Euro vs USA F40 in the States | FerrariChat

Euro vs USA F40 in the States

Discussion in '288GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari/F80' started by stradman, May 2, 2015.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. stradman

    stradman Formula 3

    Jan 8, 2004
    1,284
    London UK
    Full Name:
    Stradman
    #1 stradman, May 2, 2015
    Last edited: May 2, 2015
    Good afternoon all,

    I've noticed a couple of 1989 F40's have made their way into the US and are now for sale now that we are verging on these being 25 years old or more. It also seems that these are a bit lower priced than the respective US F40's. My question is what do people think will happen to the F40 market in the US in say the next five years when more and more of these Euro F40's make their way into the US?(Ok I know you can't import the Euro F40 into the Republic of California, but that's another story....)
    We all know that the Euro F40 is more in line with what the manufacturer intended it to be being somewhat lighter than the US counterpart. Will this make the Euro F40 more desirable than the US one in due course? Ok I know that they imported and therefore produced far fewer US spec F40's but will people accept this fact alone as an argument to support and justify a higher price for the US spec cars? If so why? In my mind I know given the choice between the 2 which spec I would rather have....Interested to know thoughts.
     
  2. of2worlds

    of2worlds F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 6, 2004
    18,109
    ON
    Full Name:
    CH
    While there are exceptions to every rule I would say the euro F40 typically has more miles (kilometers) on it than a USA market version. Price is often driven by the mileage especially on the USA model F40.
    Maybe Joe can comment if USA F40 prices have softened in the past few months as the 288 GTO by comparison continues to climb. There was never a USA version of the 288 GTO built but there were more of them built than the USA version F40. More GTO's available but at a much higher price now than the original 125k USD. The F40 in the USA sold for a million dollars or more as people tried to get one new in the resale market.
    There is also the question of a 1990 1991 or 1992 version USA F40 having a further effect on the value. Some like the last year of production better even if there is no valid reason for that choice.
     
  3. Bill S

    Bill S Formula 3

    Oct 2, 2004
    1,995
    I think serious US buyers will always pay a premium for vintage US Ferraris. Little things like speedo in km, missing safety equipment, wrong lights, wrong muffler etc take away from the nostalgic enjoyment and could be missing points at shows. iMHO this is more important than having a faster and lighter car. Of course if the car was only available in Europe this would not apply.
     
  4. 483hp

    483hp Formula 3
    Owner

    Aug 17, 2005
    1,428
    www.fca.alberta.com
    Historically the USA has been the major market. Since there are typically fewer usa spec cars and the cost to federalize a euro is high a premium usually exists for usa spec versions.

    As the model gets older and the requirements for import expire the prices for euros and USA spec cars begin to converge. In the case of the f40, they converge to the upper bound. In the next 3 years the remaining 1000 or so euro specs will be over 25 yrs old and I have wondered how much of an effect it will have on values.

    Is a USA car more desirable than a euro spec? It will depend on the buyer. Personally I prefer the euros. They have a little more power, a little less weight, they have regular seat belts instead of the horrible mouse rails, they have the proper carbon race seats and they don't have the extra third brake light, reflectors, and extended chin. If you find a really early one they have the sliding windows as well which I think is cool. A euro is the purest form of the design. It is as Ferrari intended.

    If you get in on a euro early there is also a bit more upside potential as well.

    The downsides are mileage and the fuel bladders. Personally I prefer higher mileage cars since I use them regularly and they tend to be a bit healthier with regular use. Condition tends to be good as well for many cars of this class so I tend not to use mileage as a proxy for condition. Fuel bladders need to be replaced but there are shops that can reproduce the USA spec tanks so that is not an ongoing issue either.
     
  5. stradman

    stradman Formula 3

    Jan 8, 2004
    1,284
    London UK
    Full Name:
    Stradman
    That's interesting to hear Bill. So do classic car shows in the US have a bias towards US spec cars and always dock the Euro cars points accordingly-all things considering? I didn't know that.....

    I wasn't aware also that people would place so much emphasis in the nostalgic enjoyment of an F40's safety equipment, mufflers and lights...... ; )
     
  6. ChalStrad

    ChalStrad Formula 3

    Jan 22, 2004
    2,249
    Lausanne Switzerland
    Full Name:
    Peter Mann
    In addition, there are different types of Euro F40s. There are the "light" ones with the sliding lexan windows and hollow doors. There were only 50 made like this and are the most desirable as they do not have catalytic converters nor the trick suspension. I have such an example and the car weighs just 1100 kgs

    There are the "cat" cars and the "cat" and trick suspension cars (least desirable ones over here)

    Yes you have to change the fuel cells every 10 years, but that is not a huge deal.

