'Ferrari chassis failed FIA test' | FerrariChat

'Ferrari chassis failed FIA test'

Discussion in 'F1' started by 05011994, Jan 13, 2012.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. 05011994

    05011994 Formula 3
    Owner

    May 1, 2004
    1,865
    Golden, Colorado
    http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/7426788/-Ferrari-chassis-failed-FIA-test-

    Ferrari's bid to challenge for this year's World titles reportedly took a knock when their 663 failed its crash tests.

    A new regulation this season is that all chassis must pass the mandatory FIA crash tests before they can take part in pre-season testing.

    But, according to Finland's Turun Sanomat, Ferrari's 2012 chassis, dubbed the 663, failed on its first attempt.

    This meant it was back to the drawing board for Ferrari, who had to reinforce the structure before the second attempt at the tests.

    That test is reportedly scheduled for the coming week with Ferrari then set to unveil their new car on February 3rd before testing kicks off on the 7th.
     
  2. mousecatcher

    mousecatcher Formula 3

    Dec 18, 2007
    2,116
    san mateo, ca
    This is great news!!! It means Ferrari is being quite aggressive in chassis design.
     
  3. kylec

    kylec F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 9, 2005
    3,670
    Orlando
    sorry, I'm a bit confused (again)
    I thought it took weeks to build a car from scratch. If they need to do a redesign, construct that car, crash test it and build more, how are they going to get all that done in 3 weeks.
     
  4. DF1

    DF1 Three Time F1 World Champ

    I see this as bad news. What else needs to be changed to make it pass. Hopefully the failure was marginal.
     
  5. junglistluder

    junglistluder F1 Rookie
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Mar 23, 2007
    3,622
    VA
    Full Name:
    Brendan
    The article says they are going to reinforce the current chassis.
     
  6. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Beg to differ - This is close to a major problem - It means that at least their CAD system (presumably CATIA?) got it wrong..... And;

    This "theory" was postulated here a while back - AFAIK, the carbon needs up to ~24 hours in the oven after ~ the same in labor to lay up. [Obviously, this varies hugely depending on the part(s) that are being made.]

    They don't need a "new car", just a new tub that I suspect will be substantially stronger in the area it failed than previously. ;)

    It's a PITA, but not a disaster unless it fails again.

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  7. DeSoto

    DeSoto F1 Veteran

    Nov 26, 2003
    7,813
    IIRC, last year´s Red Bull also failed the first test.

    A good omen?
     
  8. 4rePhill

    4rePhill F1 Veteran

    Oct 18, 2009
    8,267
    Worcester, England
    Full Name:
    Phill J
    It's a bit early to be panicking just yet as I see it!

    I'm pretty sure Ferrari will have this all sorted and remain on schedule, especially as the FIA will have pointed out exactly what improvements need to be made in order to pass the test.
     
  9. mousecatcher

    mousecatcher Formula 3

    Dec 18, 2007
    2,116
    san mateo, ca
    No. What's in CAD isn't reality, and we don't know enough about these things to simulate it that correctly. When you're on the very edge of tolerances and such and you can't afford too much safety margin, you end up with some failures. Also, laying CF isn't exactly repeatable science yet either.

    That's why you actually test.

    Like CFD vs wind tunnel.
     
  10. Etcetera

    Etcetera Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 7, 2003
    24,148
    Full Name:
    C6H14O5
    Seems every year, a handful of chassis bomb their first few rounds of tests, yet manage fine in the end.

    Non-issue, imo.
     
  11. mousecatcher

    mousecatcher Formula 3

    Dec 18, 2007
    2,116
    san mateo, ca
    Easily, if you are building every part. But they only have to rebuild the chassis.

    My guess, from a tiny bit of experience seeing these things built, is it's 4-5 days on full assault to put out a new tub from the drawings. I imagine it only takes a day or so (depending how much simulation time) to modify the drawings to add reinforcement.
     
  12. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,878
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    Mercedes' nose last year failed. Doesn't mean much right now unless it keeps failing and they have to redesign things.....
     
  13. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Like the old Lotus theory that a properly designed car should fall to pieces just past the finish line?
    ;)
     
  14. Ney

    Ney F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 20, 2004
    7,399
    ...and we know how that theory worked out in the real world for more than a few drivers.....
     
  15. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Which is why we now have mandated safety standards and tests
    Thank God
     
  16. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Thank...... [With apologies in advance to Steve ;)]
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Mad Max. And Professor Sid.

    While Max went certifiably crazy towards the end (similar to JMB) he does deserve a lot of the credit for safety improvements during his tenure.

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  17. crinoid

    crinoid F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 2, 2005
    9,984
    Full Name:
    LaCrinoid
    According to twitter reports the new Ferrari has been retested and passed.
     
  18. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Got to give Max and the devil their due.
    Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
     
  19. Etcetera

    Etcetera Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 7, 2003
    24,148
    Full Name:
    C6H14O5
    Not on military time!
     
  20. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Touché
     
  21. Sellnit

    Sellnit Formula Junior

    Mar 22, 2010
    975
    Cincinnati
    Full Name:
    James
    Think of it as a pre-season "update". They will be on track, I can't imagine the pressure on the Scuderia this season. So many changes to the team behind the scenes, and two drivers that still have a lot to prove. Alonso has out driven the car for two years and wants that WDC, and Massa who needs to find some form quickly or be out of a job. Best wishes to SF in 2012.
     
  22. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,476
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    So pass or no pass now?
     
  23. crinoid

    crinoid F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 2, 2005
    9,984
    Full Name:
    LaCrinoid
    Ferrari pasa definitivamente el ‘Crash-Test’ de la*FIA
    Ferrari ha pasado los crash-test de la FIA para homologar el chasis esta semana, después de que fallaran en su primer intento en el mes de Diciembre. El test fue realizado el pasado martes en Bollate (Milán), donde el monocasco tuvo que ser recubierto en alguna parte con láminas de carbono para ser reforzado, a pesar de ello el chasis homologado se muestra muy ligero y la pérdida de rendimiento es escasa.C
     
  24. Cozmic_Kid

    Cozmic_Kid F1 Veteran

    Dec 1, 2005
    7,573
    Denmark
    Full Name:
    B. Frandsen
    Thery should replace Domenicali and Massa instead.
     
  25. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,692
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    A long time ago.
     

Share This Page