the steepest depreciation curve and that I am content paying five figures of sales taxes if there are legal ways to aviod it. More importantly, I'd like to have the ability to buy cars with expectation of shorter ownership duration and not feel like I'm required to keep them for years and years to spread out the tax hit. Most of the big players with millions and millions of dollars worth of cars do somethign like this, and I'm sure they can all afford to pay the sales tax if they wanted.

    I guess someone can call people who take legal options to minimize taxes "rats," but how far do you want to extend that accusation? Would buying a home with an equivalent mortgage to your monthly rent for the purposes of taking advantage of the income tax savings make you a "rat?" If not, then taking advantage of state receprocity laws do not make you a rat either in my humble opinion.
     
  15. Chadly

    Chadly Formula Junior

    Mar 21, 2010
    294
    Bothell, WA
    Full Name:
    Chad
    I pay $110 through Allstate a month for my 360 coupe(secondary less then 7.5 k). This I mind you is after I tolled my first 360 and they gave me several thousand dollars more than what I had paid for it. I am 32 now but got my first one when I was 30 with no accidents or tickets. Now of course I have one at fault accident because of me wrecking my first 360... However it did not change my insurance.
     
  16. MikeR397

    MikeR397 Formula 3

    May 9, 2010
    1,469
    SE Michigan
    #16 MikeR397, Oct 21, 2011
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2011
    For what it's worth, I found out what I'm looking for with respect to Ohio's regluations on this. The short of it is "an out of state, closely held corp owning personal property will be deemed a entity of Ohio for tax purposes against the personaly property the shareholder is primary using within Ohio for personal enjoyment."

    There are, however, plenty of legal ways to avoid this applying, some taking more effort than others, but all of them legal. I've got some ideas, but since the laws of each state vary, and some states are more strict than others in this regard, it doesn't make much sense to get into the nitty gritty with Ohio's laws here though.
     
  17. 2NA

    2NA F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner Professional Ferrari Technician

    Dec 29, 2006
    18,221
    Twin Cities
    Full Name:
    Tim Keseluk
    I wonder where Wesley Snipes had his cars registered? ;)
     
  18. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    105,219
    Vegas baby
    #18 TheMayor, Oct 21, 2011
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2011
    You have your version of doing the right thing, I have mine.

    I'm sure the police and firefighters in Montana will thank you.
     
  19. crcs

    crcs Formula 3
    BANNED

    Apr 18, 2009
    1,306
    Burlington Ontario
    Sorry, ratting/informing out your neighbor or placing undue hardships on them is not my idea of honorable. Stop confusing government laws with some sort of higher morality. States like Montana keep a check and balance system in place that prevent other regions from going on insane taxing sprees. If more people broke "the rules" then maybe the government would finally get it. Not all of us want to be treated like a milking cow.
     
    TUTTSF likes this.
  20. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    105,219
    Vegas baby
    Let's say that someone sees a robbery in your house. They call the police. But, it's not a robbery but just you doing something odd in the middle of the night that caused suspicion.

    Was the neighbor who called the police a rat? If you have nothing to fear, then why fear the rat at all?
     
  21. J Wall

    J Wall Rookie

    Oct 16, 2011
    17
    Missouri/Alaska
    Full Name:
    J Wall
    The robber is taking something that does not belong to them. My Alaska plates keep the state from taking something that doesn't belong to them.

    Rather poor analogy.
     
  22. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    105,219
    Vegas baby
    #22 TheMayor, Oct 21, 2011
    Last edited: Oct 21, 2011
    No, I'm referring to the RAT issue. On that, I'm 100% correct in that analogy.

    If you live in Alaska, supporting the police, fire fighters, etc with your tax revenue is the right thing to do. No problem from me whatsoever.

    If you don't, then the people of the state in which you live and rely on it's services have to make up the difference. Someone has to pay.

    If I go to a 7-11 and steal a candy bar, someone else paid for my removing it. I may argue that 7-11's prices are crazy and they deserved it. Still, the other customers end up paying for that loss one way or the other.

    We survive together. Together is the key word here. As individuals we all fail.

    If everyone in the US got their plates in Montana or Alaska, somehow I think we would all be in deep trouble.

    But, as I said -- I have my version of what's in the best interest of my community. Others have theirs. For me, I'm happy to be able to afford an expensive car and repay my success in keeping my community safe, effective, and functional.

    I may not like everything they spend the money on but I fix that at the ballot box, not by getting around the system.

    To me, people who live in one state but register their car in Alaska should call the Juneau PD 911 when a burglar breaks in their home in the lower 48. After all, you paid them.

    But, that's just me. :)
     
  23. gilly6993

    gilly6993 F1 Rookie

    Aug 20, 2009
    2,550
    Longmeadow, MA
    Full Name:
    Eric
    Very good analogy there....I hate paying taxes like the rest of us but also know they pay for the roads I drive on every day and he fulltime fire dept down the street amongst other things....I just read an interesting article that the top 1% income earners earn 17% of the nations income and pay 37% of the taxes....quite staggering numbers....the cut off for the top 1%....$344K.....as I said taxes suck but we need to keep this country and our local gov'ts running....if everyone did this we would be in HUGE trouble....my suggestion is buck up and pay your taxes or move.....
     
  24. dustman

    dustman F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Jun 12, 2007
    11,195
    Perhaps....but saving money is smart any way you cut it.


     
  25. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    105,219
    Vegas baby
    I can save money by tapping into my neighbor's electricity.

    It's not bad to save money, but is it the right thing to do?
     

Share This Page