Qualifying could change AGAIN for 2009 | FerrariChat

Qualifying could change AGAIN for 2009

Discussion in 'Other Racing' started by AlexO91, Nov 21, 2008.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. AlexO91

    AlexO91 F1 Rookie

    Sep 26, 2008
    2,909
    NW England
    Full Name:
    Alex
  2. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    How about a 10K Iron man contest in between the sessions. Lets see who is really in shape. I say 1 10 lap race to set qualifying. Full tanks and then start the race on whats left. No pit stops and if you wreck you start on the pit lane. No point for pole.

    Points only to those who finish 2nd or worse.

    Title decided by wins only.
    You win the most races you win the title.

    Also the driver doing the best on Strictly Come Dancing gets an extra year on his contract and pole starts for each week he is still in contention as a dancer. :)
     
  3. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Being pedantic, FOTA is meeting on Dec 4th - If they agree, then they'll present it to the FIA.

    It actually sounds like a reasonable idea to me - In short (from Autosport):

    I reckon you'd have to allow 'em a few "warm up" laps first, but it could be cool I think.....

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  4. senna21

    senna21 F1 Rookie

    Jul 2, 2004
    3,334
    Los Angeles, CA
    Full Name:
    Charles W
    So basically it would be a 14 + ? laps free for all. It's interesting to say the least. I certainly don't dislike it but, I'm not sure I'm on board with it either. I think this format would certainly help Kimi. :) That, I'm all for.
     
  5. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    That's not the way I read it - My take is everyone goes out (we'll leave any "warm up" laps aside for now) - Everyone crosses the start and records a lap time. If you're the slowest, you're done for the day. Everyone else continues, and after 1 more lap, if you're the "suckiest", you're "outta there!"......

    You don't have to be fastest, just not slowest..... (I presume previous "fast laps" still count!.... ;) ) - Eventually, after 14 laps, 14 cars are gone -> Fresh rubber and go for it..... NO friggin "fuel load BS" - That I really do like.

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  6. AustinMartin

    AustinMartin F1 Veteran

    Mar 1, 2008
    5,445
    Los Angeles/Idaho
    I smell Bernie.....
     
  7. Far Out

    Far Out F1 Veteran

    Feb 18, 2007
    9,768
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Full Name:
    Florian
    Sounds like knockout in Need For Speed...
     
  8. AlexO91

    AlexO91 F1 Rookie

    Sep 26, 2008
    2,909
    NW England
    Full Name:
    Alex
    That's how i understand it yes.
     
  9. GoFerrari28

    GoFerrari28 Formula 3

    Jun 16, 2004
    2,313
    Ridgemont, CA
    Full Name:
    Jeff Spicoli
    I say make them all play quarters the night before the race, and the last man standing has pole.
     
  10. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,478
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    sounds good!
     
  11. Far Out

    Far Out F1 Veteran

    Feb 18, 2007
    9,768
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Full Name:
    Florian
    That would mean Kimi having the pole in every race. I like that.
     
  12. SPEEDCORE

    SPEEDCORE Four Time F1 World Champ

    Jul 11, 2005
    46,182
    Full Name:
    Toe Knee
    How about going back to the oldskool way. What's wrong with the oldskool way? How is this randomness cost effective? They used to be limited to 12laps giving them 4~ runs to get fastest lap. Running as light as possible thus using less fuel.

    They can keep Parc Ferme but I want fastest on the day not fastest based on tomorrows strategy. Alot of Pole's were lost to other drivers that didn't deserve them due to this nonsense.

    I know I know, how about they all just run over Bernie and Max during the offseason. :mad:
     
  13. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,478
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    yea..i 100% agree. problem with that format was, the teams, i.e. Ferrari, Mclaren, only came out the last 5 mins of the session, then everyone complains about 'traffic'
     
  14. Gilles27

    Gilles27 F1 World Champ

    Mar 16, 2002
    13,337
    Ex-Urbia
    Full Name:
    Jack
    WTF?! That was MY idea! I'll find the thread...Damn idea-thievin' bastards!
     
