car design thread

Discussion in 'Creative Arts' started by jm2, Oct 19, 2012.

  1. I have started the new week 1 FerrariChat Update poll, please vote... http://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/threads/ferrarichat-com-update-week-1-poll.560487/
  1. energy88

    energy88 Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 21, 2012
    2,490
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Full Name:
    John
    2 words: New Coke!
     
    of2worlds likes this.
  2. tritone

    tritone F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 8, 2003
    3,683
    On the Rock
    Full Name:
    James
    :cool:
     
  3. of2worlds

    of2worlds F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 6, 2004
    9,423
    ON
    Full Name:
    CH
    Happily residing in the old skin where the earth is now flat again with no break down the middle.
     
  4. Tcar

    Tcar F1 Rookie

    Seems like fchat decided to 'fix' something that was not broken...

    Time is valuable, so not trying to wade through 'new' with gray small text... I'm 'old'.

    Plus, I look at other boards that use the previous fchat format... much easier if you don't have to reinvent.
     
  5. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    OK, however lets talk DESIGN, I boys & girls. How about the Frankfurt auto show concepts? Enough of this new website design confusion, even though as stated, it IS a design issue, just not a car design issue. :) 4633595222_30f90dc385.jpg I need fodder for my class to discuss. ;)
     
    NeuroBeaker and of2worlds like this.
  6. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    No. 914
    September 13, 2017


    [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]




    THE AUTOEXTREMIST - RANTS
    ADRIFT IN A PRIMROSE SEA: THE GOOD AND MOSTLY UGLY FROM THE FRANKFURT SHOW.

    [​IMG]WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 AT 08:42AM
    By Peter M. DeLorenzo

    Detroit. The news out of the Frankfurt Auto Show – I will dispense with the official name because it’s as ineffective and irrelevant as “NAIAS” is for the Detroit Auto Show – is that the entire auto industry is going flat-out crazy yet again. Yes, this isn’t exactly news, because the auto industry careens around in a permanent state of craziness as a matter of standing operating procedure. But this time the business is going off the deep end to a new level of full crazy never seen before, and it’s all about – yes, you guessed it – Electric Vehicles.

    How they’ll be built, how far they’ll run on a charge, how long it’s going to take to charge them, and most important (as you’ll see), what they’ll look like. An interesting sidebar to the EV frenzy is that German car executives warned that a wholesale shift to electric cars brings with it a raft of problems. And it’s not just infrastructure and charging stations – the usual hand-wringing associated with selling EVs – it is the fact that building EVs will require dramatically fewer people, which will severely impact not only the homegrown German economy and its workforce, but the future of the auto industry going forward. (It should be pointed out here that Tesla actually uses more people to build its cars, which makes Tesla, hands down, the industry model of inefficiency. But St. Elon is a genius, and don’t you ever forget it.) So, in spite of the ongoing frenzy, the arrival of the EV era will bring with it some intense challenges, and nothing about this transition will be automatic. There will be blood – and drastic measures – to accommodate this fundamental shift.

    Now, back to the look of these EVs. Manufacturers displayed the gamut of EVs in Frankfurt, from real live production-intent vehicles to blue-sky meanderings. But because there is no inherent sexiness in the mechanical ingredients in an EV design, it’s clear that the importance of design has now come to the fore. I said long ago in these pages that Design is the Ultimate Initial Product Differentiator, and this has become even more crucial now that this business is devoting its full energy to EVs. And what I’m seeing coming out of Frankfurt should be a wakeup call to a lot of automakers that insist that they know what they’re doing and have it goin’ on, because clearly they don’t.

    Two of the prime offenders are BMW and Mercedes-Benz. It’s no secret that BMW has been phoning it in for years now, especially when it comes to design. The company seems to be adrift in a primrose sea made up of one part self-importance and one part hubris. Throw in a massive dollop of self-congratulatory studio chatter in its design halls and you have a recipe for disaster. And sure enough BMW designers confirmed my assessment by unleashing a dimension of ugliness at the Frankfurt show that is simply stunning to behold.

    [​IMG]

    (BMW)

    If the BMW iVision Dynamic is a “vision” of BMW’s electric future (see more images in “On The Table” –WG), then this company is in for a real bad time. This concept is flat-out ugly from the front, but don’t worry, the rest of it really doesn't get much better. (That blue accent color you see in the front? The manufacturers have decided en masse that blue is the new code color of electrification. It was everywhere in Frankfurt, which is funny, but remember when blue used to be the color for diesel? Oh well.)

