I'm being sued by Ferrari | Page 2 | FerrariChat

I'm being sued by Ferrari

Discussion in 'Ferrari Discussion (not model specific)' started by Paul_308, Mar 26, 2010.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. PhilNotHill

    PhilNotHill Two Time F1 World Champ Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2006
    Messages:
    27,855
    Location:
    Aspen CO 81611
    Full Name:
    FelipeNotMassa
    Corps are hypersensitive about protecting their brand name. If they don't, they can lose it if it becomes generic.

    Jeep is noted for this bcaus people call all 4 wheel drives Jeeps. Same with Kleenex.

    Plus, people can rightly assume that since you are using the name and are thus sanctioned by SF or are a subsidiary of the company. Unless reversed, this could result in their legal liabilities for your actions. At the least you would have to indemnify SF from any suits resulting from your actions whether intentional or accidental.

    I am sure that Fchat had to get permission to use the name Ferrari.

    Imagine someone using YOUR name w/o your permission. Normally this is called "identity theft."

    Good luck.
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2010
  2. AceMaster

    AceMaster Three Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    34,777
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Full Name:
    Mike
    Scott, I have come to expect nothing less from you. You are simply one of the best :)
     
  3. 50hdmc

    50hdmc Formula 3

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,211
    Location:
    Michigan
    Full Name:
    mark s
    Paul, how about just posting something like "Exotic Car Wiring Diagrams" in the appropriate places and let the vehicle owners inquire if you have a wiring diagram for a '90 348?........
     
  4. Jackmb1

    Jackmb1 F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2005
    Messages:
    3,329
    Sad to hear this. Hope you resolve this peacefully.
     
  5. Jonny Law

    Jonny Law F1 Rookie Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    3,203
    Location:
    Over yonder.
    Full Name:
    IT Guy
    We could always just play their game. Anyone remember the major F1 sponsor who's logo must not be shown? How about a non descriptive logo for those who are producing parts for cars. What ever brand it may be. Or could just referrer to Ferrari as "that which shall not be mentioned" (Harry Potter).

    I remember a 60 Minutes episode where In 1996 McDonald's forced Scottish sandwich shop owner Mary Blair of Fenny Stratford, Buckinghamshire to drop McMunchies as her trading name. 60 Minutes contacted the person in charge of the McDonald Clan in Scotland. He said McDonald's Corp had never ask their permission to use the name.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  6. boiseferrari

    boiseferrari Formula 3

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,077
    Location:
    Boise, Id.
    Full Name:
    Kriss
    This is Horse sh*t! (pun intended)
     
  7. greyboxer

    greyboxer F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2004
    Messages:
    12,665
    Location:
    South East
    Full Name:
    Jimmie
    As many of the posts have suggested this is a fairly standard process

    In the UK I believe several of the teams in Ferrari race series have received these letters about the sign-writing on their trucks !
     
  8. parkerfe

    parkerfe F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2001
    Messages:
    12,887
    Location:
    Cumming, Georgia
    Full Name:
    Franklin E. Parker
    Why would you think you could use the property of a company for profit without their expressed consent?
     
  9. italiafan

    italiafan F1 World Champ Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    16,121
    Full Name:
    Stickbones Swagglesmith
    This is such a great online community.
    Kudos to you.
     
  10. 410SA

    410SA F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2003
    Messages:
    8,511
    Location:
    West Coast
    Full Name:
    A
    As trivial as this sounds, the greater picture for the trademark owner is not the income you may generate, but the risk that by allowing you to use their name they expose themselves to the "course of conduct" issue where anyone, including big for-profit outfits use their trademark under the premise that Ferrari has allowed others to use it for free.

    They have a responsibility to their shareholders to protect their intellectual property. If they didn't, the brand name would be devalued and all of the Ferrari fans around the world would have less to enjoy. It's not personal. Give them their brand name or alternatively negotiate a licensing agreement that proves to the world that you didn't get it for free.
    Ferrari is probably the most prolific licensor on the planet and that's what they are protecting.
     
  11. Bullfighter

    Bullfighter Two Time F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    22,596
    Location:
    Gates Mills, Ohio
    Full Name:
    Jon
    I agree, not sure that a cease-and-desist letter is all that out of line.

    Just clean it up as sparta49 and toggie suggest.
     
  12. mousecatcher

    mousecatcher Formula 3

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Messages:
    2,116
    Location:
    san mateo, ca
    Why are these cases universally corporate harassment? Ferrari is protecting their trademark, as is their right and actually their obligation as well. If the OP is using the prancing horse or other Ferrari images, to sell non-authorized non-Ferrari products, it is probably infringing. It doesn't matter that it's a valuable service.
     
  13. technom3

    technom3 F1 World Champ Rossa Subscribed

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    18,597
    Location:
    Phoenix AZ
    Full Name:
    Justin
    every manufacturer does this. The two worst are BMW and VW. I worked a t a bmw dealer where we were required to wear white dress shirts and have the BMW logo embroidered on them per Penske rules. It felt awesome to have a BMW big wig who was in town come up to me and tell me that I was wearing an unauthorized shirt, and for me to tell them the name of the embroidery company for using there trademark without permission... I know of several people who are in court with BMW over there websites as well

    AWESOME...

    VW is very very similar.
     
