Intake valves carbon removal choices. | Page 2 | FerrariChat

Intake valves carbon removal choices.

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by staatsof, Apr 17, 2007.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Artvonne

    Artvonne F1 Veteran

    Oct 29, 2004
    5,379
    NWA
    Full Name:
    Paul
    Long time Ferrari enthusiast Marcell stopped posting on Fchat after being attacked and questioned about 0052. Carl Fung stopped posting to the FerrariList for the same basic reasons. I can list others who gave up and went away. Shortly after I came here there was a battle raging between two posters over a set of coroded cylinder heads. They are both gone. Every darned thread that mr K posted to, he was attacked until he finally gave up. Ed Gault attempted to make some heavy duty timing belt sprockets to build long term reliability into the 308. After questions about warranteeing engines and liability, he gave up and left, and left the entire Ferrari community.

    Sir, no one has attacked you with the emotion you have used to attack others. You come here asking questions, and when you dont get the answer you like, you attack and demean people. When has anyone called you anal retentive? Irrelevent? Having zero knowledge? Not one that I have seen. Maybe its spring, maybe its the world turned upside down, but I for one am getting tired of all this BS. I find myself staying away for days at a time, and more and more regretting ever opening up the damned website. Keep attacking everyone, your making a lot of friends here.
     
  2. Artvonne

    Artvonne F1 Veteran

    Oct 29, 2004
    5,379
    NWA
    Full Name:
    Paul
    Oh wait just a damned minute. Scant amount of evidence? Lets see. Your car is some oddball that has different valves than anything else on the planet? Your car has some different kind of deposits from any other car on the planet? Its got carbon on the fricken valves, just like every other 4 cycle engine in the world has ever had over the last 150 years. How is your "problem" different? You want to blast it out with media, go ahead. You want to put dry ice down there and chill the valve, possibly warping it, go ahead. I do know that very fine particles can collect between the valve and seat and become impossible to blow out with compressed air, but hey, what the hell do I know. Nothing, not a thing.

    Want to know how much an engine can take? Ive seen an engine ran over 30 miles without any oil and still run for over a year after getting refilled. I had a friend who dropped all the carbon and gasket material from the intake manifold and head gaskets on a GM V8 down in the valley. He then washed it out with a garden hose. He took a pick and scratched out the garbage that was jammed in the rings, threw it together and drove it for years. I seen another guy pour water down a carb of a running engine and gas it and drown it out and gas it some more. It still ran. Hell, I seen motors pulled out of lakes that still ran after. Engines are tough. You can do a lot of abuse to them and they are plastic enough to take it. For a while. They also are all capable of breaking. They all can collect garbage in the ring grooves. They all can blow up. They all can drop a valve. Ive seen aircraft engines that ran and landed with whole cylinders blown off, missing the piston and having the rod smacking around bashing everything to hell. One particular Cessna that was offshore flew almost 200 miles inland to land after dropping a valve and bashing itself to death for an hour and a half. Ive seen diesel engines that threw a rod and blew out the side of the block, and kept running. One was a 149 series Detroit V16 in a Locomotive.

    The point is that guys who are mechanics fix things the way they are meant to be fixed, and non-mechanics are always trying to find a way to cut corners. The correct way to fix your problem is to tear the motor apart. Anything else is at your own risk.
     
  3. Gary48

    Gary48 Guest

    Dec 30, 2003
    940
    Artvonne has alot to say about real world practicalities of the engine world and is showing justified frustration about know it all's and do nothings who continue to pontificate and flame and drive away the real minds of Ferrari chat. Who can blame them? They put out bonifide, thoughtful and intuitive information only to be challanged at every turn no matter what they say.
    I must say that I have thought of leaving for good myself because these pages have been diluted by more and more self appointed experts who feel safe behind their screens, not touchable while spewing forth reams of venom and clouding real exchange of information.

    Enough of that! Tear you darn engine apart and mechanically remove the carbon and put it back together and then do something to prevent carbon from reforming on backs of valves, combustion chambers and in you ring lands.
    What to do? At each fill up use one of the across the counter valve, injector and combustion chamber cleaners. There are many but one that comes to mind also provides upper cylinder lube as well is Lucas, listen boy's they are proven to work and I have seen the results from its use in torn down engines, have you? My two cents. Now all you keyboard jocky's get busy and find something wrong with that.
     