    BMW Design is stinking up the joint right now, there’s just no two ways about it. But it isn’t a surprise, because BMW has been on an enduring quest to be all things to all people for so long that it has completely lost its way, or mind, or both. BMW has now become a logo without much substance attached, because for every genuine “M” car, there are seemingly a dozen SUV models and a smattering of bland sedans that are so mind-numbingly uninspired and so far removed from what BMW once was that it has become a bad joke. And now that we have a preview of the BMW’s electric future, the outlook is grim. What is a BMW again? And why should we care? BMW operatives clearly don’t even have the first clue anymore.

    Not to be outdone, Mercedes-Benz weighed in with its latest stab at designing for electrification with something called the EQA. Now remember, this is a company that wowed the business a month ago at Pebble Beach with its fabulous Mercedes-Maybach 6 Cabriolet, which I wrote about in my column “An Eloquent Rebuttal.” That car was stunning in its magnificence and sheer exuberance, and it gave me hope that Mercedes wouldn’t abandon the importance of design going forward. I was sorely mistaken, because the EQA is an abysmal idea executed poorly.

    [​IMG]

    (Mercedes-Benz)

    Actually, Mercedes spent more time discussing how the grille changes depending on what drive program you engage, and how its light design evokes “the copper windings of an electric motor and the animation visualizing electrical impulses,” than they did talking about the car itself. That’s because the EQA is devoid of even a shred of inspiration. Mercedes designers didn’t even phone it in with this thing, they just fired off a text and called it good.

    The EQA is another example of Mercedes-Benz operating as the biggest Jekyll & Hyde car company on earth. When they have it goin' on, with machines like the Mercedes-Maybach 6 Cabriolet, they do magnificent stuff. But then they turn around and unleash this miserable excuse for a future electric car on the landscape. As Colonel Kurtz once famously said: “The horror. The horror.”

    But then again, left to its own devices, Mercedes-Benz’ propensity to do stupid things knows no bounds. They also chose the Frankfurt show to unveil the Mercedes-AMG Project ONE, which had Mercedes PR minions crowing that, for the first time, a "two-seater supersports show car brings the very latest and efficient, fully-fledged Formula 1 hybrid technology from the race track to the road almost par for par to represent the highlight of AMG's 50th anniversary." Not that anyone asked for another supercar that has 1000HP, goes over 217 mph and costs $2.5 million, but Mercedes wanted us all to know that when it deigns to do it we should all bow down and genuflect at the sheer splendor of it all (see images in “On The Table” –WG).

    [​IMG]

    (Mercedes-Benz)

    Mercedes insists that the machine "combines outstanding racetrack performance and day-to-day suitable Formula 1 hybrid technology with exemplary efficiency. This is a world first." Except that bringing F1 technology from the track to the street is a nonstarter. As in, what's the point? And to what end? So the biggest swinging **** "enthusiasts" can fulfill their destiny by spending millions on another trophy car that never sees the light of day – or the road – and sits in the garage just long enough before heading to auction? And the Project One is only "a world first" until the next trophy supercar emerges.

    The Mercedes-AMG Project ONE is the quintessential example of Mercedes’ unbridled hubris and wrong-headedness run amuck. And make no mistake, when Mercedes goes off the rails, nobody does it better. What a monumental waste of time and money.

    Thank goodness there was one manufacturer who showcased genuine, clear-cut vision for a future electric vehicle. The Honda Urban EV Concept was brilliant in its simplicity and design purity, and it demonstrates that Honda is getting back to its essence, just in time for the onset of electrification. The Urban EV Concept is no pipe dream either, because Honda plans on having it in-market in Europe in two years.

    It’s nice to see that at least one manufacturer hasn’t lost its way.

    And that’s the High-Octane Truth for this week.
     
    of2worlds likes this.
  7. Tired of seeing this ad? Upgrade now
  8. Jeff Kennedy

    Jeff Kennedy F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Oct 16, 2007
    4,202
    Edwardsville, IL
    Full Name:
    Jeff Kennedy
    Yes, Pete D was on a roll this week. But, he is mostly right about these so called designs. Blame the most senior management as they are approving this stuff and their highest levels of design leadership must be agreeing since they are letting the underlying proposals be seen by the leaders.

    They all want to be different but seem to find that "different for the sake of being different" OK even if it is crap. What happened to "taste"?

    John: Please report on what your students are saying as their evaluation of these designs.
     
    of2worlds and anunakki like this.
  9. anunakki

    anunakki Four Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Oct 8, 2005
    41,981
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Full Name:
    Jerry
    i love it. they call it retro but i dont see it as retro. just nice clean design imo
     
  10. NeuroBeaker

    NeuroBeaker Moderator
    Moderator

    Oct 1, 2008
    27,814
    Huntsville, AL., USA
    Full Name:
    Andrew

    Gentlemen, scroll down to the bottom of the page and change the forum skin from the new look to "FerrariChat Old". I think it'll address your concerns.

