747-8: Flight Report | Page 21 | FerrariChat

747-8: Flight Report

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by LouB747, Aug 17, 2012.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    39,171
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    Lou- Pretty sad. Over the Pacific or the pole, having four engines would be a warm and fuzzy for me. Passengers, or freight, would probably not even notice one shut down.

    My friends who flew single engine fighters liked to say you had better odds of an engine problem with a twin engine fighter. I would tell them when one looks like it has a problem, we shut it down or put it in idle. Not an option in a Lawn Dart.
     
  2. LouB747

    LouB747 Formula 3

    Apr 8, 2009
    2,123
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Lou Boyer
    #502 LouB747, Feb 21, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    While trying to get a faster GS yesterday, I pushed up the speed a bit. Or at least I tried to. The plan was .90 (RVSM limit). In the 400, you select your speed, the autothrottles go up and obtain that speed. In the -8, apparently it won't let you fly in the yellow arc. You can see the selected speed, Mach .86 as shown by the magenta speed marker. But the airspeed wouldn't go into the yellow. The autothrottles increased thrust until reaching the top of the yellow, then reduced power to stay there. Of course, you can disconnect the autothrottles and push the power up yourself.

    It's interesting to note the large yellow arc at the top end of the airspeed. The 400 doesn't really have one. At a few altitudes there's a small one, but only a few knots. I've been told that the -8s wing ended up stiffer than planned, which created a few problems. Using software and fly by wire, the spoilers and ailerons can both deploy upwards to reduce wing load. Anyways, the top limit is a result of the stiffer wing.

    So 701 GS was the best we saw on this flight. On the 400 we could have easily gotten another 20 knots.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  3. RWP137

    RWP137 Formula 3

    Apr 29, 2013
    1,606
    AZ
    Full Name:
    Rick
    You've just got to find the right circuit breakers to pull.
    ...at least that's what I've heard.
     
  4. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    26,115
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    Is the yellow arc defined by altitude or temperature or something?

    I haven't heard of a Part 25 airplane with a yellow arc before...
     
  5. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    39,171
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    Lou- Mach 0.90 should be pretty easy. Around mach 0.92 you start getting into transonic airflow and instruments and air data start getting squirrely. Probably flight control surfaces on a subsonic airframe, too.
     
  6. LouB747

    LouB747 Formula 3

    Apr 8, 2009
    2,123
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Lou Boyer
    Yeah, the 747 classic would go right to barber pole (.92) easily. The 400 starts to mach buffet right around mach .90. It's noticable. I've only had the -8 to mach .88. Maybe next week I'll see where it's buffet is.

    The yellow arc is defined by altitude. Probably temperature too as it's related to mach. It doesn't show up until the mid 20s if I remember right. Maybe high 20's.

    As far as pulling breakers, these newer planes report everything back to the company. If a breakers out, they'll know it.

    The -8 is definitely strange as far as altitudes go. In the 400, if you're a little heavy for an altitude, you can just fly faster and the margins are better. Say you're flying at mach .84 at 33000 and you're heavy. Max altitude may be 33200. But if you speed up, max altitude goes up. Say you fly .86, then max altitude may be 33400. But the -8 is the opposite. Speeding up makes thing worse and max altitude goes down. It must be because to that top yellow arc that really isn't present on the 400.

    I'll try and get more info. It's nothing we really have to deal with, and not of any real significance. We just fly the altitudes the FMS calculates within reason.
     
  7. LouB747

    LouB747 Formula 3

    Apr 8, 2009
    2,123
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Lou Boyer
    As far as a part 25 aircraft and a yellow arc, I'm not sure. It's definitely not like the yellow arc in light aircraft. Again, I'll see what info I can pull up.
     
  8. FERRARI-TECH

    FERRARI-TECH Formula 3

    Nov 9, 2006
    1,677
    Los Angeles
    Full Name:
    Ferrari-tech


    Wonder if its the new wing, the wing makes for a more efficient aircraft but you loose something on the other end. Talking to my friend who fly's the 777 a while ago about the new 777-300ER he was about to fly for the first time, he said the new wing made the aircraft super efficient but that he couldn't get the altitudes when heavy (early in the flight) that he could in the 777-200. I think he said it was as much as 7-8000 ft lower initially.
     
  9. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    39,171
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    Lou- Very interesting. Parts of the aircraft are going supersonic faster on the -8, apparently. On modern supersonic aircraft, the gauges jumping around are about the only indication of transonic flow. Very little, if any, buffet. Not a region where you want to drop bombs because the air data going to the computers is all fouled up from about mach 0.92 to 1.04 and INS only drops were not as accurate. Does not affect PGMs, naturally.
     
  10. Michiel

    Michiel Formula 3

    Apr 15, 2008
    1,969
    Amsterdam, NL
    Full Name:
    Michiel
    #510 Michiel, Apr 4, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  11. LouB747

    LouB747 Formula 3

    Apr 8, 2009
    2,123
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Lou Boyer
    No, not me. They won't let me fly to Europe. Actually, I just try and stay across the Pacific to keep my trips shorter.

    NCA is up to 5 747-8s now. All the west coast to Japan flying is on the -8. When I fly the occasional 400, it feels a bit strange.

