Ferrari LaFerrari vs Mclaren P1 vs Porsche 918 | Page 356 | FerrariChat

Ferrari LaFerrari vs Mclaren P1 vs Porsche 918

Discussion in '288GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari/F80' started by mpowered, Nov 3, 2012.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Wtdoom

    Wtdoom Formula Junior

    Sep 30, 2012
    617
    Agartha
    Full Name:
    WT Doom
    #8876 Wtdoom, May 7, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: May 7, 2014
    Have you seen some of the cars on that list ?
    9 seconds on that track is an age mate , especially as it was only 2 seconds faster than the nearly 2 ton veyron in the dry .
    No wonder they didn't turn up to face the 918 on the damp top gear track ...

    I think the la Ferrari will eat it alive .
     
  2. kanu

    kanu Karting

    Jan 26, 2014
    56
    In fact, if we look the times of Autocar, we can say P1 is not faster than a F1 from 0 to 300. Even better! 100mph to 186mph, the F1 is almost faster than P1, amazing!
     
  3. Wtdoom

    Wtdoom Formula Junior

    Sep 30, 2012
    617
    Agartha
    Full Name:
    WT Doom
    #8878 Wtdoom, May 7, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Here you go sir, I am w,t doomus . General of the empire and owner of a mighty bum dyno . My bum ( like The Lord humungus ) will not be defied
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  4. andy101

    andy101 Formula Junior
    BANNED

    Nov 28, 2013
    259
    bravo!!!!!!!!! what a marvelous triumph! simply beautiful!
    it is unbelievable that there is living legend among us mortal coils.
     
  5. Wtdoom

    Wtdoom Formula Junior

    Sep 30, 2012
    617
    Agartha
    Full Name:
    WT Doom
    #8880 Wtdoom, May 7, 2014
    Last edited: May 7, 2014
    Mark a damp patch or two where described won't make even half a second difference .
    The 9 seconds annihilation and the ss being faster everywhere and all the time is what interests me . Especially after I was mocked for daring to suggest the ss is the faster car after I drove them both . At the same time on the same day , back to back and together .

    Please post the wet times mark ...
    Cars faster than the p1 include a VW golf (!), a ford focus st and a bmw 320 . Diesel.


    A lap that the owner has refused to provide me any video v box data for . I was very impressed and as someone who has done a lot of work around spa I was merely interested . Did I get any video v box data? You know the answer to that one.
     
  6. amenasce

    amenasce Three Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Oct 17, 2001
    34,428
    Full Name:
    Joe Mansion
    Your bum dyno seems to be properly calibrated.
    Although i expected an SS to be faster on a wet track, 9 sec is a lot, esp on a 60-70sec lap.
     
  7. HabereNonHaberi

    Feb 17, 2013
    30

    Thanks Wtdoom for posting the test results and congrats for your bum.

    Despite the short track length, I was expecting a faster track time for the P1, mainly because of those high speed curves.
    Does anyone know if the tarmac is smooth or more "Nürburgring style"?


    Regards
     
  8. Wtdoom

    Wtdoom Formula Junior

    Sep 30, 2012
    617
    Agartha
    Full Name:
    WT Doom
    #8883 Wtdoom, May 7, 2014
    Last edited: May 7, 2014
    Me too . Thanks for the bum comments , lol

    Tarmacs smooth , autocar laps are done at Mira and the sprinkler system makes it consistently wet .

    My bum dyno thanks you .





    To elaborate , the p1 is immense and makes it's power very very dramatically but mclaren have failed to match figures .
    16.5 to 300? Not quite .
    I'm very interested to see the 918 and la Ferrari full tests by autocar .
     
  9. gt4me

    gt4me F1 Veteran

    Sep 10, 2005
    5,671
    UK
    Full Name:
    Lewis Mitchell
    Fair point, 9 seconds is a whole lot of time.
     
  10. REALZEUS

    REALZEUS F1 Veteran

    Feb 16, 2011
    8,424
    Bournemouth, UK
    To be honest, wet weather is not the forte of any 2WD car. What amazes me though is that the Veyron SS is faster in a straight line. That particular SS might have been a bit too powerful I reckon... "wink"
     
  11. Wtdoom

    Wtdoom Formula Junior

    Sep 30, 2012
    617
    Agartha
    Full Name:
    WT Doom
    What is very interesting is that these lap times do utterly confirm my predictions about aero laps , mechanical grip / real conditions laps . They suggest any fast P1 time comes from aero, hence the 1.2g on the skid pan and the lap times at MIRA.
     
  12. Wtdoom

    Wtdoom Formula Junior

    Sep 30, 2012
    617
    Agartha
    Full Name:
    WT Doom
    The bmw 320diesel that's faster on the same track in the same conditions is rwd .

