275 NART Spyder lawsuit | FerrariChat

275 NART Spyder lawsuit

Discussion in 'Vintage (thru 365 GTC4)' started by Peloton25, Nov 17, 2010.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Peloton25

    Peloton25 F1 Veteran

    Jan 24, 2004
    7,646
    California, USA
    Full Name:
    Erik
    Anyone familiar with the details of this story? I found it while looking for stuff related to the F1 and didn't see any mention here. Seems quite a mess and perhaps with a pending lawsuit no one will be doing any talking.

    If someone wants to PM me that's fine too. Obviously most here would be interested in the NART Spyder whereas I'm more curious about the other car mentioned. ;)

    >8^)
    ER
     
  2. normv

    normv F1 Rookie

    May 3, 2005
    2,767
    Mishawaka In
    Full Name:
    Norm
    Hello maybe Im missing something, Carl the buyer states that he bought both for 4.5 million yet later he says the NART is worth 7 million or so. So why is he complaining even if its damaged he got a deal and how does he know its damaged if he hasnt yet got the car. There all damaged at some point in 30 yrs or so unless it was in a time capsule. Im sure the dealer(seller) had or did a PPI and showed it to the buyer and both were satisfied. Unless he never got the NART or he got frustrated over the shipping. I guess I dont get it, thats why there lawyers involved.
     
  3. amenasce

    amenasce Three Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Oct 17, 2001
    34,425
    Full Name:
    Joe Mansion
    If he bought a real NART spider and a Mc F1 for $4.5M, he got a great deal. Still, it sucks that both cars were damaged prior (while?) to delivery.

    Obviously we dont know all the details (Why isn't the Mcf1 delivered?), it will be interesting to follow this story.
     
  4. normv

    normv F1 Rookie

    May 3, 2005
    2,767
    Mishawaka In
    Full Name:
    Norm
    Sorry I should have wrote that he hasnt received the McF1 yet, so he still got a deal.
     
  5. Peloton25

    Peloton25 F1 Veteran

    Jan 24, 2004
    7,646
    California, USA
    Full Name:
    Erik
    I'm mostly confused about how a McLaren F1 is considered a "rare Ferrari" now. ;)

    Seems the facts are a little muddy with what was presented at the link so that's why I was hoping to hear more from the assembled masses at FChat.

    >8^)
    ER
     
  6. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    106,040
    Vegas baby
    #6 TheMayor, Nov 17, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2010
    I'm confused here.

    If the McLaren never showed up, how do they know about it overheating?

    Also, who buys and pays for a car for that much money and doesn't have it inspected prior to paying for it?
     
  7. Peloton25

    Peloton25 F1 Veteran

    Jan 24, 2004
    7,646
    California, USA
    Full Name:
    Erik
    #7 Peloton25, Nov 17, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2010
    The McLaren is here in the USA now, just never delivered to Mr Carl. Not sure how he knows what may have happened to it. Before it can be delivered it will need federalization/Show or Display approval as it's new here. I heard there was some funny business with the price he was supposed to pay for the car but don't have specifics. I'd love to read the legal complaint if anyone knows of an easy way to access it.

    Several brokers are offering the F1 for sale now too which adds to the mystery. You'd think with a purchase contract in dispute that the judge might order that the car would not be able to be sold. Could make things an even bigger mess.

    >8^)
    ER
     
  8. greyboxer

    greyboxer F1 World Champ

    Dec 8, 2004
    12,664
    South East
    Full Name:
    Jimmie
    The original story is four months old so maybe its resolved in some way that lets the McLaren be sold
     
  9. Terra

    Terra F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 16, 2004
    3,917
    #9 Terra, Nov 17, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 17, 2010
    The story is completely wrong factually.

    Since the 1990s, Bernie Carl owned a 275 GTS/4 NART Spider #11057. It was quietly on the market for some time.

    John Gillespie had a British client for a NART Spider. The client ended up purchasing 11057.

    Apparently, some trades were sourced from two separate sellers, and injected into the transaction (i.e. perhaps Bernie Carl opted for some sort of a 1031-esque "Like-Kind" Tax Trade due to the large Captial Gains tax exposure from the sale of the NART Spider for circa-$7 million?).

    Anyways, the two part-exchanges were a silver 1994 McLaren F1 road car #013 (sourced from a dealer in Tokyo), and a yellow 1966 Ferrari 275 GTB Alloy #08067 fitted from new with an outside fuel filler, factory roll bar and six carburetors), which was sourced from a well-known Southern California collector and vintage racer. The McLaren F1 apparently sits in the Free Trade Zone in Baltimore (i.e. it hasn't officially entered into the stream of U.S. Commerce).