  4. Rifledriver

    Rifledriver Three Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 29, 2004
    37,335
    Cowboy Capitol of the World
    Full Name:
    Brian Crall
    I am sorry but I really can't comment further on that post. It seems it is very presumptious, demeaning and down right rude. I would hate to cause further distress to the A S S H O L E that objected to it.
     
  5. staatsof

    staatsof Nine Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 13, 2005
    96,397
    Fuggetaboutitland
    Full Name:
    Bob
    Amusing but you do drone on a bit.

    You do remind of an old boss I had.
    Ask him the time of day and he would proceed to instruct you as to how to build a clock.

    Bob S.
     
  6. staatsof

    staatsof Nine Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 13, 2005
    96,397
    Fuggetaboutitland
    Full Name:
    Bob
    So you don't think that Artvonne comes across exactly that way? hmmm

    From my perspective he's done exactly that and he's not alone.

    Fortunately I wouldn't be foolish enough to follow that advice and yes it's foolish because the car runs quite well enough so even if it's only great for another 10K miles that's typically many years of use. The people I feel sorry for are those that don't know better and it's not that these suggestions are coming from people that don't know a lot about these issues.

    It's just that they are ready to jump to conclusions very quickly and I fear many people get goaded into very expensive engine rebuilds way before it's time.

    Go ahead and say that an idea is a bad one and give the reasons you think so. That they have done and that's what I was looking for.

    Why can't we just stay on the original topic?

    It was the arrogant directives to remove the heads and rebuild them at this time without knowing the particular vehicle in question and yes this model is a little different as there are no valve guide seals. A lot of them smoke a little on startup and then it goes away. When it gets bad, yes you do the heads.

    Now could we please get back on topic. I think we have heard a number of interesting comments about the various proceedures.

    I did notice that the Gun community uses Sea Foam and GM Top end cleaner for removing carbon from their barrels.

    Bob S.
     
  7. Gary48

    Gary48 Guest

    Dec 30, 2003
    940
    Artvonne was right to many posters without any substance. I am gone too.
     
  8. JohnnyS

    JohnnyS F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Oct 19, 2006
    15,285
    Illinois
    Full Name:
    John
    Okay, let me venture into this.

    I have used Sea-Foam to decarbonize 2 cars and my boat engine. I don't like putting things in an engine that just don't belong, however, short of pulling the engine apart to clean carbon deposits, this was recommended to me and it seemed to work.

    Sea-Foam is a light penetrating oil that can be sprayed into the intake manifold. Spray it lightly into a warm engine while it is running and then heavier until the engine nearly stalls. If it does stall, let it sit for about 30 minutes. If the engine doesn’t stall, turn it off and wait about 30 minutes. Restart and run the RPMs up to about 1500-2000. There will be a bunch of white smoke coming out the exhaust. Don’t worry this is the light oil burning off and taking the carbon with it.

    The way it was explained to me was the penetrating oil works into the carbon deposits. Then when burned off, the combustion loosens and dislodges the carbon so it can be blown out the exhaust.

    I am just the messenger here. If you don’t believe in this, fine, don’t do it.
     
  9. blkprlz

    blkprlz Formula 3

    Mar 24, 2007
    2,169
    Tampa bay
    Full Name:
    Bruce
    Point well taken, thanks for your response.
     
  10. Artvonne

    Artvonne F1 Veteran

    Oct 29, 2004
    5,379
    NWA
    Full Name:
    Paul
    When I was little my dad would buy old cars and fix them up. SeaFoam wasnt around I dont think, but he would mix up a quart of some home brew kerosene, fuel oil, and automatic tranny fluid and pour it down thier throats. Smoked up the yard so thick Algore would have freaked out and fell over dead.

    Thing is, it would actually take out the carbon from inside the combustion chamber, because fuel oil, kerosene or ATF, they all burn really hot, but it wont do a damned thing for the crap on the back of the valve. I used to get stuck with the job grinding that junk off on a bench grinder with a wire wheel. Its like fricken rock. Its basically coke deposits from the oil residue that got past the valve guide and burned away. Almost pure carbon, its very hard, very brittle, and very abrasive. I dont think silica sand or valve grinding compound would do any worse damage if it got into your motor. Thats why I think most of us are against trying to remove it off the valve in situ.

