599 successor

+1 ??

 

This is not a pic. Looks nothing like the car. Inaccurate wood representation.

 

Cariad,

So you're saying that the pic of the Argento, "F620" reported by GTSpirit (or whoever), isn't accurate? And/Or wasn't taken at the preview? I'm sorry, I feel like an idiot. LOL

Mark

 

Perhaps the leaked picture is an earlier styling model?

 

Which rear end do you like the GTSpirit or Autoblog.
Many previews on successive days at Fiorano and Enzo's old office.

 

Someone on record as having seen the car disagrees with you if I am reading your post correctly: http://www.ferrarichat.com/forum/showpost.php?p=141239863&postcount=498

Please clarify.

 

No. Guys that were on presentation confirmed that wooden model presents overall look of 620GT, but there are some additional elements that were later shown on real car (red one that was presented 22th).

 

Hmm...well, I take that back...I guess I managed to trick myself into seeing and believing different than I first thought after the model leaked. Maybe that says something about what I think so far.

Still will hold judgement till I take it all in once I see it in metal and contemplate it for a while.

 

so now all cars except california have the same front design, they will use it also for F70?

 

Exactly my first thought! I expect it to be much more breathtaking than the wooden model and i agree with FerrariMC that it partly damages the fun to smuggle the pics out of the sneak preview.

I also keep holding my breath....

 

I suspect this car is going to look stunning, tough and super cool in Black paint.

 

Thanks for the clarification Dreamcatcher, very much appreciated. Did you ever get my PM?

 

It's a tough call, though neither of the pics show the "full" rear end for a complete perspective, so it's hard to say. But judging from those pics alone, I do like the "Autoblog" version better because it's sleeker, smoother, and running with the lines of the body before it. Conversely, the GTSpirit (Wild-Speed) version's rear-end "drops off" from my perspective and is less aerodynamic. It's hard to say though, cause each looks appealing, but function is the most important, so I believe Autoblog's is more efficient. What do you think? Cause you're the Ferrari owner.

Mark

 

newest picture from auto.it
i like it
Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

Just looks like a non-hatch FF.

I like it.

Will be great in black.

 

Nice! Can't wait to see more.

 

Europe is not the main market for Ferraris.

 

Same concern here :/

 

I was not implying anything else.

 

I'd be happy if it looked like that.

 

Well I really for the first time in a while am disapointed. Really I am. The car does nothing for me, not even the crazy power figures, or the wine-ing and dining Ferrari gave for the preview.

The car stinks of American muscle car, mixed with obvious Italian style cues, all with a bit of Jap racer in the mix too...

Really disapointed.


Sorry Ferrari.


EDIT: Think Japped up Alfa Alfetta GTV... and the wheels dont look 575ish as I expected. They look ****.

 

This:

 

I really hope this will be real one! Simply beautiful! The wooden model looked a bit too much as the 410 Super America Superfast
Image Unavailable, Please Login