    As to mileage, a 25 year old car should have miles on it. The more you use it, the less trouble it will give you. I would never buy a low mileage 25 year old car and especially not an F40!!

    I have seen F40s with more than 100,000 Kms and still going strong. Mine has 35,000 kms and still the original turbos.
     
  7. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    So many questions, yet to be determined in time in an ever-evolving market.

    I tend to take things on a car-by-car basis in terms of provenance, condition, miles etc, whether they are Euro/ROW or USA cars.

    I recently sold a very special USA car to a USA resident based in California. A California-based buyer can only buy a USA car if he wants to use it on the road, for example. The rest have the option of Euro/ROW or USA spec.

    There are also clients who have a collection of USA cars (F50, Enzo, La Ferrari etc) and want a USA F40 to compliment the set.

    It all depends on the buyer's location & preferences.
     
  8. stradman

    stradman Formula 3

    Jan 8, 2004
    1,284
    London UK
    Full Name:
    Stradman
    #8 stradman, May 2, 2015
    Last edited: May 2, 2015
    Well Peter, Cats can always be removed. Likewise if you really don't want the adjustable suspension it can also be removed if necessary(however to me and many others who have this and use the car on the road this is invaluable and I wouldn't be without it) . In the end its about ultimate condition, mileage,and service history that matters. Otherwise all Euro cars are desirable.
     
  9. BMW.SauberF1Team

    BMW.SauberF1Team F1 World Champ

    Dec 4, 2004
    14,440
    FL
    All things being equal (condition, mileage), I don't see why Euro cars get dinged here in the US just for being Euro. I'd rather have a Ferrari made the way it was intended to if it stayed in its hometown in Maranello and not some added on bits to meet some non-Italian governments regs. I think the Euro bumpers and lack of side and third brake lights look better anyway on the F40 and F50 for that matter...just imo.
     
  10. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    Generally agreed, but I think Peter's point is valid in today's market, the 50 or so Lightweight cars with sliding Lexan windows with no catalytic converters or adjustable suspension, are very desirable. Ive been asked by several people just to be on the lookout for those, and that's a good measure of interest. Yes anything can be modified, but the market always prizes pure originals, and there is an endless list of makes & models that underscores this notion.
     
  11. stradman

    stradman Formula 3

    Jan 8, 2004
    1,284
    London UK
    Full Name:
    Stradman
    #11 stradman, May 3, 2015
    Last edited: May 3, 2015
    Well in the end I still contest that condition, particularly as the years go by will become the single most important factor in the decision making process. I don't think removing a catalytic convertor and installing say a sports exhaust(which many cars have anyway) will make a Cat car less desirable. Modifications usually refer to adding rather than removing something, but of course you can if want to extend that anyway you like to whether any respray has taken place and hence lost the "weave", have the wheels been refurbished and hence lost the "speedline" logo etc...... In the same vein that I predict that a US spec car will probably also become less important in the States as Euro cars come in. But again it will always boil down to condition of each individual car that matters the most. I will concede however that maybe the Lexan sliding windows may have a premium attached....
     
  12. Challenge64

    Challenge64 F1 Veteran
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jul 28, 2004
    6,365
    Full Name:
    Ron
    I agree.

    The F40 was not made by Enzo with the idea of having mickey mouse seat belts, side marker lights, and the black rubber bumpers.

    I was living in Germany during the debut of the F40 into the European market and after having seen the Euro F40s for years upon returning to the USA saw a US spec car and thought what an ugly bastardized version of an otherwise perfect car. Personally I would buy a Euro car over a US car any day.
     
  13. ChalStrad

    ChalStrad Formula 3

    Jan 22, 2004
    2,249
    Lausanne Switzerland
    Full Name:
    Peter Mann
    Anything can be done to any car! All you have to do is look at some of the atrocities that pop up occasionally on this forum (cf the wide bodied 458 for the Gumball)!!!

    However, the chassis number will reflect exactly how the car was produced and without being "materialistic" this is a material issue especially in a car whose value is so strong,

    As others have pointed out, the original had no cats, no trick suspension, full harness and racing fuel tanks - that is the original. Can't change it!!!!
     
  14. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    This is exactly the point, it is a material issue.

