Three Multi Millionaires Threatened With Bans For Fighting on the Forum

Dear Comrades,

RufMD, 410SA and Joe Sackey have been threatened with bans by Dave the Moderator Goderator Commissar for fighting on the F-40 Cam Belts thread. The thread has since been closed.

I am wondering whether a conspiracy has taken place as seemingly no one has been able to answer the cam belt question satisfactorily. Accordingly, has this trilogy of exalted status conspired to have the thread closed rather than admit defeat? And, please, is there anyone who is able to advise why the 512 TR cam belts are changed every five years in the United States of America and yet the recommendation is three years in England. Similarly the cam belts on the USA F-40 are scheduled for changing every three years and yet the English F-40 must have the cam belts changed every two years. Why should this be the case, please?


With kind regards,

512 Tea Are

 

Dear Comrade mattymouse33,

One must bear in mind that the United Kingdon is approximately the size of Oregon. We are but an island - a jewel set within the seas. The United States of America could hardly be more disparate and accordingly has extremes of climate. I cannot therefore believe that it has anything to do with the climate in England. Yet, no one seems to be able to provide a categoric answer to this puzzle, wrapped as it is within an enigma, and coddled in abject mystery.

Indeed, something akin to a Masonic plot has already occurred with the clandestine closing of one thread - such is the secret of the US/UK Cam Belt that it is protected by the American trilogical hierarchy of millionaire medics, millionaire motor car dealers and millionaire lay preachers.

With kind regards,

512 Tea Are

 

Dear Comrade jorge-enzo,

I never stated that they were banned. The Goderator, Moderator Commissar, Dave, has perfectly reasonably informed this trilogy that they will be banned if they don't buck their ideas up and stop being naughty boys. Therefore, he has threatened to ban them if they do not discontinue their naughtiness.

The problem as I see it, is that Joey the car sales proprietor has lots of cars that he continually acquires but never sells. He lavishes untold sums upon them and then comes on here with highly detailed accounts of the spirited motoring that he performs in them across the plains of California. RufMD also has a huge collection of motor cars. His vehicles are used as ambulances in pursuit of his occupation of medic and as such are tax deductable. 410SA being a lay preacher uses his motor cars for rounding up the congregation for the Sunday morning service. As such his cars are not tax deductible. Furthermore, 410SA has recently acquired a 275 GTB replete with aluminum body. Joey has wanted one for years as has RufMD. However, and whilst this is far from within the public domain, word has got out that Joey acquired a Lear Jet last week. This is fully tax deductable as he will fly around the world seeking out cars to acquire for his 'not-for-sale' car sales business. 410SA has a heliocopeter specifically for the purposes of transporting his magnificent collection of motor cars around the United States of America where he races them and holds speed records for almost all of the race circuits. Both Joey and RufMD would like to race their cars but are too busy following their respective occupations to do so. And from the foregoing you will establish that from time to time a little conflict occurs. Dave, the moderator, goderator, commissar has to then come on and close the place down and remonstrate with them in the strongest of terms. Hence my F-40 Cam Belt thread has become locked and no more posts may be placed.

With kind regards,

512 Tea Are

 

Dear Comrade SRT Mike,

I beg to inform you that you have misspelt 'knowledgeable.' Furthermore, the rhetorical technique to which you allude of referring to something by professing to omit it, is called 'preterition.'

Culminating a sentence with a question mark is a poor literary technique.

With kind regards,

512 Tea Are

 

Dear Comrade SRT Mike,

You may not be aware that there is a button that one can use to switch a contributor off. I have never wished to switch anyone off. But I shall not be at all offended should you do so. I try my absolute best to be helpful wherever I can and therefore am only too pleased to help you a little by advising you that you spelt diarrhoea incorrectly within your post.

All good wishes from England.

With kind regards,

512 Tea Are