    Zeus remember I drove them side by side on closed roads in the Middle East .
    I told everyone that the ss was faster and more stable on the fast sweeping bends and was laughed at on the mac forum ( even though I said how exiting etc the p1 was ) .
    They were both customer cars , the same customer .
     
  13. Drive550PFB

    Drive550PFB Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dude, give it a rest.
     
  14. REALZEUS

    REALZEUS F1 Veteran

    Feb 16, 2011
    8,424
    Bournemouth, UK
    Not to mention that the alleged aero has to be proven first. Anyway, what really amazes me is that the P1 is some 3 sec slower to 186 mph compared to what McLaren claims. OK, this was just one review, let's wait for more.
     
  15. Wtdoom

    Wtdoom Formula Junior

    Sep 30, 2012
    617
    Agartha
    Full Name:
    WT Doom
    Here in the uk the autocar test is the benchmark.
    They test at Mira which a proper test centre . Sprinklers simulate the wet etc . They use the same drivers at the same track.

    The quoted quarter miles and 0to 300 haven't been matched in any test ( even though the figures are very special).

    Big mistake for the press to underestimate the SS and the mighty doom bum dyno.
     
  16. jcosta79

    jcosta79 Formula 3

    Nov 15, 2011
    1,368
    Dallas, TX
    Full Name:
    LaJonathan
    The Veyron SS is at least 250 HP up on any of the 3 new hypercars. Plus it has AWD so it has the advantage off the line. I'm not seeing why it shouldn't be the fastest in a straight line.
     
  17. amenasce

    amenasce Three Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Oct 17, 2001
    34,428
    Full Name:
    Joe Mansion
    What other cars is on that wet lap list? Very hard to find autocar here in US.
     
  18. perrinnation

    perrinnation Formula Junior

    Nov 24, 2012
    700
    The Detroit area
    Full Name:
    David
    Ok, that's it! I'm having 'Butt Dyno' t-shirts printed up!

    Doom, I'll send you a check! :)
     
  19. Argosy

    Argosy Formula Junior

    Mar 8, 2013
    415
    Well, it has nearly 2 tonnes, so it actually has a poorer power-2-weight ratio and AWD creates more drivetrain loses.
     
  20. Wtdoom

    Wtdoom Formula Junior

    Sep 30, 2012
    617
    Agartha
    Full Name:
    WT Doom
    Ok in USA it's "butt" in uk it's "bum"
    Copyright wtdoom split profits
    Deal?lol
     
  21. REALZEUS

    REALZEUS F1 Veteran

    Feb 16, 2011
    8,424
    Bournemouth, UK
    I bet that the LaFerrari with its much higher power/weight ratio will prove faster. At least it is faster on paper!
     
  22. ferkan

    ferkan Karting

    Apr 27, 2014
    104
    P1s track time and somewhat disappointing benchmarking by Autocar doesn't really surprise me. 12C was supposed to be 458 killer, and it severely outperformed it and 911 Turbo S on straight drag race but was as we saw slower on track. This time all three are very very close on straight line so I can't imagine P1 being faster if at all, and I have no doubt we are going to be hearing a lot of excuses as time goes by.
     
  23. amenasce

    amenasce Three Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Oct 17, 2001
    34,428
    Full Name:
    Joe Mansion
    To be honest, the 12C proved faster than the 458 on several occasions, esp after the power updated. Some tests did find the 458 faster though.
     
  24. REALZEUS

    REALZEUS F1 Veteran

    Feb 16, 2011
    8,424
    Bournemouth, UK
    When the 12c came out, it lost out in nearly all tests against the already 2 year old 458, including the track battles. After the upgrades, the 12c became the faster car, but still not the best one to drive.

    Now it is another story altogether though as this time around the LaFerrari doesn't have an age disadvantage and it is both more powerful and lighter than the P1.
     
  25. noone1

    noone1 F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    Jan 21, 2008
    4,612
    Los Angeles
    Full Name:
    Mike
    Wet time is pretty bad. Will be interesting to see the LF wet time. Maybe 900-1000hp in a RWD car in very wet conditions just isn't going to work out.

    That said, I would argue 1.7s quicker in the dry on this track is a ton. Not sure how accurate those FL times are, but here are some cars that are 1.7s or less quick than others:

    Ariel Atom V8 vs F430 = 1.6s
    Veyron SS vs F430 = 1.5s
    Veyron SS vs 458 = 1s

    With the track layout and just how short it is, you aren't going to see 10s differences in lap time.

    @TG track:

    Ariel Atom vs 430 = 7.8s
    SS vs 430 = 6.1s
    SS vs 458 = 2.3s

    We need to see P1, LF, and 918 times on various circuits on the same days to draw overall conclusions. And I'm not even sure there will be any overall winner. I would not at all be surprised to see each of the cars better in different situations and on different circuits.
     

Share This Page