To the 348 and 355 owners... We have released the Girodisc 2 piece rotor for the front only. Unfortunately, it is not possible to make the OE size rear rotor in a 2 pc version due to the tight clearance between the caliper and the hat section of the rotor. There is no room for the flange and pins. However, there is still benefit to replacing the front rotors with lightweight 2pc versions. The benefits are listed below, but the main point is this: Each front rotor is 6.5 lbs lighter than the OE unit! thats 13 lbs of rotating mass and inertia removed from the front axle for less money than OE parts from the dealer! Check our sponsor forum at the bottom of the site for coming products, pads, and other parts! Cheers Eric Girodisc Announce Lightweight Two-Piece Brake Disc for FERRARI 348 and 355 FRONT COSTA MESA, CA March 2007 Girodisc announces its lightweight Ferrari 355 two-piece brake rotor system. The Girodisc brake rotor system is a direct replacement for the OE 348 and 355 front only, and provides significant weight, handling, and brake fade-resistance performance benefits. The rotor is compatible with the OE brake pads and will also tolerate the higher heat and wear levels of performance and racing spec pads. The Girodisc system provides an economical and performance enhancing replacement solution for vehicles which will see track use. Additional product benefits of the Girodisc lightweight brake rotor system include: Weight Savings: The Girodisc disc set weights in at 13 lb less than the OE system. 6.5 Lbs per disc is removed. The Girodisc front discs offer a 52% improvement in surface area-to-weight for the rotor. The light weight disc decreases the rotational inertia of the braking system and reduces unsprung mass. The Girodisc lightweight discs help improve acceleration and require less energy to be dissipated during deceleration. Braking Performance: The rotor is a two-piece design developed in racing to produce a lightweight rotor that can compensate for the different expansion rates between the hat and rotor and eliminate the possibility of rotor warping. The rotor and hat have a floating mount system, which utilizes 10 high strength alloy steel drive pins, which allows for axial and radial float. In order to keep the rotors from making noise when cold, the pins are mounted with anti-noise springs which allow the rotor to grow but eliminate rattle. This float also allows the rotor to self center between the pads. Thirty-two directionally curved vanes in the rotor act as a centrifugal air pump and actively move cooling air through the rotor as it rotates helping to shed heat quickly and reduce brake pad fading. The discs are also slotted, allowing a maximized contact at the interface between pad and disc as the edges of the slots continuously clean and refresh the pad surface. High Quality Materials: The Girodisc lightweight discs use only the highest quality materials and components. The rotors are high carbon content iron for long wear and stable thermal performance, with zinc plating for corrosion resistance. The top hat section is aircraft 6061 T-6 billet aluminum with a gun-metal color anodized finish. The disc hardware consists of 10 cadmium plated alloy steel drive bushings which take the load from braking actions while maintaining the float between the hat and disc. Grade 12 cap screws with spring washers allow for float under braking while maintaining a rattle-free assembly while cold. Matching Pad Materials: Girodisc Magic pads are available as direct replacements for the OE pad. The Magic pad produces the same great friction and fade characteristics as the OE pad with minimal dust and noise. Girodisc also stocks Ferodo, Mintex, Pagid and more brake pad sets to match the rotor set. Give us a call for to find out which pads match your needs. Girodisc Thermal barrier coated Titanium pad backing plates are available to further block heat transfer to the caliper and fluid for extreme or track use. High performance fluids from Brembo, Motul, and Castrol are also available. To find out more, contact Girodisc at (949) 350-6194 or email info@************. More information is available on the web site: www.************. Image Unavailable, Please Login
A solid but similar design rotor with directional vanes would be a nice compliment for the rear, and I think would help you sell front rotors too. I know that I am too obsessive to have different appearing discs front and rear. I also found I had more heat issues on the rear than the front, I believe due to the air ducts for the front rotors that are absent in the rear on the 355. Directional vane rotors would help. And what about the 512 TR? There's a big car that would use some brake cooling help.
They look bad ass!!! Do you have matching slotted rears 'without' the aluminum center (due to the tight tolerance)??
Outstanding! I'd have to add that knocking 13 pounds off of the front wheels is also going to lighten the 348's manual steering input (by the driver) for slow speeds such as parking the car. ...so your new technology is for more than just racing. 348 Spider drivers should appreciate the easier steering.
Agreed. Nice product, but more info and pricing would be helpful. Add that and my next brake service will see your parts installed on my 348.
