** Possible Spoiler** Ferrari were aware of potential problems | FerrariChat

** Possible Spoiler** Ferrari were aware of potential problems

Discussion in 'Other Racing' started by jk0001, Aug 26, 2008.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. jk0001

    jk0001 F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,706
    Location:
    Sun Coast
    Full Name:
    Jim
    http://www.planetf1.com/story/0,18954,3213_4051453,00.html



    Ferrari admit they were aware that Kimi Raikkonen's engine was at risk of blowing up during the European Grand Prix.


    The Scuderia believe the same con rod issues that troubled Felipe Massa during the Hungarian GP is to blame. Massa was just three laps away from a win at the Hungagoring when his engine blew up.


    Raikkonen suffered the same fate during this weekend's race around the streets of Valencia, and initial analysis of the Finn's car confirmed the breakage of a con rod.


    "The engineers were aware of a potential risk in general terms with the 056 engine fitted to Kimi's car, which was on its second race, given that the con rods were part of the same batch used on Felipe's engine," said a statement.


    "Changing the engine on Kimi's car would have seen the Finn start from far down the grid at a track where it appeared that overtaking was impossible, proving it's not enough to bring Formula One to a street circuit in a fantastic location to produce spectacular racing."
     
  2. Far Out

    Far Out F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Messages:
    9,768
    Location:
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Full Name:
    Florian
    So that confirms what I wrote in the "cooling problems" thread:


     
  3. jk0001

    jk0001 F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    6,706
    Location:
    Sun Coast
    Full Name:
    Jim
    Looking back now, They should have changed the engine and taken the penalty. But now they will have a fresh engine for Spa.
     
  4. Far Out

    Far Out F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Messages:
    9,768
    Location:
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Full Name:
    Florian
    There was a certain chance that the engine would last, I guess... and if he had started from the back, he would have lost any chance for a win at that track.
     
  5. Gatorrari

    Gatorrari F1 World Champ Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2004
    Messages:
    16,460
    Location:
    Georgia
    Full Name:
    Jim Pernikoff
  6. GrndLkNatv

    GrndLkNatv Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    878
    Location:
    Grand Lake, Colorado
    Full Name:
    Mark Stephens
    So this is the company that makes the con rods:

    http://www.pankl.com/en/

    and this is the company that makes the pistons:

    http://www.mahle.com/


    Apparently pankl makes the rods for all F1 engines for the most part so it could have been a Mercedes with the same problem..
     
  7. Lindsay_Ross

    Lindsay_Ross Formula Junior

    Joined:
    May 14, 2007
    Messages:
    416
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Full Name:
    Lindsay Ross
    I loved the look of the circuit but was really really disappointed with the lack of passing. There really was none. I agree, Ferrari were looking ahead, and Kimi got the shaft cause they know Massa had a good engine and Kimi's had a really good chance to pop. Everytime he picked up the pace too much, it seemed like he backed off. Meh. Lets hope that a fresh engine for Kimi at Spa will turn things around.
     
  8. jssans

    jssans Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2005
    Messages:
    839
    Location:
    St. Louis
    Full Name:
    Josh
    I think SF would have taken the penalty if they knew the engine would perform 100%. Which leads me to believe that Ferraris engines are prone to blow at this point in the season(that point is obvious). If the rods are all the same for all the cars then you could deduct that the stress Ferrari puts on those rods at this stage are greater than other teams. IMO Ferrari has tweaked their engines to a point where they don't have a good idea of reliability. Ferrari clearly has a huge grey area in development at this stage.
     
  9. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    30,120
    Location:
    FRA - nice city with a really big airport :)
    Toro Rosso not destroying engines. Customer motor a bit less power on hand?
     
  10. GrndLkNatv

    GrndLkNatv Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    878
    Location:
    Grand Lake, Colorado
    Full Name:
    Mark Stephens
    Rumor is that STR has about 25 less BHP than Ferrari but they now also have the new seamless shift transmission which looks to be better than Ferrari's.
     