    With that done, I think you'll find the added functionality and continued development support that we didn't have before makes this an upgrade. :)

    All the best,
    Andrew.
     
  11. Dolcevita

    Dolcevita Formula Junior
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Jul 5, 2011
    483
    Ontario, Canada
    Full Name:
    Craig
    Morgan doesn't need to worry about retro. Their problem is how to go modern. I love the Aero 8. 2017-09-13 20.39.12.jpg 2017-09-13 20.36.53.jpg 2017-09-13 20.37.57.jpg
     
    of2worlds likes this.
  12. of2worlds

    of2worlds F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 6, 2004
    9,423
    ON
    Full Name:
    CH
    How about asking them if they think Chris Bangle was consulting at Toyota Design for the new 2018 Camry? Umpteen million spent on design and it comes out looking like an old BMW with a nose job. The exotic stuff may be fun but it is the bread & butter models that keep the lights on.
    I agree with Jeff it would be interesting to get some feedback on their brush with the future design ideas which mostly seem to equate weird with 'reach'.
     
  13. energy88

    energy88 Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 21, 2012
    2,490
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Full Name:
    John
    My impression is that the 2018 Camry is a 2017 Camry that has morphed in a more radical direction. Can't tell if the car is on a new platform or carryover.
     
    of2worlds likes this.
  14. Tired of seeing this ad? Upgrade now
  15. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john

    To me it looks like a car Apple would have designed.
     
  16. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    Business Week magazine called me for some input on the design of the new Camry.
    I tried to be as positive as I could be.
     
  17. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john

    I brought up the Frankfurt concepts in today's class. They all liked the Honda. They pretty much liked the Portofino. Mixed reaction to the Mercedes hypercar. They seemed to like the Renault.
     
    anunakki likes this.
  18. anunakki

    anunakki Four Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Oct 8, 2005
    41,981
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Full Name:
    Jerry
    to me thats a good thing. Ives is a great designer and im relly tired of the "super sculpted" look of modern cars
     
  19. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    Agree, if Apple does a car, I would expect the best from Ives and company.
     
    anunakki likes this.
  20. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    Ahh, the reach v. appeal argument. How much is enough? Or not enough?
     
    anunakki and of2worlds like this.
  21. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john

    For those looking for nostalgia, this answers that question. Nothing goofy or silly, just a straightforward look to honor the past...........but it's not for everyone.
     
  22. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    AR-170919861.jpg Mr. Bangle is back...
    FRANKFURT -- Chris Bangle is back!

    Back at the Frankfurt auto show. Back in the car business. Back in the groove.

    The famed former BMW boy wonder who talks really, really fast, but perhaps not as fast as he thinks, pointedly avoided automotive clients at Chris Bangle Associates, the consultancy he formed in 2009 after 17 years as BMW Group's chief of design.

    Operating in a small town in Italy, his team designed everything from liquor bottles to nursing homes. But as for cars, he says, "I stayed out."

    Indeed, there seems to have been an expectation by his former bosses in Munich that kept him out of the automotive limelight.

    Now, eight years later, he is once again fully engrossed in cars. And the sight of Chris Bangle thinking, talking and gesticulating about automobile design is, well, something to behold.

    Still boyish at 60, he is at work on a vehicle project about which he will say next to nothing. But there's a lot he WILL say about the state of vehicle design.

    Try this on for size.

    After visiting the stand of a former competitor this week he came back dismayed.

    "It's a wonderful stand, it has a wonderful amount of technology they are showing," said Bangle. "But as a designer I am used to a set of uniqueness and freshness and change. This will turn into a critique of [try to guess] and I really don't want it to be published like that, but for the life of me I can't find a new idea.

    "I would love to and they have really good designers, but I've seen this all before in other places."

    His criticism is not really aimed at this particular company, which is generally perceived to be getting it right these days, design-wise. Rather, it's aimed at the entire industry.

    "Companies like that are getting so good at putting a sheen on what you already know that they'll convince everybody that it's new.

    "And the young designers don't know their own history. There is very little understanding where the past came from for car designers today because they are worried so much about just learning the tools. They're being asked to do little more than just 'give me a little twist on what we just did.'

    Thus, he says, the industry is in a terrible rut.

    "If it's left up to these hyper-conservative, hyper-terrified companies that are so huge, and where everything is resting on a bottom line that could go south at any minute ... well, these are the last people to ask for the courage to go forward into the future. The LAST people.

    "They defend their brands like the virtue of Guinevere and they are doing it by putting a chastity belt around the girl and, sorry, that's not how you make kids. That's not how you make a future."

    Bangle says car brands have been put on a pedestal -- undeservedly.

