THE F70 (LaFerrari) Thread | Page 123 | FerrariChat

THE F70 (LaFerrari) Thread

Discussion in '288GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari/F80' started by Greg23, Jun 6, 2012.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. gregh

    gregh Karting

    Dec 7, 2004
    221
    Farnborough, Hants
    Full Name:
    Greg Hurst
    Looks like a blend of current Enzo, 458 lights and Mclaren P1 = Autocar fails yet again
     
  2. REALZEUS

    REALZEUS F1 Veteran

    Feb 16, 2011
    8,420
    Bournemouth, UK
    As per usual. On the other hand, that F12 vs Aventador comparisson might be worth something.
     
  3. Senna1994

    Senna1994 F1 World Champ

    Nov 11, 2003
    13,189
    Orange County
    Full Name:
    Anthony T
    +1
     
  4. mpowered

    mpowered Formula Junior

    Jul 17, 2008
    588
    United States
    Full Name:
    You Know Me
    can anyone who's seen the car confirm that autocar is incorrect?
     
  5. S Brake

    S Brake F1 World Champ

    Aug 3, 2006
    17,182
    Utah
    Full Name:
    Dave
    I haven't seen the car, but if it's anything like the autocar rendering I'll eat my shoe. It's a mash up of so many current cars that it jut looks silly.
     
  6. Traveller

    Traveller F1 Veteran

    Apr 10, 2009
    6,323
    UK
    Full Name:
    Tim
    I have to disagree. I think it is a good magazine that normally has good info. Can anyone who has seen the car say this definitively is not it? Personally I doubt it is accurate as it is an unlikely scoop and is not offered as such, more just Autocars's best guess at present. I really hope it looks better than this but the concern is there is nothing immediately that shows on the mule that contradicts it.

    They are clearly wrong on power and weight as we know the F12 already makes 740 so it is guaranteed to make more than that in this car and then has at least 140 of KERS and all that will weigh more than 1100. Hopefully they are equally accurate on styling although their history on forecasting is not bad.
     
  7. amenasce

    amenasce Three Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Oct 17, 2001
    34,425
    Full Name:
    Joe Mansion
    I like Autocar a lot. They always have thorough tests and usually before any other mags. And before the Internet, that was where i used to get my car news.
     
  8. Peloton25

    Peloton25 F1 Veteran

    Jan 24, 2004
    7,646
    California, USA
    Full Name:
    Erik
    #3058 Peloton25, Nov 13, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Autocar's renderings are generally garbage.

    For example - this was what they said the McLaren F1 successor was going to look like. Compare that to a photo of the P1 and find one single element that matches besides the fact they both have wheels and tires. I can't see any resemblance between the two.

    The only elements they got right on this rendering of the Enzo successor seem to be the ones that you can see plainly by studying photos of the mules and the chassis shown in Paris.

    >8^)
    ER
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  9. S Brake

    S Brake F1 World Champ

    Aug 3, 2006
    17,182
    Utah
    Full Name:
    Dave
    That's even uglier than the P1!
    ;)
     
  10. Peloton25

    Peloton25 F1 Veteran

    Jan 24, 2004
    7,646
    California, USA
    Full Name:
    Erik
    You are correct because the P1 is not ugly. ;)

    But anyway... Autocar should fire their "artists" and stop paying their sources.

    >8^)
    ER
     
  11. REALZEUS

    REALZEUS F1 Veteran

    Feb 16, 2011
    8,420
    Bournemouth, UK
    Even though Sutcliffe is a honed racer, excellent tester and a good journalist, the standards of Autocar's tests are sub par. More often than not, I disagree wholeheartedly with their conclusions; it makes me think that they drove a different car to the one I drove! Moreover, their numbers are usually a joke and differ a lot from the median of all other mags. Amusing it may be, but like Top Gear, it's not a reliable source of information. That said, they are not always wrong of course. I find CAR or Evo much more agreeable readings though.
     
  12. JeremyJon

    JeremyJon F1 Veteran

    Jul 28, 2010
    7,569
    Calgary, Canada

    ugh, kinda threw up a little with this one!
     
  13. Traveller

    Traveller F1 Veteran

    Apr 10, 2009
    6,323
    UK
    Full Name:
    Tim
    Read the SCOOP Autocar review and they seem to have some facts muddled but a few points I was unaware of. Interesting that the CF tub is made of a Carbon so expensive that it was banned in FI and this is an exclusive tub unlike the Macca. They suggest 850 BHP and then elsewhere in the article say the F12 engine should be tuned to produce at least 800 and then add at least another 100+ for KERS and you get well in excess of 900. I dont give that much credence to the image, although the rear looks more credible than the front.

    Same magazine compares the F12 to the Aventador in a brief road test and an easy win for Ferrari on all fronts.
     
  14. Scuderia980

    Scuderia980 F1 Rookie

    Aug 12, 2006
    3,636
    Mountains--Colorado
    Full Name:
    Dave S. V
    interesting, the part about the CF being banned in F1. would like to know the details. hmm, it's not like it's technically out of this world. it's just Toray's higher end fabrics, being the T-800 and T-1000 used in new 'Enzo'...these things have been around
     
  15. Igor Ound

    Igor Ound F1 Veteran

    Sep 30, 2012
    8,102
    The Horn
    Full Name:
    Igor Ound
    #3065 Igor Ound, Nov 14, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  16. Igor Ound

    Igor Ound F1 Veteran

    Sep 30, 2012
    8,102
    The Horn
    Full Name:
    Igor Ound
    #3066 Igor Ound, Nov 14, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  17. Igor Ound

    Igor Ound F1 Veteran

    Sep 30, 2012
    8,102
    The Horn
    Full Name:
    Igor Ound
    #3067 Igor Ound, Nov 14, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  18. Igor Ound

    Igor Ound F1 Veteran

    Sep 30, 2012
    8,102
    The Horn
    Full Name:
    Igor Ound
    #3068 Igor Ound, Nov 14, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  19. Scuderia980

    Scuderia980 F1 Rookie

    Aug 12, 2006
    3,636
    Mountains--Colorado
    Full Name:
    Dave S. V
    aw man, too blurry...doesn't sound like any real info, but still like to read it :-(
     
  20. Ferrari_Michael

    Ferrari_Michael Formula Junior

    Nov 30, 2006
    614
    Wait for the next issue of 'Evo' mag
     
  21. Traveller

    Traveller F1 Veteran

    Apr 10, 2009
    6,323
    UK
    Full Name:
    Tim
    You are right and are missing little. Aside from the chassis material being banned for F1 due to expense etc, the rest is really a rehash of what we already know.
     
  22. Prancing 12

    Prancing 12 F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    May 11, 2004
    2,757
    The long way home
    Can you expand on this? Since when are things banned from F1 due to expense?
     
  23. dr.sb

    dr.sb Formula Junior

    Aug 19, 2011
    789
    UK
    Full Name:
    Sunny B
    I do not know this for sure, but I also thought that teams were allowed a certain budget on R&D and on the car every year?
     

Share This Page