Gemballa MIG U1 (Enzo)

ok. kewel!

 

The Gemballa MIG U1 not awesome Enzo.

The Gemballa MIG U1 poor sacrificed Enzo.

 

Why start new thread if exist old one?

http://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/showthread.php?t=268077

 

Because he's just joined and too lazy to use the search function.

 

+1

 

Many on Fchat prefer the class of a JG P4/5 Enzo transformation. MIG is eye catching but over the top x129359.

Maybe he doesn't know of the search function? IMO we should be a bit nicer to new members. If there weren't reposts of topics there would hardly be a forum beyond up to the minute press releases.

 

I agree with this. I love the P4/5, but I also don't think the Gemballa MIG-U1 isn't that bad, it's just over the top and not needed.

 

I agree with Amenasce and YellowF50....!

 

I'm sure (if he has read this after posting) he is now aware of the search function. I have never seen a forum on the internet without a search function. So job done !
I apologise if my manner was a little crass, but surely he couldn't be so niave to think this hadn't been discussed at an earlier point ( like when the press first got sight of it, or when they launched the car).

Different if he had opened a thread with a statement like I like this car because.... Or has anybody seen it, or even stated that if the Enzo had been a Picasso and an art student decided to paint over it, it would be sacralidge what they had done to the picture.
Instead of just stating the title of the car. Also this car cannot be used in the same sentence as jim's car as jim's car was redesigned in a tunnel by the very people who do this work for the people who created this car, the car in the discussion has had bits and pieces bolted on ( probably found on a Porsche too), and tried there best to look a little like an fxx but more transformer style. And if that was there intention well job well done if that's what you like, each to their own.