It's not all I have. Dont forget "...not a liar or a undeserved braggart and extremely successful, unlike some people named Tristan." Take this: Image Unavailable, Please Login
Guys Can we please be respectful of my post here and give me the courtesy that I would give you all by dedicating my post to assist me in selling my car. i appreciate everyones comments but it is time to be respectful to me. Thanks! Dino
Look on the bright side. All of this off topic nonsense is keeping your ad at the top of the stack. BTW - love your car.
Hey ******....Anybody here would take the 348 over your self-proclaimed "title defamed" 355. And trust me, I hate the 348...I'd still take a 348 over your junk...or what YOU made into junk. You suck again.
As in Tristam's own words: *Irregardless* of the situation, you're right man. Sorry about that. (Your car is awesome!!!)
Sorry, but no matter what sort of junk you consider the 348 that DrS owns is, keep in mind that you still drive a salvage 355.
Dino, may I suggest you place a new ad for your car with clear note not to post any comment about it. Only for serious buyers. You have a nice car and I think you were just unlucky the ex owner advertised his 355 at the same time you did. The ex-owner of your car shouldn't affect the sale in my opinion. Good luck with sale.
Not a good suggestion. First, only a single ad is allowed. Second, placing a 'clear note not to post any comment about it' is unenforceable and unreasonable. This is a forum classified. Through this medium members can comment on whatever they choose to: history, appearance, seller's attitude, past experience with the seller, whatever. Mike
At least he actually owned those bikes. You're just a used-car salesman who curbstones and likely doesn't even have a single Ferrari currently registered in your name. DMV Cracks Down on "Curbstoners" | NBC 7 San Diego
These posts have not only been defamatory, but they violate FChat's own self-represented rules. Rule 1.1 entitled "flaming" has clearly and indisputably been violated. Rule 1.5 entitled "no personal information" has clearly and indisputably been violated. Rules 1.2 and 1.4 have also been violated. These are more serious rules than the "only a single ad" rule.
You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and your statements are readily provable as false. (Again, your profile shows you are not a Ferrari owner, past or present.)
Explain to me how the hell whether or not he is a Ferrari owner is even REMOTELY relevant to the fact that he made a statement using general knowledge. Stop using that as your pitiful excuse to stray away from the statement. Your bull**** has already been exposed. Stop trying to cover it up. It's not working and all you're doing is making yourself look like an even bigger joke.