Acceleration: F40, F50, Enzo, CGT & Veyron | Page 19 | FerrariChat

Acceleration: F40, F50, Enzo, CGT & Veyron

Discussion in '288GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari/F80' started by Bill S, Aug 30, 2009.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Feb 13, 2004
    8,046
    SFL
    I have seen the Euro spec manual before, but not the USA spec car. Boy oh boy, some of those numbers for the USA spec car are WAY off. Top Speed 171 mph? We all know the top speed is lower for the USA spec cars, but we also know it is ALOT more then 171 mph, and this has been verified. What a typo that is LOL.
     
  2. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    Something tells me that for legal or compliance reasons (which I don't exactly know) the USA car's numbers had to be suppressed. You can basically disregard them when considering accurate data.
     
  3. Bill S

    Bill S Formula 3

    Oct 2, 2004
    1,995
    F40 LeMans, since you can't come to Laguna Seca, can you post GPS acceleration data for your car? Here's something that works nicely:

    http://www.performancebox.co.uk/
     
  4. F40 LeMans

    F40 LeMans Formula Junior

    Nov 23, 2009
    826
    #454 F40 LeMans, Apr 30, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2010
    Good idea. I will post something about or Vbox or other GPS data in future. I want to try some runs about that with 1/4 tank weight. About 2650 lbs.
    171 is crazy. haha.

    I have owned 7 F40s, I don't know about that data, but Euro-cat cars are 21.6s in the standing km- 21.9s about US cars (logically slower being heavier).
    These data could be surely all optimized but some even slower than the fastest non cat specification, for the factory.

    Nothing about I had owned or tryed of F50 or Enzo are oscillating about.

    We are talking about knowledge of F40. But you really know that the real F40 was made in no catalytic period here in Italy? how you think about first development about "cat" car about that engine? Yes Ferrari worked well about, but never better than the original version of the first type of it. Your folklore is good about your US car with the factory (could not otherwise) , but we all knows here (even Michelotto) that the bast F40s are/was the 1st version of it, lighter and stronger.

    That's not only a point of weight, even a TORQUE point, comparing the gearing. The 1st version had longher gears, but the TwinTurbo torque being better in the average of the TQ line than the higher band is/was good for that gearing, better for the shorter one mentioning for the catalytic versions. F40s gearing/ engine is good in the half band of the revs, not like the CGT that you must put the engine to the limiter for the best performance.

    I have noticed some difference about euro cars both, so you cannot really know about our best specification being you not able to know how are really the difference.
    We all know about knowledge about our car, we all are loving it, even 20 years later, we all have mountains of magazine and books about it, articles and data (even GPS data now), but untill you are not really inside the non cat version about, we cannot talk more.

    I don't want to say 600hp for the europenans, but there are hudge difference in the euro cars, that is nothing about US spec now?
    I like this topic, and I like talk with your ALL friendly confidence, but is so funny you are considering (with your loving entusiasm about that and the knowledge of it) that they are all the same.

    If you came in Padova to Michelotto company, the first thing about your car could/should be shurely exclude the cats in your F40s than open your exhaust with a better opened one than you think about cats egine should be better performing?lol
    Than they are good for remapping the ECU with other better parameters as the stronger type, similar and wild as the 1st version of that, about air/fuel mixture over the other parameters, and we are talking here 22 pages about US cat engine are the same as the wilder verion of that engine?

    Pass up better or worst tests about, but the LM engine version is the closest engine about the familiarity of the 1st specification of that one.
     
  5. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    Wow. And I thought I had a problem...
     
  6. Bill S

    Bill S Formula 3

    Oct 2, 2004
    1,995

    Very good! I really would like to see your 60 to 130 mph and 60 to 140 mph times starting in second gear. You do not need to start from 0.
     
  7. Bill S

    Bill S Formula 3

    Oct 2, 2004
    1,995
    #457 Bill S, Apr 30, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Here is the CGTs power compared to the F40 when you shift at redline in each gear:
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  8. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    Bill: we will have to get a neutral 3rd party to go to Italy, install the device, and monitor the proceedings.
     
  9. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    I would love to do this, as well as learn more about the different gearing available.
     
  10. RICE RACING

    RICE RACING Rookie

    Apr 20, 2010
    38
    Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter Giljevic
    F40LM please get a RL VBOX type unit,and when you do if you need any help at all with it please E-Mail me and I wiould be for ever in immense gratitude if you would forward me your .dbn test file of your F40 :) please :) [email protected]
     
  11. F40 LeMans

    F40 LeMans Formula Junior

    Nov 23, 2009
    826
    #461 F40 LeMans, Apr 30, 2010
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2010
    Yes BUT, like SSNISTR is well saying.. how about scentific proof? If i try my runs in good weather perfect condition day a could be able of well down 8" in the 60 to 130 mph like well above in a hot summer day. So, how we can really know the real performance level?

    Here we are arguing about even half second, and that's could be a huge difference, than a day condition can overtake the differnce as hudge as an half second difference- so....

    SSINISTR has right.lol We cannot really know about, if we are not in the same place with the same condition for ideal as both cars. But you being engineer don't think about that?
    An engine can achieve power or not depending the condition comparing the SAE/DIN standards and the other engines, so how could be really a PERFECT performance comparing two cars in two different place, conditions, fuels, etc. ??

