No, non ho capito. Ne anche tu. If you believe this what you say then explain to me the case and sale philosophy of the FXX Hehe. No, I did not mention F1 for the reason you say. I mean less volume mean increased value over time. Now please listen to me, donot try to understand what I say here above, it will put overload on you and will make you to much pain.
You're Italian leaves a bit to be desired... *Neanche tu I know more than one person who has been turned down for LaFerrari. So I don't think they would have any issue selling more of them if they wanted to. The 918 remains my pick out of the trio (matter of personal taste); but fact remains that LaFerrari is the car that sold more easily.
The 918 has really evolved into a very well developed machine. Seems like they listened to all the initial criticism from the press and potential clients.
I laugh everyday, I don't need you to make me laugh to my death. You want me to improve my use of my language because I leave a space between 2 letters? You must blame my second year teacher, she was not very well educated. On the other foot my friend, you are the one who need grammatical help 'You're Italian leaves a bit '. Go back to school and learn difference between You're and Your. Hehe. You are slow no? Now just talk about LaFerrari please.
Bozo? Who is Bozo? Why do you want me to tell you when my circus is in your town? For what? You are too pazzo to get a job with our circus, so no, you cannot have employment with us, try your local employment centre. Now please talk about LaFerrari.
You manners are somewhat lacking, generally speaking topics here stimulate constructive debate, seemingly more of your posts here have to do commenting on other members than actually discussing LaFerrari. For what its worth I feel demand for the P1 probably wasn't great enough for them to go through with a production run of 500 units, also how "right" will this car actually be, considering the issues they have had with the 12C.
There's a video where it is explained that Bugatti's Marketing Director says the typical Veyron customer is worth around $300m. Now, the running costs of the machine are not a problem for THIS demographic. BUT if someone is buying a used Bugatti (to save money - why else?) then the running costs DO become prohibitive which is why there's no used market. Hence appalling residuals. Or put another way, typically, if you're buying a Veyron, you buy a new one to your own spec.
You're quite right...forgive my mistake Fact remains that you act like a classless person and contribute nothing to this forum. By insulting long-standing forum members who have more experience with these cars than you might imagine, you do little to add any credibility to your words.
363 delivered through Q3 of this year. Bath's of course relative, but people are willing to pay large sums at auction: Lot | Sotheby's Overall I'd suggest a demand problem for the vehicle.
It's immaterial what the subject is when a user is being verbally combative and downright rude. Either maintain your discussion points without the lame verbal jabs, or back out of the discussion. Continuing to go in the direction you're going will result in, at a minimum, a temporary ban from the board. Mike
First LaF vs P1 video.. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeYfx7yPsc8]Forza Motorsport 5 Gameplay : Ferrari LaFerrari sur Le Mans - YouTube[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hmji6TcRIpc[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKU3rnGwFXY[/ame] We live in a sad world don't we?
Enzo has better brakes than GTR, Enzo is more powerful than GTR, Enzo has way more downforce than GTR, Enzo is way more lighter than GTR, And finally Enzo is beaten............by.....um...........20s......... Do you think an Enzo with 300 more hp, 200kg downforce, can be 20s faster at the Ring? not likely. If it dose, do you truly think it will be 40-50s faster??? If you dont, what makes you believe that p1 with extra 250hp,300kg downforce can be 40-50 seconds faster than enzo? come on
First of all, you're comparing two different generations of cars here. There's a reason why the 458 Italia is nearly as fast as the Enzo on the 'Ring, with less power and of course, less downforce. And what about the Top Gear test track? Ferrari's downforce claims have been proven wrong on more than one occasion, so no, I doubt it has more than Nismo GT-R's claimed 180kg of downforce, especially when you look at that massive wing that it has. And Enzo's tires are as old as it gets... I'm sick of all this 'Ring nonsense and I really don't care what everyone else thinks.