Digiplexes --- several on Ebay currently | Page 2 | FerrariChat

Digiplexes --- several on Ebay currently

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by finnerty, Mar 9, 2013.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. fastradio

    fastradio F1 Rookie
    BANNED Professional Ferrari Technician

    Apr 26, 2006
    3,664
    New England
    Full Name:
    David Feinberg
    One reason; US emissions. The timing curves for the US-spec cars are horrible in terms of performance.
     
  2. Rifledriver

    Rifledriver Three Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 29, 2004
    37,050
    Cowboy Capitol of the World
    Full Name:
    Brian Crall
    And detonation. Ferrari has always run scared of it. One reason so many of the cars had very conservative compression ratios on the pre detonation sensor cars.

    Ever wondered why the cars went from 8 something to 1 to 11 to 1 in the 355?
     
  3. fastradio

    fastradio F1 Rookie
    BANNED Professional Ferrari Technician

    Apr 26, 2006
    3,664
    New England
    Full Name:
    David Feinberg
    Point well taken. I figured that they were (also) paranoid about NOx emissions which are almost directly tied to combustion temp. Based on the combustion chamber design, I didn't really even consider detonation to be an issue. Then again, how could it be at the low ratios prior to knock sensors...

    I do find it quite amazing on just how much both the QV and 2-valve engines "come alive" with just a 1 point bump in compression.
     
  4. Rifledriver

    Rifledriver Three Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 29, 2004
    37,050
    Cowboy Capitol of the World
    Full Name:
    Brian Crall
    Their concern about detonation goes way back. Even most of the old comp motors only had around 10:1.

    American street V8's were in the 12's for a while.


    But there is no question, smog laws were an issue too. Lower compression and conservative timing.


    My 328 is 10.7:1 with stock timing and California pump gas works great in it.
     
  5. ME308

    ME308 Formula 3

    Nov 5, 2003
    1,550
    Munich, Germany
    Full Name:
    Michael
    #30 ME308, Mar 31, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    @Adrian,

    after switching to the electromotive XDI ignition set up five ears ago, I have 2 digiplexes med801A as left overs - one is (almost) shot, the other still in working order

    sofar, I saved them although I`m pretty sure I will never use them again -
    on the other hand, if there is a chance that the modules can serve a nice project of someone who knows his stuff ...we can give it a try
    and maybe, in the end you will not only find out more secrets of those boxes but also I end up with a repaired unit ;)

    if you send me your address via pm, I can have both units shipped to you by next week

    .
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  6. alhbln

    alhbln Formula 3
    Consultant Owner

    Mar 4, 2008
    1,749
    Berlin, Germany
    Full Name:
    Adrian
    Fantastic, thanks! I'll send you my contact details as pm.

    Danke,
    Adrian
     
  7. alhbln

    alhbln Formula 3
    Consultant Owner

    Mar 4, 2008
    1,749
    Berlin, Germany
    Full Name:
    Adrian
    #32 alhbln, Apr 1, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    For the fun of it i did a quick draft design of a new 801A/802A electronics board with a programmable coil output ignition driver, status led's for RPM/TDC/APS/Ignition for easy fault finding and an USB port for installing custom maps. Just a doodle right now but i'll probably build one or two to do some software development and testing on it.

    I noticed that the connector terminals 4, 6 and 7 of the original MED 801/802A are not connected in the 308 GTB wiring sheet, although internally they are wired to the PCB. Does anyone know what the terminals are for?

    Adrian
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  8. finnerty

    finnerty F1 World Champ

    May 18, 2004
    10,406
    #33 finnerty, Apr 1, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Curious, my diagram for the '80-'82 2V cars shows only terminals 4 & 7 not being used by the harness / connector --- I will double check the actual engine harness on my '81 to confirm that it does indeed have those wire positions "empty" and post that info ASAP.

