WILLIAMS GP: Position On Budget Caps | FerrariChat

WILLIAMS GP: Position On Budget Caps

Discussion in 'F1' started by RP, May 15, 2009.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. RP

    RP F1 World Champ

    Feb 9, 2005
    17,667
    Bocahuahua, Florxico
    Full Name:
    Tone Def
    Williams CEO Adam Parr has said he fears time is running out to find a solution to secure the future of Formula 1 as teams head into their day of crunch meetings in London.

    On the back of threats from Ferrari, Toyota, Renault and Red Bul to quit F1 if a two-tier category is introduced next week, team members have begun discussions at a Heathrow airport to find a way forward ahead of showdown talks with Max Mosley and Bernie Ecclestone this afternoon.

    Although most team principals were keeping tight lipped about what they expected from the day, Parr admitted that the situation was very serious.

    "I think this is a very important day," he said. "I think everybody feels we need to find a solution that makes sense for independent teams, manufacturers and the FIA - everybody."

    When asked about Williams's stance on a budget cap, Parr said: "We have always been in support of a budget cap.

    "You have to remember this was first formally put together in January 2008 in Paris, and we have always said we were in favour, although the level is something we have been flexible on as we recognise other teams are starting from a different point to us.

    "We want to make sure we can get where we need in the right timeframe.

    "Unfortunately we had an opportunity 12 months ago to do it in a more flexible and gentle way, and I fear time is running out."

    Senior sources within teams have revealed this morning that although the boycott threat was sparked by the possibility of a voluntary budget cap, it is the governance of the sport that is now of bigger concern.

    One representative from a leading team told AUTOSPORT: "Things have to change."

    Interest in today's meeting is huge, with the world's media descending on the hotel to cover events.

    It is Ferrari's threat to not enter the championship in 2010 that has fuelled coverage of the F1 crisis, and a team insider made it clear this morning that the team was not bluffing in its stance.

    "We are serious," said the source.

    Ferrari is represented by team principal Stefano Domenicali today as FOTA and Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo is unable to attend after the death of his father yesterday.

    Parr added: "I think different teams have different perspectives. For all of us the economic situation is very important but there is no question that for some of the teams it is governance of the sport.

    "The position of FOTA is very important as well."
     
  2. Wolfgang5150

    Wolfgang5150 F1 Rookie

    Oct 31, 2003
    4,706
    'Senior sources within teams have revealed this morning that although the boycott threat was sparked by the possibility of a voluntary budget cap, it is the governance of the sport that is now of bigger concern.

    One representative from a leading team told AUTOSPORT: "Things have to change"...'

    translation - MAX HAS TO GO
     
  3. RP

    RP F1 World Champ

    Feb 9, 2005
    17,667
    Bocahuahua, Florxico
    Full Name:
    Tone Def
    When asked about Williams's stance on a budget cap, Parr said: "We have always been in support of a budget cap."
     
  4. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    Correct I have have been saying that from day one.

    For one thing, the teams have in recent years been getting increasingly aggravated by Mosley's constant changing of the rules. They want stable regulations and a level playing field.

    The bottom line:
    Fota's position was summed up eloquently Mark Hughes in Autosport magazine last week:

    "Yes, the teams should get a greater share of the revenue, no the sport should not be owned by a venture capital company that squeezes half the sport's profit out of it, no the traditional venues should not be priced out of the championship, no it should not be so stupidly expensive for fans to attend a grand prix, no F1 should never be about spec cars or engines, yes F1 should be represented in North America, no it shouldn't be going to places where no-one wants to come and watch."

    Bang on !! up yours Mosley and your supporters.
     
  5. LightGuy

    LightGuy Four Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Oct 4, 2004
    45,864
    Texas
    Full Name:
    David
    I agree totally and vehemently with everything here except there should be a "spec" engine alternative like Cosworth.
     
  6. mousecatcher

    mousecatcher Formula 3

    Dec 18, 2007
    2,116
    san mateo, ca
    easy to say that now
     
  7. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    It been said for along time, in many ways.

    While I can accept folk do not like change, times change and needs must. But if you think Mosley is right and agree with the way he rules the sport waving his whip, good for you, I tend not to fly in the face of public opinion.
     
  8. mousecatcher

    mousecatcher Formula 3

    Dec 18, 2007
    2,116
    san mateo, ca
    Did I say I agree with Mosley and his methods? No. I was just highlighting the hypocrisy of FOTA being critical of FIA/FOM's treatment of F1 as a money making machine right now, while going along with it all these years.
     
  9. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    No fair comment, you didn't agree with the Max way, the problem has always been getting the teams to unite, I also think Ferrari, are being hyprocites, as last time they were nearing a break away series, Ferrari scuppered the deal, but that's the point, Max and Bernie's routine is divide and conquer.
     

Share This Page