DOT said NO!! | FerrariChat

DOT said NO!!

Discussion in 'LamborghiniChat.com' started by roytoy2003, Mar 16, 2010.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. roytoy2003

    roytoy2003 F1 Veteran

    Jul 30, 2004
    9,591
    Full Name:
    Roy L. Cats
    #1 roytoy2003, Mar 16, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Well the USA goverment in an effort to keep us safe, (the DOT) would not allow the LP670-4SV OEM Factory racing harness into the USA for USA cars NOR as an option to purchase..

    Well got my set in today, via a good frined in Europe..hope to have them installed this weekend on my LP670-4SV White #12 car. Hardware and mounting bolts/points are the same on ALL car, USA and Euro..will bolt right in.

    LOVE them!!
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  2. Nuvolari

    Nuvolari F1 Veteran
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Sep 3, 2002
    6,640
    Toronto / SoCal
    Full Name:
    Rob C.
    As much as I hate so much of what the DOT does I must warn you that those seat belts will have you snap your neck if the car rolls over. Standard 3 point belts allow the body to displace sideways in a rollover keeping the head from being pinned in place as the roof collapses a little in a rollover. 4 point and up belts should only be used when a car has a roll cage in it. The cage ensures that a rolling car does not pin the drivers head if the vehicle overturns.

    Cool parts and I suspect my comments will not deter their installation however what I mention is a fact that many overlook when fitting racing belts to their car for a better 'strapped in' experience.
     
  3. GrigioGuy

    GrigioGuy Splenda Daddy
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 26, 2001
    33,168
    E ' ' '/ F
    Full Name:
    Snike Fingersmith
    Is it a good idea to post on a public website your intention to circumvent DOT regulations?

    Just askin'
     
  4. roytoy2003

    roytoy2003 F1 Veteran

    Jul 30, 2004
    9,591
    Full Name:
    Roy L. Cats
    Very good point...I should add that the 3 point belts well not have to be removed and will still be functional...was going to take them out...but may leave them now with thisinfo...of course the best would be to add the roll cage..WHICH is an option from the factory for the SL, LP670-4SV and the new Lp5704SL cars...but again not allowed to be sold to the USA market..maybe I will look into getting that sent over..??
     
  5. MurcieMurcie

    MurcieMurcie F1 Rookie

    Jan 31, 2004
    3,100
    Have youy ordered your Gallardo SL yet? Any insider info other than what we already know?
     
  6. Peter K.

    Peter K. F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 9, 2004
    4,448
    Connecticut
    Full Name:
    Peter K.
    Attention snitches, here your deal for the feds to get out of that drug bust. hahahaha
     
  7. Pcar928fan

    Pcar928fan Formula 3

    Jan 21, 2008
    1,702
    Austin, TX
    Thank god the DOT is looking out for us! Bunch of IDIOTS!
     
  8. TRScotty

    TRScotty F1 Rookie
    Owner

    Oct 12, 2006
    2,505
    Tyler, Texas
    Full Name:
    Scotty
    "we're from the government, and we're here to help"
     
  9. ProRallyCodriver

    ProRallyCodriver Formula 3

    Oct 25, 2005
    1,250
    Alexandria, VA
    Full Name:
    Dave Shindle
    #9 ProRallyCodriver, Mar 16, 2010
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2010
    I've rolled many times, have had cages fail, and been on the side a bunch of other times. bet you cannot find one non-crashtest dummy in DOT w/ more real-life experience in this aspect than me.

    I would much rather take my chances with harnesses going inverted than standard seatbelts.
     
  10. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    Surely you mean harnesses WITH a roll cage?

    Nuvolari is absolutely right: "4 point and up belts should only be used when a car has a roll cage in it". They go hand-in-hand and an installed roll cage is the proper application for harness use. Sure, you can do whatever you want and take your chances, but I certainly wouldn't advise it.

    Both harnesses and roll cages can fail, but properly manufactured & installed units wont. If the installation of the harnesses is for more than just aesthetic appeal, and the vehicle is used in a manner where a roll is entirely possible, youd better have a good roll cage properly installed.

    Cool belts though, and as Roy points out a factory-supplied roll cage can be used in concert with them.
     
  11. Kelsa

    Kelsa F1 Veteran

    Jul 25, 2005
    5,376
    Adult Toy Land
    Full Name:
    Crazy Chinaman
    there are factory roller cage for the LP670? wow, does anyone have a photo of those? be damn sure cool, but they road legal at all? i mean u can bump ur head on those things on sudden brake weren't u?
     
  12. roytoy2003

    roytoy2003 F1 Veteran

    Jul 30, 2004
    9,591
    Full Name:
    Roy L. Cats
    OEM from the factory is the roll cage "feet"..you have to have your own cage then constructed into the feet once you have the car..also available for the SL, but could probably put it in any G car..not totaly sure on that however.

    Lucky for me and others LOL I dont intend to operate the car on a public roadway or track for that matter that would cause for a possible rollover...at least I would hope so, but there is no counting for tire blow outs, other issues etc etc..

    I have been in two roll over accidents..BOTH in my Police Car on Duty when I was a Deputy sheriff from 1979 to 1990. Both cars had rtoll bars. I recieved injury in both cars..but ALL injuries were due to all the crap in the car that went flyinh, like notebook, radio mich, misc hardware in the patrol car...and the last time my arm swinging into the shotgun mount and breaking my wrist.
     