    Water injection. Well, it dont burn. And as was pointed out elsewhere, its not in there long enough and there isnt enough energy available to break the molecule apart so it cant add oxygen to aid burning, so it comes out just like it went in, water. So whats it do? Well, if you remember physics, water is not compressible. If it gets into the combustion chamber, it takes up incompressible space. So it basically increases the available compression ratio and will continue to do so until you pour in so much it hydraulically locks up and bends the connecting rod or some other nasty event. But up to that point the more you add the more power you get, and it gets HOT! And in addition, it can turn to steam and give even more power. So its steam cleaning your combustion chambers while its giving you a boost. But it still wont clean the back of the valves. I dont even think there is anything you could soak them in that would remove carbon off the valves that wouldnt hust something else. Its like ceramic coated rock.

    While the idea of using compressed air to blow material out of the port sounds logical, it doesnt work so well in reality. I dropped a small nut down a port once, and all the air did was make it fly all around in there wildly. But it never came out with air. Even blowing through a small tube extended down as far as possible made no difference. And again, while it seems logical that ever smaller particles will easily blow out, that to is not 100%. Finer grains will collect around the valve seat and all the air pressure or air flow in the world isnt going to move it. And the first time that valve opens its going inside your motor. In fact the very method of blowing air into the port could blow the valve open. Mark gave a figure of around 18 psi on the back of a QV intake IIRC. With 100+ psi in the port blowing around it would not be difficult to exceed 18 psi on the back of the valve. POOF! all that crap just went inside your engine.
     
  11. staatsof

    staatsof Nine Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 13, 2005
    96,397
    Fuggetaboutitland
    Full Name:
    Bob
    That alone would make it a worthwhile endeavor. ;>))
     
  12. lndshrk

    lndshrk Formula Junior

    Nov 7, 2003
    753
    SLC, Utah
    Full Name:
    Jim Conforti
    Yes, it was used.. it was used because it was CHEAP.

    It was used on cars that were having idle problems during the warranty.

    The machines are LONG gone.

    As far as it being fantastically effective, it was - it was fantasticlly effective
    at postponing any real engine issues until the warranty was up. Which of
    course was (and is) the point of any automotive OEM.

    The only way to safely media blast a Ferrari (or any) engine in-situ is to use
    dry-ice blasting. Still you will need to fanatically clean the intake bowls above
    the closed valves to remove little bits of carbon that WILL NOT be your friend
    should they find any way into the spaces twixt piston and cylinder wall.

    Failing that, and if you are detail oriented - glass bead blasting each CLOSED
    valve intake bowl whilst the others are taped off - followed by a careful
    cleaning is possible.

    Recommended - No

    Sane - No

    Possible - Yes.

    Jim Conforti

    PS: NOTHING but mechanical removal will work for carbon on the intake
    valves. Anything strong enough to "dissolve" elemental carbon is either too
    toxic for you to handle, or it's so corrosive that the block/valves will go first.
     
  13. Ken

    Ken F1 World Champ

    Oct 19, 2001
    16,078
    Arlington Heights IL
    Full Name:
    Kenneth
    Glass bead blasting any aluminum eninge part is not a good idea. Fragments of glass cannot be removed from the aluminum by any cleaning method outside of prolonged engine use, which means the bearings will be toast in short order as the microscopic glass bits leech into your engine.

    Ken
     
  14. staatsof

    staatsof Nine Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 13, 2005
    96,397
    Fuggetaboutitland
    Full Name:
    Bob
    Ken,

    I wasn't thinking about glass beading but I am intrigued by your comments about the contamination issue. Have you seen examples of this happening?
    There's a Weber specialist that uses a combination of ultrasonic and bead blasting for restoration and although I'm sure it's limited to the exterior of the body of the carburetor your comments do cause some concern about potential inadvertent contamination.

    Can you elaborate about some of your experiences?

    Thanks,

    Bob S.
     
