Xtn, Well stated explanation. I agree that for the most part, people have been quite civil. No nasty name calling as in some Fchat threads. Some barbs, high browed humor, sarcasm. Some rambling accusations of "perversion" from the OP however. When a logical argument is presented he runs off on a tangent. Most of us are on "ignore" now....like trees falling in a forest...is there a noise? The OP truly thinks the world is flat. Nothing we say will sway him. This thread has been quite entertaining and educational. I've learned about the Dunning Kruger effect and also refreshed my understanding of the friction circle. Even my wife, who's certainly not a car person, has followed this thread. She says I should send a gift to the OP to thank him for the entertainment provided.
Don, as an aside, I appreciate your reorganizing your message but in the future, when you refer to an earlier discussion it would be better if you attach a hot-link to it so I can quickly locate and review the original context you are referring to. This thread is long and getting even longer. TIA. Anyhow, I brought up 4-wheel drift because you asked what I meant by "if you are turning left and your car skids to the right". I purposely made that statement broad so as to include any situation where loss of traction in the rear causes the car to not respond to intended steering. I pointed out 2-wheel and 4-wheel just as examples. I agree an accidental 4-wheel drift/slide is pretty scarce. IMO, it happens when all 4 wheels lose the same amount of traction. But aside from ice, it can also happen on wet or snow-covered roads, because the road surface and hence friction or lack of it is pretty consistent over at least that portion of the roadway. You say a distinction between road conditions and the effects of weight transfer is missing in this discussion. Well, you may feel that way but since I am the OP, my intent was simply to have a better way of engaging neutral than trying to find and simultaneously pull back on F1 paddles when I am in the middle of correcting a spin. I wasn't interested in discussing road conditions or weight transfer. I'm not sure where you want to take a discussion of road conditions but I think that should deserve its own thread. Maybe you can start one on an appropriate forum. If I have time or know anything useful, I could possibly contribute. As for weight transfer, I believe it depends on many static factors, like the setup, throttle, tread, relative F<>R tire pressures, relative widths of F<>R tires, relative stiffness of the chassis F<>R...etc as well as dynamic factors like sudden changes in the attitude of the car, rear vs. front wheel friction, slip angles... e.g. lifting throttle on a RWD during a turn will transfer weight from rear to front. I think it is potentially very broad topic, and again something I would not tackle as I am neither knowledgeable enough nor motivated enough to do so. But I think it would make a fascinating thread topic for an expert to start.
No, of course I'm not the author but I would actually be flattered if someone thought so... if they mean it in a good way, which in this case, you don't. And in a similarly uncomplimentary manner, you also accuse me of mangling terminology but then you go on to say I'm "riding the clutch" whereas I was referring to "slipping the clutch" - 2 very different things. And this brings me to the main point of this reply. A few days ago, some poster called Q_res interjected in similarly ad hoc fashion, a quick couple of postings, saying I suffer from some hypothetical phenomenon with a fancy name, Dunning-Kruger Effect. "An instructive course... absolutely textbook" he said, posting with an air of professorial authority: Why didn't he just say I have a "delusional mental affliction"? But maybe it sounds more impressive to use an obscure and technical-sounding medical term and maybe Q_res likes to make himself appear more authoritative than he is? And just maybe he is actually describing his own problem? It wouldn't be the first time someone did this. So what do you think, xtn? Was Q_res actually describing his own behaviour?
I'm beginning to think our OP is defending his absurd position because he relishes in all the attention... Whether it be positive or negative. I am also growing more convinced that he is some college kid really enjoying the give and take and the fact that somehow he has been given some level of respect. Personally, I think this thread has run its course and should be closed. It would be easier to teach a ham sandwich to speak Latin than to get him to understand how hopeless his position is.
Awe, come on, Joe, you don't buy his authority on liability for Ferrari for when his yet-to-arrive California rolls over with adults in the back seat with the roof down? I thought that thread would have the legs this one does but it's being ignored.
Evidently I made quite the impression on our poor, beleaguered OP. Though I'm shocked to see phrases like "air of professorial authority" and "technical-sounding medical term". I didn't realize using the simple name of an affliction and posting a link to Wikipedia, so as not to have to explain it in actual technical-sounding terms, was so impressive. If he wasn't so arrogant and obnoxious, he'd almost be kind of adorable in a sad sort of way.
Good God! You still didn't read the discussion I offered up about when you may or may not want to use neutral when a car oversteering or else you would have at least commented on the times I pointed out that neutral could help here or there. I'm not interested in preaching to the choir about car control, everyone here but you already thinks the same. The entire discussion here has ignored a significant condition in which wanting to use neutral during oversteer might have a hint of merit, but you don't want to complicate the discussion by breaking it out from other conditions. That's why I wanted to discuss different road conditions separately instead of thoughtlessly lumping things together. Because I have some genuine knowledge I was trying to share with you on the topic. Now that this has been offered to you, you retreat from your typical point-by-point refutation of opposing statements and say "you're talking about a bunch of stuff I wasn't." No, I was trying to have an analytical discussion of when one would or would not have a use for your proposal.
Not sure what you mean. I'm just responding to your message a little at a time as I said I would, to make it manageable. Really? Sorry to disappoint you. Well, you can share that any time. I won't stop you posting. I haven't even put you on "ignore". Well, like I said, you should start a new thread and just mention it stemmed from discussing this thread with me. Honestly, I need to keep this thread on-topic. I'm just suggesting to have the N button offered as an option on street-driven F-cars. That's all. If you want to discuss road conditions and weight transfer I'll contribute my comments to your thread if you want to direct that discussion. This is the first instance you indicated that you want to get into discussing road conditions and weight transfer. Interesting. If you don't like this thread, you can start your own. I just want to keep this thread on-topic and manageable. You can extend your interest into something more technical but I'm too busy and not expert enough to carry such topics. If you are really interested to discuss those technical topics don't let anyone stop you from starting a thread of your own. Ouch! But the truth is you seem to be the one who is all of a sudden in a rush (?) while I actually do intend to drive slowly. It's a GT after all.
I feel like we've taken the wrong tact here. Perhaps we should encourage him to contact Ferrari with his brilliant idea. Surely they would appreciate his genius and tell him they'll work on it right away.
Now that you mention it, I do recall you asking for patience in digesting and analyzing the explanation I put together for you of "skid" recovery on different surfaces. I mentioned different surfaces because you said the car control technique this whole thread is about was applicable on a variety of surfaces, but I hadn't noticed any of the discussion that addressed differences in what it takes to control oversteer on these different surfaces. And that difference is due to weight transfer. It's impossible to have a discussion about vehicle dynamics without at least an implicit acknowledgement of what the surface is and weight transfer. If you now want to drop the assertion that "Going to neutral during a slide or a skid is a valuable car control technique" and instead make the focus "I'd like this on my car because I think it will be cool to look like an F1 car" then that's fine, but discussing how to control a car at or beyond the limit and back it up (which you were demanding a few pages back) with WHY is actually quite technical. I'm sorry if I'm boring or losing you with all this engineering discussion (believe me, I'm keeping it simple), but you kept demanding people provide more than brief assertions without backup, so here I am.
Can I suggest you something? Get longer paddles that join at the top and you could activate N with one hand. Regards.