  13. ProRallyCodriver

    ProRallyCodriver Formula 3

    Oct 25, 2005
    1,250
    Alexandria, VA
    Full Name:
    Dave Shindle
    Harnesses w/ cage are optimal. Rollovers are a small percentage of accidents and roof collapsing directly on driver's head (barring convertibles) is way smaller. I'm in collision industry and see lots of rollover damage of cars and SUVs. Lots of strength in pillars these days w/ boron steel. Yeah, your head can move to side w/ factory belts, ....right into lots of hard stuff. Considering all the types of accidents, being banged to hell rolling over w/ standard belts vs. being held firm w/ harnesses, I'd choose harnesses. 2 of my street vehicles w/ harnesses have main hoops and 1 does not. 1 that does not is slow and low.

    Cages can fail regardless if you wack something harder than it is. Thats physics. Go land on your roof on a rock larger than the car and see what gives. In my experience, it wasn't the rock and the FIA-spec cage in logbooked rallycar collapsed at A-pillar.

    The real reason DOT doesn't want harnesses is,.... their own power-tripping. For years they said no harnesses because our EMTs are too dumb to release them w/o having a red button for them to push. Now that harness manufacturers began producing them w/ red buttons, DOT is looking for another excuse. Classic example of giving people some authority and it going to their head.
     
  14. DennisForza

    DennisForza Formula 3

    May 23, 2006
    1,814
    Arlington, VA
    Full Name:
    Dennis
    DOT's real reasoning against the harnesses as OEM is that they do not automatically retract to fit the occupant. Has little to nothing to do with EMT's as we just pull out our knife and cut the belts when we can't reach the button anyway(I am a Firefighter in Arlington, not an EMT ;) blood is gross).

    It would make sense to allow them as a dealer installed option, as that way the buyer is theoretically making a thoughtful decision on how they will be used. But based on the reasoning for the ban, regardless of our views on government intrusion into our lives, harnesses just do not fit the bill as mandated standard safety equipment for a passenger vehicle.
     
  15. roytoy2003

    roytoy2003 F1 Veteran

    Jul 30, 2004
    9,591
    Full Name:
    Roy L. Cats
    WOW, I am glad this has started a very informative exchange of info..

    But just for the record...I bought them cause it looks cool and fun...

    I sure hope this thread is not jinxing me into a 3 time roll over accident with a broken neck and no EMT with a knife to cut me out...but then again I guess it dont matter anyways..

    As they say, what will be will be.....

    Now, I am off to see if I can get this car up on the two wheels of the driver side, like the stunt drivers do in the movies..LOL LOL
     
  16. BAKY

    BAKY Formula 3

    May 23, 2007
    1,296
    USA
    Full Name:
    Bobby
    Just make sure you drive with one of your elfs with those inflated things haha.....those should help keep the roof off your head.
     
  17. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    Roy: I actually think a car with a sporty look and livery, such as the new Superleggera, with roll cage and harnesses would be the business. Your track Lamborghini, ready to go!
     
  18. mfennell70

    mfennell70 Formula Junior

    Nov 3, 2003
    613
    Middletown, NJ
    The Schroth 4 point belts have a system they call ASM, for Anti SubMarining. The inside belt has a fold of fabric sewn together. In a big accident, the fold separates, effectively making the inside belt much longer and allowing your torso some freedom of movement. The main point is so that you don't squirt out from under the lap belt, a real concern with a four point system, but it also gives you some freedom to escape the squish.

    You can see the little patch sewn over the fold in Roy's picture (which has the belts reversed BTW - the fold goes on the inside belt).

    I don't know where this falls on the risk/reward scale vs. traditional 3 point belts. Just pointing it out.
     
  19. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    #19 joe sackey, Mar 18, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  20. cantwait

    cantwait Rookie

    Sep 12, 2006
    46
    My SL has factory roll bars (the inverted "U" shape) along with the factory install 4 point harness...for everyday driving the harnesses are a pain in the arse so I had normal lap belts fitted as well...when the harneses are not in use they hang behind the seat with no issues, when you want them for track or the real racing sensation then you can swap at will...works well.
     
  21. roytoy2003

    roytoy2003 F1 Veteran

    Jul 30, 2004
    9,591
    Full Name:
    Roy L. Cats
    Well just say June 23rd 2010 is going to be special day for me...
     
  22. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    Fantastic. Color hint??
     
  23. staatsof

    staatsof Nine Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 13, 2005
    95,992
    Fuggetaboutitland
    Full Name:
    Bob

    Something else to think about with your body securely strapped in so that it can't move.
    Your head will still snap forward like a loose bowling ball. Are you going to use a Hans device when you use the harness. I would. With the 3 point belt system and air bags it's a completely different system that operates very differently.

    Better yet, avoid the incident. That car is too damn nice.

    Bob S.
     
  24. roytoy2003

    roytoy2003 F1 Veteran

    Jul 30, 2004
    9,591
    Full Name:
    Roy L. Cats
    I am going all out to the wild side this time..lets just say the Geneve car show caught my eye...
     
  25. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    I knew it!
     

Share This Page