    "I was talking to a designer here today who has been in the business as long as I have and he said, 'When I grew up, yeah there was a brand, and then I created the brand out of the design in my mind.' Now we're being fed... 'it's a brand, it's a brand.'"

    He says the brand-uber-alles consciousness is causing ideas to be endlessly recirculated.

    "I know this stuff from the past," says Bangle. "I know these graphics, I know these surfaces, I know these proportions.

    "But then there are these start-up companies, like the one we're working for and some have the courage to ask significant questions. I think we've done something pretty interesting with the car we're working on."

    What about other industry's start-ups? Doesn't Bangle see signs of originality he craves?

    "Not yet. Some come kinda close. They like to think they're giving their designers freedom and you look at it again and you go, 'about where we were in 1980, except much smoother.'"

    Bangle was holding forth at the Exa Corp. stand in one of Frankfurt's supplier halls. Exa is the visualization and software specialist that works with many of the industry's leaders, worked with Bangle at BMW and is helping him with his current project.

    [​IMG]
    Bangle: "Companies ... are getting so good at putting a sheen on what you already know that they'll convince everybody that it's new." Photo credit: EXA
    So what about this project?

    "I can't tell you really anything about it," says Bangle. "It's an existing company that comes from a manufacturing point of view -- not an automaker.

    "They understand hardware and electric vehicles very well, but they've never forayed into the automotive world. They came to us a couple of years ago and said, 'we want to do a small car,' and I said, ' why don't you go up the street. Pininfarina is up the street. They'd love to do that for you' and these guys said, 'No we want to do it with you.'"

    Bangle gave the company some free advice.

    "'If you are going to go about it in a normal way,' he told them, 'you are going to end up with the exact same kind of a piece that everyone else does and I really don't want to do that.

    "'But if you want to look at it seriously and seriously pose questions and answer those questions with a lot of guts and courage then I'll stick with you'.

    "So we spent two years creating a concept for them which had no real aesthetics until we understood the car from a functional point of view. Seriously, no aesthetics.

    Now Bangle says he's got something he likes.

    "I feel strongly enough about this that I would put my name on this," he said.

    When will we see it?

    "Much sooner than later. I just don't want to get into hype."

    Actually, Bangle can't resist hyping it in his own way. He related a story about one of his designers, a veteran stylist who Bangle asked to do something quite radical. The designer told him, "every bone in my body refuses to do this."

    "He said, 'I can't do this' and he got sick, literally sick. He came down with a bad flu and he spent three days in his hotel room, eating soup -- and drawing what I had asked him to draw. And when he came out he had created something no one had ever seen, and he said to me, 'I am liberated.'

    Talking about this, Bangle got choked up. He had to excuse himself, pull out a handkerchief and dab his suddenly red, watery eyes.

    His voice cracked.

    "This was extremely emotional," he said. "I was able to get this designer to go past a mental barrier. When people ask me what is the problem with cars of the future, I say it is the mental barriers in the heads of designers. It is not the management's fault or the customer's fault or technology's fault, it is these things in our heads. We've got to end the banality. We've got to get rid of the normal."

    So welcome back, Chris Bangle, the Ohio boy who was all of 36 when he took over as head of BMW design in 1992 after successfully battling banality at Opel and Fiat.

    "When we got back into doing this project I found myself looking at cars again," he said. "Sitting at a stoplight and you say, 'look at that light going over this fender there' or "did you see that graphic?' You start making these little comments while you're driving with your wife sitting next to you."

    At a certain point Catherine said to me, "OK, you're back."

    You can reach Richard Johnson at rjohnson@crain.com
    Tags: Design Frankfurt Motor show BMW Richard Johnson Cars and Concepts Blog
    215

    Shares




    Read Next[​IMG]
    Read Next[​IMG]
    Read Next[​IMG]
    Read Next[​IMG]
    Read Next[​IMG]
    EV holdouts: Ferrari and Lamborghini
     
    anunakki and of2worlds like this.
  23. of2worlds

    of2worlds F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 6, 2004
    9,423
    ON
    Full Name:
    CH
    New platform for the Camry but as ever you can't go to radical and expect your customer base to keep buying. The real improvement comes from the engineering you can't see. The design has certainly gotten more busy especially at the front.

    Designers have it easy these days; back in the 60's they had to come up with a re-design every year for the big sedans. The new model year meant a new look and not just a different serial number...
     
    jm2 likes this.
  24. Jeff Kennedy

    Jeff Kennedy F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Oct 16, 2007
    4,202
    Edwardsville, IL
    Full Name:
    Jeff Kennedy
    Bangle is so correct in his assessment of the current state of automotive design at the regular companies. Maybe the industry will decide to listen to this but that would require courage and jeopardize all the brand managers.
     