    I would make the assumption that even if the car does not need to use the ECU on those pin locations, that perhaps MM needed to use them for bench testing connections to verify the units' operation??? Interestingly enough, too, is that pin 4 and pin 3 are directly coupled to each other inside the unit ---- downstream of the connector, but BEFORE entering the PCB --- so any signal coming from pin 4 is redundant to that which already is available from pin 3. Pin 7 connects to the PCB independently, and I am not sure what part of the circuit it "talks to" ---- but, again, I suspect it is a signal that is valuable for bench testing but not needed for the car's operation / engine management.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  9. Steve Magnusson

    Steve Magnusson Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Jan 11, 2001
    26,731
    30°30'40" N 97°35'41" W (Texas)
    Full Name:
    Steve Magnusson
    #34 Steve Magnusson, Apr 1, 2013
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2013
    Terminal 6 is connected to the coolant thermoswitch on the US i-2V (801A) -- see the note on page D5 of the Mondial8/QV WSM 281/83 that indicates that the ignition map shown in Fig 6 is for a "hot engine" and the whole map is retarded by 5 deg "with cold engine" -- one of the maps on page D5 is Fig 6 (801A US i-2V) and the other is Fig 6/1 (805A US 308QV), but they mucked up the multi-language labeling at the bottom so I'd guess that Fig 6 (801A) is on the left, but don't know that for sure. Since no coolant thermoswitch is present on euro i-2V (802A), terminal 6 is not used.

    But are you saying that you have a single "308...wiring sheet" that applies simultaneously to both 801A and 802A?
     
  10. alhbln

    alhbln Formula 3
    Consultant Owner

    Mar 4, 2008
    1,749
    Berlin, Germany
    Full Name:
    Adrian
    Dave, yes 6 & 7 could be for bench testing but then again it does not seem to be documented anywhere and factory testing would have direct access to the PCB test points. Hmmm..
    A Fiat (Uno?) Digiplex wiring diagram i found somewhere in the net shows terminal 4 as the connection point for the economy meter, so that would make sense as terminal 4 supplies the RPM signal from terminal 3.

    Steve, sorry that should have been sheets. Terminal 6 wiring is not shown in the ignition chapters (page 71 of the 308 GTB and GTBiGTSi US owners manuals) but i found it in the circuit diagrams of the 308 GTB and 308 GTBi/GTSI owners manual after looking again, thanks!
     
  11. rustybits

    rustybits F1 Rookie
    Professional Ferrari Technician

    Jan 28, 2007
    2,509
    Somewhere, anywhere
    Full Name:
    Eddie B
  12. finnerty

    finnerty F1 World Champ

    May 18, 2004
    10,406
    #37 finnerty, Apr 2, 2013
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2013
    Adrian ---

    I did a physical check today of the ECU harness on my car (an '81 US-spec, so it uses the 801 unit) and confirmed that connector positions corresponding to pins 4 & 7, as identified in the wiring diagram which I posted above (of course I cannot speak to which diagram you have in hand), are indeed unused (empty). So, as far as the US spec cars utilizing the 801, those pins / signals are not needed to run the car.

    I can't speak to the Euro-spec cars, as I do not currently have access to one to examine. However, since they utilize the 802 unit, it is not relevant anyway I suppose.

    Just to clarify, please note that the unused (un-wired) terminals are actually numbers 4 & 7 (not 6, which is wired and is used by the US-spec cars).

    Steve's information about the functionality of terminal 6 is correct --- and it is definitely wired (and used) by US spec cars.

    PS -- looks like you are off to a great start on your PCB design :) Please keep us posted on your progress !! :)
     
  13. alhbln

    alhbln Formula 3
    Consultant Owner

    Mar 4, 2008
    1,749
    Berlin, Germany
    Full Name:
    Adrian
    Great, thanks for checking!
     
  14. finnerty

    finnerty F1 World Champ

    May 18, 2004
    10,406
    #39 finnerty, Apr 2, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Correct.

    For reference, here is an attached PDF copy of the complete 1981 MY US-spec wiring diagrams if you want them --- should be easier to read than the fuzzy eye chart I posted earlier ;).
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  15. BigTex

    BigTex Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 6, 2002
    79,368
    Houston, Texas
    Full Name:
    Bubba
    Simply AWESOME!!!!!!
     
