Bold stuff from Zetsche today in Detroit | FerrariChat

Bold stuff from Zetsche today in Detroit

Discussion in 'F1' started by Ferraripilot, Jan 17, 2013.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,944
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    I'll preface this by stating as a self-confessed Mercedes F1 fanatic, I'll believe their intentions for 2014 when I see them. 2013 performance and ability to develope the car during the season should be a fair indicator of how 2014 could shape up.

    Then again, this could be a Honda developing BGP001 type scenario where Honda performed with abysmal results all the while developing their Hatori Hanzo-like machine which of course Brawn capitalized (then destroyed the internals of the team midway through 2008, but that's another story).


    http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2013/01/17/f1-fanatic-roundup-1701/
     
  2. stever

    stever F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 18, 2006
    4,706
    West. Wisconsin
    Full Name:
    Steve R
    Or it might be his line in the sand?; i.e., do it in 2014 or we are done with F1.

    Mercedes is a big outfit; if F1 something he focuses on? Here in the US, Mercedes customers surely don't care much....
     
  3. fiorano94

    fiorano94 F1 Veteran

    May 26, 2006
    6,892
    MW/NW/SE
    This makes me wonder what sort of season 2013 will pan out to be. I have a feeling that a lot of teams will have a majority of their focus on 2014.
     
  4. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,818
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    This isn't the first time the MB team (including Zetsche) have talked about fighting for the WDC.

    I'll believe it when I see it.
     
  5. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Pretty much like any other is my guess;

    - Someone(s) will come out of the box well - Hopefully, say, 3-4 teams in with a real chance.
    - Someone(s) of these will get their development right and move forward. As long as they remain close (in with a chance of the title) they'll "forget" about 2014.
    - The guys out of it will certainly concentrate on '14 from about mid-season.

    Always been that way and always will be......

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  6. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Could be, but I very much doubt it. My guess is they'll be around for at least 3-4 more years in order to amortize the new engine costs.

    I'm sure Florian has better data, but yes - It's a pretty big line item that has already got some nay-sayers up in arms and he needs to defend it (?)

    +1 ;)

    My WAG is most Merc buyers don't know what F1 even is! Is it the same in Europe?....

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  7. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,944
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    So true. My local dealer looks at me cross-eyed when I mention the MB F1 team, their heads are almost as up in the clouds as most of their cars buyers lol.

    As for Europe, it's my understand the F1 team presence is much more known there and they're working on China.


    MB have until 2016 to really come good with something then anything further would be a waste. None of these big teams simply became big and successful overnight. I have confidence in their approach in that they are already dedicating large resources to 2014. I conjecture 2014 is their springboard year, whether they build on it as Red Bull built on their springboard RB5 has yet to me known.
     
  8. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,818
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Didn't you say on here last year that there is a huge connection between the F1 team and the MB sales force and that everybody knows about the team and is on board with it?

    Reason I remember this is because I gave it a try and went to the local MB dealer (big shop) and F1 was not even close to their minds.

    You'd have to live under a rock in Europe not to know about F1.

    Wait a minute!
    Last year you said that 2014 was the last year for the team to come up with real results. Put up or shut up were your words.

    Now you just extended the goal post until 2016?
     
  9. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,944
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    #9 Ferraripilot, Jan 17, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2013
    The AMG-only dealers have F1 featured and has a big presence. That's the one I am near, I just assumed it was a vanilla MB dealer at the time.


    2014 they need real results, they need a championship by 2016.
     
  10. TifosiUSA

    TifosiUSA F1 Veteran

    Nov 18, 2007
    8,468
    Kansas City, MO
    Full Name:
    DJ
    +1

    MB will never get there, IMO.
     
  11. jav

    jav Formula Junior

    Apr 9, 2007
    508
    Massachusetts
    Full Name:
    John
    Here is the full text...

    http://formula-one.speedtv.com/article/f1-zetsche-mercedes-must-push-for-2014-formula-one-title/

    ... and this embodies my problems with how this team operates.

    He admits the real problem is the chassis... and cites replacing a chairman and a driver????



    This like you getting a flat tire on your way to work and calling your boss saying.. " I'll be late to today becuase I have a flat tire. But, I'm getting a new radio and changing the air filter so I may be a little late tomorrow, but when those new parst gel, I should beon time every day."

    Makes no sense.
     
  12. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,818
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Actually makes a lot of sense:

    As one of the top honchos Haug was also responsible for the development of the chassis.

    As for the driver:
    - for one he would still be around if he had accepted the team's offer in mid summer
    - also maybe his feedback was not helpful to the engineers in developing the chassis

    And before everybody pulls the "MS hater" card: Some of his supporters have stated on here more than once that MS' style is very different from Nico's and required a different way of the car turning in etc. So maybe it was impossible/difficult/not ideal to develop a chassis that had to support two different styles?
     
  13. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,944
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    You're more right than you know. I completely agree with you re Haug. Bob Bell has a brilliant thing going with that suspension system of theirs, it just needs a proper car, and they need to place that ball exclusively in Costa's court. That susp system was the only reason they had any success in 2012, it is literally beyond anything any of us can imagine in terms of connectivity and monitoring (that's what I'm told anyway). Costa should run the show for 2013, and Willis is to be busy cranking on 2014 all year, 2014 is going to be very interesting to say the least as every major team is cranking down for that one.

    I've heard a lot about MS and Nico's driving styles and setup differences. In the end, I have no idea really. Michael took to W03 better than Nico, and if I had to pinpoint something it would be that Michael is not as sensitive to rear end downforce. Nico was simply quicker or set the car up better for qualifying with W01 and W02 and they both had 30 points more rear end downforce compared to W03. So, the car either has tons of downforce and is somewhat predictable, or it must be wrestled, and I believe Michael was simply better at wrestling. Probably not ideal development-wise though, you're right there.
     
