McLaren Charged by FIA! | Page 8 | FerrariChat

McLaren Charged by FIA!

Discussion in 'F1' started by pastmaster, Jul 12, 2007.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    Yes indeed :(.

    Pete
     
  2. moretti

    moretti Five Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 1, 2003
    59,757
    Australia
    Full Name:
    John
    I agree, just winding you up, you don't normally fall for it :D

    but don't lay the entire blame at Ferrari's feet, they had too many years where they had the entire garagisti against them so the seige mentality will set in.

    Bottomline, McL had the docs, they knew about them, could have cleared themselves easily by calling Ferrari and the FIA the second they received them, they didn't, complicite in this case .

    btw, I'm in Sydney next month, we should try to catch up, I've still got your number from a few years ago , is it still current ? :)
     
  3. QT3141

    QT3141 Formula Junior

    Jul 24, 2006
    609
    And in fact, if driver's points are docked, the silver lining on the cloud is if LH decides he's had enough of McL (his previously stated stance is that he'll never leave, but this may change things) and defects to SF. :D I guess he'll have to be a test/backup for the moment, but maybe, just maybe, he'll get a first drive in 2008.
     
  4. bill365

    bill365 F1 Rookie

    Nov 3, 2003
    3,319
    Chicago area
    Full Name:
    Bill
    #179 bill365, Jul 15, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  5. jknight

    jknight F1 Veteran

    Oct 30, 2004
    7,821
    Central Texas
    Scary situation - I actually made sense of the majority of it.

    Just read this comment by Lewis:

    . . .the young Brit is refusing to let the situation get to him….

    "All I can do is focus on the racing - my job is to go to every race and try to

    Bernie in another article said if McLaren weren't going to give Lewis a seat this year, he would do his very best to find him one.


    Carol
     
  6. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    Should be :).

    Pete
    A proud Kiwi
     
  7. bill365

    bill365 F1 Rookie

    Nov 3, 2003
    3,319
    Chicago area
    Full Name:
    Bill
    Well, I wouldn't get your hopes up, contracts do not usually make moral or other behavioral requirements, on the corporate side. It might be difficult for him to break his obligation, even IF he wanted to.

    I know I'd be pretty pis+ed about now.
     
  8. jknight

    jknight F1 Veteran

    Oct 30, 2004
    7,821
    Central Texas
    We must be on a similar thought wave length right now. As I was reading other documents, especially the one where Bernie promised Lewis a seat, I was thinking . . okay . .supposing this affects the drivers driving for McLaren, what if those drivers drive for another team - if I were Renault, I'd move one of the guys or both to testing the remainder of the season (they're not setting the world on fire anyway) and voila new Renault team. I hope that Bernie's influence could give the two guys a break. At least there'd be competition for the remainder of the season. I just hate to see the guys screwed by Coughlan.

    Carol
     
  9. bill365

    bill365 F1 Rookie

    Nov 3, 2003
    3,319
    Chicago area
    Full Name:
    Bill
    I thought you'd like that.
     
  10. jknight

    jknight F1 Veteran

    Oct 30, 2004
    7,821
    Central Texas

    Some of the great drivers in the last 20 years have walked out of a deal at some point in their careers. It was necessary at the time to force the issue. Alain Prost did it with McLaren when he left to join Renault, Ayrton Senna did it with Toleman so he could go to Lotus, Michael Schumacher did it to go from Jordan to Benetton, Mika Hakkinen did it to go from Lotus to McLaren and Kimi Raikkonen did it to get from Sauber to McLaren.

    Carol
     
  11. bill365

    bill365 F1 Rookie

    Nov 3, 2003
    3,319
    Chicago area
    Full Name:
    Bill
    Hi Carol,
    I know that there have been drivers, that have changed teams before their contracts have expired before... but I think that Hamilton's, may have McLaren, in a bit more of a favorable position, due to the nurturing relationship that has preceded his F1 debut.

    Bill
     
  12. 1_can_dream

    1_can_dream F1 Veteran

    Jan 7, 2006
    8,051
    Colorado
    Full Name:
    Kyle
    Even so I don't see Lewis jumping ship to Ferrari.
     
  13. 1_can_dream

    1_can_dream F1 Veteran

    Jan 7, 2006
    8,051
    Colorado
    Full Name:
    Kyle
    Crazy double posts....
     
  14. jknight

    jknight F1 Veteran

    Oct 30, 2004
    7,821
    Central Texas
    That's probably quite correct but one would think that if an adverse situation occurred, that in Lewis' best interest, he would be able to go elsewhere if only on a temporary "loaned" driver basis. I'd be inclined to think his sponsors might have some input . . .money talks. . .

    What a big mess this all is and so unnecessary.

