Toyota NASCAR engine | FerrariChat

Toyota NASCAR engine

Discussion in 'F1' started by BillyD, Mar 3, 2007.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. BillyD

    BillyD Formula 3 Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2004
    Messages:
    1,828
    Location:
    Pacific Northwest
    Full Name:
    Bill
    Not that I watch left turn sedan racing, but where did Toyota get a pushrod V8 for their Camrys?
     
  2. Kieran

    Kieran F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2006
    Messages:
    4,202
    Location:
    Westchester, NY
    Full Name:
    Kieran
    From the Tacomas in the Craftsman Truck Series. Thats my guess.
     
  3. hardtop

    hardtop F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2002
    Messages:
    11,294
    Location:
    Colorado
    Full Name:
    Dave
    I think it was designed from scratch. I remember when they were getting ready to race trucks they were having a hard time finding a foundry in Japan to make the iron blocks.

    Dave
     
  4. DMOORE

    DMOORE Formula 3

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,720
    Location:
    San Diego
    Full Name:
    Darrell
    Designed by TRD.
    That is the major sticking point with the rest of the NASCAR teams. It's NOT from a production vehicle. To me it's very simple, if you let one manufacturer build a one-off motor for a series, let them all. Rousch and the others are upset because the have to work withen the limits imposed by a "production" layout. TRD had no such limits. They purchased all the other motors available, and took the best design qualities of each, and this allowed them to stay within the rules. A year ago or so I watched a very interesting program about this very problem.


    Darrell.
     
  5. Senna1994

    Senna1994 F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2003
    Messages:
    13,189
    Location:
    Orange County
    Full Name:
    Anthony T
    Absolutely correct, and Toyota's defense was that they didn't have an ohv V8 available in their production.
     
  6. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,673
    Location:
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    Just allow them all to use a current production engine of size Z ... solves the problem. Who cares how the valves are operated.

    Pete
     
  7. hardtop

    hardtop F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2002
    Messages:
    11,294
    Location:
    Colorado
    Full Name:
    Dave
    It is easier to get high revs out of an overhead cam motor than pushrod motor, all other factors being equal.

    Dave
     
  8. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,673
    Location:
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    I know that :).

    My point was why not change the rules and say:

    Ford, GM, Chrysler and anybody who wants to play these are now the engine rules:

    Must be production engine (10,000 minimum per year) of x cc size with a maximum of 4 valves per cylinder.


    Then it would be level playing field again. We must remember that when these current rules were created that these current engines were the top of the tree technology wise for an American v8 engine. It is now 50+ years later, lets update the rules to allow modern engines.

    Even Formula Ford has changed to a modern Ford production engine. No longer the Ford Cortina 1600 engine but the Ztec. NASCAR needs to do the same and then Toyota won't have to 'cheat' with a non-production engine.

    Pete
     
  9. 62 250 GTO

    62 250 GTO F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    7,765
    Location:
    Nova Scotia Canada
    Full Name:
    Neil
    Change all the rules for one team??? That sounds familiar!
     
  10. Gary48

    Gary48 Guest

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Messages:
    940
    This is not NASCAR bashing but it really makes me wonder why as other motor sports have advanced technically in the motor design arena, that NASCAR has not budged from their stance. The small block design has been taken as far as possible so that now you have to cheat to get an edge.
    Modern cars all have embraced modern design, these include aluminum blocks, four valves per cyl., fuel injection-direct injection, distributorless ignition and more. So I beg the question, what is the real reason for keeping this sport continually confined to the days of Billy Bob and technically inept when compared to other motor sports?
     
  11. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,673
    Location:
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    Well you can think of it that way if you like, but it really is time for NASCAR to move forward.

    Heck why not restrict all teams to running a Model T Ford engine ;)
    Pete
     
  12. Whisky

    Whisky Three Time F1 World Champ Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    31,859
    Location:
    In the flight path to Offutt
    Full Name:
    The original Fernando
    I agree, if Toyota cannot make their own block, they can't race, period.

    As far as nascar allowing DOHC or 4 valves, etc. I think that would send the costs really through the roof, and you would NEVER see an independent even TRY to make a race.
    Let's just bring the British Touring Car Series over here and see how they do at Daytona - wouldn't that be interesting ?

    Anyway, my rationale for the motor is; banning turbos after 1988 was supposed to lower costs, and it did anything BUT, in 1989 they revved to, what, 13,000 RPM's ? What are they at now, 19,500 or 20,000 ? At what cost ??
     
  13. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,673
    Location:
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    They would under my proposal.

    I reckon those pushrod motors cost a fortune. Can't see DOHC increasing costs ... if still production based, infact I see it lowering costs. They must have to do a lot of clever work to make those 'old engines' hang together at such high piston speeds, etc.

    When NASCAR started it was 'stock cars', that were very close to production cars, and they ran current engines. Why not run current engines now?.

    I know Ford and GM make modern engines, why not use them?

    Pete
     
  14. parkerfe

    parkerfe F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2001
    Messages:
    12,887
    Location:
    Cumming, Georgia
    Full Name:
    Franklin E. Parker
    FYI, the Toyota Camry is the only car/engine package in NASCAR representing a car made in the USA...the rest of the field represent cars made in Canada and/or Mexico...
     
  15. parkerfe

    parkerfe F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2001
    Messages:
    12,887
    Location:
    Cumming, Georgia
    Full Name:
    Franklin E. Parker
    Why should they change? The push-rod engines now used have to be detuned with restrictor plates to slow them down as it is...without the restrictor plates the current NASCAR field would go 250mph+ on tracks such as Daytona and Talladega!
     
  16. hardtop

    hardtop F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2002
    Messages:
    11,294
    Location:
    Colorado
    Full Name:
    Dave
    Any change in rules/specs will increase costs and increase the gap between the best and worst teams. I remember reading comments from an F1 engineer who said if they would just leave the rules alone, eventually all the teams would figure out what the top teams are doing, competition would get much closer and costs would ultimately go down.

    Dave
     

Share This Page