Is there a correlation?

A board I haunt is yakking about the hoary subject of whether there is a correlation between the size of a man's (ahem) unit of copulation and the type of vehicle he drives.

People probably buy sports cars and large 4 x 4's because they like them, and not to compensate for a natural shortcoming, but what do I know?

I am reminded, however, of some memorable post-coital pillow talk from a co-ed who said that her boyfriend, who drove a Jaguar XK-E, was endowed like a hamster (ouch).

 

Paging Urotrash! Uro! This is YOUR subject matter

 

Merge thread with the Vatican alter boy first gear subject...

Referee says (after showing you the yellow card) - play on!

 

Then can we make the same leap in logic to those driving **** cars? Are they "huge"?

This is an r-tarded subject that was likely started by some jealous ****** who had to bash the owner of some car he lusted after.
Plain and simple.


Not saying there aren't those out there who buy stuff like cars due to some sort of issues, but the size of one's unit (or lack thereof) is a stupid reason to buy a fancy car.

 

I'll admit, mine is small but it cums fast!

 

Shouldn't this be in the technical section?

 

Well, I really like the Ferrari, and I would never own an SUV. So what does that say?

BT

 

Indeed.

While it IS generally true those who drive Ferraris are endowed like mosquitos, it is equally true those that ALMOST drive Ferraris (or should I say "drive ALMOST FERRARIS") are hung like cavallinos rampante.

 

If this logic is true, wouldn't it make more sense to spend the money on an implant instead of an import.

Said about a prominent attourney that recently passed away here in SC, "He's the only man that I know
of that spent $3 million on a 4-inch dick".

 

I'm putting a bumper sticker on my Ferrari that says, ' AND I have a big D I C K!'