Reprofiling TR cams & milling Deck Height | FerrariChat

Reprofiling TR cams & milling Deck Height

Discussion in 'Boxers/TR/M' started by Red Head Seeker, Sep 10, 2011.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Red Head Seeker

    Red Head Seeker Formula 3
    BANNED

    Apr 27, 2009
    2,443
    San Francisco Area
    Full Name:
    Mark
    Hello "All"; Would appreciate everyone's thoughts/inputs/experiences with regrinding TR cams to a more "Aggressive" profile, & also milling the deck height to achieve a higher compression ratio. It would seem that the horsepower potential of the TR motor is quite expansive. I REALLY WISH!!! there was an after market chain driven camshafts assembly, Imagine the cost savings of no MORE engine-out majors....Ferrari really dropped the ball on that one.....maybe on purpose....Imagine the MILLIONS Ferrari has made on both major parts ( belts, tensioners, etc) & the labor costs associated with an "Engine-Out Major"......Mark
     
  2. carguy

    carguy F1 Rookie

    Oct 30, 2002
    3,425
    Alabama (was Mich.)
    Full Name:
    Jeff
    I have heard of one or two people regrinding cams for more performance, with modest results. For more compression the way to go is new pistons, and leave the block and cylinder liners as they are. I have a friend who was working on a twin-turbo set up for the TR motor...that he planned on marketing at some point - not sure where he's at with it right now. But he achieved great results with just turbos....getting a bit over 600 horsepower with very little boost. Of course with power increases like that, the differential carrier should be upgraded to a one piece billet unit from Mr. Newman. I too would love to hear some actual experiences from those who have hot rodded a TR motor. Anyone.....
     
  3. Cribbj

    Cribbj Formula 3
    BANNED

  4. Red Head Seeker

    Red Head Seeker Formula 3
    BANNED

    Apr 27, 2009
    2,443
    San Francisco Area
    Full Name:
    Mark
    Hello John; Thanks for the links.....interesting to see how the stock 515TR motor makes horsepower all the up to 6,900 rpms. It notes the stock compression ratio of a 512TR motor as 10 to 1.....I have to research to see the compression ratio of my 1991 Testarossa motor.....Mark
     
  5. davehelms

    davehelms F1 Rookie

    Jan 3, 2004
    4,629
    Full Name:
    Dave Helms
    One need only look at the BBLM and 512 S to see that the potential is there but those are race cars, not street cars.

    Milling the deck?! You have been reading too many hot rod magazines! That may work for a Chevy or Ford but in this market it amount to the destruction of a perfectly good engine. You want compression, buy pistons but leave the block and head surfaces alone.

    Chain drives...?! There is sound reasoning used when Ferrari chose to use belts for these engines.... leave that alone and yes, be grateful Ferrari chose to use rubber bands on these.

    You want handling and a well balanced SuperCar? Make it mid engine. You want it to have incredible performance? Make it so the entire power plant comes out as a package so it can be maintained to a high level of perfection while timing 4 cams that are right in front of you with the engine on the table. Folks gripe about an absolutely brilliant design that allows for complete power plant removal as a package. Make no mistake, it is brilliant!

    Things change completely when you get into the SuperCar world over domestic production based muscle cars. There is little left on the table in the way of performance and design as Ferrari was shooting to take back the Worlds Fastest production car trophy at the time.... and got it. The entire car is a well designed Package and quite reliable when used as intended. Adding substantially more power will amount to an exercise to locate, identify and destroy the next weakest link in the system..... exactly what building a race car from a production based car amounts to, the ultimate exercise in compromise! Hell, 9/10's of the cars on the road don't run a fraction of what they did when new... I suggest that is a better place to start before going into destruction testing of driveline components.

    Just one doorknobs opinion....
     
  6. jgoodman

    jgoodman F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Aug 29, 2009
    3,267
    Central PA
    Full Name:
    Jay Goodman
    Very well said Dave!
     
  7. Testa-rossa

    Testa-rossa Karting

    Aug 21, 2010
    61
    The Netherlands
    Full Name:
    Martijn
    I agree too !!!
     
  8. davehelms

    davehelms F1 Rookie

    Jan 3, 2004
    4,629
    Full Name:
    Dave Helms
    I surely find no fault with the want and desire for more performance, its why we purchased these cars in the first place. The simple fact is, at best, the TR's are difficult to "Enhance" and still maintain any degree of reliability. It was designed as a GT car, not a Sprint car and what it does, it does very well when everything is as it should be.