  16. alhbln

    alhbln Formula 3
    Consultant Owner

    Mar 4, 2008
    1,749
    Berlin, Germany
    Full Name:
    Adrian
    #41 alhbln, Apr 5, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    All, thanks! Have added an input for terminal 6 for later use. Will spend a bit more time to see if the approach is feasible and then create a new thread if there is interest. I need to do a bit of research to see what components make sense and can be easily sourced.

    Adrian
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  17. jlc308

    jlc308 Karting

    Jul 11, 2009
    121
    Irvine CA
    I am planning to replace my digiplexes with Nick's electromotive units and I just read Rifledriver's comment that Ferrari left horsepower on their US models. I have a 1985 Calif 308QV with the 805MEDs, therfore will I notice any power increase with the Electromotive units?

    Joe
     
  18. finnerty

    finnerty F1 World Champ

    May 18, 2004
    10,406
    #43 finnerty, Apr 18, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Here is what the guts (brains) of an actual, original, M-M MED801A look like. At first blush, I can already determine that Adrian's proposed layout is a better design in many ways :).
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  19. climb

    climb F1 Rookie

    Sep 19, 2006
    4,866
    Atlantic Beach Fl
    Full Name:
    Stuart K. Hicks
    Plenty of us would love a reliable plug and play adaptation of the existing units that would extract more performance. Definitely a market for it 'round here.
     
  20. Steve Magnusson

    Steve Magnusson Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Jan 11, 2001
    26,731
    30°30'40" N 97°35'41" W (Texas)
    Full Name:
    Steve Magnusson
    Wow, that is a great photo that preserves some engineering history of the changeover from leaded components to surface-mount components. Can't fault them for trying to keep the cost down (a via-less PCB?) in this application, but surface-mounting leaded components was ballsy -- no wonder they figured out that they needed to pot it in cement ;)
     
  21. fastradio

    fastradio F1 Rookie
    BANNED Professional Ferrari Technician

    Apr 26, 2006
    3,664
    New England
    Full Name:
    David Feinberg
    Stay tuned...I've heard several rumors that a well-respected supplier will be marketing exactly that in the not too distant future.
     
  22. finnerty

    finnerty F1 World Champ

    May 18, 2004
    10,406
    #47 finnerty, Apr 18, 2013
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2013
    Actually, and perhaps quite ironically, after so many years of no real pursuant interest.....

    All of the sudden, there (could be ;)) multiple folks, and teams, working independently on concurrent solutions ---- right now ;) :)

    Will have to see what the "market" prefers from what may soon be not only a solution......but, perhaps even a choice of solutions available....
     
  23. finnerty

    finnerty F1 World Champ

    May 18, 2004
    10,406
    Yeah, kinda "old-school meets new-school meets ahhhh....what the hell" isn't it ;) ?!

    ......ohhhh, but the approach (design) is soooooo Italian ---- you gotta love it !
     
  24. alhbln

    alhbln Formula 3
    Consultant Owner

    Mar 4, 2008
    1,749
    Berlin, Germany
    Full Name:
    Adrian
    The PCB in the MED801 actually isn't a PCB at all but a ceramic substrate hybrid :) Marelli deployed hybrids in the precedessor of the Digiplex mid to end of the seventies, and then opted to do a full hybrid with thick film resistors and SMD capacitors for the Digiplex 1 & 2 series. Except two transistors, all other discrete parts are in wire-through packages (but with surface mount wires), an interesting mix of packages and technologies.

    Marelli went back to wire-through PCBs with the Microplex and the more complex IAW series. Ceramic hybrids are good for small and low volume custom circuits but not really that robust and economically viable in a size as used in the Digiplex units.

    Quite forward thinking engineering for that time though.
     
  25. miketuason

    miketuason F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Feb 24, 2006
    15,804
    Cerritos, CA.
    Full Name:
    Mike
    A Ferrari shop down in Orange county sent out six digiplex to a place in Arizona that he claimed got it all back and was all repaired. I'll see if I can find out who and where in AR. repairs Digiplex.
     

Share This Page