  14. lil squid

    lil squid F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,949
    Location:
    Houston TX
    Full Name:
    Yuliya
    Scott, I'm curious about you mentioning that there are no copyright markings and that they can 'pound sand' since the OP legally registered the domain. In my experience (IP practice was a big, although not primary, part of my in-house practice), author has a copyright in a document when he creates it, and markings (or absence thereof) are usually irrelevant to the issue of whether valid copyright exists. I do tend to agree though that the OP most likely made sufficient modifications to the original copyrighted diagrams not to create copyright infringement claims. Let me know if I'm missing something here.

    As to legal domain registration, as you noted, that is a trademark issue, and it's good for OP to keep in mind that Ferrari can get an injunction to force him to transfer the domains over to Ferrari for free, regardless of legal ownership, who registered them first or why, if likelihood of confusion regarding origin or affiliation can be shown.

    From in-house counsel perspective, OP's best approach is to make the recommended changes re removal of Ferrari's trademarks and adding disclaimers, and then get with the author of the seize & desist letter to discuss what other steps he can take to get them comfortable. In any case, this is not a problem that will just go away if OP does nothing.
     
  15. TopElement

    TopElement Formula 3

    Joined:
    May 14, 2005
    Messages:
    1,540
    Location:
    OC & Vegas
    Full Name:
    A Montoya
    Right on. It's a simple fix to avoid this situation.
     
  16. future328driver

    future328driver Formula 3

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2001
    Messages:
    1,838
    Location:
    Dallas, Texas
    Full Name:
    Ken Thomas
    I am an in-house attorney for a major corporation and I have experience in these types of issues. IP practice is a large portion of what I do and I am actively involved in policing improper uses of my company's trademarks.

    According to the c/d letter, the issue is related to the use of the "ferrari" mark in the website, so this appears to be a trademark domain name issue. The problem that you will encounter here is that Ferrari has registered is trademarks in various countries and the laws in those countries will vary regarding the extent to which using a Ferrari mark in a URL is allowable. What may be acceptable under US law is not necessarily what will be deemed acceptable under the laws of another country. Because the URL is global in reach, you will be impacted by the laws of all jurisdictions in which Ferrari has registered the marks.

    As LIL-SQUID noted, it is best to be pragmatic in dealing with Ferrari on these issues and to work out a resolution that is satisfactory for Ferrari. The more open you are to resolving this amicably with Ferrari, the more likely you are to avoid escalating the issue into a fight that you do not want to be in.
     
  17. AceMaster

    AceMaster Three Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    34,777
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Full Name:
    Mike
    and by the sounds of it lose that battle...
     
  18. lil squid

    lil squid F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2007
    Messages:
    5,949
    Location:
    Houston TX
    Full Name:
    Yuliya
    Damn in-house lawyers, being pragmatic and always looking to save on outside counsel costs :D Came across this today, thought you might get a grin out of it too (not in any way to be interpreted as a jab against IP lawyers, who RULE! lol)
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  19. flyguyskt

    flyguyskt Formula Junior

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    443
    Location:
    South Dakota
    Full Name:
    sean
    and what does ferrari stand to lose out on? what do they gain from suing him?

    stuuuuupid
     
  20. Steve Magnusson

    Steve Magnusson Two Time F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2001
    Messages:
    26,794
    Location:
    30°30'40" N 97°35'41" W (Texas)
    Full Name:
    Steve Magnusson
    Sorry -- it's not stupid (nor evil) on Ferrari's part to act this way. If a business doesn't always vigorously defend its IP/trademarks/copyrights, it can lose the future right to do so (i.e., F can't let Paul slide and then go after a replica maker).
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2010
  21. Dr Tommy Cosgrove

    Dr Tommy Cosgrove Three Time F1 World Champ Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Joined:
    May 4, 2001
    Messages:
    36,428
    Location:
    Birmingham, AL
    Full Name:
    Tommy
    Even the FCA has been "asked" to drop the logo. From what I understand, Ferrari will officially recognize our club in exchange for our ditching the logo.
     
  22. HotShoe

    HotShoe F1 Veteran Silver Subscribed

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Messages:
    8,772
    Location:
    Lake Worth, FL
    Full Name:
    Anthony Lauro
    I'm not surprised this is happening. It was always my understanding that you can't use any corporation's logo without their consent. I think it's just that they are now starting to enforce it more aggressively. Given the breadth of the web and the millions of sites out there that use their logo they are going to be real busy!

    Of course I have a dog in this race and I'm particularly interested to see where they stand in the future with regards to artwork.
     
  23. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ Rossa Subscribed

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    106,118
    Location:
    Vegas baby
    I have two points.

    1) You cannot blame Ferrari for protecting their properties and rights. In fact, they are forced to do it or risk losing it. If the tables were turned and Ferrari were using his trademark and logo for their business without permission, for sure the OP would be issuing a legal claim against Ferrari.

    2) If I were the OP, I would not be discussing this in an open forum. Don't be surprised if you get a second letter.
     
  24. finnerty

    finnerty F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    May 18, 2004
    Messages:
    10,406
    While I sympathize with you, Paul... From a legal standpoint, Ferrari is correct. You simply can't do it the way you are doing it. They (Ferrari) will probably be satisfied if you just "cease and desist" your activities that they object to --- I doubt seriously they would try to collect any damages from you.
     
  25. finnerty

    finnerty F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    May 18, 2004
    Messages:
    10,406
    DITTO ---- heed this advice. You are opening yourself up to more (and potentially serious) litigation here --- the last thing you want is to have a "defamation element" added to the complaint.

    There is no way in hell you can win.... but, you can choose to what degree of losing you suffer --- best to make it as small as possible. ;)
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2010

Share This Page