    It's the season for windshear in Narita. SW winds, even when relatively light, can make for an interesting approach. I saw this Lufthansa A340 in the NCA hanger yesterday in Narita. Apparently this landing ending up being 2.8 G's. Not sure how much damage.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK5Nm_rKu50

    Not sure how to embem that video to play directly from FChat.....
     
  12. Michiel

    Michiel Formula 3

    Apr 15, 2008
    1,969
    Amsterdam, NL
    Full Name:
    Michiel
    Damn, that's rough landing........ My record is 2.5G, but female co-pilot was flying, off course :D

    Still love to see the -8's at AMS every day..... stunning plane.
     
  13. tazandjan

    tazandjan Three Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Jul 19, 2008
    39,171
    Clarksville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    Terry H Phillips
    Lou- Hope all the passengers had their mouths closed during that touchdown.
     
  14. MARK1992

    MARK1992 Formula 3

    Feb 7, 2010
    1,214
    Hi Lou! Fantastic thread. Gives a real insight to something most people don't get to see.

    Quick question on the 747-400 - I noticed what looks to be a pair of black switches on the back of the Engine 1 and 4 thrust levers. May I ask what they're for?
     
  15. LouB747

    LouB747 Formula 3

    Apr 8, 2009
    2,123
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Lou Boyer
    #515 LouB747, Apr 5, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Thanks so much. The switches just aft and outside of throttles #1 and #4 are the autothrottle disconnect switches. You disconnect them using your thumb. So the captain would typically use the one by the #1 throttle and the FO the one by the #4 throttle. Pushing once disconnects the autothrottles, but a warning appears on the EICAS and a beeper sounds announcing the disconnect. Pushing twice disconnects and keeps the warning inhibited. So we typically push that button twice.

    There are also 2 switches almost identical to those in front of throttles #2 and #3. They are the Go Around switches. You can't see them in this picture. Anyways, there have been quite a few cases of pilots accidentally pushing the Go Around switches instead of the autothrottle switches.

    I borrowed this pic off the web. I'm flying back LAX SFO NRT tonight and will try and remember to take a pic showing those switches.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  16. MARK1992

    MARK1992 Formula 3

    Feb 7, 2010
    1,214
    Ah! Thank you so much for your explanation. I had assumed they were little buttons on the side of the levers like in the 737NG. I suppose the relatively narrow levers on the 747 does not permit that design.
     
  17. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,017
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    Off the subject but I just an email from a friend who was FE on 727's in 1986. He took a shot of the steam gauge airspeed indicator at cruise and it was reading .895. That was a great airplane.
     
  18. KKSBA

    KKSBA F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2003
    15,300
    SBarbara-La Jolla CA
    Full Name:
    KKSBA
    The 727 was an awesome aircraft. The wing fell apart at landing, but it was an orchestra of airfoils.

    The 727, as I recall, had one of the highest allowable airspeeds of any commercial Boeing aircraft. Mach 0.92. Correct me if I'm wrong.

    I spent many years in 727's. I loved that plane. Too bad they are noise limited now because of the #2 engine.
     
  19. Jet-X

    Jet-X F1 Veteran

    Nov 2, 2003
    5,693
    Washington State
    Full Name:
    Brian
    It's my understanding that the 747SP also had a .92 speed.
     
  20. LouB747

    LouB747 Formula 3

    Apr 8, 2009
    2,123
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Lou Boyer
    All the 747 classics (including the SP) : 375 kts or .92
    The 400 : 365 kts or .92
    The -8 : 365 kts or .90

    The classic could be flown at .92 without a problem
    The 400 starts to mach buffet and shake at .90
    The -8, not sure. I've only been at .88 No buffet

    I've heard the 727 is a great "pilots" airplane. I would have liked to have flown it.
     
  21. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,017
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    Lew Wallick, 727 test pilot, told me that it was his favorite. Lateral control was very powerful and quick and an old friend who flew them at United told me that when he gave a new copilot a landing, he kept his hand on his knees palms up so that he could take control if he had to keep the new guy from possibly getting a wing tip. I remember someone telling me that the 727's roll rate was faster than a P-51.
     
  22. Rifledriver

    Rifledriver Three Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 29, 2004
    37,104
    Cowboy Capitol of the World
    Full Name:
    Brian Crall
    In the early days when fuel was cheap and sound wasn't a problem it was fun going out of Oakland in a 727. They would rotate and keep an attitude like a U2 climbing out. Felt like you were laying on your back until they got to cruise altitude. There must have been 50 a day on the Oakland/LA hop.

    Ah, air travel. Drive to the door, run to the airplane and be in LA 45 minutes later. Now door to door I can drive there just as fast.
     
  23. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,017
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    Yeah, Brian. It was designed to operate out of short fields and had a climb rate of 3400 FPM if I remember.
     
  24. LouB747

    LouB747 Formula 3

    Apr 8, 2009
    2,123
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Lou Boyer
    #524 LouB747, Apr 9, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Here's a pic of the throttle quadrant showing the Go Around switches above throttles #2 and #3. This is a -8, but it's the same on the 400 too.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  25. finnerty

    finnerty F1 World Champ

    May 18, 2004
    10,406
    #525 finnerty, Apr 10, 2014
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2014
    Wow --- that is a nice bit of piloting !

    Seriously..... I've come that close only a couple of times ---- and, I aborted.
     

Share This Page