  25. technom3

    technom3 F1 Rookie

    Mar 29, 2007
    2,536
    Phoenix AZ
    Full Name:
    Justin
    Trying to get the thread back on track here...

    I am probably a few years to old to truly love this design (Young young guys like this design) but I think its WORLDS better than most electric car designs
     
  26. energy88

    energy88 Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 21, 2012
    2,490
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Full Name:
    John
    I just got back from taking my wife to the Toyota dealer to get her Highlander serviced. The dealer had a number of 2018 Camrys on the lot and I took a quick 1 minute look from my car.

    Front End: Did not know which models (trim levels) I was observing (LE, SE, XLE, XSE), some front variations in the real world are more attractive than others. I didn't like the ones where the lower horizontal grill extended from the extremes of each side. The ones with a scoop-like relief on each corner were more attractive (probably "S" models). In 2017, the SEs had the more tasteful front end treatment, but again, I was not aware of which models were present. In summary, the front ends reminded me of the art deco design seen on locomotives in the 1930s. The new Toyotas didn't look any worse than some of the newer Hondas I have seen in the wild.

    Side: Looks like the modeler used his tool to slash some new creases in the sides for the sake of change. However, the area near the rear bumper has a sculpt that is probably unnecessary and looks busy.

    Rear End: It looks like the rear ends are more simplified and rounded versus 2017 and probably an improvement. Could not tell any difference in the main tail lights; looks similar to 2017, but I'm sure they are different. I know from pictures there is one model where the side of the tail light falls off towards the ground, but I did not observe that variant- probably the ones with the "X" in the model. Don't know how this might look in the real world.

    Conclusion: parts of the Camry are an improvement and others a regression which varies by trim level.
     
    of2worlds likes this.
  27. bitzman

    bitzman Formula 3

    Feb 15, 2008
    1,804
    Can't find Start New Thread but this is on

    Design Analysis Mercedes Vision Maybach 6

    At the Pebble Beach concours, Mercedes unveiled a car called the Vision Mercedes Maybach 6 (they seem determined to keep that name alive as their ultimate luxury model, though a Maybach model in the US previously failed). They showed it as a roadster this year but previously showed a gullwing coupe.

    The puzzler about this car is that it had a long long bonnet (maybe 10 ft.) but instead of a V12 or V16 motor you would expect in an ultimate luxury roadster it had four electric motors.

    It was rated at 738 hp., a figure you would expect from an ultimate car. The 0 to 60 time is four seconds which handily beats a 427 Cobra by .2 seconds. They said the car will go 200 miles on a charge and if you need to add range, a mere 5 minute plug in will get you another 60 plus miles of range.

    Surprisingly for such a modern car with lots of electronics,they said the roadster (they call it a cabriolet) had Elmwood trim in the interior and lots of leather.

    Here’s my take on the styling:

    SIDE: the coupe is just too exaggerated to believe, maybe needs 10% of the length taken out between the front wheels and the firewall. The roofline when the convertible top is up is very stylish, like a coupe, with good to the side visibility. I have seen two types of wheels on it, the mag wheels of the coupe and the more many bladed mags (simulating wire wheels at a distance) of the roadster. Side indentation to emphasize curving sides is made more acceptable by chrome along its edge.

    FRONT: The front grille is very strong and dynamic, though you wonder if it will meet crash standards. The body color front spoiler is well integrated, and gets away from the flat black spoilers.

    The bonnet opening in two halves (like old Rolls Royce Silver Cloud) might be welcome, especially if you ever had a rearward hinged one piece hood fly up and smash your windshield as I have.

    REAR: Very old fashioned shape similar to 1961 E-type Jaguar. Wonder if that undertray rear spoiler is going to be enough to prevent rear end lift.

    INTERIOR: I didn’t see the interior of the roadster at Pebble but the picture of the coupe looks very space age, without any wood as they describe in the press release.


    OVERALL: Have to say that the car is daring but still too exaggerated from the coupe (if it was in a movie, the villain would drive it , a sort of Snively Whiplash kinda guy) , this is second gen, should be tamed down to reality by now; still too much like a movie prop car. Any opinions?
     

    Attached Files:

    of2worlds likes this.
  28. Tenney

    Tenney F1 Rookie
    Consultant

    Feb 21, 2001
    2,987
    A Tesla that looks like a Fisker?
     
  29. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    I thought the Coupe was like a caricature, but I believe the Cabrio is fitting for a 'vision' car for design & the brand.
     
  30. of2worlds

    of2worlds F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 6, 2004
    9,423
    ON
    Full Name:
    CH
    The coupe is over the top and not in a good way with vast expanses of surface where not much is happening.