    BillS had run his US F40 in a condition (achiving 8.6s in the 60-130 mph) day, and it was exactly the same condition as the CGT he was tryed? How you know? If, I run my Vbox data in future are surely in exacly the same as the BillS f40 runs? or CGT runs?
    How can we know, really if the Porsche day conditions of BillS runs are better than his F40's runs? How can we know about mine?
    We are here all talking about even 0.1 like half second a hudge difference and a day could confuse the cards on the table a lot more than the real performance difference.

    Here we only know for sure that BillS should be faster during his F40's runs in a EURO car...that day. Because we are all sure (me shurely) about the difference in the specification of both in the exactly the same moment.
     
  12. Bill S

    Bill S Formula 3

    Oct 2, 2004
    1,995
    #462 Bill S, Apr 30, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    I knew you were going to ask that! So I went out today with the CGT under the same conditions as the F40. I can tell you that the CGT is brutally fast and is much scarier than the F40 during these tests! Here is the data from today for the CGT...
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  13. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Feb 13, 2004
    8,046
    SFL
    You say when. :) I even have an SCCA license.
     
  14. Bill S

    Bill S Formula 3

    Oct 2, 2004
    1,995
    I agree! And maybe a bodyguard too depending on the outcome.
     
  15. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    Don't forget digital image recording to eliminate data manipulation.
     
  16. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    I have to say looking at this thread purely from an enthusiast's perspective, the F40 inspires a lot of excitement and passion, but that Carrera GT is just peerless in its efficiency of performance! Wow.
     
  17. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Feb 13, 2004
    8,046
    SFL
    The thing about this thread that I think is cool is how we are comparing the close acceleration of an F40 to a CGT. Not an Enzo, but the car that came some 15 years before. While technically we should be comparing the Porsche that came at the same time, the 959. Which as we all know would be no contest....
     
  18. Bill S

    Bill S Formula 3

    Oct 2, 2004
    1,995
    Yes, the CGT is really a technological wonder. But as SSNISTR points out, the F40 was incredibly ahead of its time to even compare to a world-class super car 15 years later!

    Enzo made the mistake (?) of asking his people to build the fastest car they could. It took them 15 years to build something faster.
     
  19. malebomb01

    malebomb01 Formula Junior

    Mar 10, 2010
    707
    Big D
    #469 malebomb01, May 1, 2010
    Last edited: May 1, 2010
     
  20. malebomb01

    malebomb01 Formula Junior

    Mar 10, 2010
    707
    Big D
     
  21. RICE RACING

    RICE RACING Rookie

    Apr 20, 2010
    38
    Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter Giljevic
    Hey Mate,

    All very valid points you raise.

    The one biggest thing there is in all of this more than any other variable is a fair does of honesty (not that anyone doubts the people involved) but its worth mentioning. This is to do with car specifications, any tune up parts etc.

    So far as things effecting the car, if you aim for std temp, std pressure (i.e. sea level or close too) then starting the test in a non heat soaked fashion will return comparable numbers, a little bit here or there makes marginal differences in my hundreds of runs on my own cars and customers. I probably have the biggest data base of VBOX tests fully logging all engien parameters so am happy to talk to you over E-Mail in greater detail about any aspects of it.

    The one point you mention that is 100% correct if you want to eliminate any doubts at all then you test all the cars in one place at the same location in the same condition with the same equipment to minimize all these effects. I can say though that is proper tests are followed and consistency applied then the spread will not be significant.

    We could and I am known to type paragraphs on this subject alone, but there is not much need (oops too late lol). But please get a inexpensive Race Logic Performance box and E-Mail me and I'd love to help you out with it and obviously would love even more to see your file of your F40! :) :) :) I tested my RX7 again today and wanting to overlay the data !
     
  22. F40 LeMans

    F40 LeMans Formula Junior

    Nov 23, 2009
    826
    #472 F40 LeMans, May 1, 2010
    Last edited: May 1, 2010
    Nope. These are the conclusions about people are completely out of knowledge or reading people magazine without any introdution of real world points. Referring only about the bad folklore is saying.

    Are you so angry? no, I don't want absolutely that. I'm here talking amicably, but I will stop talking if you want.
    Not a problem for me. I'm sorry about you (and Joe) are not confident about I'm saying, I will like to do.
     
  23. Bill S

    Bill S Formula 3

    Oct 2, 2004
    1,995
    We are just joking. We would really like to see your GPS time, speed and height data for 60 to 140 mph starting in second gear. It is hard to test a Euro F40 in the US. You are our only chance!

    You can take many tests on hot and cold days. The important things are:

    1. The ground is pretty flat and has good dry traction.
    2. You are close to sea level.
    3. It's not too hot or too cold.
    4. You start in second gear below 60 mph and floor it.
    5. You take it to almost redline in each gear.
    6. You shift pretty fast (.5 seconds or so).
    7. You use gas similar to ours.
    8. Your F40 had no modifications.
    9. The PerformanceBox is fairly level and can see the GPS satellites.
    10. Keep the PerformanceBox in the mph mode. Mine has some problems in the km/h mode.

    As Rice Racing says, there are other variables but they do not matter so much as these. We can probably duplicate your conditions (temperature, altitude and ground) in CA if needed.
     
  24. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Feb 13, 2004
    8,046
    SFL
    #474 SSNISTR, May 1, 2010
    Last edited: May 1, 2010
    Actually not at all. But thanks for using an internet "word" my 11 year old cousin uses.

    We all can see now that your not capable of dropping something....I moved on, maybe you should try too.
     
  25. malebomb01

    malebomb01 Formula Junior

    Mar 10, 2010
    707
    Big D
     

Share This Page