  15. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    In the really "old" days they could whatever the hell they wanted - 20 laps if they wanted/needed to.... Trouble there was, the track was basically empty for the first 3/4 of the session (been there, done that - watching an empty track is *really* boring!) That's the basic reason they started "messing" with quali - To "improve the show".......

    I'd also like to see 'em do away with parc-ferme - Not a return to qualifying cars, but why the hell shouldn't they be allowed to change stuff (wing angles, ride height and fuel load etc). And, let 'em run as light as they want and refuel before the race - I fail to see any way this stupid rule "improves the show".

    My 02c,
    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  16. 1_can_dream

    1_can_dream F1 Veteran

    Jan 7, 2006
    8,051
    Colorado
    Full Name:
    Kyle
    Agreed, still make them go out there for the knockout qualifying sessions to keep cars on the track, but get rid of all the regulations that don't allow the cars to be changed at all and get rid of that stupid race fuel load rule.
     
  17. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    Whatever they decide, I hope for one that there is clear and precise consistant steward rulings, ones that as fans we can understand, and there be no grey area.

    If it aint broke, why fix it.
     
  18. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    +1

    Isn't the subject of "permanent" stewards on the agenda soon as well? [Dec 4th maybe?]

    But, IMHO, it *is* broke - *IF* FOTA agree (always doubtful, as the evil pygmy knows all too well) we'll see the fastest 6 cars for a minimum of 14 laps. Up to at least 20 (timed) laps for pole - That's not counting in & out laps and any "warm up" laps...... The more I think on this, the more I really do like the idea......

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  19. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    Yes Ian, I debated putting why fix it!, and on the whole the scheme looks appealing I agree, it's just when Max get's his twisting mits on it and takes the credit, that bit worry's me.
     
  20. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    MadMax is welcome to the "credit" if that's what it takes IMHO.

    However, as I alluded to earlier, the FOTA agreeing to *anything* unanimously is pretty rare..... Hopefully, for once, they can "stand united" against the crazies running the show. We'll see. [The "single engine supplier" debate seems to have cooled for the moment, which has to be good?]

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  21. toddjw73

    toddjw73 F1 Rookie

    Feb 5, 2004
    3,506
    Nor-Cal
    Full Name:
    Todd Westbrook
    I like this idea! :D

    Be sure all drivers hit the track on a full fuel load and truly fight for the pole. None of this waiting until the last 5 Minutes BS. Eliminations until the last 6, then a fastest lap of the final 6 gets the pole. Start the race with what fuel remains. That would be a show. Maybe it would get some of these drivers to really put forth some harder effort and fight for it.
     
  22. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Hmm - I believe they'll be allowed to refuel before the race. Or at least before the "pole shootout" with the fastest 6 maybe? - Which is fine with me, other than that "+1".

    It does bring up a question though - If I'm Force India, chances are I'm not going to last more than a couple of laps - I'll fuel for 4-5 and hope for the best!... Which might be "interesting" in and of itself.........

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  23. Gilles27

    Gilles27 F1 World Champ

    Mar 16, 2002
    13,337
    Ex-Urbia
    Full Name:
    Jack
    What about this idea--the bottom 6 teams in points can run 3 cars. This would increase the points potential and change who gets to run three cars race to race. It could add some excitement to the middle of the grid.
     
  24. ms.gto

    ms.gto Formula Junior

    May 17, 2008
    651
    Mornington Peninsula
    Full Name:
    andrew tregurtha
    I saw this format used in Chad Read's Super X series in "the land downunder". 30 start, last 5, drop out and so on, until the Top 5 are left for the final.
    Super X is spectacular and noisy, but it's no formula 1
    To adopt the "Eliminator" style of qualifying would destroy the tactical Element of fuel loads and pit stops, ( God I miss Ross Braun )
    And I hope we dont get the flame throwers and fireworks as Massa crosses the finish line, 30ft in the air
     
  25. anguruso

    anguruso Formula Junior

    Jan 20, 2007
    493
    Hong Kong/Sydney
    Full Name:
    Angus Cheng
    Supercross is INSANE, I saw some highlights on Sunday and they were interviewing an injured driver... ON THE TRACK!
     

Share This Page