Red Bull's Matesschitz Denies Plot Confirms Webber *SPOILER?* | FerrariChat

Red Bull's Matesschitz Denies Plot Confirms Webber *SPOILER?*

Discussion in 'F1' started by RP, Nov 15, 2010.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    As long as we have his word on it.
    PULEEZE!
     
  2. RWatters

    RWatters Formula 3

    Feb 21, 2006
    1,075
    Kansas
    The fact that he's given his word makes me think it might just be a possibility. They've lied just as much as Ferrari has this season IMO. lol
     
  3. thirteendog

    thirteendog Formula 3

    Mar 6, 2008
    1,587
    Nashville, TN
    Maybe I'm way off on understanding your post, but are you considering Red Bull using Mark Webber as a Pawn to help Vettle win the Championship?

    Webber pitted and Ferrari followed. Red Bull had no idea that Ferrar would do that. It didn't matter anyway since Alonso came out in front of Webber. FA then spent the next 50+ laps trying to get around a russian rookie. Seriously, Alonso couldn't get around a rookie who was in a slower car than what the two time world champion was driving. I'm sure he was playing it safe, I would. It's a rookie that can't seem to keep the car out of the barracade.

    I read the article and didn't see where Webber confirmed that that was the plan all along.
     
  4. Wolfgang5150

    Wolfgang5150 F1 Rookie

    Oct 31, 2003
    4,706
    In Ferraris defense; they were screwed. They were too worried about Webber, and couldn't focus on Vettel. They couldn't cover both bases. Hindsight is too easy, but Webber was off the pace Sat & Sun. Vettel was in a zone....
     
  5. SpeedLimit?

    SpeedLimit? Karting

    May 19, 2009
    115
    Theres not to many "safe" passing points at that track especially when the car ahead is even on straight line speed. I just don't understand RB's call because webber has done will with managing tires before so I can't imagine him not being able to maintain pace on his "bad" tires to the point where he'd get called in and released into traffic.
     
  6. Tipo815

    Tipo815 F1 Rookie

    Nov 1, 2003
    3,565
    Newport Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Jeffrey
    Who cares if they intended to bait Ferrari or not. If they intended to do it - they succeeded. Either way it was Ferrari's decision (and mistake).
     
  7. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    I too doubt there was any great conspiracy. I just think that taking anyone in F1's word at face value is foolish.
     
  8. ferrari 512 tr

    ferrari 512 tr F1 Rookie

    Nov 16, 2008
    4,180
    Australia
    Full Name:
    Paolo
  9. racerx3317

    racerx3317 F1 Veteran

    Oct 17, 2004
    5,701
    New York, NY
    Full Name:
    Luis
    It would really be extremely difficult to rig such a thing. It seems to me that it was just everything faslling Vettel's way.
     
  10. RP

    RP F1 World Champ

    Feb 9, 2005
    17,667
    Bocahuahua, Florxico
    Full Name:
    Tone Def
    No plot, no drama. Ferrari made a call, it backfired. That is racing.
     
  11. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,671
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    +1

    Whether Ferrari fell for it (assuming there was even a Webber hare) or not is irrelevant: With Vettel running out in front faster than Alonso, there was little they could do.

    It is also irrelevant that Alonso couldn't pass Petrov: There were still two more cars to pass ahead on a hard to pass track in a sub par car.

    It was an uphill battle. That's racing. Better luck and a better car next year.
     
  12. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    If he hadn't pitted when he did he wouldn't have ended up behind any of them.
     
  13. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,671
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    I bow to the maestro.
     
  14. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    MS gets clipped then gets T boned, Rosberg and Petrov dive in pits, tyres on till the end, FA stuck behind, no one could plan or see that coming.

    Well maybe if you had deepblue computing on hand.
     
  15. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    THAT'S IT!
    SCHUMIE WAS BEHIND IT ALL.
     
  16. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    Correctomundo..:)
     
  17. DGS

    DGS Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    May 27, 2003
    72,486
    MidTN
    Full Name:
    DGS
    Well nobody would crash a Renault on purpose, either. :D
     
  18. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    #19 PSk, Nov 15, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2010
    Exactly.

    Ferrari have already said they pitted to cover Webber's strategy ... see http://en.espnf1.com/abudhabi/motorsport/story/34377.html, so they took the bait. IDIOTS.

    If they hadn't Alonso would most likely have finished a trailing 4th and won.


    I also believe Red Bull fiddled with Marks car to ensure he did not challenge Vettel in qualifying.

    Why do I believe this?

    Because Mark was recently very close to Vettel's qualifying times and in third practice he was real close and everything looked normal and then all of a sudden he has no grip ... WTF? Mark even stated afterwards that he was mystified as to why his pace fell off.

    Taking Mark out of the equation is completely consistent with Red Bulls strategy everywhere else and makes sense particularly after Brazil when they could easily have pretty much ensured Mark won and was confident going in to the last race. Instead they didn't clearly displayed to the world that either Vettel won or they did not care.

    Then they pitted Mark early which completely fncked his race and ensured completely that there would have to be no team order discussion, etc.

    This is why Mark is so p!ssed now (or it could simply be that he is upset with himself, which would be fair enough as it was a **** performance ... but if the car was below par ... ?).

    Mark should go to Renault IMO. He has no future at Red Bull, especially now Vettel has cracked his duck.
    Pete
     
  19. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    There was talk at the time that Alonso thought his tires were going off and asked for the pit stop. Anyone remember?
    Of course later in the race Lewis thought his tires were going too but drove through it and finished second. So who knows?
     
  20. SRT Mike

    SRT Mike Two Time F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    23,343
    Taxachusetts
    Full Name:
    Raymond Luxury Yacht
    Webber says in his post-race interview that he was the one who wanted to come in for tires because he felt his tires were shot and he wanted to get on the primes. So he came in. Ferrari noticed that within a couple of laps, Webber was significantly faster so they made a snap judgement to call in Alonso.

    The guys who got in between them came in very early after the SC, so unless Alonso was going to stay out for a long time and put a big gap on them, it was likely that he was going to end up behind them anyway, whether he came in when he did or stayed out a big longer. Their main rival was Webber, so he's the one they were watching.

    It backfired on them, but there is definitely no conspiracy involved. To think there even could be more then stretches the boundaries of reason.
     
  21. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    Stefano knows and has said so.


    Again on that track Alonso could easily have held fourth even if it was nearly a lap down, so tyre performance did not matter a **** ... as it has no passing opportunities. They pitted because they are stupid and thought Red Bull were being clever with Mark when really they were ensuring he was fncked.
    Pete
     
  22. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    Mate we have 5 months to fill ... :)

    Pete
     
  23. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Agreed about there being no cabal.
    There was some talk that Alonso believed he was having tire issues and requested the early (ish) tire changes. Given the experience others (Hamilton in particular) had yesterday might it well be that his tires could have lasted rather longer? A lot of meaningless speculation I know but that's half the fun.
     
  24. racerx3317

    racerx3317 F1 Veteran

    Oct 17, 2004
    5,701
    New York, NY
    Full Name:
    Luis
    Absolutely, but it's really easy to say that in hindsight. I figured he would be Ok. I never dreamed he'd be stuck behind Petrov. I don't think Red Bull would know that before hand either. They rolled the dice and it worked, good for them, but no way that was planned.
     

Share This Page