Miura, the original supercar | Page 277 | FerrariChat

Miura, the original supercar

Discussion in 'LamborghiniChat.com' started by joe sackey, Dec 5, 2006.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    #6902 joe sackey, Dec 7, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  2. Olivier NAMECHE

    Olivier NAMECHE F1 Veteran

    Aug 18, 2007
    5,094
    CANADA
    Full Name:
    Olivier
    Michael,
    I like this topic and I believe you are confusing some facts :
    * engine rebuilt has been done many times at different period by factory on several models, not only once !
    * "recognized" => you mean "identified as"... but still not "legitimate as original"
    * factory has NOT performed these modifications, so it's still a notification that was reported in the speudo factory file, BUT not reported as well on the factory built sheet.
    * anybody who wants to make a spyder today from a Miura that will ask for recommandations from factory will get it today either... nothing thrilling !
    * speaking about God's permission... I never heard somebody waiting for a permission to make something on a Lambo, did Affolter ask for before making these ugly Diablo ? I just try to imagine your ex boss Wicki praying for the absolute approuval from "God" in order to scalp his Miura...overwise he won't have it done...

    sorry but I disagree with your story, as Joe said : end of story !
     
  3. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    Michael:

    Methinks thou doth protest too much. Please post the Factory Documents that you say you have, and let us review them.

    Because a component (engine) was sent to the factory to be rebuilt, makes this a factory SV-J Spyder? I think not.

    The factory "endorsed" or gave "permission" for this car's modification? At no time.

    Its really unfortunate for 4808, but the desperation to link this car to the works takes away from any redeeming qualities its uniqueness might offer.
     
  4. xs10shl

    xs10shl Formula 3

    Dec 17, 2003
    2,037
    San Francisco
    I still remember your SCM writeup on it - good stuff!
     
  5. raymondQV

    raymondQV F1 Rookie

    Aug 22, 2007
    4,059
    Switzerland
    Full Name:
    Raymond S.
    #6906 raymondQV, Dec 7, 2009
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2009
    Michael, I think you got it the wrong way round (reminds me of the story with the Diablo GT...)
    The factory had no cars on their own those days, everything went directly to the customers who waited up to 18 month for the delivery of the already paid cars. Lambo Motors had very good connections to Leimer/Rosetti and a lot of clients from germany too.
    So it was more than normal that on the Lambo stand in Geneva customer cars were presented, in that circumstance also #4808.
    Zenari did not ask the factory if he's allowed to chop it, he simply had it done. End of the story.

    I hardly believe that Wicki had the engine at the factory, more likely the mechanic of lambo motors revised the engine, but I'm anxious to see the scans you mentioned.
     
  6. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    Yes me too!
     
  7. kldconcept

    kldconcept Rookie

    Jul 16, 2009
    14
    France
    #6908 kldconcept, Dec 7, 2009
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2009
    hello,
    As I had said the documents in hand are at 2001,
    But I have not made a copy of the document (for compliance) was my biggest woe
    the current owner must have all the documents because it was good to have with the car when Wicky jean sold the car ..
    I do not say any more than the car has had done at the factory, but the written document exists proving their agreement amendment Spyder, with instructions to respect

    I contact someone who can keep a copy to file

    English is not a language I metrised correctly
    and the translator did not turn words into their real meaning
     
  8. kldconcept

    kldconcept Rookie

    Jul 16, 2009
    14
    France
    #6909 kldconcept, Dec 7, 2009
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2009
    The subject is not diablo,
    BUT

    But without waiting for the horrible things he does he will not have ny dashboard on the model after 94/95, non-retractable headlights, fenders large. ... And I do not even speak of pearl colors Orange and Yellow Pearl
    I can make a very long list of improvements made by Affolter recovery by the plant that helped make it visually more beautiful Diablo
    But as said this is not the n subjects

    « Les gouts et les couleurs sont au grée de chacun »
     
  9. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    This makes no sense at all. The Lamborghini factory never gave any consent to any privateer to customize their Lamborghini. Ever. Nor did they have any "agreement" with the owner of this car that he could do with it as he was already free to do!
     
  10. M.B.

    M.B. Formula Junior

    Oct 2, 2006
    349
    the very best thing for this car would be no modifications at all.. it started its life already perfect..
     
  11. kldconcept

    kldconcept Rookie

    Jul 16, 2009
    14
    France
    #6912 kldconcept, Dec 7, 2009
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2009
    Exactly
    quite agree with you
     
  12. kldconcept

    kldconcept Rookie

    Jul 16, 2009
    14
    France
    ?????
     
  13. raymondQV

    raymondQV F1 Rookie

    Aug 22, 2007
    4,059
    Switzerland
    Full Name:
    Raymond S.
    Lost in Translation...
     