  11. Far Out

    Far Out F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Messages:
    9,768
    Location:
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Full Name:
    Florian
    Read the statement! Manufacturing errors on a batch of rods, and Ferrari wasn't able to change the rods, otherwise they had received a penalty.
     
  12. SRT Mike

    SRT Mike Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    23,343
    Location:
    Taxachusetts
    Full Name:
    Raymond Luxury Yacht
    Too bad for Ferrari that they already used their "one free engine swap with no penalty" for the 08 season (after they swapped Kimis motor following Massas prior failure)
     
  13. 1_can_dream

    1_can_dream F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2006
    Messages:
    8,051
    Location:
    Colorado
    Full Name:
    Kyle
    Does each driver get a freebie or is it just one for the team? Kimi got his freebie after the exhaust decided to pop off and if I'm not mistaken Massa hasn't used a free swap?

    I'm surprised we found out so soon what the failure was tho everyone did have a good idea that it would turn out to be the same fate as Massa's.
     
  14. IanMac

    IanMac Formula 3

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,455
    Location:
    Scotland
    Full Name:
    Ian
    I imagine the con rod sticking out of the engine block was the giveaway. :D
     
  15. DeSoto

    DeSoto F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    Messages:
    7,792
    The rods are built by the same manufacturer for almost all the cars, but that doesn´t mean that they build the same rods for everybody, each engine may use different rods.
     
  16. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    May 12, 2007
    Messages:
    26,826
    Location:
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    Blame Lewis...................................:D
     
  17. Senna1994

    Senna1994 F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2003
    Messages:
    13,189
    Location:
    Orange County
    Full Name:
    Anthony T
    Haha Steve, actually, I think Kimi would have been better to start off in 14th place with a new motor then lose points no matter what against not only the WDC but more importantly the WCC.
     
  18. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    May 12, 2007
    Messages:
    26,826
    Location:
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    Very true in retrospect Tony, I suppose they were hoping for the best, I'm sure it will be sorted ASAP..
     
  19. xpensivewino

    xpensivewino Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2008
    Messages:
    954
    Location:
    Simi Valley CA
    Full Name:
    Need to know basis
    I would like to say that Mahle is one of the finest metalurgists in the world. They have produced some of the finest engine components for world champions for decades, from F1 to Rally, as well as all sorts of high performance street engines. Ferrari could pick no better.
     
  20. R2112

    R2112 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,422
    Location:
    TX
    +1 Tony.

    With a healthy engine Kimi could have easily finished in the points and most likely podium'd. - (is that a word?)
     
  21. SRT Mike

    SRT Mike Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2003
    Messages:
    23,343
    Location:
    Taxachusetts
    Full Name:
    Raymond Luxury Yacht
    Another example of how the stupid rules ruin the spectacle of the sport. Ferrari KNEW Kimis engine was potentially a problem yet the asinine rules that Mosley implemented made it so they couldn't change the engine.

    How is that in any way good for the spectacle of the sport?

    Oh, I forgot - it saves money right?

    Except during the last Racing Per Matchett segment, the McLaren guy said they cast around 100 engines per year. Since there are 18 races, 2 drivers, one engine per 2 races, that's 18 engines per year. I am sure the cost of 18 engines (out of ~100) is not that big of a savings for the team, and would be *dwarfed* by the cost of switching from V10's to V8's, as well as the costs or R&D and inspection to make engines last 2 races.

    Good job Mosley!
     
  22. Senna1994

    Senna1994 F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2003
    Messages:
    13,189
    Location:
    Orange County
    Full Name:
    Anthony T
    "355" shut the Fcku up, everyone is tired of your stupid ****ty posts on here. Learn something besides posting garbage. Franco you for one is someone who has been always on my Ignore List, but your are the Biggest Ass Hatt on this site, with your stupid posts.
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2008
  23. Far Out

    Far Out F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Messages:
    9,768
    Location:
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Full Name:
    Florian
    +1
     

Share This Page