  14. jav

    jav Formula Junior

    Apr 9, 2007
    508
    Massachusetts
    Full Name:
    John
    #14 jav, Jan 18, 2013
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2013

    could you point me to a source that suggests Haug had any chassis design impact at all? It's my understanding that his was on oversight role, subordinated by Brawn, then Bell(or willis/costa). I've not read or heard that he had any direct technical involvement at all.

    Also- to the driver issue. My point is that Zetsche made no mention of a driver concern and specifically pointed to the chassis as the problem.

    I suppose if you believe the chassis problems emminate from unreliable driver feedback, or if you feel upper management has been derelict by mismanagement or misdirection of the technical staff.... then yes- it makes sense. That's reading more into the article than I feel is apparent.
     
  15. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,944
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    Haug was upper management, the 'head' of operations so to speak. When changes are wanted within any company, upper management are the first to go.
     
  16. LightGuy

    LightGuy Four Time F1 World Champ

    Oct 4, 2004
    46,160
    Texas
    Full Name:
    David
    Per the autosport link in another thread;

    'Red Bull chief technical officer Adrian Newey suggested last year that the power units would become the critical factor in deciding the outcome of the 2014 championship.

    Cowell believed it was too early to be specific about the impact the engines will have, but was confident that the importance of the engine manufacturer would be greater than it was now, a move he welcomed.

    "We are putting the motor back in motorsport, but to what extent we will only know in 2014," he said. "It will definitely have more of an influence."

    The new power units will produce the same 750hp figure of the current engines but a larger percentage of that will come from Energy Recovery Systems.

    The current KERS currently produces 80hp for 6.7 seconds per lap, while the new ERS will deliver 161 hp for 33.3 seconds per lap.

    Cowell said: "Today it is difficult to be quick without KERS - for 2014 it will be impossible to go racing without ERS."



    Pity the backmarkers.
     
  17. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    We can always say that! And there has been some crap at the back over the years ;) However, as long as they can get within 107, I say "welcome!"

    Worth noting again though that they'll all get supplied with "powertrains" come 2014. For sure, you're gonna need a good ERS, and we're a long way from knowing who's got it right, but they'll be fine - Even if still at the back......

    Somewhat related, there's a story floating around that Force India may switch from Merc to Ferrari powertrains in 2014 - And they want Jules Bianchi in a race seat. I think this is the reason why FI are not announcing their 2nd jockey. I reckon Jules will be in a Ferrari powered FI in 2014.

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  18. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,693
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
     
  19. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,818
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    The reason they're not announcing the 2nd jockey is because they're still trying to get a Bill Gates for that seat.
    They're broke and it'd be a miracle if they make it to the first race. Let alone into 2014.
     
  20. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,944
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    I cannot imagine any investor/company fronting large cash for a Force India ride.

    Kobayashi would be good IMO
     
  21. jav

    jav Formula Junior

    Apr 9, 2007
    508
    Massachusetts
    Full Name:
    John
    He was upper management with respect to Motorsport- yes.. I would suggest he was middle management relative to the Mercedes organization as a whole.



    I disagree. Upper management are usually the last to go. Only when upper managements decisions become obviously inneffective are they at risk from the real upper management. Clearly- all opinions that matter suggest Mercedes return to F1 has fallen well short of expectations.

    I think it's fair to say that Haug may not have implemented the necessary technical personnel or changes required to have a better chassis, as Zetsche comments is the "real problem" . But to say he was directy responsible for it misses the mark. Futher- his leaving, does nothing to correct the design system/team, that has been left behind. I would argue it is this system/team which IS directly responsible for the real problem.

    Don't get me wrong- I think it correct that Haug accepted ultimate responsibility for the teams standing 3 years in, I just don't think his leaving or Lewis' coming is going to directly correct the real problem.
     
  22. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    Ain't that the (often unfortunate!) truth!

    +1 I think dear ol' Norbert became the fall guy. And that's fine too - Someone had to fall on their sword.

    Another +1

    Dunno who was responsible for all the new "talent" they've been hiring though (?) There's no way he knows one end of a tub from the other - Not his job. ;)

    And another! Fer sure, they can no longer use the jockeys as any kind of excuse. Their engines have always been good, so it's not those (see Mclaren for proof ;)).

    They'll certainly be one of the more "interesting" teams on the grid next year.

    Cheers,
    Ian
     
  23. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,944
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    Great points. I believe Haug was upper management in a sense that the only superiors he reported to was the board. The board moved the funds directly to Haug as I understand the hierarchy.

    I don't pretend to know the inner workings of the team, but I would think Haug would be in control of what department gets what resources. I suspect Brawn probably had an input but Haug was the mover and shaker of the deal. In a sense, Haug is the Todt of MB and Haug simply falls short of Todt's greatness at the time.

    Haug leaving represents MB's desire to shake up the team and re-organize as they've obviously noticed however it was organized prior was simply not working out. Schumacher commented the team not given equivalent cashflow to Ferrari/Mclaren, which was the reason they were unable to run with them. While I don't think that is completely the case, it could be part of it.


    In my opinion: Give Brawn full authority. Give Costa, Willis, Bell anything they need. Bell has brought in some stellar people since summer 2012 so I remain confident in Mercedes efforts simply because they are not stagnating/sitting on the team hoping for results.
     
  24. Fast_ian

    Fast_ian Two Time F1 World Champ

    Sep 25, 2006
    23,397
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Ian Anderson
    You *may* be right. But for now at least they're adamant that's not the case;

    May all be BS of course, but they're sounding bullish.....

    Cheers,
    Ian
    http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/105185

    Almost out of Autosport views again :(
     
  25. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,818
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    I hope I'm wrong.
     

Share This Page