    The cabriolet by comparison flows nicely once you get past the Buick front grill. The pinched mid section and the chrome detailing on the fender and door are just enough to break up a lot of surface between the nose and tail. That tail has a certain delicate elegance that say a BMW Z8 lacks. The scale and stance of the cabriolet plus the windshield rake all seem to float just above the road with little effort. The visual effect of an open car that probably is somewhat less so in the reality world of cd numbers. Strangely the dark red coupe has the feeling of dragging a ball and chain through wet cement. Part of that perception is the paint colors chosen for each model.
    my 2 cents
     
  31. anunakki

    anunakki Four Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Oct 8, 2005
    41,981
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Full Name:
    Jerry
    the same can be said about all the worlds i work in from video games to toys to film design. all stale
     
  32. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    Why do you think that is?
     
  33. anunakki

    anunakki Four Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Oct 8, 2005
    41,981
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Full Name:
    Jerry
    i will try and reply to this tomorrow.
     
  34. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    For the auto industry, there are multiple reasons for the current state of affairs, regarding design sameness/banality. While I agree with Mr. Bangle in principle, it's easy for him to be on the sidelines and be critical. My personal spin is because the investments required in the car industry are so great (1Billion $ +) for a new program, no one is willing to take any risks. All the design teams play it safe. Senior management is risk averse and is afraid of making an expensive mistake. Tesla, the darling of the media had an opportunity to do a clean sheet of paper design with no legacy or baggage of an existing brand. They chose to pay it safe and do a conventionally designed sedan. A nice one mind you, but still very conventional looking. Why? Because they wanted to appeal to the greatest number of people, and mitigating any risk.
    I believe Hollywood is i the same situation. The investments necessary to do a movie are astronomical, and no one wants to do a money losing dud. So they keep redoing the same formulas hoping for that blockbuster hit. Appeal to the lowest common denominator, and don't risk offending anyone. And I can surmise the same for the 'popular' music business. Everyone appears to be in a creative rut. No one wants to stand out and lead or break away fro the pack.
    So when people say 'all cars look the same', there's a reason for that. It's not a lack of talent amongst the designers, but an averse to risk holding their hands.
    And by the way, you can't blame it all on aero & safety regulations.......that's just a cop out as far as I'm concerned.
    Just my $.02.
     
    of2worlds likes this.
  35. Jeff Kennedy

    Jeff Kennedy F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Oct 16, 2007
    4,202
    Edwardsville, IL
    Full Name:
    Jeff Kennedy
    I see this as the exaggerated sketch of the car it is intending to be.
     
  36. NeuroBeaker

    NeuroBeaker Moderator
    Moderator

    Oct 1, 2008
    27,814
    Huntsville, AL., USA
    Full Name:
    Andrew
    Chris Bangle was pretty radical during his time at BMW though, wasn't he? I actually had a similar initial reception to his designs that I did to the design revolution you ushered in at Cadillac. I thought it was a big jump in design nomenclature for each brand and initially recoiled a little bit. As the shock wore off and I got used to them, I came to really appreciate what had been done - so much so that now I would very happily buy and drive either a Cadillac from your era or a BMW from Bangle's era. It seems like he had skin in the game and, like you, did something more radical than most others were doing at the time. I'd say you both have pretty good standing upon which to comment on the banality of automotive design. ;)

    All the best,
    Andrew.
     
  37. Jeff Kennedy

    Jeff Kennedy F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Oct 16, 2007
    4,202
    Edwardsville, IL
    Full Name:
    Jeff Kennedy
    I want to take John's comment a bit further. Design can be creative but they need to work in an environment where that is encouraged and nurtured by Design management and, even more importantly, by the most senior levels of corporate management. I view the current situation as everyone looking around to see if someone else will make the plunge of leading since they are too risk adverse themselves and lack any conviction. I will also toss in that when the VP level of design has ascended by being an expert butt kissing politician in lieu of superior design talent to expect design leadership is a lost cause. I want to blame that design leader but the real blame sits in the C-suite and the board room where they have opted for a nice pliable bureaucrat instead of a committed advocate for the sanctity of design.

    Absolutely, the cost of new developments is staggering and no one wants a billion dollar epic fail. But at the same time spending all that money to make what appears to be not much more than a mid-cycle re-fresh is a waste of resources. But I am thinking that even worse if what we are getting too much of - I have no clue where I am or where I am going so lets just keep throwing crap at the wall; who cares if the one car has 5 competing designs in it.