  14. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    Well, I hope you understand that he means the car should have remained the lovely P400S it was, and if you do, and agree with him as you now suggest, then it remains a mystery as to why you seem to be working so hard to convince everyone this car's current modified configuration has a shred of factory provenance, when in fact it doesn't.
     
  15. xs10shl

    xs10shl Formula 3

    Dec 17, 2003
    2,037
    San Francisco
    #6916 xs10shl, Dec 8, 2009
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2009
    This reminds me of a similar discussion about 4808 on VLG a few years back. As I recall, it went something like this:

    1) Someone does a writeup on 4808 making the same claim of Factory provenance ( I can't remember who exactly, I'll have to check)
    2) Big argument along exactly the same lines ensues. Pasani gets so flustered that he leaves group.
    3) We learn that the person arguing case for factory provenance appears to be brokering the car, or otherwise may have a financial interest
    4) People get tired of posting about it, and move on to other topics, leaving things unresolved.

    I don't recall anything more significant offered as proof of the claim at that time either, except that we all could agree that the car was on display at a Lamborghini stand at one time (looking completely different then it does now).
     
  16. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    Sounds about right! Except that I should add that this matter is very much resolved by many who have no stake one way or another.
     
  17. M.B.

    M.B. Formula Junior

    Oct 2, 2006
    349
    OK,
    Lets vote, just a PERSONAL meaning yes or no..

    1) do you like 4808 the way it looked after first modification with the wing?
    2) do you like the way it looks now?
    3) do you think this car is better than a stock P400S?
    4) would you buy this car?
    5) do you like the history of this car?
    6) would you prefer this car instead of a original P400S?
    7) has this car anything to do with a SVJ?
    8) are the beautifull lines from the miura still there?
    9) would it be a good driver?

    Sorry Michael, you seems to be very optimistic about this car but MY answer for all questions is: no, to me this car is like a countach LP400 converted to a aniversario targa i just can't love it......
     
  18. Jota 5084

    Jota 5084 Formula 3

    May 18, 2006
    1,922
    Sweden
    Full Name:
    Eric Andersson
    This is my weiv of the subject :)

    1) Kind of, very 80th.
    2) No.
    3) No.
    4) No.
    5) Its good there is a story after all.
    6) No.
    7) No.
    8) No.
    9) No.
     
  19. Diablo_4_Ever

    Diablo_4_Ever Formula Junior

    Nov 9, 2004
    949
    Netherlands
    I don't understand, why would you all care so much about this car. If the owner likes it as it is, what does it matter?
     
  20. Olivier NAMECHE

    Olivier NAMECHE F1 Veteran

    Aug 18, 2007
    5,094
    CANADA
    Full Name:
    Olivier
    for sure he must like it when you know that he spent already a lot of €€€ => price from Autodromes and then has it "resprayed" by Lecocq for extra €€€ (remember it was about 300 labor hours)

    1) Not at all with that tail
    2) Yes why not...
    3) Not at all
    4) Never
    5) Yes, story is good and facts are clear evidences
    6) No
    7) No
    8) No
    9) Not that much and I can tell also after the day spent at Spa with it, the owner had difficulties to fit back the roof... too much flexibility from rear T top & chassis as well !
     
  21. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    Uhhh, don't assume anyone cares about this car.

    The big fuss is over the blatant LYING about its history!
     
  22. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    I will stick to the questions where I have first-hand knowlege or involvement:

    5 - No. Simply because successive owners have compromised its provenance by turning this Miura into one of the most controversial in existence. I know for a fact that attempts were made to sell this car representing it untruthfully as a factory SVJ. To me, the only way the sins of the constant misrepresentation and lying about the history of this car can ever be washed away would be to take it and return it to the way it was built: a P400S.

    9 - I drove it. For an hour with my son at my side. He is a consummate car guy, former karting champion, and safe driver today. He has logged hundreds of miles with me in all 5 Miuras I have owned, always an enjoyable experience, and this is the one and only time we looked at each other and thought the same thing: lets take this thing back as soon as possible! To say it was as squirmy as a rickshaw would not be an understatement. It was the one time I felt truly unsafe in a Lamborghini. It seemed to pull one way under acceleration, and another under braking. Basically it felt like a car that had been 'cut' without chassis reinforcement to compensate - as simple as that. Judging by Olivier's comments, this has still not been rectified.
     
  23. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    #6924 joe sackey, Dec 9, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  24. Olivier NAMECHE

    Olivier NAMECHE F1 Veteran

    Aug 18, 2007
    5,094
    CANADA
    Full Name:
    Olivier
    #6925 Olivier NAMECHE, Dec 9, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    1st pic when was passenger for the 1st time
    2nd pic I'm driving it progressively from "learning it" to "hard/hot driving" after few laps !
    wheel aligment was good as it went straight while throttling/braking
    Nevertheless all what we can say, it was still an experience to live, any how is the result !
    Ciao
    Olivier - LCB
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     

Share This Page