This will do nothing for felt steering effort. My question is if I can trigger the ABS with the old system which is the 348 braking threshold what does the new design do? I expect it to trigger the same way and have the same stopping distances assuming the same heat capacity. Steel mass is what has the heat capacity to absorb the friction of stopping so if you drop the mass with a floating hat and rotor more heat must go into the caliper and brake fluid at the same car speed? Slotting just takes care of pad outgas and used friction material waste but does not help heat capacity. "Floating" helps with brake feel as uneven pad and rotor wear increase harmonics felt as poor braking and help prevent rotor distorsion from heat and thus more uneven pad wear. So that is good. But beyond the small benefit of floating rotors and slots and the cool factor, where else am I going to benefit? What am I not understanding? Oh less unsprung weight is good.
FWIW, it is damn hard to get the 348 ABS to engage. I was only able to get mine to activate once, and that was during a serious spin toward a tire-wall in wet grass at VIR. That was the only time the pump has activated in my ownership of the car, and I've stood on the pedal plenty of times.
Hiya, The iron grade in our rotor is harder than the OE rotor, (more martensitic)allowing it to run with higher friction compounds and last a bit longer in heavy duty use. The friction coeficient of the rotor itself is marginally less than OE, but is generally easily made up for by using an agressive pad. A rotor with a higher hardness value is also more resistant to DTV (disc thickness variation) -or warp. There is a trade off between cooling rate and heat absorbtion capability by changing the iron hat section of OE. By using the aluminum hat, first weight is lost, but the gain is that the aluminum transfers heat to the air much quicker than does iron. This keeps some amount of heat away from the bearings as a benefit, which will be cooked by a very hot iron heat sink. The heat of braking will be dissapated much quicker by the curved vane design of our rotor than the OE pillar design. The amount of iron in the actual braking surface is comparable between Girodisc and OE. The air gaps and aluminum material of the hat are for heat dissipation and weight savings. So in general, the Girodisc rotor is designed to shed heat at a faster rate, and the OE design simple absorbs heat and stays hot longer. The Girodisc rotor assembly is lighter, which is a big help for unsprung weight and rotational inertia. Will it make the steering lighter? I can promise that. Hope this makes some sense. Cheers, Eric
I agree about the ABS never activating on my car - you need some really slippy surfaces to do that and since I don't drive in those conditons, I can't remember the last time they went off - wonder if they work... The only thing I can think of is, with a lower weight, will the wheels have a lower rebound rate and, hence, be more likely to activate ABS if the car hits a sharp bump under breaking? Minor, but it happens, especially near my corner at home. I like the two piece rotor design for its heat dissapation (less likely to warp rotors, better hub and bearing life in the long run and maybe better pad life as well. And the less weight at the corners the better. I find the gas slots kind of gimickey on the street, but I like the look. I also agree that having a matching slotted rear set would balance the look even if they are totally stock otherwise. Now, what do those biyotches cost?
I have a question for the guys at Girodisc. Do you have a larger disk available with an offset bracket for the stock caliper? This is a very common setup on motorcycles, and just wondering if it is available for the 355. The stock disk just looks kind of silly inside the wheel because it is so small. Especially when the car is sitting next to my wife's CLK55. How times have changed! BTW, I love the 2 piece design. Darrell.
Hi Darrell, Thanks for bringing this up. This is something we are considering and studying at the moment, both for the 355 and the 550. The concerns for this type of kit: 1. The offset bracket must have a minimum space between the holes, and this minimum amount might grow the caliper radius larger than the OE wheel can allow inside radially. 2. placing the caliper outboard farther may put too much load on the OE caliper mount castings (the leverage and moment arm increase) and the spacer bracket will have very severe loadings. I am looking into that now. I would want the kit to be as safe as possible before releasing it. This is easier to do on a motorcycle because there are no radial constraints of fitting inside a wheel, and the loads and torque amount on a motorcycle are mucgh lower overall. So the OE components and the spacer bracket arent critically loaded for their mss as can be in a car. Stay tuned.... Cheers Eric
Ha! You're a very funny guy. You're baiting me! You're trying to win yet another free dinner at my expense, I can tell. Yeah, as if putting a 348 rotor onto a bicycle, or replacing a 348 rotor/caliper with a bicycle brake would see no difference to either bicycle or 348 in steering feel! Not!