    As values have become stronger, it has become more important to F40 buyers to find one that remains as it left Maranello. Their thinking is that they don't want to mess with greatness, and they'd like to receive a car just as the original artisans built it, and keep it that way as a nod of respect to them. I see this more & more, and it seems to correspond with higher values.
     
  15. stradman

    stradman Formula 3

    Jan 8, 2004
    1,284
    London UK
    Full Name:
    Stradman
    #15 stradman, May 4, 2015
    Last edited: May 4, 2015
    Guys, guys guys. This notion that they want the car as the "artisans" wanted it is plain nonsense. Which artisans are you talking about? Ferrari?? Well the factory produced Cats, steel tanks, and adj suspension for their F40's for their customers. Its not as though these are made by someone else. Does anyone have any direct, and I mean direct, literature that Ferraris at some point distanced itself or has stated that it does not accept these cars as part of its family or heritage part-or that they are in some way the black sheeps of the family? Of course not. Never have and never will. All this talk about artisans and how they wanted it is all rubbish therefore. An F40 is an F40. What you are referring to is what some people may want or desire now, and which many times simply reflects the views of a few stronger voices on forums and the media thats all, and which many potential purchasers simply follow blindly without actually having any personal experience of their own or further knowledge. These are just bigoted views suggesting this version is better than that version. Of course people are entitled to have what they prefer and the cars may be somewhat different in some respects, but the essence is the same. People have different needs and different requirements for their own uses. In the end, even with the different variations, they are all the same great car that we all know and love...the F40 for heavens sake.....
     
  16. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    You started a thread asking questions stating that you are "Interested to know thoughts".

    People are giving their thoughts.

    Mine are based on my day-to-day experiences as a professional who specializes in these cars full-time. I am not biased one way or another as I'm happy to deal with USA or ROW/Eu cars of any variant, I'm simply reporting what I'm experiencing in recent times.

    It is a market fact that as values have become stronger, it has become more important to F40 buyers to find one that remains as it left Maranello, and it is true that the 50 or so Lightweight cars with sliding Lexan windows with no catalytic converters or adjustable suspension, are very desirable, and therefore more valuable. The fact that Ive been asked by several people just to be on the lookout for those, is a good measure of interest in my book.

    Without advocating one variant or another, its interesting to see what buyers are wanting, and I'm simply sharing those thoughts.

    The market is often illogical, and people often want the 'pure original', even if it has less 'bells & whistles' than a later variant.

    For example, in the Lamborghini world, why do people pay 2 or 3 times as much for the pure original LP400? I can't answer that question, but I know they consistently do.

    The same is true in the Ferrari & Porsche world.
     
  17. stradman

    stradman Formula 3

    Jan 8, 2004
    1,284
    London UK
    Full Name:
    Stradman
    As far as I know Joe, all F40's regardless of the spec, all left the same Maranello and also a lot of cars, US spec, Cat spec, Adjust spec or any combination spec remain as they left Maranello as well so don't get this argument.
    I also cannot see your comparison with the Countach. There was only one F40 model. unlike the Countach which went through different guises and change of models. And unlike say many 911RS guises, Ferrari never produced a "comfort" or "lightweight" F40 model, so can't quite reconcile this either.....I think we are trying to make a lot of "something" out of "nothing" really imo.....
     
  18. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    Again, we are all just responding to a thread you started asking for input, so if this is something out of nothing, why bother starting the thread?

    As far as production F40s go, there are several different variants: Eu/ROW with sliding plexi-windows & hollow doors/no cats/no lift kits, widely accepted as the "Lightweight" version, then there are the solid-door & glass-window/cats/lift kit F40s, then there are the USA-spec F40s, so there are really 3 different variants, not counting those sent off to become LMs. All F40s did not leave Maranello the same.

    My point with the Countach is an easy one to reconcile and is seen over & over in the sports car market - early pure cars are often the most valuable.
     
  19. stradman

    stradman Formula 3

    Jan 8, 2004
    1,284
    London UK
    Full Name:
    Stradman
    I think my thread started with a specific question about US cars and the market what happens with Euro cars come in. I didn't start talking about the perceived merits and demerits of the different combinations of options that the F40 came in.

    I don't believe there was any formal Lightweight verison as you suggest, unlike Porsche which had a specific factory code for these. All F40 had the same product code I believe. Of course as is clear different options were available in ROW although the US spec can perhaps be considered a distinct variant. With respect to Countach the main reason the early car is desirable is the appearance- less aerodynamic laundry out to hang in the early version and therefore cleaner design- hence more desirable. You can't say the same thing about the F40. They all have the same appearance-apart from US ones.....
     