    Carol
     
  15. SRT Mike

    SRT Mike Two Time F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    23,343
    Taxachusetts
    Full Name:
    Raymond Luxury Yacht
    No way McLaren is going to get a fair shake in THIS public court of opinion. Some here would not be content until the team was disbanded and Ron Dennis was in jail.

    Fact of the matter is, the official statement says that Coughlan told some folks at McLaren he had the docs and nobody wanted to look at them and everyone told him to get rid of them. I wonder how many here would pick up the phone and call the police if their spouse or child came home and said they hit a parked car and got scared and drove off? I'll wager... ohh... about 0% of you would. It's only natural to defend one's own, whether it be an employee or family member. It's clear Coughlans motive was to leverage a higher paying job at a new team, so divulging all that info to McLaren would be unhelpful to him.

    McLaren was not in posession of the info - that much is clear. Some want to say that just because an employee had the info, its the same as the team having it and willfully using it - yeah, right! Thats like saying that having access to a gun is the same as using it to kill someone. They likely did not use the info, and did not even look at it. Surely Coughlan saw it and knew much of it, but I bet very little, if any, made it to the actual car.

    McLaren shouldn't be penalized any points, nor should the drivers. They should not face any kind of race ban. Maybe they ought to pay a fine or issue some sort of apology for their employees behaviour, but that's about it.

    Of course, if McLaren wins the WDC and/or WCC this year, people here will forever want to call it a Ferrari win.

    Let's wait to see what happens officially, I think. Most here are extremely biased, and if anything the FIA is Ferrari-biased. Whatever comes out of there in terms of a decision will be a lot fairer than anything decided here.
     
  16. bill365

    bill365 F1 Rookie

    Nov 3, 2003
    3,319
    Chicago area
    Full Name:
    Bill

    Absolutely !!
     
  17. D.Mauro

    D.Mauro Formula 3

    Jun 18, 2006
    1,266
    Cumming/ Hlwd Fl
    Full Name:
    Dominick
    Very well stated!
     
  18. Senna3xWC

    Senna3xWC F1 Rookie

    Nov 30, 2006
    3,152
    NYC

    Excellent post as usual, Mike.

    I have been making the same points to no avail.
     
  19. Senna3xWC

    Senna3xWC F1 Rookie

    Nov 30, 2006
    3,152
    NYC
    +1

    You are spot on, Dave
     
  20. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    May 17, 2006
    12,755
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    Extremely biased, eh?

    Would anyone care to comment on the issues of prejudgement, contradictory statements, and the evidence of bias right here in these statements?
     
  21. Senna3xWC

    Senna3xWC F1 Rookie

    Nov 30, 2006
    3,152
    NYC
    Not in the least. I am not the one who raised the issue of Ferrari ownership in the first place. You did with your idiotic post.

    Your time is better spent saving kittens in tree than trying to add an intelligent comment to this thread. You have nothing to add but insults and personal attacks. You certainly have no insight into this scandal nor F1 in general.
     
  22. amenasce

    amenasce Three Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Oct 17, 2001
    34,440
    Full Name:
    Joe Mansion
    And why not ? If i work for an ad agency and we are bidding to get the next big budget and somehow i discover the big flashy clever line from the competition but do not tell anyone else in the company . Then at the next brainstorming meeting, i submit it as my own idea and we win the budget ..

    How is that fair ? We won but by cheating. So the company shouldmt have the budget and i should be fired or more.
     
  23. GERRA456gt

    GERRA456gt Formula 3

    Jun 4, 2005
    1,407
    Australia, Melbourne
    Full Name:
    Anthony
    Look i do tend to Agree on what you have to say.
    But...
    Now maybe i might be buyiest as I am a Ferrari Fan but we have to remember that he is PART of the "TEAM". He Knew it was illegal but chose to do it. He knows how Ferrari work. He Has showed other members, of the team the info. They Would have some knowlege of how Ferrari Work, and they can deny it all they like!
    i know in the end we will see the truth but,
    Cheatin is Cheatin and they must be delt accordinly.
    Even though it will be bad for the team, but worse The Sport and FANS.
    Its like saying "SORRY" even when you dont really mean it.
    Eg. You shoot someone and say "SORRY" "i didnt mean it" you still did it now pay the consequene.
    He Is part of the "TEAM" Now the Team have to pay the consequene.
     
  24. Senna3xWC

    Senna3xWC F1 Rookie

    Nov 30, 2006
    3,152
    NYC
    Coughlan and Stepney went to Honda with the documents in hand to offer themselves out as a design team. It is pretty clear that he actively solicited the documents for his own personal gain, not on behalf of McLaren.

    If McLaren is responsible becuase the employed Coughlan, then is not Ferrari also complicit since they employed Steney?
     
  25. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    May 17, 2006
    12,755
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    Yeah - and I am responsible for the death of a kitty-cat because I have a swimming pool.
     

Share This Page