    Some people have posited/theorized that the aforementioned lawsuit might be related to Bernie Carl's general displeasure for what he believes to be a rather large discrepancy between what Cohen/Gillespie's actual acquisition costs were for the McLaren F1 and 275 GTB Alloy were, versus the respective values which were assigned to them in the Tax Trade structure, etc.
     
  10. Peloton25

    Peloton25 F1 Veteran

    Jan 24, 2004
    7,646
    California, USA
    Full Name:
    Erik
    That's exactly the kind of clarification I was looking for. Thanks Terra! :cool:

    Interesting that he's trying to force the delivery of the F1 now (assuming that portion is true) with the lawsuit. At the time this all originally took place the auction sale of F1 #062 had not yet occurred and the general value of an F1 was probably seen as being a bit lower than one might assume today.

    greyboxer - recongnizing the age of this story I was told quite recently that things have not yet been resolved.

    >8^)
    ER
     
  11. CornersWell

    CornersWell F1 Rookie

    Nov 24, 2004
    4,894
    I was perplexed, too, why BC would want another NART Spyder or trading out his car for an unknown...

    But, yes, at $4.5MM, you're not going to get a "correct" 275 NART Spyder and McL F1, I don't think. EVERYONE in their right mind would be clamoring to get that deal!

    CW
     
  12. Peloton25

    Peloton25 F1 Veteran

    Jan 24, 2004
    7,646
    California, USA
    Full Name:
    Erik
    So true - some F1 owners would suggest that you could only get their F1 and a small diecast recreation of a Ferrari 308 for $4.5M right now. :D

    >8^)
    ER
     
  13. of2worlds

    of2worlds F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 6, 2004
    18,006
    ON
    Full Name:
    CH
    Hasn't it happened before; a lawsuit following his car purchase?
    CH
     
  14. 335s

    335s Formula Junior

    Jan 17, 2007
    870
    SF Bay Area
    Full Name:
    T. Monma
    Lowest mileage F! car in USA{CA legal with BAR sticker to boot!) sold late summer 2010 for "mid-high threes,"
    NARTS are MUCH more expensive than posters think...

    These figs make NO sense...the "early VIN" F1 in Port Baltimore IS a candidate for Certification under ICI conformity rules...it's "just time and money...."
    4.5M is "around" half of the cost for a legit NART(been shopped a few over last few years...)

    The 275 VIN referenced earlier is a 6C, alloy, filler, rollbar "comp car"...also shopped to an associate who passed for unstated reasons...

    This thread "sounds" like a mish mosh of several different, and unrelated, transactions and cars-IMHO ...
     
  15. Terra

    Terra F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 16, 2004
    3,917
    #15 Terra, Nov 18, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 18, 2010
    These two part-exchanges (McLaren F1 #013 and 275 GTB #08067), ARE currently being offered around (i.e. ostensibly with their CURRENT OWNER Bernie Carl's approval/authorization/consent). While all these cars (including 275 GTS/4 NART Spider #11057) might sound like a mish-mosh of several different, unrelated transactions, trust me they're all inter-related (i.e. "one-in-the-same").
     
  16. BVC500

    BVC500 Karting

    Feb 26, 2008
    61
    Washington, D.C.
    Very interesting. Yeah, I thought Bernie Carl owned the Nart for quite some time. He also owns the second 250 GTO built, 3387.
     
  17. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
    08067 is currently offered for sale in FML by Beverly Hills Sports & Classic cars.
     
  18. azfast1

    azfast1 Karting

    Jan 10, 2004
    208
    #18 azfast1, Nov 19, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  19. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
    The add is in this week's FML.
     
  20. Terra

    Terra F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 16, 2004
    3,917
    #20 Terra, Nov 19, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2010
    Harley Cluxton is a good friend of Bernie Carl's, etc.
     
  21. Terra

    Terra F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 16, 2004
    3,917
    #21 Terra, Nov 19, 2010
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2010
    Man, a nose only a mother could love....
     
  22. azfast1

    azfast1 Karting

    Jan 10, 2004
    208
    Its been in Arizona for 2 weeks now, must be quite a lead time for an ad to come out.
    Harley is a good friend, but is not storing this one.
     
  23. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
    :)
     
  24. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
    Was this Jimmy from Japan's car?
     
  25. Terra

    Terra F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 16, 2004
    3,917
    No.
     

Share This Page