Eric, thanks for the reply. It would be a great alternative to new calipers and such if the offset brackets and larger rotors would work out. Keep us posted. You guys really do a great job. Darrell.
for you guys that don't activate ABS I do it all the time. My car lives on slicks too so my tire grip is very high. I probably have somewhere between 1 and shy of 1.5 G braking on a 2800lb 348 with a wing. I don't know about you guys but IMO you aren't going deep enough into the corners if the ABS is not coming on.
Thanks Eric! So my stoping distances may not decrease or will they decrease because the rotational mass is less?
Eric, Most 348 guys interested in more performance have long abandoned the 17" 348 stock wheels for 355CH wheels , 355 wheels or some other 18" varient. So concern ! may not be much of an issue. In fact you really need to get a bigger disc in there and fill up that wheel ala 430ch As to cast oem caliper mountings Bremob already put stress on there with their GT big brake kit and perhaps even more stress in the unconfirmed larger challenge brmbos which are rumoured to be even bigger. I have seen 348/355's with up to 14" rotors it would be great to see a competitor to Brembo at less than Brembo blood money and the great service you and martin give to their drivers. By the way Stoptech has a 348/355 big brake system but know one is using repositioned stock OEM Calipers and bigger disks. You could be the first. 90% of your buyers would be not track guys and this set-up would be a decent lowcost compromise. For the 10% or less of us racers well I seriously want bigger brakes but am not convinced in the performance per dollar for my driving style. I seem to use OEM parts just fine and or a mild track only pad and have long life in my pads and rotors as a mid-pak open class racer on some very high speed tracks and seriously fast cars. My only modification 3" brake ducts seem to keep brakes cool and fluid from boiling. I have never had an on track fade issue. Maybe I am still not going fast enough. But I guess if bigger brake would get me on and off threshold braking a 1/10th or so quicker that could be 1 second on an average race track or a car length or two diving into a corner to pass big brakes would then be worth it. So beside the obvious ability to have "reserve" for repeat brake flogging with a big brake , does the big brake get me to "on and off" threshold braking faster than what a little brake can do eventhough you can achieve threshold braking with either big or little brakes?
Wondering too....honestly I'm not trying to wring out every last tenth of speed from the 355. I'll drive it daily, maybe a track day here and there, but not on a regular basis. My STi race car has the lightweight 2 pc. rotors, but if price is excessive I really don't need these for the Ferrari... FWIW, I recall paying $700 for the two front 2-pc STi rotors.
OkOk...geez The list price is $450 each ($900 front axle). We should have it updated to the website in the next few days. Cheers Eric
The math says that your stopping distance will decrease a very small amount due to lower rotational inertia to have to slow. So more brake energy is available to slow the car. However..... The reality is that "stopping distance" is a silly measure, as the grip of any given patch of road, and the type and condition of the tires will make a much bigger difference than our rotors. Be aware that stopping distance can be manipuated with simple tire pressure adjustments. - once the brakes lock, or ABS takes over, it doesnt matter if they are F1 brakes or honda civic, its all about the tire, road, and chassis balance. The measure of performance brakes is in fade resistance and consistency. Its about the vehicle being able to slow down into a corner at the same deceleration with the same pedal feel lap after lap. A better measure for performance brakes is how many times can the car slow from 150-50mph without pedal travel change and fade (increasd distance to 50mph). magazines are testing cars all the same, and the measure of a minivan braking has little to do with a high performance sportscars functionality. This magazine test mentality has given a false idea to general drivers of what is a good measure of braking performance. Hope that makes some sense. Cheers Eric
* Be sure to check the website for pricing and info. Like most products, the price may change due to costs of materials etc... http://************/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=21_22&products_id=59 Keep an eye out for the upcoming Girodisc pad sets and new Mintex line also. Cheers Eric
Eric, Here is my 348/355 wish list: First 348 and 355 brakes are the same. So you can cross two model lines with one product. I am in Redondo Beach area so I am accessable to you. Im a club racer only, so if you make a caliper extension bracket to use the oem caliper I would be glad to test it for you on the track and write up the install here on Fchat. I would like to see at least 1 larger diameter rotor than stock. Since you have hats already you have all the dimensions. Perhaps this would be an easy project for you. Last on my wish list would be OEM sized rear floating rotors and aluminium hat in the OEM caliper position with NO parking brake. This would take huge amount of weight out of the back end of the cars where it is needed most. I have even thought about machining out the internal parking brake mass of metal on the OE rotor but I am unsure of how that will effect the ultimate safety of the rotor.