Great to see this Miura being restored at last, and hopefully it will be another faithful-to-original-build effort.
This is #5092 the walter Wolf SV whch was originally Gold. I don't know which Idiot decided to paint here Yellow in 2001.
Click on the link: https://www.facebook.com/#!/photo.php?v=10150094103166533&set=vb.131382396919675&type=2&theater
Raymond, I agree with you completely. If ever there as a Lamborghini restoration 'Faux Pas', this was it, committed by the factory itself. I learned my lesson with 5064, and IMO its pointless restoring classic cars that have a special history unless it is to original spec.
We can only assume that it was done for corporate identidy reason since in 2001 the official colours were yellow/black, all the new cars they showed (Murci/Gallardo) were always there as twins in these two colours (plus additional like the Ithaca green). Anyway doesn't justify that fauxpas.
I'm not so sure about that. Given the era in which it was built, and knowing Lamborghini's practices of the time, my money is on the fact that this car now exists as another P400 whose owner is completely unaware of that fact.
Isn't that the car the Bob turned into the Jota? That was the practice at Lamborghini, reusing old prototypes as the basis for prototypes of newer models. Still happens at Lamborghini today!
I don't think so, and I'd love to see some clarification either way. But you are right about the practice of re-using prototypes etc. They also turned them into production cars and sold them represented as such.
So you think the original prototype which was supposedly written off after it was in its accident is somehow alive? No one knows where the engine is (probably pretty easy to spot given the engine number), so they reused parts of the chassis, body, or what? Other than pure speculation, what evidence is there if this (see, now you have me sounding like Joe Sackey!).
Well, lets get into this: What accident did it have, when, where and to what extent? Any proof that this was not just another of Wallace's 'convenient' explanations? The factory never thrashed a Miura within an inch of its life, and some even came back from the dead and were sprinkled with Sant Agata Holy Water! They (the factory) re-used whatever they liked in combinations to suit them, stamped with whatever numbers met their fancy. Anyone who has done a serious study on Miura production knows this is fact. Ergo my suggestion that this car is still alive in one guise or another, and that is just an educated guess (as I have clarified), nothing more, but an educated guess consistent with the practices of Automobili Lamborghini SpA of the period as proven over & over. Dunno where the engine is. You tell me. That's why I said in my earlier post: "Haven't a clue".... If I have learned anything about that factory's practices of the era, it is to question everything, and I have been pretty consistent in that posture for many years. As the great TC Browne said, "There are lies, damned lies, and then there are automobile manufacturers statistics." I think he meant well for our collective peace of mind.
I should also add that my healthy skepticism of Lamborghini folklore has served me well because I can think of at least 2 historical cars that I was assured were "dead" which I subsequently stumbled across (I use the word "stumbled" loosely, I'm sure you'll understand). Image Unavailable, Please Login
Joe says: Given the era in which it was built, and knowing Lamborghini's practices of the time, my money is on the fact that this car now exists as another P400 whose owner is completely unaware of that fact. ---------------- Cool! - I'm now taking offers for my P400 which *might* be the prototype but I am unaware if it is. Starting at, say, $1.5M - anyone? anyone?
I'll take it at $1.5m, so far as there is a cashier's check in the glove-box for $1.2m Seriously though, to clarify my thinking: we have seen bits of a car (stamped) dispersed amongst several cars (fact) by the factory. So, with new bodywork, a fresh engine etc, only a chassis might remain. Who knows? And we know Miura chassis can easily be sectioned to the point that they are mostly replaced. *All I'm saying is that I'm not buying the story that the prototype Miura was scrapped* Bob's rather vague story that "a truck backed into it" is not enough for the car to be scrapped, and Bob's recollection has turned out to be notoriously inaccurate. In his defense, he is not a sentimental man, and simply put, could care less about the past. He has admitted several times to saying whatever a journalist needed to hear to get him off his back and close the topic. The factory even went into their junkyard behind the works and saved everything of importance. The 1965 Turin Salon Miura chassis & engine was supposedly also discarded, yet we found it intact in the Mediterranean. And yes, as Steve suggested, please post pics of your fabulous P400, we love them all in this thread!
I am looking for another of these for a friend/client to round off his tool kit etc. Any leads are very much appreciated. Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
Originally Posted by jimmy In their 30th anniversary edition this month, Classic & Sports Car claim in a more general context that the Daytona beats the Miura. Is that really the case? I guess it depends what aspect of the car you're talking about. It can't be about what goes round a track better. By most accounts, the Miura is a supercar and gave birth to the term. It broke new ground in so many ways. But is a Daytona a supercar? I don't think so. A Daytona not a supercar? I can't believe what you two have written here.
IMO I don't think it is. I think its a front-engined production sports car which happens to be made by Ferrari, A Grand Tourer if you must qualify it, hence the name, 365 GTB/4. The fact that it is not considered a Supercar by some does not mean it it not an excellent sports car, as its prowess against the Miura on the track proves.
Ahh, no, you won't lure me into your trap, my friend. It's your theory to prove, not mine. You'll need to disprove the contemporary accounts of it being in an accident, for example, if that's what you are claiming. For the record, I hope you are right and that it still exists. Good hunting. Alberto
I'm now doubting the accident story, whereas years ago I previously went along with it. Your theory was that its "dead". However, I think it exists in one form or another