355 airbox conversion question | FerrariChat

355 airbox conversion question

Discussion in '348/355' started by Extreme, Mar 20, 2013.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Extreme

    Extreme F1 Rookie

    May 26, 2010
    2,515
    Northern Utah
    Full Name:
    Erick
    I’ve been wondering if it would be possible to convert a 99 5.2 355 with the single mass airflow over to a twin system like the early 355s?
    Would there be a benefit to doing this such as HP gain?
     
  2. vlamgat

    vlamgat Formula Junior

    Jan 9, 2004
    776
    Too small to measure. Just like filter material changes.
     
  3. Mitch Alsup

    Mitch Alsup F1 Veteran

    Nov 4, 2003
    9,741
    Is it possible, yes; the challenge cars were so converted.

    However, it entails ditching the 5.2 ECU and wiring harness and going back to the 2.7 wiring harness and ECUs. {$$$}
     
  4. Extreme

    Extreme F1 Rookie

    May 26, 2010
    2,515
    Northern Utah
    Full Name:
    Erick
    I figured the cost would outweigh any benefit.
    Why did Ferrari go to the single intake tube and MAF then go back to the double with the 360? I'm guessing because the single isn't as efficient?
     
  5. Subarubrat

    Subarubrat Formula 3

    Apr 1, 2009
    2,072
    VA
    Full Name:
    Scott
    #5 Subarubrat, Mar 21, 2013
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2013
    On the 350z and a few other cars there are dual MAF converters that sum the total of both MAFs and present a single measurement so the hardware is out there. You might have to play with tube diameter to calibrate it but I don't see why it can't be done. I would imagine that Jim Selin might even be able to calibrate it to the two MAFs if you sent them to him along with the single MAF. In fact I am going to email him and ask the question right now.

    Selin Dual MAF Translator
     
  6. Subarubrat

    Subarubrat Formula 3

    Apr 1, 2009
    2,072
    VA
    Full Name:
    Scott
    Got a reply right away, seems that it may already be a consideration. I will point Jim to this thread.
     

Share This Page