FIA's 2007 WDC decision | FerrariChat

FIA's 2007 WDC decision

Discussion in 'Other Racing' started by tifosi12, Nov 16, 2007.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2002
    Messages:
    49,633
    Location:
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    It is late afternoon in Europe. Where is the decision?
     
  2. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Messages:
    12,755
    Location:
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    They are waiting for Hillary C. to make up her mind...???
     
  3. jtremlett

    jtremlett F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2004
    Messages:
    4,791
    Unofficial word is: appeal rejected. Brazil result unchanged. Official confirmation awaited.

    Jonathan
     
  4. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2002
    Messages:
    49,633
    Location:
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    It'll be interesting to read the rationale. It should actually be thrown out because of a procedural technicality (McLaren missed to protest the results of the race).
     
  5. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Messages:
    12,755
    Location:
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    So, no Superlicense for illegal aliens?

    I always trusted Max to do the right thing.
     
  6. Tifoso1

    Tifoso1 F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2003
    Messages:
    2,602
    Location:
    Pacific NW
    Full Name:
    Anthony C.
    FIA has decided that they will order Chinese take-out tonight for dinner. That is all.
     
  7. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2002
    Messages:
    49,633
    Location:
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    LOL

    Seriously, I don't like the sound of silence. This thing should have been decided within an hour and thrown out on a technicality. The longer this lasts the less good it sounds.
     
  8. Tifoso1

    Tifoso1 F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2003
    Messages:
    2,602
    Location:
    Pacific NW
    Full Name:
    Anthony C.
    IMO, FIA has two choices: 1) Take away constructor points from BMW & Williams in Brazil, driver points as stands. Kimi wins the title or 2) Decided that driver and car are indeed one package, thus DQ BMW & Williams and their drivers in Brazil, but in doing so, they will have to DQ Alonso and Hamilton for the 2007 season all together. Kimi wins the title.

    If they do anything other than one or the other, what will follow in the F1 world will be unthinkable.
     
  9. Wolfgang5150

    Wolfgang5150 F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    4,706
    In all honesty - I think McLaren are getting screwed. Forget the stepneygate drama - and Yes I am glad Kimi is Champion. But in a normal year, the FIA would exclude these two teams and drivers immediately. just look at Canada 2004 when both Williams were disqualified for having brake ducts that were millimeters too large.
    Just my 2 lira.
    Kevin S.
    Orchard Park, NY (tifosi to the core)
     
  10. Wolfgang5150

    Wolfgang5150 F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    4,706
    FYI - Not official.............
    Court of Appeal rejects McLaren claim
    16/11/2007

    Although it has yet to be officially confirmed, we hear that the International Court of Appeal has rejected McLaren's appeal against the result of the Brazilian GP and that consequently the World Championship standings remain unchanged.

    We repeat, this has not been officially confirmed but does come from a very good source.


    http://www.pitpass.com/fes_php/pitpass_news_item.php?fes_art_id=33411
    _________________
     
  11. ferrari4evr1

    ferrari4evr1 Formula 3

    Joined:
    May 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,249
    They screwed themselves.....
     
  12. Wolfgang5150

    Wolfgang5150 F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    4,706
    Well - my point is - aside from the colossal f-up that was Stepneygate - they are getting screwed in this stand alone incident.
    Kevin
     
  13. Wolfgang5150

    Wolfgang5150 F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    4,706
    BTW - I believe that under British law they have to wait until after 12/31 to lower the boom on Mike Coughlan. I would expect a major civil suit against him by McLaren..........
     
  14. tonyc

    tonyc Formula 3

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Messages:
    1,665
    Location:
    Monterey, CA
    Full Name:
    Tony C
    A third option is to just fine BMW and Williams so there is a penalty for the infraction and be done
    with this season (and mess).
     
  15. DeSoto

    DeSoto F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    Messages:
    7,795
    There is not clear criteria for this (as usual). In Brasil 95 they disqualified Benetton and Williams (a problem with gasoline too) but didn´t disqualify the drivers.
     
