| Author |
Message |
Rob Schermerhorn (Rexrcr)
Member
Username: Rexrcr
Post Number: 777
Registered: 11-2002
| | Posted on Saturday, August 16, 2003 - 10:43 am: | |
I'll be submitting an article to Mr. Lay on this very topic soon.
You're on the right track.
BTW, the alignment for Challenge from Pirelli and Ferrari is only a guidline, not an absolute. |
billy bob (Fatbillybob)
Member
Username: Fatbillybob
Post Number: 316
Registered: 8-2002
| | Posted on Saturday, August 16, 2003 - 12:43 am: | |
Rexrcr,
You once posted ride height for your race evnture in a 348 as 95mm front 70mm rear. Stock is 134 front 125 rear. If you lower the car to 95front 70 rear you change the chassis rake. What effect does changing chasis rake have on handling dynamic? What goal were you trying to obtain changing the chassis rake off of stock? You also had the front camber at -2.5 while challenge spec is -1.66. The rear camber you use of -3.2 is the same as challenge spec.. I would think by having -2.5 front camber you would find more rear end breaking away at limit. Is that the reason for the change in chassis rake to a lower position to control the rear oversteer at limit?
TIA |
|