Though there might be a few who would enjoy this. Taz Terry Phillips It was my honor to fly this original 1909 Bleriot this week. It is the oldest flying airplane in the country, second oldest in the world. Its sister ship was the first airplane to cross the English Channel, also in 1909. It has an original Anzani engine, which has been powering it for 100 years. Since it has no flying instruments, I have no idea how fast it flies, but would guess something around 30 mph. It uses wing warping for roll control, which is marginally effective at such slow speeds. The rudder is small, but produces adequate yaw, albeit somewhat delayed after control input. Pitch control is similar to modern light airplanes when flown at absolute minimum speeds. The 35 hp engine starts and runs well, but having only three cylinders fires every 240 degrees of rotation, which is to say it is not the smoothest. Who knows how much horsepower it still produces? There are neither brakes nor any way to steer it effectively on the ground, so wing walkers are necessary. It barely makes enough speed to takeoff, and with its highly cambered airfoil seems to levitate as much as fly. In flight it feels like I imagine a butterfly would, affected by the slightest wind change. The margin between stall and level flight is only a couple of knots. Drag is very high, so it descends quickly with either less than full power or minor excess pitch. It lands nicely, but with little control at such minimal speeds. Built just six years after the Wright brothers first flew, it is an amazing accomplishment for Louis Bleriot to have flown across the English Channel in an identical airplane. Sitting in its wicker seat, surrounded by an incredible century of history and patina, and flying with the same sense of anticipation of the unknown as Louis Bleriot, was humbling and an honor. Hugh Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
Very, very cool. I know next to nothing about planes, though I was born on a USAF base , but I appreciate history and originality. Especially those things that represent the beginnings of major advances, i.e. flight. I noticed that the black gauge was made by Jaeger, thus a connection to Ferrari (not my photo, source: http://blog.iso50.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/ferrari-gauge.jpg)... Image Unavailable, Please Login
Steve, Scott, Russ- Was definitely not me flying it, but whoever Hugh is. 2000 hours of flying fighters with virtually no light aircraft time and no pilot's license leave me very unqualified to fly this museum piece. Taz Terry Phillips
Old Rhinebeck is an awesome place to visit during the summer if you can make it....all kinds of neat stuff flying there....
After reading Terry's accounts of the need for correct techniques to fly different jets only awakened my witnessing this need many times when heavy horsepower pilots assume that they can "handle anything" and then get into something like a Cub and prang it. Flying a Bleriot with warping wings can be just as deadly as mishandling an F-86 if you don't know what you are doing and don't fly the airplane LIKE IT WANTS TO FLY. Wing warping is roll control by changing the angle of incidence on the outer wing. When you are at low speed and drop a wing the natural instinct is to give it " opposite aileron" but in a wing warper all you do is to increase the angle of incidence in the lower wing and simply stall it thus allowing you to do a nice cartwheel along the strip. Switches
Great story, great video. Old aircraft have the much the same fascination for me as Vintage autos. I built one of these as well when very young; it was a plastic kit.
Note on the video the Bleriot was rolling almost uncontrollably to the right at touch-down. Luckily at the 28 knot landing speed vs the 30 knot cruising speed, not too much gets damaged. Like my friend Fred Murrin says about take-offs and landings of his replica prototype Fokker Triplane (F.I 102/17), powered by an original 120 hp LeRhone 9Jbs (iron pistons 110 hp, aluminum pistons 120 hp)- There are no crosswind aerodrome operations. That is why early aerodromes were usually rectangularly shaped, so you could always take off and land into the wind. Taz Terry Phillips
I just remembered a documentary that was made to record a reenactment of Louis Bleriot's cross Channel flight. It was to be made by his grandson, I think, who tried to learn to fly just for this event. The footage of his dual instruction in a Cub was painful to watch because he wasn't what one could call a pilot. After many jerky and clumsy attempts to handle the Cub he was soloed and allowed to fly the Bleriot replica for the commemorative flight. His take off was barely acceptable but after climbing a bit the airplane went into a nose down right turn and crashed into a lake without too much damage to the plane or pilot. When they played the footage from a nose-mounted camera trained to look aft at the pilot, one could see in the background that he had held right full rudder the entire time and rode the airplane in without a clue as to what happened or why. As he sat in the water with the mangled airplane he threw his hands up in disgust as if to blame that dumb airplane. My wife thought I had gone nuts when I started yelling " Left Rudder, Left Rudder !" as I watched him sit there "head up and locked." I would love to have flown that but I had the wrong name. Switches
I noticed, and couldn't see the end of the landing because of the buildings. I guess that in 1909, you carried your own fix-it kit. When did moveable aileron surfaces replace wing warping?
Scott- They coexisted in WW-1 until late 1916, with the Fokker and Pfalz Eindeckers (E.I-E.IV monoplanes) being close to the last holdouts. Ailerons were in wide use by 1915 and universal by early 1917. We are working on internal wing warping of contemporary aircraft as we speak, but do not expect to see it anytime soon. Great for stealth, but hard to implement. Taz Terry Phillips
Yes, landing and taking off into the wind. In 1967 at the Abottsford Airshow Bob Cansdale tried to fly his Sopwith Pup according to the prescribed directions , ie. parallel to the show line and the wind was crossed enough to cause a ground loop. No damage but thereafter he flew the Pup into the wind like they did in WW1 when they operated out of a circular or rectangular base with flags and socks. Another thing that should be noticed is the aft weighted tail that could dig the tailskid in to track straight and stop quicker. Put a wheel back there on a smooth concrete surface and you will have a very busy rollout. I've been there. Switches