    If is tragic to watch when good designers are demoralized because every time they give good proposals "management" repeatedly keeps selecting the worst choice.
     
    of2worlds and jm2 like this.
  38. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    '94-'96_Pontiac_Trans_Sport_SE.jpg LeMons-Wish-List-GM-Dustbuster-626x382.jpg

    Yes, Chris was quite radical for his time. Everyone was horrified he was changing BMW's design language.............which everyone else wound up copying. At the time I didn't think the 'Bangle butt' was such a big deal, but the customer outcry made it clear that change of that magnitude wasn't acceptable.........yet sales increased. While myself or my team really didn't 'invent' art & science, we tried to take it to the next level and reduce all the controversy. The CTS Coupe & Wagon were the results of that strategy. Even those cars were very controversial to the mainstream public.
    The general public can only accept a certain amount of change before they get uncomfortable. I believe the car companies understand this and are inclined to play it safe and do more of the same every time. No one wants another Aztek or the GM Minivans known as the 'Dustbusters'
     
  39. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
  40. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john

    This made me laugh. The other night my friends & I were having dinner and we were talking about how some cars have several design themes on them..........you just want to yell at them....JUST CHOOSE ONE THEME AND EXECUTE IT WELL! But alas, no one is listening.
     
  41. NeuroBeaker

    NeuroBeaker Moderator
    Moderator

    Oct 1, 2008
    27,814
    Huntsville, AL., USA
    Full Name:
    Andrew
    Initially, yes. It took me a while to get over the initial shock of the change, but I really do appreciate and admire them now. Those cars set Cadillac on a design path that I really like, whereas Cadillac's brand image was always as a comfortable "old man's" aspirational car in the past, rather than an aspirational stylish car I now want as someone in his 30s. :)

    All the best,
    Andrew.
     
  42. Jeff Kennedy

    Jeff Kennedy F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Oct 16, 2007
    4,202
    Edwardsville, IL
    Full Name:
    Jeff Kennedy
    And the Emperor has no clothes because that crap got approved for production. Are they all blind?
     
    jm2 likes this.
  43. technom3

    technom3 F1 Rookie

    Mar 29, 2007
    2,536
    Phoenix AZ
    Full Name:
    Justin
    It amazes me anyone got where they were going in those dust busters. I remember being in one... and I never get car sick... but that windshield did something to me... and we had to go back to the rental car place and get a different van. It was pretty terrible.

    Remember the Pontiac Montana? That AWD minivan? I remeber the magazines going crazy for it.

    I am so glad you mentioned that everyone copied the Bangle cars. He got such **** for it... bmw sales went through the roof... and people talked about how ugly it was... but people kept buying... and buying... and buying... and Now even a Mercedes S class has some bangle butt LOL
     
    of2worlds and jm2 like this.
  44. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    From the NYT:Supercruise will be followed next year by Cadillac’s introduction of a new small sport-utility vehicle, called the XT4. That model is the first to break from the angular styling of other Cadillacs, setting the company on a new design path.
    The whole push is a giant gamble. Returning the luster to a damaged brand is no easy task, and previous attempts by G.M. have fallen short. The overhaul Mr. de Nysschen is leading will cost the automaker several billion dollars by 2020, by which time its model line will most likely have been completely remade.

    Success, however, would resurrect what was once one of the most admired American brand names — one that was long a synonym for luxury.

    It will take a lot to change consumer perceptions, too. Chris Kanuit, a retired manufacturing executive in Jacksonville, Fla., has considered buying Cadillacs a few times in the last several years, but always ended up sticking with BMW instead.
    “You look at a Cadillac and there’s a lot of bling,” he said. “They have a splashy look. BMW is not as showy.”

    That is one of the next issues Cadillac will address, Mr. de Nysschen said. The forthcoming XT4 S.U.V. will have some of the design elements Cadillacs are known for — the distinctive grille and the vertical lighting theme. But the wedge-shaped look of the current models is on the way out.

    The new look will be more curvaceous and sculpted, he said. The beltline — the line where the doors meet the windows — will be lowered, and the wheels moved closer to the corners.
    “They will be drivers’ cars,” Mr. de Nysschen said.

    The photo is someone's guess and could or could not be accurate 2018-Cadillac-XT4-rear.jpg
     
    Jeff Kennedy and of2worlds like this.
  45. bitzman

    bitzman Formula 3

    Feb 15, 2008
    1,804
    Saw the Mercedes Vision concept Maybach 6 cabriolet at Pebble. Looked at it more than the gullwing red concept of the same car last year. Any opinions to counter mine? I think now that it steals a lot from the one off Rolls Hyperion that Jason Castriota
    did for Pininfarina when they had a special order. Here’s my take on the styling:

    SIDE: the coupe is just too exaggerated to believe, maybe needs 10% of the length taken out between the front wheels and the firewall. The roofline when the convertible top is up is very stylish, like a coupe, with good to the side visibility. I have seen two types of wheels on it, the mag wheels of the coupe and the more many bladed mags (simulating wire wheels at a distance) of the roadster. Side indentation to emphasize curving sides is made more acceptable by chrome along its edge.