  20. Super_Dave

    Super_Dave Formula Junior

    Oct 6, 2014
    710
    USA
    Full Name:
    Dave
    I'd take any F40 -- all beautiful, BUT... I think the original marketed version was the one with the sliding plexi windows, and early journalist reviews definitely flagged the difference in weight between the euro cars and US cars, and the roll-up vs. sliding plexi variants.

    One question... I know from a review ('90 or '91 R&T, I think) there was speculation that the US variant cars had more HP, despite the emissions systems. The number I recall from memory quoted was 515 vs. 478 bhp... Any truth to this?

    Also, how many Euro cars were spec'd with the evoluzione engine option (I think there was an option to get 600+bhp from factory)...
     
  21. stradman

    stradman Formula 3

    Jan 8, 2004
    1,284
    London UK
    Full Name:
    Stradman
    Well it has been suggested that Cat cars had more boost than non cat cars to cover any loss of possible power from Cat so not much difference in RW power in the end.
    Weight of Catalyst maybe 6 kg. Weight of manual window vs lexan and open door maybe 2.5kgs. So we are looking at a total of maybe 9kg at most. Stick a sports exhaust on and take out the standard nuclear reactor muffler and you have more than covered that shortfall... If someone has hard data to suggest otherwise please let me know......
    So going back to what I was saying there is not much difference between cat/lexan options in Euro cars. US cars however do have a more substantial difference....
     
  22. fbrs2

    fbrs2 Formula Junior

    Sep 7, 2012
    323
    Cayman
    I think you're absolutely right.

    But I will never, ever understand it!

    FWIW I've got a US car in Europe, with all the US (and some of the European) junk thrown in a skip somewhere! hehe
     
  23. Caeruleus11

    Caeruleus11 F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Jun 11, 2013
    11,626
    Agreement.
     
  24. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    True, its not speculation.

    John Amette, the West Coast USA Ferrari Classiche director who was part of the Ferrari North America team working on the Homologation process for the USA version F40 circa 1988-89 has confirmed this several times, and will still do so today.
     
  25. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    They do.

    Here are the differences:

    1. USA production spanned from early 1990 to late 1992. Chassis numbers to follow (European production started late 1987).

    2. USA F40s weigh in at 2878 lbs dry. Actual USA F40s weighed by FNA with all fluids and half-a-tank of gas weighed in at 2969 lbs (European cars are stated at 2717 lbs dry).

    3. USA F40s have aluminum gas tanks with twin fuel pumps mounted within the tanks (European cars have rubber fuel cells which require replacement each 7 years with externally located fuel pumps ).

    4. USA F40s have twist-off gas caps (European cars have the locking items).

    5. USA F40s were all supplied with the variable ride height system deleted (some European cars were thus supplied).

    6. USA F40s have 2-peice seats with reclining backs and a passive restraint system (European cars have single-peice seats with 3-point seat belts).

    7. USA F40s have their tow-hook attachment mounted directly into the chassis (European cars attach to the front body).

    8. USA F40s have a final drive ratio of 10-29 (European cars are rated at 11-30).

    9. USA F40s acheive maximum torque of 58.8 kgm/427 ft lbs at 4300 rpm (European cars acheive this same torque at 4000 rpm).

    10. USA F40s are rated "at or above 500 bhp" @ 7000 rpm (European cars are rated at 478 bhp at same rpm).

    11. USA F40s were the first car to utilize metallic (titanium) based catalysts to allow faster warm up and greater resilience.

    12. USA F40s have a 'secondary air injection' for emissions that can be heard at each start up.

    13. USA F40s had to pass DOT front, rear & side impact tests. These include the 2.5 mph front and rear tests. Accordingly the bodywork is strengthened.

    14. USA F40s have a drag co-efficient of 0.34CX including the rear wing (European F40s are rated the same).

    With respect to the gear ratios, please note the following differences:

    First gear - 1:10.707 (USA), 1:10.069 (Euro)
    Second gear - 1:6.628 (USA), 1:6.262 (Euro)
    Third gear - 1:4.745 (USA), 1:4.463 (Euro)
    Fourth gear - 1:3.724 (USA), 1:3.501 (Euro)
    Fifth gear - 1:2.965 (USA), 1:2.787 (Euro)
     

Share This Page