blame the guy who started it . he wants us here . i say take it back to AE , where it belongs , agreed ?
too small an audience scud for Aircon, being on here is like whinging about a dodgy builder on Today Tonight
If there's some consistency between what you say and what you do, perhaps things will evolve in a manner more agreeable to you.
one thing at a time vmax lets focus on the $1m question thats gone unanswered/dodged WHY is Aircon claiming Rog HOPES he will crash....when in actual fact all he said on AE was that a "near miss" would make him laugh??
*shrug* Not of my concern - I haven't read the AE thread and I don't really care. I've not said anything to support either side, I'm merely highlighting the fact that certain people's actions appear inconsistent with the content of their posts in this thread.
theres nothing in there that pless hasnt shed tears about here. if youve read this, you know all about it and then some *yawn* the bottom line is, scud made a comment that suggested a near miss would make him laugh...and pless is now flapping his arms and (incorrectly) stating that rog said he hopes for/would laugh at an ACTUAL crash im not saying scuds comment was in the best taste....but it was not the malicious remark pless is selling it as. its an important distinction to make, dontcha think?
I am not wasting a non refundable hour of my life on reading 12 pages of drivel. I assume there is no resolution of anything any way!
Correct, I shouldn't have used 'subtle'. Scud, my post was a tad ambigious regarding my reference to your 'past performance'. That was mentioned in the context of being Peter's view and what informed his ice comment. I make no personal assumptions about your driving skill... cos I have no knowledge but for what I've read here, etc.
just skim the pics, the only worthwhile bit. cmon scott, you know pete! he doesnt WANT a resolution what would he do for the rest of the day??
"I am not wasting a non refundable hour of my life on reading 12 pages of drivel" I couldnt agree more , life is too short. Michael
So, you are comparing scud to a dodgy builder on Today Tonight. LOL Actually the first page or so of this thread was quite interesting with discussion on what you think and what you say being two different things. Scud (or anyone else for that matter) or not, the theorey behind the discussion was thought (or thaught) provoking. Unfortunately Scud took it too personally and he and his new lapdog have just been posting drivel ever since. Pity really.
actually...you make an excellent point. everyone, just refer to post number 1. if in doubt re-read it. unlike scott and others, i'm more than happy to continue ad infinitum...but at the end of the day, the only person not changing his story and clutching at straws is me. http://ferrarichat.com/forum/showpost.php?p=137434917&postcount=1
we need a light hearted laugh around here it has everything. today tonight, coren, and pless in full 80s mode
hey, waz, you have all the originality of an ABBA tribute band its good to see you pipe up though, usually your stirring is relegated to behind-closed-doors situations where you may do so unchallenged and was that "theorey" or theory?
Your constant posts regarding originality are very unoriginal. Time for you to get some new material. Gee, I made a spelling error. At least it was grammatically correct. Read some of your mates sh1te. You really have lost the plot.