    [​IMG]Pin It

    FRONT: The front grille is very strong and dynamic, though you wonder if it will meet crash standards. The body color front spoiler is well integrated, and gets away from the flat black spoilers.

    [​IMG]Pin It

    The bonnet opening in two halves (like old Rolls Royce Silver Cloud) might be welcome, especially if you ever had a rearward hinged one piece hood fly up and smash your windshield as I have.

    REAR: Very old-fashioned shape to the tail, similar to 1961 E-type Jaguar. Wonder if that under tray rear spoiler is going to be enough to prevent rear end lift. The coupe had a tunnel back (inset rear window) split window roofline but fortunately the convertible doesn’t have these gimmicks.

    [​IMG]Pin It

    INTERIOR: I didn’t see the interior of the roadster at Pebble but the picture of the coupe interior found online looks very space age, without any wood as they describe in the press release.
    did for Pininfarina to a client special order but that was in 2008 so this was started a long time later.
    Here’s my take on the styling:

    SIDE: the coupe is just too exaggerated to believe, maybe needs 10% of the length taken out between the front wheels and the firewall. The roofline when the convertible top is up is very stylish, like a coupe, with good to the side visibility. I have seen two types of wheels on it, the mag wheels of the coupe and the more many bladed mags (simulating wire wheels at a distance) of the roadster. Side indentation to emphasize curving sides is made more acceptable by chrome along its edge.

    [​IMG]Pin It

    FRONT: The front grille is very strong and dynamic, though you wonder if it will meet crash standards. The body color front spoiler is well integrated, and gets away from the flat black spoilers.

    [​IMG]Pin It

    The bonnet opening in two halves (like old Rolls Royce Silver Cloud) might be welcome, especially if you ever had a rearward hinged one piece hood fly up and smash your windshield as I have.

    REAR: Very old-fashioned shape to the tail, similar to 1961 E-type Jaguar. Wonder if that under tray rear spoiler is going to be enough to prevent rear end lift. The coupe had a tunnel back (inset rear window) split window roofline but fortunately the convertible doesn’t have these gimmicks.

    [​IMG]Pin It

    INTERIOR: I didn’t see the interior of the roadster at Pebble but the picture of the coupe interior found online looks very space age, without any wood as they describe in the press release.
     
  46. of2worlds

    of2worlds F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 6, 2004
    9,423
    ON
    Full Name:
    CH
    Is he hinting at what a new mid-engine edition Cadillac would look like?
     
  47. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    Don't know yet.
     
  48. energy88

    energy88 Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 21, 2012
    2,490
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Full Name:
    John
    If the photo is close to the final variant, I definitely like it.

    First, because it looks like an SUV rather than a mini-van like so many other SUVs are starting to look. Second, I like the "clean" look on the rear. At first, I didn't know if I liked the tail lights extending all the way up the C-pillar, a la Honda CR-V. But the treatment is so much cleaner than the CR-V and avoids looking gaudy. I found some photos on google of the XT4 without that vertical light treatment, and those below the window tail lights looked just mundane. I also noticed that the backlight in the pictured vehicle is flat which seems to allow the tall tail light treatment to exist tastefully. Again, photos on google of a curved backlight were not as appealing. I just hope Caddy doesn't overprice the XT4.
     
  49. energy88

    energy88 Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 21, 2012
    2,490
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Full Name:
    John
    If it is Wow! Wow! Wow! Sign me up for the waiting list!
     
    of2worlds likes this.
  50. Jeff Kennedy

    Jeff Kennedy F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Oct 16, 2007
    4,202
    Edwardsville, IL
    Full Name:
    Jeff Kennedy
    This article might as well have been written by Johann's person PR flack. They even found someone that want's a "me too" BMW; guess it would have been way too obvious if it was a current Audi owner. This is written like Cadillac is already dead but Johann is it's Moses leading it to the promised land - Cadillac scent and espresso bar and all.

    As for the illustration, it is only an illustration that might or might not be based upon reliable information. The tail does look like John's CTS Wagon - a very good thing.
     
  51. jm2

    jm2 F1 Veteran
    Rossa Subscribed Owner

    Aug 19, 2002
    9,281
    michigan
    Full Name:
    john
    I'm suspicious of the rendering, but we'll find out.
     
  52. of2worlds

    of2worlds F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 6, 2004
    9,423
    ON
    Full Name:
    CH
    Remember how the C7 design profile showing that front fender detail was leaked long before it was official?
    This Cadillac image is much more artistic....
     

Share This Page