  15. Ken

    Ken F1 World Champ

    Oct 19, 2001
    16,078
    Arlington Heights IL
    Full Name:
    Kenneth
    The Dave Bean Engineering Lotus catalog has quite a bit of technical information, and they stress NOT glass bead blasting aluminum engine parts. (Bean has quite an engineering department and they make race engines as well as rebuild Lotus street engines)

    Also, the Wilkins book on Twin Cam Lotus engine has a few pictures of cam shaft bearing wear due to glass bead blasting. This book is the bible for Lotus TC engine rebuilding. Both are pretty informed sources IMO, so I take that advice seriously.

    Ken
     
  16. staatsof

    staatsof Nine Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 13, 2005
    96,397
    Fuggetaboutitland
    Full Name:
    Bob
    Thanks Ken.

    Coincidentally, they are located 5 miles from my Ranch but I'm never there.
    Stuck on the east coast ....

    Bob S.
     
  17. bill308

    bill308 Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    May 13, 2001
    1,225
    Windsor, CT
    Full Name:
    Bill Sebestyen
    Well I'm a little intrigued with the dry ice blasting. I have no idea where you would get this media and how much one would need and how long one would have to work with it before it vanished.

    Presumably, the dry ice is hard enough abrade the carbon deposits in situ. The temperature shock may aid in cracking the deposits as the temperature of CO2 is at least -110 F, at atmospheric pressure. It is highly unlikely that this temperature shock would warp any of the metal even if were in sudden and intimate contact with a block of C02. If it is hard enough to abrade the carbon deposits, then it is hard enough to pock mark the aluminum intake track. On the inlet side, this is not necessarily a bad result, as one wants a little texture for air flow reasons. It breaks up the boundary layer. Exhaust ports want a smooth, polished surface to discourage carbon adhesion. Carbon build up on the inlet tracts is not a concern because the temperatures during operation are much lower due to the cooling effects of the air-fuel charge.

    I think the trick would be to deliver the dry ice blast media using a gun, where one wants it, with an extended nozzle. One would likely have to fabricate one to reach in far enough.

    Assuming the inlet valve were closed, most of the carbon would be blown out the intake port opening during the blast operation and most of the rest could be vaccuumed out. Most of the remainder would be blown out the exhaust upon starting. The dry ice is not a concern as it will just evaporate as CO2 gas after several minutes.

    Bill
     
  18. staatsof

    staatsof Nine Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 13, 2005
    96,397
    Fuggetaboutitland
    Full Name:
    Bob
    Most of the opertators I found do large comercial jobs. Not really practicall to have them conme to your site. Material is $ 0.35 per lbs with a 500lb minimum.
    I did find one that was in a lull period so if I brought the car by it was relatively inexpensive. They are located near Hershey PA.

    It shouldn't too long now before this is banned though. It's CO2 after all.
     
  19. lndshrk

    lndshrk Formula Junior

    Nov 7, 2003
    753
    SLC, Utah
    Full Name:
    Jim Conforti
    Ken,

    How would glass get from the intake bowl to a bearing? Assume that the
    oil filtration circuit is working normally.

    (BTW, you could just as easily use ceramic or plastic blast media - it all
    depends on the exact alloy you're blasting, the pressure you're blasting at,
    and the intended result/finish you want.)

    Jim
     
  20. Brian Harper

    Brian Harper F1 Rookie
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Feb 17, 2006
    4,078
    San Jose area
    Full Name:
    Brian Harper
    Oil filters have a bypass valve for when the oil pressure differential across the media gets too high. It is a safety mechanism to prevent the media from failing completely. This valve will open when the filter is clogged or when the oil is too thick to go through the media fast enough - cold starts, cold mornings, high revs. If you pump a piece of anything when the bypass valve is open, onward to your bearings.
     
  21. staatsof

    staatsof Nine Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 13, 2005
    96,397
    Fuggetaboutitland
    Full Name:
    Bob
    I have to agree and it's the only plausible explanation for the bearing damage I've observed on an engine I currently have apart that had the oil and filter changed after every track day. I had "stuff" get into to the oil sump due to a turbo failure due to track debris smackin' one of my turbos.

    Bob S.
     

Share This Page