    CIS injection does NOT like big cams, never did, never will. Find your way around that little fact and then figure out a way to transfer the newly found power through a driveshaft the same size as your little finger.

    Build a bigger, bulletproof shaft and then test the longevity of the transaxle components. Say you find a way past all of these small details and you can get the power to the ground..... now you have to stop it which involves new wheels so larger calipers/rotors can fit...... Its a long, expensive road that few take the time to finish properly.

    One person that did it correct........... Rick. A beautiful TR in correct GT form sitting along side a 355 B that can be used when in the Sprint mood. Each one designed for the application and each doing what they were designed to do, quite well. Not only is this the correct way to deal with the urges, it is also by far the most inexpensive method.
     
  9. Red Head Seeker

    Red Head Seeker Formula 3
    BANNED

    Apr 27, 2009
    2,443
    San Francisco Area
    Full Name:
    Mark
    Hello Dave; Very much appreciate your knowledge & thoughtful insights. Truly modifying a TR or for that matter "any car" is akin to the old adage...." A chain is only as strong as it's weakest link"....My illusions of "Tremendous Horsepower" are now just a fleeting memory, as you have yanked me from my cloud.....back to reality....I always have my 1972 De Tomaso Pantera to "Hot Rod"....and it's drive shafts are "Bigger than my thumb"......Mark
     
  10. davehelms

    davehelms F1 Rookie

    Jan 3, 2004
    4,629
    Full Name:
    Dave Helms
    Any model where the driver could hold a Coke between their knees while eating a Cheeseburger, doing 150 MPH plus.......That has to be considered a, exceptionaly well tuned design from the onset. Very few owners have felt what a perfectly tuned and sorted TR really feels like, there is plenty left on the table to be had for most.

    If running stop lights defines the best, your Pantera holds the title in this race. Over 80 MPH or in the twisties....... it is but a fleeting memory in the RV mirror!
     
  11. kerrywittig

    kerrywittig Formula 3
    BANNED

    Nov 10, 2005
    1,668
    Ithaca, New York
    Full Name:
    Kerry David Wittig
    I love Dave Helms.......and I'm not ashamed to admit it!


    "Not that there's anything wrong with that!" ME
     
  12. davehelms

    davehelms F1 Rookie

    Jan 3, 2004
    4,629
    Full Name:
    Dave Helms
    Its just the age old debate Kerry and I happened to have lived long enough now to be the Kergugen on the other side of the arguement. Like it was yesterday I can remember telling my mentor in this business how I was going to redesign this and that on the 250 GTO I used to maintain and campaign at the race tracks.

    "So you little pissant... you think you know more than the team of World Class Engineers that spent the better part of their lives designing and building what they considered the most flawless design to date......Talk it up doorknob and lets hear your brilliance come forth...."

    I have lived both sides of the debate, wear the shirt proudly and paid for it in full.

    Do we get to sit on Pearl Street Mall sipping Scotch together this Fall or will Winter coats be required? Is you project all together yet?
     
  13. jratcliff

    jratcliff Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2004
    1,024
    Texas
    #13 jratcliff, Sep 14, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  14. carguy

    carguy F1 Rookie

    Oct 30, 2002
    3,425
    Alabama (was Mich.)
    Full Name:
    Jeff
    Wow....wow.....JRATCLIFF's car is worthy of it's own thread. How about it? A thread showing all of the mods you've done? Or at least some more pics!
     
  15. jratcliff

    jratcliff Formula 3

    Sep 7, 2004
    1,024
    Texas
    Thanks Jeff and I would be pleased to get a thread started once I get some time. I went for controlled power and not ultimate (no turbos,etc.). Motec system with the 512TR intake runners, Brembo big brakes all around, rebuilt all the suspension pieces, power steering, and several other mods.

    John
     
  16. plip

    plip Formula Junior

    Aug 25, 2003
    292
    Switzerland
    Full Name:
    Gianni Olivieri
    Have been following this post with great interest. Would love to hear a bit more in detail the mods made by jratcliff.
    Have a spare long block sitting on the bench for a very long time which need some attention.....
     
  17. Testarossa1

    Testarossa1 Karting

    Jun 15, 2007
    229
    UK
    Full Name:
    Clive
    Hi John
    The car looks stunning buddy !! I would love to hear more of the engine conversion as I am considering something very similar :)

    Tr boy
     

Share This Page