  16. 400SPYDER

    400SPYDER F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,473
    Location:
    Kent, England
    Full Name:
    kevan
  17. ferrari4evr1

    ferrari4evr1 Formula 3

    Joined:
    May 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,249
  18. YellowbirdRS

    YellowbirdRS Formula 3

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2005
    Messages:
    1,765
    Location:
    DFW/RGV/MX
    Full Name:
    Xavier
    The FIA International Court of Appeal met in London on Thursday, November 15, 2007, to examine an appeal lodged by the Motor Sports Association (MSA) on behalf of its licence-holder Vodafone McLaren Mercedes against the decision (document 41) of the Panel of the Stewards of the 2007 Brazilian Grand Prix dated 21 October 2007 and counting towards the 2007 FIA Formula One World Championship.

    Following a report from the Technical Delegate indicating that the temperature of fuel pumped into the cars N°9 - Nick Heidfeld, N°10 - Robert Kubica, N°16 - Nico Rosberg and N°17 - Kazuki Nakajima, was more than 10 degrees centigrade below ambient temperature, the Stewards of the Meeting met to consider whether a penalty should be imposed. Having heard the evidence they decided not to impose a penalty as they had sufficient doubt as to both the temperature of the fuel on board the car and to the true ambient temperature.

    Having heard the explanations of both parties and having examined the various documents and other evidence, the Court decided that the appeal lodged by Vodafone McLaren Mercedes is inadmissible.

    The International Court of Appeal was presided over by Mr Jan STOVICEK (Czech Republic), elected President, and composed of Mr John CASSIDY (United States), Mr Vassilis KOUSSIS (Greece) and Mr José MACEDO e CUNHA (Portugal).

    The full text of the International Court of Appeal’s decision is available, on request, from the secretariat of the FIA International Court of Appeal in Paris.


    Note: Unofficial document for media use, not binding on the International Court of Appeal.
     
  19. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2002
    Messages:
    49,633
    Location:
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    "Appeal is inadmissible". As I thought, a technicality that killed the whole thing in the first place: McLaren cannot appeal simply because they forgot to protest the race results. Only an answer/decision from the FIA to such a protest could be appealed. Gee, they must feel really stupid now.

    PS: Had they allowed the appeal, there would be still the two can of worms of a) the temperature measured not at the nozzle (as the regulations claim it should be, but isn't) and b) two different temperature readings at the Brazilian GP (the one used by the FIA stewards, and the official one transmitted to the teams, both showing different temps). Forget the political implications of a McLaren Championship win, these two issues alone would have made the FIA look even more incompetent as Ferrari's lawyers would have fought them to the bitter end.
     
  20. puppylinux

    puppylinux Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Messages:
    15
    There was no way on earth the establishment (Bernie and friends) could let McLaren win. Letting Hamilton have the title would have been bad for the sport in a scandal ridden year. F1 should asterisk 2007* as the year of shame.
     
  21. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    May 12, 2007
    Messages:
    26,826
    Location:
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    DING DING round 2 goes to MAX It doesn't make me happy or sad..
     
  22. Back Marker

    Back Marker Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Messages:
    545
    Location:
    South
    Full Name:
    Tom
    Kimi's title was won fair and square, and does not deserve an asterisk.
     
  23. Brakefade

    Brakefade Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    Messages:
    306
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Full Name:
    Luis
    Awesome!!! :D

    What is Mclaren gonna do now? Hand a fake WDC trophy to Hamilton?
     
  24. jk0001

    jk0001 F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,706
    Location:
    Sun Coast
    Full Name:
    Jim
    Great news, the decision was fair. Now Ron Dennis and his band of cheats can now settle down and try to rebuild the Mclaren name. They really pulled a boner this year.
     
  25. Isobel

    Isobel F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    10,630
    Location:
    On a Wave's Chicane
    Full Name:
    Is, Izzy for Australians
    As close to an asterisk-free champion as we're going to get from 2007. Ron and Lew, thanks for hanging on to those shreddies in China. That faint glimmer and the bag of neutrals in Brazil made things right. Finally, it's time to erect the tombstone for the year of accusation.
     

Share This Page